Cited by 231Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

A qualitative analysis of experiential challenges associated with meditation practice

Open access
Lomas, Tim, Cartwright, Tina, Edginton, Trudi, Ridge, Damien·2015·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-014-0329-8

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lomas, T., Cartwright, T., Edginton, T., & Ridge, D.
Affiliations
  • University of East London (GB)
  • University of Westminster (GB)
Corresponding author
Lomas, Tim
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2014-08-10
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
848-860
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2050710755
Cited by
229
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2
FWCI
13.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
  • UEL Research Repository (University of East London) (acceptedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • UEL Research Repository (University of East London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
meditation, psychological difficulties, depression, anxiety, psychosis, meditation instruction, safeguarding, mental health risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review