Cited by 86Nutrition and Health in AgingMuscle metabolism and nutritionMuscle Physiology and Disorders

Effectiveness of nutritional and exercise interventions to improve body composition and muscle strength or function in sarcopenic obese older adults: a systematic review

Open access
Theodorakopoulos, Christos, Jones, Jacklyn, Bannerman, Elaine, Greig, Carolyn A.·2017·Nutrition Research

Abstract

Although sarcopenic obesity (SO) poses a major public health concern, a robust approach for the optimization of body composition and strength/function in SO has not yet been established. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of nutritional (focusing on energy and protein modulation) and exercise interventions, either individually or combined, on body composition and strength/function in older adults with SO. MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus were searched. Main inclusion criteria comprised sarcopenia as defined by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) and obesity defined as % body fat ≥40% (women) and ≥28% (men). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), randomized controlled crossover trials and controlled clinical trials with older adults (mean age ≥65 years) following a nutritional regimen and/or an exercise training program were considered. Out of 109 full text articles identified, only two RCTs (61 participants) met the inclusion criteria. One study was a nutritional intervention adding 15 g protein·day-1 (via cheese consumption) to the participants' habitual diet. The second study was a high-speed circuit resistance training intervention. Body composition did not change significantly in either of the studies. However, the exercise intervention improved significantly muscle strength and physical function. Although this review was limited by the small number of eligible studies, it provides evidence for the potential benefits of exercise and highlights the necessity for future research to develop effective interventions including dietary and exercise regimens to combat sarcopenic obesity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nutres.2017.05.002

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 77 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Theodorakopoulos, C., Jones, J., Bannerman, E., & Greig, C. A.
Affiliations
  • Queen Margaret University (GB)
  • University of Dundee (GB)
  • Arthritis Research UK (GB)
Corresponding author
Jones, Jacklyn
Venue
Nutrition Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
43
Pages
3-15
ISSN
0271-5317 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2612183129
Cited by
86
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrition Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Queen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Queen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Queen Margaret University
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K00414X/1, MR/P021220/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Keywords
sarcopenic obesity, sarcopenia, obesity, older adults, body composition, muscle strength, physical function, dietary intervention, protein supplementation, exercise training, resistance training, caloric restriction
MeSH terms
Aged, Body Composition, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Obesity, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Muscle Strength, Sarcopenia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review