Cited by 25Plant biochemistry and biosynthesisSesquiterpenes and Asteraceae StudiesPlant tissue culture and regeneration

Seasonal and Differential Sesquiterpene Accumulation in Artemisia annua Suggest Selection Based on Both Artemisinin and Dihydroartemisinic Acid may Increase Artemisinin in planta

Open access
Ferreira, Jorge F. S., Benedito, Vagner A., Sandhu, Devinder, Marchese, José A., Liu, Shuoqian·2018·Frontiers in Plant Science

Abstract

Commercial Artemisia annua crops are the sole source of artemisinin (ART) worldwide. Data on seasonal accumulation and peak of sesquiterpenes, especially ART, in commercial A. annua, is lacking, while current breeding programs focus only on ART and plant biomass, but ignores dihydroartemisinic acid (DHAA) and artemisinic acid (AA). Despite past breeding successes, plants richer in ART are needed to decrease prices of artemisinin-combination therapy (ACT). Our results show that sesquiterpene concentrations vary greatly along the growing season and that sesquiterpene profiles differ widely among chemotypes. Field studies with elite Brazilian, Chinese, and Swiss germplasms established that ART peaks in vegetative plants late August to early September, suggesting that ART is related to the photoperiod, not flowering. DHAA peaks with ART in Chinese and Swiss plants, but decreases, as ART increases, in Brazilian plants, while AA remains stable through the season in all genotypes. Chinese plants peaked at 0.9% ART, 1.6% DHAA; Brazilian plants at 0.9% ART, with less than 0.4% DHAA; Swiss plants at 0.8% ART and 1% DHAA. At single-date harvests, seeded Swiss plants produced 0.55-1.2% ART, with plants being higher in DHAA than ART; Brazilian plants produced 0.33-1.5% ART, with most having higher ART than DHAA. Elite germplasms produced from 0.02-0.43% AA, except Sandeman-UK (0.4-1.1% AA). Our data suggest that different chemotypes, high in ART and DHAA, have complementary pathways, while competing with AA. Crossing plants high in ART and DHAA may generate hybrids with higher ART than currently available in commercial germplasms. Selecting for high ART and DHAA (and low AA) can be a valuable approach for future selection and breeding to produce plants more efficient in transforming DHAA into ART in planta and during post-harvest. This novel approach could change the breeding focus of A. annua and other pharmaceutical species that produce more than one desired metabolite in the same pathway. Obtaining natural variants with high ART content will empower countries and farmers who select, improve, and cultivate A. annua as a commercial pharmaceutical crop. This selection approach could enable ART to be produced locally where it is most needed to fight malaria and other parasitic

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpls.2018.01096

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Selecting for high dihydroartemisinic acid and artemisinin but low artemisinic acid can be a useful approach for selection and breeding to produce plants with more efficient conversion of dihydroartemisinic acid into artemisinin.

    “Based on seasonal and differential sesquiterpene accumulation, Ferreira et al. (2018) suggested that selecting for high dihydroartemisinic acid and artemisinin but low artemisinic acid can be a useful approach for selection and breeding to produce plants with more efficient conversion of dihydroartemisinic acid into artemisinin.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Debrunner N. Dvorak V. Magalhaes P. Delabays N. (1996). Selection of genotypes of Artemisia annua L. for the agricultural production of artemisinin in International Symposium on Breeding Research on Medicinal Plants, ed Pank F. (Quedlinburg), 222– 225.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferreira, J. F. S., Benedito, V. A., Sandhu, D., Marchese, J. A., & Liu, S.
Affiliations
  • U.S. Salinity Laboratory (US)
  • West Virginia University (US)
  • Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (BR)
  • Hunan Agricultural University (CN)
Corresponding author
Ferreira, Jorge F. S.
Venue
Frontiers in Plant Science
Published
2018-08-13
Volume
9
Pages
1096-1096
ISSN
1664-462X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2847394432
Cited by
25
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Plant Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • Agricultural Research Service
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
Keywords
Artemisia annua, artemisinin, dihydroartemisinic acid, artemisinic acid, seasonal variation, chemotypes, germplasm selection, photoperiod, artemisinin-based combination therapy, hybridization, harvest time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review