Cited by 10Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and IdentificationConsumer Perception and Purchasing BehaviorDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The link between self-uncertainty and conspicuous consumption: Tolerance of uncertainty as a moderator

Open access

Abstract

This study, based on self-affirmation theory, aims to investigate the impact of self-uncertainty on individual consumption behavior. Self-uncertainty was categorized into moral, cognitive, and interpersonal self-uncertainty, and different types of self-uncertainty were manipulated through four experiments, including a moral dilemma, a recall paradigm, and a picture quiz task written by E-Prime software to examine the effects of different types of self-uncertainty on conspicuous consumption and their possible boundary conditions. Our results show that moral, cognitive, and interpersonal self-uncertainty contribute to a stronger tendency to engage in conspicuous consumption. Our results also suggest that tolerance of uncertainty moderates the effect of self-uncertainty on conspicuous consumption, meaning that subjects with a high tolerance of uncertainty are less inclined to engage in conspicuous consumption than those with a low tolerance of uncertainty, even if they have high self-uncertainty. This study may provide an explanation for conspicuous consumption behavior, further validating the theory of compensatory consumption. Additionally, the results from this study also provide a reference for understanding people’s decision-making behavior in an uncertain social context and can provide new guidance to control irrational consumption behavior.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1066938

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. Barki, 2004, Conceptualizing the construct of interpersonal conflict, Int. J. Confl. Manag., 15, 216, 10.1108/eb022913 · DOI
  2. Belk, 1988, Possessions and the extended self, J. Consum. Res., 15, 139, 10.1086/209154 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bell, 2011, Does media type matter? The role of identification in adolescent girls’ media consumption and the impact of different thin-ideal media on body image, Sex Roles, 65, 478, 10.1007/s11199-011-9964-x · DOI
  4. Boelen, 2014, Intolerance of uncertainty and adult separation anxiety, Cogn. Behav. Ther., 43, 133, 10.1080/16506073.2014.888755 · DOI
  5. Botvinick, 2001, Conflict monitoring and cognitive control, Psychol. Rev., 108, 624, 10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.624 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Chang, 2002, Materialism as an attempt to cope with uncertainty, Psychol. Mark., 19, 389, 10.1002/mar.10016 · DOI
  7. Chen, 2018, Exploring the effect of power on compensatory consumption and how to repair it, Chin. J. Clin. Psych., 26, 847, 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2018.05.003 · DOI
  8. Chen, 2017, The effect of social exclusion on consumer preference for anthropomorphized brands, J. Consum. Psychol., 27, 23, 10.1016/j.jcps.2016.05.004 · DOI
  9. Choi, 2019, I hope to protect myself from the threat: the impact of self-threat on prevention-versus promotion-focused hope, J. Bus. Res., 99, 481, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.03.010 · DOI
  10. Cornil, 2013, From fan to fat? Vicarious losing increases unhealthy eating, but self-affirmation is an effective remedy, Psychol. Sci., 24, 1936, 10.1177/0956797613481232 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Darnon, 2007, Dealing with a disagreeing partner: relational and epistemic conflict elaboration, Eur. J. Psychol. Educ., 22, 227, 10.1007/BF03173423 · DOI
  12. Deng, 2005, Theories of conspicuous consumption and their latest developments, Foreign Econ. Manage., 4, 2, 10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2005.04.001 · DOI
  13. Di Trani, 2021, From resilience to burnout in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 emergency: the role of the ability to tolerate uncertainty, Front. Psychol., 12, 646435, 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.646435 · DOI
  14. Dufner, 2019, Self-enhancement and psychological adjustment: a meta-analytic review, Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev., 23, 48, 10.1177/1088868318756467 · DOI
  15. Gao, 2009, The “shaken self”: product choices as a means of restoring self-view confidence, J. Consum. Res., 36, 29, 10.1086/596028 · DOI
  16. Goor, 2020, The impostor syndrome from luxury consumption, J. Consum. Res., 46, 1031, 10.1093/jcr/ucz044 · DOI
  17. Hammad, 2018, “I shop therefore I am”: social and psychological transformations in conspicuous consumption, LRJ, 1, 303, 10.1504/LRJ.2018.090974 · DOI
  18. Hayes, 2013, Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach
  19. Hohman, 2015, Fearing the uncertain: self-uncertainty plays a role in mortality salience, J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 57, 31, 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.11.007 · DOI
  20. Koles, 2018, Compensatory consumption and consumer compromises: a state-of-the-art review, J. Mark. Manag., 34, 96, 10.1080/0267257X.2017.1373693 · DOI
  21. Krohne, 1989, The concept of coping modes: relating cognitive person variables to actual cooping behavior, Adv. Behav. Res. Ther., 11, 235, 10.1016/0146-6402(89)90027-1 · DOI
  22. Ladouceur, 1997, Behavioral expressions of intolerance of uncertainty in worry: experimental findings, Behav. Modif., 21, 355, 10.1177/01454455970213006 · DOI
  23. Langer, 1975, The illusion of control, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 32, 311, 10.1037/0022-3514.32.2.311 · DOI
  24. Lee, 2003, Development of an instrument for measuring cognitive conflict in secondary-level science classes, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 40, 585, 10.1002/tea.10099 · DOI
  25. Leibenstein, 1950, Bandwagon, snoband and Veblen effects in the theory of consumers’ demand, J. Econ., 64, 183, 10.2307/1882692 · DOI
  26. Li, 2017, Study on the compensatory consumption of parents in overseas study tours——taking Beijing as an example, J. Huaqiao Univ., 2, 35, 10.16067/j.cnki.35-1049/c.2020.02.004 · DOI
  27. Li, 2016, An empirical study of the rationality of appropriate conspicuous consumption by migrant workers——taking Changchun as an example, Modern Bus., 28, 20, 10.14097/j.cnki.5392/2016.28.004 · DOI
  28. Liang, 2018, Showing to friends or strangers? Relationship orientation influences the effect of social exclusion on conspicuous consumption, J. Consum. Behav., 17, 355, 10.1002/cb.1723 · DOI
  29. Liu, 2018, Consumer preference for national vs. private brands: the influence of brand engagement and self-concept threat, J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 41, 90, 10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.11.010 · DOI
  30. Luhmann, 2011, Intolerance of uncertainty and decisions about delayed, probabilistic rewards, Behav. Ther., 42, 378, 10.1016/j.beth.2010.09.002 · DOI
  31. Ma, 2019, Spending as protection: the need for safety increases preference for luxury products, Mark. Lett., 30, 45, 10.1007/s11002-019-09480-0 · DOI
  32. Marcoux, 1997, The attitudes underlying preferences of young urban educated polish consumers towards products made in western countries, J. Int. Consum. Mark., 9, 5, 10.1300/J046v09n04_02 · DOI
  33. McGregor, 2007, The mask of zeal: low implicit self-esteem, threat, and defensive extremism, Self Identity, 6, 223, 10.1080/15298860601115351 · DOI
  34. McGregor, 2010, Reactive approach motivation (RAM) for religion, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 99, 148, 10.1037/a0019702 · DOI
  35. McGregor, 2001, Compensatory conviction in the face of personal uncertainty: going to extremes and being oneself, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 80, 472, 10.1037//0022-3514.80.3.472 · DOI
  36. Morrison, 2012, Not all selves feel the same uncertainty: assimilation to primes among individualists and collectivists, Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci., 3, 118, 10.1177/1948550611411310 · DOI
  37. O'Cass, 2004, Exploring consumer status and conspicuous consumption, J. Consum. Behav., 4, 25, 10.1002/cb.155 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Oh, 2021, Social class, social self-esteem, and conspicuous consumption, Heliyon, 7, e06318, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06318 · DOI
  39. Pavlish, 2014, The nature of ethical conflicts and the meaning of moral community in oncology practice, Oncol. Nurs. Forum, 41, 130, 10.1188/14.ONF.130-140 · DOI
  40. Rucker, 2008, Desire to acquire: powerlessness and compensatory consumption, J. Consum. Res., 35, 257, 10.1086/588569 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Rucker, 2013, Compensatory consumption, The Routledge Companion to Identity and Consumption, 207
  42. Sherman, 2006, The psychology of self-defense: self-affirmation theory, Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 38, 183, 10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38004-5 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Shin, 2020, Effect of psychological distance on intention in self-affirmation theory, Psychol. Rep., 123, 2101, 10.1177/0033294119856547 · DOI
  44. Smith, 2007, Uncertainty and the influence of group norms in the attitude - behaviour relationship, Br. J. Soc. Psychol., 46, 769, 10.1348/014466606X164439 · DOI
  45. Stjernborg, 2019, Accessibility for all in public transport and the overlooked (social) dimension—a case study of Stockholm, Sustainability, 11, 4902, 10.3390/su11184902 · DOI
  46. Sun, 2020, Study on the influence of social exclusion on consumption tendency of status consumption, Bus. Manage. J., 4, 124, 10.19616/j.cnki.bmj.2020.04.008 · DOI
  47. Sun, 2021, How do individuals cope self-threats with consuming behaviors? Analysis based on the orientation-path integration model, Adv. Psychol. Sci., 29, 921, 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2021.00921 · DOI
  48. Taylor, 2020, Compensating for innovation: extreme product incongruity encourages consumers to affirm unrelated consumption schemas, J. Consum. Psychol., 30, 77, 10.1002/jcpy.1127 · DOI
  49. Teng, 2019, How avatars create identification and loyalty among online gamers contextualization of self-affirmation theory, Internet Res., 29, 1443, 10.1108/INTR-05-2018-0222 · DOI
  50. Trigg, 2001, Veblen, bourdieu, and conspicuous consumption, J. Econ. Issues, 35, 99, 10.1080/00213624.2001.11506342 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Van den Bos, 2001, Uncertainty management: the influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 80, 931, 10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.931 · DOI
  52. Van den Bos, 2007, Hot cognition and social justice judgments: the combined influence of cognitive and affective factors on the justice judgment process, 59
  53. Van den Bos, 2002, Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments, Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 34, 1, 10.1016/S0065-2601(02)80003-X · DOI · Paper page
  54. Van Prooijen, 2004, Group belongingness and procedural justice: social inclusion and exclusion by peers affects the psychology of voice, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 87, 66, 10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.66 · DOI
  55. Vigneron, 1999, A review and a conceptual framework of prestige seeking consumer behavior, Acad. Mark. Sci. Rev., 2, 1
  56. Wagoner, 2017, Uncertainty-identity theory, 10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1195-1 · DOI
  57. Watson, 1988, Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 54, 1063, 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Yang, 2017, Self-uncertainty: concepts, structures, and theories, Adv. Psychol. Sci., 25, 1012, 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.01012 · DOI
  59. Yang, 2019, Neurophysiological and behavioral evidence that self-uncertainty salience increases self-esteem striving, Biol. Psychol., 143, 62, 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.02.011 · DOI
  60. Yang, 2020, To do or to have? Exploring the effects of social exclusion on experiential and material purchases, Asian J. Soc. Psychol., 23, 328, 10.1111/ajsp.12405 · DOI
  61. Zhang, 2017, Reliability and validity of the intolerance of uncertainty scale-short form in university students, Chin. J. Clin. Psych., 25, 285, 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2017.02.020 · DOI
  62. Zheng, 2018, Feeling inferior, showing off: the effect of nonmaterial social comparisons on conspicuous consumption, J. Bus. Res., 90, 196, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.041 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Zheng, 2014, Consumption as psychological compensation: a review of compensatory consumption, Adv. Psychol. Sci., 22, 1513, 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.01513 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Wang, X., Zhu, H., Zhao, Q., Song, C., & Wang, X.
Affiliations
  • Qufu Normal University (CN)
  • Anyang Preschool Education College (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Xiaoming
  • Wang, Xiuxin
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2023-01-09
Volume
13
Pages
1066938-1066938
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4315490591
Cited by
10
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
self-uncertainty, conspicuous consumption, uncertainty tolerance, self-affirmation theory, compensatory consumption, irrational consumption, consumer behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review