Cited by 18Nutrition and Health in AgingPhysical Activity and HealthFrailty in Older Adults

Effects of three modes of physical activity on physical fitness and hematological parameters in older people with sarcopenic obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Zhuang, Min, Jin, Mengdie, Lu, Tijiang, Lu, Linqian, Ainsworth, Barbara E., Liu, Yu, Chen, Nan·2022·Frontiers in Physiology

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effects of three modes of physical activity (PA) (aerobic training [AT], resistance training [RT], and aerobic combined with resistance training [MT]) on body composition (body weight [BW], body mass index [BMI] and percentage of body fat [BF%]), muscle mass (skeletal muscle mass [SM], appendicular skeletal muscle mass [ASM] and appendicular skeletal muscle mass index [ASMI]), muscle strength (handgrip strength [HG] and knee extension strength [KES]), physical performance (gait speed [GS]) and hematological parameters (inflammatory markers, insulin-like growth factor 1 [IGF-1] and lipid profiles) in older people with sarcopenic obesity (SO). Methods: We searched all studies for PA effects in older people with SO from six databases published from January 2010 to November 2021. Two researchers independently screened studies, extracted data according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, and assessed the quality of included studies. Pooled analyses for pre-and post- outcome measures were performed by Review Manager 5.4. We calculated a meta-analysis with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) and the standardized mean differences (SMD). Results: 12 studies were analyzed. There were 614 older people (84.9% female) with SO, aged 58.4 to 88.4 years. Compared with a no-PA control group, AT decreased BW (SMD = −0.64, 95% CI: −1.13 to −0.16, p = 0.009, I 2 = 0%) and BMI (SMD = −0.69, 95% CI: −1.18 to −0.21, p = 0.005, I 2 = 0%); RT improved BF% (SMD = −0.43, 95% CI: −0.63 to −0.22, p < 0.0001, I 2 = 38%), ASMI (SMD = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.24 to 1.21, p = 0.004, I 2 = 0%), ASM (SMD = −0.94, 95% CI: −1.46 to −0.42, p = 0.0004), HG (SMD = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.22 to 1.91, p = 0.01, I 2 = 90%) and KES (SMD = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.73 to 1.39, p < 0.00001, I 2 = 14%); MT improved BMI (SMD = −0.77, 95% CI: −1.26 to −0.28, p = 0.002, I 2 = 0%), BF% (SMD = −0.54, 95% CI: −0.83 to −0.25, p = 0.0003, I 2 = 0%), ASMI (SMD = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.22 to 1.19, p = 0.005, I 2 = 0%) and GS (SMD = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.23 to 1.18, p = 0.004, I 2 = 37%). PA increased IGF-1 (SMD = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.66, p = 0.006, I 2 = 0%), but had no effect on inflammatory markers and lipid profiles. Conclusion: PA is an effective treatment to improve body composition, muscle mass, muscle strength, physical performance, and IGF-1 in older people with SO.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fphys.2022.917525

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent systematic review and meta-analysis encompassing 11 RCTs on the effects of PA found that all the components of SO are improved.

    “A recent systematic review and meta‐analysis encompassing 11 RCTs on the effects of PA found that all the components of SO are improved [24].”

    From Sarcopenic Obesity Phenotype Index (SOP <i>i</i> ): A Population‐Based Study (2025) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Conclusion reports improvements across body composition, muscle mass, strength, and physical performance in older people with sarcopenic obesity, but says different exercise modes improve these outcomes selectively—not that every component improves with every mode. The Results (Study selection) report 12 included studies, rather than 11; the Quality assessment table records random allocation for 11 of them. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • SO might be influenced by multiple shared factors and pathophysiological pathways that affect both sarcopenia and obesity, including age, sedentary lifestyle, lack of muscle exercise, hormone levels, nutritional status, insulin resistance, systemic inflammation and others.

    “SO might be influenced by multiple shared factors and pathophysiological pathways that affect both sarcopenia and obesity, including age, sedentary lifestyle, lack of muscle exercise, hormone levels, nutritional status, insulin resistance, systemic inflammation and others [14, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27].”

    From Sarcopenic Obesity Phenotype Index (SOP <i>i</i> ): A Population‐Based Study (2025) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) links sarcopenic obesity to aging, lower physical activity, and inflammatory and IGF-1 pathways; the Discussion (page unavailable) also describes hormonal changes and reduced activity in relation to body composition. The copy does not establish nutritional status or lack of muscle exercise as distinct contributing factors, and it describes insulin resistance as a risk associated with obesity rather than a pathway influencing sarcopenic obesity. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous studies have shown similar results on lean and fat mass and inconclusive results on the continuous or dose-response effect of protein intake effect on HGS.

    “Previous studies have shown similar results on lean and fat mass and inconclusive results on the continuous or dose–response effect of protein intake effect on HGS [20, 23, 24, 39].”

    From Sarcopenic Obesity Phenotype Index (SOP <i>i</i> ): A Population‐Based Study (2025) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Results > Outcomes and Discussion (pages unavailable) report findings on skeletal muscle mass and body-fat percentage in older people with sarcopenic obesity, providing some support for the lean- and fat-mass portion of the sentence. The paper examines exercise modes, however, and does not report a continuous or dose–response effect of protein intake on handgrip strength. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Zhuang et al. reported favorable SMDs for BMI under aerobic and mixed training.

    “Zhuang et al. (17) reported favorable SMDs for BMI under aerobic and mixed training”
  • Some reviews reported favorable changes in ASM, ASMI, standardized skeletal muscle mass index or fat-free mass.

    “Some reviews reported favorable changes in ASM, ASMI, standardized skeletal muscle mass index or fat-free mass, including Hita-Contreras et al. (14), Yin et al. (13), Zhuang et al. (17) and Qiu et al. (21).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Li S. Huang L. P. Wang L. Chen Y. W. Li L. K. Zhang L. (2020). Effects of 12 weeks aerobic exercise combined with high speed strength training on old adults with osteosarcopenic obesity syndrome. Chin. J. Rehabilitation Med. 35 (4), 420– 426. 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2020.04.007 · DOI
  2. Wang L. Z. Guo Y. B. Lou J. H. (2019). Effects of home exercise on sarcopenia obesity for aging people. Chin. J. Rehabil. Theory Pract. 25 (1), 90– 96. 10.3969/j.issn.1006⁃9771.2019.01.012 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhuang, M., Jin, M., Lu, T., Lu, L., Ainsworth, B. E., Liu, Y., & Chen, N.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai University of Sport (CN)
  • XinHua Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Liu, Yu
  • Chen, Nan
Venue
Frontiers in Physiology
Published
2022-08-25
Volume
13
Pages
917525-917525
ISSN
1664-042X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4295519592
Cited by
18
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Physiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Shanghai Municipal Health Commission
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
Keywords
sarcopenic obesity, older adults, physical activity, aerobic exercise, resistance training, concurrent training, body composition, muscle mass, muscle strength, physical performance, walking speed, hematological parameters, inflammatory markers, insulin-like growth factor I, lipid profile, sarcopenia, obesity, grip strength, quadriceps strength, body fat percentage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review