Cited by 53Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

PROMISE: a model of insight and equanimity as the key effects of mindfulness meditation

Open access
Eberth, Juliane, Sedlmeier, Peter, Schäfer, Thomas·2019·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

In a comprehensive meta-analysis on the effects of mindfulness meditation, Eberth and Sedlmeier (2012) identified a multitude of positive effects that covered a wide range of psychological variables, such as heightened mindfulness as measured through contemporary mindfulness scales, reduced negative emotions, increased positive emotions, changes in self-concept, enhanced attention, perception, and wellbeing, improved interpersonal abilities, and a reduction of negative personality traits. The present research aimed at developing and testing a comprehensive model explaining the wide range of mindfulness meditation effects and their temporal and causal relationships. In Study 1, interviews with meditators at different levels of experience were analyzed using a grounded theory procedure. The resulting model was triangulated and refined by concepts from both Western research and ancient Buddhist scriptures. The model developed highlights equanimity (reduction in emotional reactivity) and insight (alteration of cognitions) as the two key effects of mindfulness meditation that eventually lead to increased wellbeing. The model was pilot-tested with a large sample of meditators and non-meditators in Study 2. Data showed an acceptable fit with the model and indicated that meditators and non-meditators score significantly differently on the model’s core categories.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02389

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Equanimity is increasingly recognized as a central component of mindfulness practice.

    “Equanimity is a non-reactive attitude that is increasingly recognized as a central component of mindfulness practice and a key mechanism of mindfulness-based interventions that is currently lacking means of measurement.”

    From Development and Validation of the Equanimity Scale-16 (2021) · cites this paper as Eberth et al. 2019

    The Abstract identifies equanimity as one of two key effects of mindfulness meditation, supporting its central role. The General Discussion says prior research has widely neglected it, so the paper does not establish that equanimity is increasingly recognized as central. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Acceptance and non-reactivity are central mechanisms of mindfulness-based interventions.

    “Others point towards similar observations, suggesting that acceptance and non-reactivity are central mechanism of MBIs (Eberth et al. 2019; Gu et al. 2015; Lindsay et al. 2018).”

    From Development and Validation of the Equanimity Scale-16 (2021) · cites this paper as Eberth et al. 2019

    The Study 1 Results describe non-judging observation and reduced emotional reactions as important to mindfulness meditation. But the Study 1 Methods say acceptance is most often conceptualized as a component of practice rather than a mechanism, while the Results describe reduced reactivity as equanimity, an effect. The paper therefore supports their importance but not the precise claim that both are central mechanisms of MBIs. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Non-attachment can give rise to greater equanimity.

    “Furthermore, non-attachment can give rise to greater equanimity (Hadash et al., 2016; Eberth et al., 2019).”

    From Aspects of acceptance: building a shared conceptual understanding (2024) · cites this paper as Eberth et al., 2019

  • Non-reactivity is central to equanimity but generally missed in many definitions.

    “non-reactivity, which is central to equanimity (Eberth et al. 2019) but generally missed in many definitions (Hadash et al. 2016).”

    From Development and Validation of the Equanimity Scale-16 (2021) · cites this paper as Eberth et al. 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Baer R. A. (ed.) (2010). “Self-compassion as a mechanism of change in mindfulness- and acceptance-based treatments,” in Assessing Mindfulness and Acceptance Processes in Clients: Illuminating the Theory and Practice of Change, (Oakland: New Harbinger Publications), 135– 153.
  2. Eberth J. (2016). Wirkungen und Wirkmechanismen achtsamkeitsbasierter Meditation. Entwicklung eines Modells über die durch Buddhistische Meditation ausgelösten psychischen Veränderungen im Alltag. [Effects and Mechanisms of Mindfulness Meditation. Development of a Model of the Mental Changes Caused by Buddhist Meditation.]. Dissertation Thesis, TU Chemnitz.
  3. Hayes S. C. Follette V. M. Linehan M. (eds) (2004). Mindfulness and Acceptance: Expanding the Cognitive-Behavioral Tradition. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  4. Lazarus R. S. Folkman S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Berlin: Springer publishing company.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eberth, J., Sedlmeier, P., & Schäfer, T.
Affiliations
  • Chemnitz University of Technology (DE)
  • MSB Medical School Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Schäfer, Thomas
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2019-10-22
Volume
10
Pages
2389-2389
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2980235453
Cited by
53
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Technische Universität Chemnitz
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
mindfulness meditation, insight, equanimity, emotional reactivity, well-being, Buddhist scriptures, cognitive change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review