The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beliefs in conspiracy theories and the need for cognitive closure
Open accessAbstract
An important component of conspiracy theories is how they influence, and are influenced by, the evaluation of potential evidence. Some individuals may be more open minded regarding certain explanations for events whereas others may seek closure and thus cut off a conspiracy explanation. Two studies examined the relationship between the need for cognitive closure (NFCC), levels of belief in real world conspiracy theories, and the attribution of conspiracy theories to explain events. A first, small (N = 30) and preliminary study found no relationship between NFCC and beliefs in conspiracy theories, suggesting that both advocates and opponents of conspiracy explanations do not differ on this dimension. A second study (N = 86) revealed that evidence for and against conspiracy theories had an influence on attributions of the likelihood of a conspiracy to explain a novel event. Specifically, after reading evidence individuals with high levels of belief in conspiracy theories tended to rate a conspiracy explanation as more likely whereas those with low levels of belief rated it as less likely. However, when the need for cognitive closure (NFCC) was experimentally lowered the effects of prior beliefs in conspiracy theories diminished.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It also appears to be stronger when events are especially large in scale or significant and leave people dissatisfied with mundane, small-scale explanations (Leman & Cinnirella, 2013).”
From The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories (2017) · cites this paper as Leman & Cinnirella, 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
Book Review: The Psychology of Attitudes
Chakravarti, D., Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1997) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151869 · Cited by 7,173
(2023) · doi:10.1126/science · Cited by 6,063
Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098 · Cited by 4,583
TRUST AND DISTRUST IN ORGANIZATIONS: Emerging Perspectives, Enduring Questions
Kramer, R. M. (1999) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.569 · Cited by 3,415
Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.95 · Cited by 3,146 · cited 1×
“No exclusion variables were employed.”
Individual differences in need for cognitive closure.
Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049 · Cited by 2,494
Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing
Klayman, J., & Ha, Y.-W. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.2.211 · Cited by 2,094
Eagly, A. H. 1., & Chaiken, S. (n.d.) · Cited by 1,929
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Fiske S. T. Taylor S. E. (1991). Social Cognition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding Conspiracy Theories
Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., & Deravi, F. (2019) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12568 · Cited by 1,511
The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories
Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., & Cichocka, A. (2017) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721417718261 · Cited by 1,316
“It also appears to be stronger when events are especially large in scale or significant and leave people dissatisfied with mundane, small-scale explanations (Leman & Cinnirella, 2013).”
BackgroundAnalytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories
Swami, V., Voracek, M., Stieger, S., Tran, U. S., & Furnham, A. (2014) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.006 · Cited by 726
Science vs Conspiracy: Collective Narratives in the Age of Misinformation
Bessi, A., Coletto, M., Davidescu, G. A., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118093 · Cited by 645
Social Media, Echo Chambers, and Political Polarization
Barberá, P. (2020) · Social Media and Democracy · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.004 · Cited by 373
Addicted to answers: need for cognitive closure and the endorsement of conspiracy beliefs
Marchlewska, M., Cichocka, A., & Kossowska, M. (2018) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2308 · Cited by 311
Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them
(2018) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.001.0001 · Cited by 294
Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2011) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02018.x · Cited by 261
Misinformation, Disinformation, and Online Propaganda
Guess, A. M., & Lyons, B. A. (2020) · Social Media and Democracy · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.003 · Cited by 284
Alper, S., Bayrak, F., & Yilmaz, O. (2021) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-020-00903-0 · Cited by 192
Swami, V., Barron, D. S., Weis, L., Voracek, M., Stieger, S., & Furnham, A. F. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0172617 · Cited by 212
Mistrust and misinformation: A two-component, socio-epistemic model of belief in conspiracy theories
Pierre, J. M. (2020) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.v8i2.1362 · Cited by 202
Moulding, R., Nix-Carnell, S., Schnabel, A., Nedeljkovic, M., Burnside, E. E., Lentini, A., & Mehzabin, N. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.060 · Cited by 115
Wood, M. (2017) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12231 · Cited by 80
Facts and Where to Find Them: Empirical Research on Internet Platforms and Content Moderation
Keller, D., & Leerssen, P. (2020) · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · doi:10.1017/9781108890960
Siegel, A. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.005 · Cited by 123
Beliefs in conspiracy theories following ostracism
Poon, K.-T., Chen, Z., & Wong, W.-Y. (2020) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167219898944 · Cited by 115
Online communication as a window to conspiracist worldviews
Wood, M. J., & Douglas, K. M. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00836 · Cited by 110
Bridging the great divide: Conspiracy theory research for the 21st century
Bütter, M., & Knight, P. (2015) · Diogenes · doi:10.1177/0392192116669289 · Cited by 95
Čavojová, V., Šrol, J., & Jurkovič, M. (2019) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3595 · Cited by 103
Greifeneder, R., Jaffé, M. E., Newman, E. J., & Schwarz, N. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429295379 · Cited by 114
The role of system identity threat in conspiracy theory endorsement
Federico, C. M., Williams, A. L., & Vitriol, J. A. (2018) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2495 · Cited by 85
Handbook of Conspiracy Theory and Contemporary Religion
Wood, M. J., & Douglas, K. (2018) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004382022 · Cited by 79
Heiss, R., Gell, S., Röthlingshöfer, E., & Zoller, C. (2021) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2021.110672 · Cited by 86
Jolley, D., Douglas, K. M., Skipper, Y., Thomas, E., & Cookson, D. (2021) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjdp.12368 · Cited by 58
Meuer, M., & Imhoff, R. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104081 · Cited by 73
Chisita, C. T. (2020) · Library Hi Tech News · doi:10.1108/lhtn-03-2020-0022 · Cited by 71
Democratic Transparency in the Platform Society
Gorwa, R., & Ash, T. G. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.013 · Cited by 71
Perceptual Biases in Relation to Paranormal and Conspiracy Beliefs
van Elk, M. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130422 · Cited by 75
Misinformation and Its Correction
Wittenberg, C., & Berinsky, A. J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.009 · Cited by 64
Who Believes in Conspiracy Theories in Great Britain and Europe?
Drochon, H. H. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0022 · Cited by 62
Conspiracy Beliefs of Future Teachers
Mikušková, E. B. (2017) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-017-9561-4
Hughes, J. P., Efstratiou, A., Komer, S. R., Baxter, L. A., Vasiljevic, M., & Leite, A. C. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0263716 · Cited by 52
Priming Resistance to Persuasion decreases adherence to Conspiracy Theories*
Bonetto, E., Troian, J., Varet, F., Monaco, G. L., & Girandola, F. (2018) · Social Influence · doi:10.1080/15534510.2018.1471415 · Cited by 35
Ren, Z., Carton, A. M., Dimant, E., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2022) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101388 · Cited by 42
The History of Conspiracy Theory Research
Bütter, M., & Knight, P. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0002 · Cited by 47
Flat-Smacked! Converting to Flat Eartherism
Olshansky, A., Peaslee, R. M., & Landrum, A. R. (2020) · Journal of Media and Religion · doi:10.1080/15348423.2020.1774257 · Cited by 43
Bots and Computational Propaganda: Automation for Communication and Control
Woolley, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.006 · Cited by 41
Belief in COVID-19 related conspiracy theories around the globe: A systematic review
Fotakis, E. A., & Simou, E. (2023) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104903 · Cited by 41
Facts and Where to Find Them: Empirical Research on Internet Platforms and Content Moderation
Keller, D., & Leerssen, P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.011 · Cited by 39
Empowerment as a Tool to Reduce Belief in Conspiracy Theories
van Prooijen, J. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0030 · Cited by 37
Conspiracy Theories and Philosophy
Dentith, M. R. X. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0006 · Cited by 38
DiFonzo, N. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0017 · Cited by 34
Schmaltz, R. M., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00336 · Cited by 40
Democratic Creative Destruction? The Effect of a Changing Media Landscape on Democracy
Nielsen, R. K., & Fletcher, R. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.008 · Cited by 35
Conspiratorial Thinking and Dueling Fact Perceptions
Marietta, M., & Barker, D. C. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0014 · Cited by 32
Strömbäck, J., Broda, E., Bouchafra, S., Johansson, S., Rettenegger, G., & Lindgren, E. (2022) · European Journal of Communication · doi:10.1177/02673231221122951 · Cited by 47
Sallam, M., Eid, H., Awamleh, N., Al‐Tammemi, A. B., Barakat, M. M., Athamneh, R. Y., Hallit, S. R., Harapan, H., & Mahafzah, A. M. (2022) · Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease · doi:10.3390/tropicalmed7120411 · Cited by 32
Räikkä, J., & Basham, L. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0011 · Cited by 32
Factors associated with the belief in COVID-19 related conspiracy theories in Pakistan
Ejaz, W., Ittefaq, M., Seo, H., & Naz, F. (2021) · Health Risk & Society · doi:10.1080/13698575.2021.1929865 · Cited by 30
Conspiracy Theories in Post-Soviet Russia
Yablokov, I. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0024 · Cited by 33
Polls, Plots, and Party Politics
Enders, A. M., & Smallpage, S. M. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0020 · Cited by 28
A call to action for librarians: Countering conspiracy theories in the age of QAnon
Beene, S., & Greer, K. (2021) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102292 · Cited by 28
(2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0001 · Cited by 29
Conspiracy-Beliefs and Receptivity to Disconfirmatory Information: A Study Using the BADE Task
Georgiou, N., Delfabbro, P., & Balzan, R. P. (2021) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440211006131 · Cited by 27
Comparative Media Regulation in the United States and Europe
Fukuyama, F., & Grotto, A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.010 · Cited by 28
The Collective Conspiracy Mentality in Poland
Soral, W., Cichocka, A. K., Bilewicz, M., & Marchlewska, M. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0025 · Cited by 30
Online Political Advertising in the United States
Fowler, E. F., Franz, M. M., & Ridout, T. N. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.007 · Cited by 26
Hohlfeld, R., Harnischmacher, M., Heinke, E., Lehner, L. S., Sengl, M., & Verlagsgesellschaft, N. (2020) · Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooks · doi:10.5771/9783748901334 · Cited by 34
Adherence to Misinformation on Social Media Through Socio-Cognitive and Group-Based Processes
Efstratiou, A., & Cristofaro, E. D. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3555589 · Cited by 33
How Conspiracy Theories Spread
DeWitt, D., Atkinson, M., & Wegner, D. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0021 · Cited by 24
Conclusion: The Challenges and Opportunities for Social Media Research
Persily, N., & Tucker, J. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.014 · Cited by 24
Ladini, R. (2021) · Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica · doi:10.1017/ipo.2021.15 · Cited by 22
What We Mean When We Say “Conspiracy Theory”
Walker, J. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0003 · Cited by 23
Conspiracy Theories and Religion
Robertson, D. G. C., & Dyrendal, A. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0028 · Cited by 21
Conspiracy theory beliefs in the adolescent population: A systematic review
Byrne, A., Martin, D., Jones, C., Galbraith, N. D., & Mercer, T. (2024) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1002/jad.12316 · Cited by 20
Jolley, D., Seger, C. R., & Meleady, R. (2023) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2973 · Cited by 22
Wood, M. J., & Douglas, K. M. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0016 · Cited by 22
On the relationship between age and conspiracy beliefs
Bordeleau, J., & Stockemer, D. (2024) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.13044 · Cited by 30
Probability and conspiratorial thinking
Kovic, M., & Füchslin, T. (2018) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3408 · Cited by 19
Solak, Ç., Peker-Dural, H., Karlıdağ, S., & Peker, M. (2021) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2021.111245 · Cited by 18
Dagnall, N., Denovan, A., Drinkwater, K., & Escolà-Gascón, Á. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1303838 · Cited by 15
Gathering, processing, and interpreting information about COVID-19
Boot, A. B., Eerland, A., Jongerling, J., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., & Zwaan, R. A. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-86088-3 · Cited by 17
Conspiracy and bias: argumentative features and persuasiveness of conspiracy theories
Oswald, S. (2016) · Cited by 16
Atkinson, M., & DeWitt, D. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0008 · Cited by 17
Conspiracy Mongering in Venezuela: The Chavismo Period (1998–2018)
Andrade, G. E. (2019) · Bulletin of Latin American Research · doi:10.1111/blar.13019 · Cited by 15
Post-truth politics and neoliberal competition: the social sources of dogmatic cynicism
Schindler, S. (2023) · International Theory · doi:10.1017/s1752971923000040 · Cited by 17
McKenzie-McHarg, A. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0004 · Cited by 18
Panchal, R., & Jack, A. H. (2020) · BJPsych Bulletin · doi:10.1192/bjb.2020.120 · Cited by 16
[Conspiracy narratives in the context of the coronavirus pandemic].
Lamberty, P., & Imhoff, R. (2021) · PubMed Central · doi:10.1007/s00278-021-00498-2 · Cited by 4
Media Marginalization of Racial Minorities
Orr, M., & Husting, G. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0005 · Cited by 16
Tam, L., & Kim, S. (2023) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2023.102354 · Cited by 19
On the Democratic Problem of Conspiracy Politics
Moore, A. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0007 · Cited by 14
COVID-19: Belief in Conspiracy Theories and the Need for Quarantine
Егорова, М., Parshikova, O. V., Chertkova, Y. D., Staroverov, V. M., & Mitina, O. V. (2020) · Psychology in Russia State of Art · doi:10.11621/pir.2020.0401 · Cited by 14
Klein, C., Clutton, P., & Dunn, A. G. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/8vesf · Cited by 14
The 2020 Belarusian presidential election and conspiracy theories in the Russo-Ukrainian conflict
Gentile, M., & Kragh, M. (2022) · International Affairs · doi:10.1093/ia/iiac053 · Cited by 13
A rhetorical perspective on conspiracies
Zagarella, R. M., & Annoni, M. (2019) · Journal of Argumentation in Context · doi:10.1075/jaic.18006.zag · Cited by 12
Bordeleau, J. (2023) · International Political Science Abstracts · doi:10.1177/00208345231157664 · Cited by 12
Combler le fossé. L’avenir des recherches sur les théories du complot
Bütter, M., Knight, P., & Albert, N. G. (2016) · Diogène · doi:10.3917/dio.249.0021 · Cited by 12
How Do Viewers Synthesize Conflicting Information from Data Visualizations?
Mantri, P., Subramonyam, H., Michal, A. L., & Xiong, C. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2022.3209467 · Cited by 12
How cultural evolution can inform the science of science communication—and vice versa
Bendixen, T. (2020) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-020-00634-4 · Cited by 14
Cicco, G. D., Molinario, E., Contu, F., Pierro, A., Douglas, K. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2025) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-07710-5 · Cited by 12
Conspiracy Theories in U.S. History
Olmstead, K. S. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0019 · Cited by 10
Persily, N., & Tucker, J. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.002 · Cited by 11
Cultural Evolutionary Psychology of Belief
Bendixen, T., & Purzycki, B. G. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009001021.015 · Cited by 9
Lewandowsky, S. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190844073.003.0010 · Cited by 12
Martini, S., Guidi, M., Olmastroni, F., Basile, L., Borri, R., & Isernia, P. (2021) · Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica · doi:10.1017/ipo.2021.26 · Cited by 11
Conspiracy Stress or Relief? Learned Helplessness and Conspiratorial Thinking
Farhart, C. E., Miller, J. M., & Saunders, K. L. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197578384.003.0011 · Cited by 10
„Lügenpresse“ – Eine Verschwörungstheorie?
Krüger, U., & Seiffert‐Brockmann, J. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-18099-7_4 · Cited by 10
Conspiracy Theories and their Believers
Stockemer, D., & Bordeleau, J. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009570794 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Leman, P. J., & Cinnirella, M.
- Affiliations
- Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Leman, Patrick J.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 4
- Pages
- 378-378
- ISSN
- 1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3694217
- OpenAlex
- W2061321207
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 14.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- conspiracy theories, need for cognitive closure, conspiracy beliefs, evidence evaluation, prior beliefs, belief updating, openness to experience
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review