CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Cards and Lottery Task: Validation of a New Paradigm Assessing Decision Making Under Risk in Individuals With Severe Obesity

Schäfer, Lisa, Schmidt, Ricarda, Müller, Silke M., Dietrich, Arne, Hilbert, Anja·2020·Frontiers in Psychiatry
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00690PMC PMC7378783
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00690

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Illustration of a decision-making situation in the Cards and Lottery Task. The task starts with a balance of 0 EUR and a lottery stack of 10 stars versus 10 bombs. The left deck contains 10 cards with immediate gains ranging from 0 to 100 EUR, of which three additionally have bomb symbols and seven are neutral. The right deck contains 10 cards with values ranging from −50 EUR to 50 EUR, of which three additionally have star symbols and seven are neutral. In this example, the participant draws a card from the right deck. Feedback is immediately given about the card randomly drawn from the right deck, in this case a card with an immediate loss of −17 EUR and a star symbol. Participant’s balance and lottery stack are updated according to the card drawn previously. The next trial starts with altered win/loss margin and star/bomb symbol frequencies displayed above both decks.
Figure 1 Illustration of a decision-making situation in the Cards and Lottery Task. The task starts with a balance of 0 EUR and a lottery stack of 10 stars versus 10 bombs. The left deck contains 10 cards with immediate gains ranging from 0 to 100 EUR, of which three additionally have bomb symbols and seven are neutral. The right deck contains 10 cards with values ranging from −50 EUR to 50 EUR, of which three additionally have star symbols and seven are neutral. In this example, the participant draws a card from the right deck. Feedback is immediately given about the card randomly drawn from the right deck, in this case a card with an immediate loss of −17 EUR and a star symbol. Participant’s balance and lottery stack are updated according to the card drawn previously. The next trial starts with altered win/loss margin and star/bomb symbol frequencies displayed above both decks.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 79

  1. Overweight and obesity.2020 · DOI
  2. Hales, 2018, Trends in obesity and severe obesity prevalence in US youth and adults by sex and age, 2007-2008 to 2015-2016, JAMA, 319, 10.1001/jama.2018.3060 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Salminen, 2018, Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss at 5 years among patients with morbid obesity: the SLEEVEPASS randomized clinical trial, JAMA, 319, 10.1001/jama.2017.20313 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Kalarchian, 2019, Mental disorders and weight change in a prospective study of bariatric surgery patients: 7 years of follow-up, Surg Obes Relat Dis, 15, 10.1016/j.soard.2019.01.008 · DOI
  5. Bray, 2016, Management of obesity, Lancet, 387, 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00271-3 · DOI · Paper page
  6. LeBlanc, 2018, Behavioral and pharmacotherapy weight loss interventions to prevent obesity-related morbidity and mortality in adults: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force, JAMA, 320, 10.1001/jama.2018.7777 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Lauti, 2016, Weight regain following sleeve gastrectomy – a systematic review, Obes Surg, 26, 10.1007/s11695-016-2152-x · DOI · Paper page
  8. Magro, 2008, Long-term weight regain after gastric bypass: a 5-year prospective study, Obes Surg, 18, 10.1007/s11695-007-9265-1 · DOI
  9. Csendes, 2018, Loss and regain of weight after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy according to preoperative BMI: Late results of a prospective study (78-138 months) with 93% of follow-up, Obes Surg, 28, 10.1007/s11695-018-3356-z · DOI
  10. Lowe, 2019, The prefrontal cortex and obesity: a health neuroscience perspective, Trend Cognit Sci, 23, 10.1016/j.tics.2019.01.005 · DOI
  11. Stice, 2018, Neural vulnerability factors for obesity, Clin Psychol Rev, 68, 38, 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.12.002 · DOI
  12. Diamond, 2013, Executive functions, Annu Rev Psychol, 64, 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Baumeister, 2007, Self-regulation, ego depletion, and motivation, Soc Pers Psychol Compass, 1, 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00001.x · DOI · Paper page
  14. Rangel, 2008, A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making, Nat Rev Neurosci, 9, 10.1038/nrn2357 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Yang, 2018, Executive function performance in obesity and overweight individuals: A meta-analysis and review, Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 84, 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.11.020 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Bechara, 1994, Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex, Cognition, 50, 7, 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Richards, 1999, Delay or probability discounting in a model of impulsive behavior: effect of alcohol, J Exp Anal Behav, 71, 10.1901/jeab.1999.71-121 · DOI
  18. Brogan, 2011, Impaired decision making among morbidly obese adults, J Psychosom Res, 70, 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.07.012 · DOI
  19. Fagundo, 2016, Modulation of irisin and physical activity on executive functions in obesity and morbid obesity, Sci Rep, 6, 10.1038/srep30820 · DOI
  20. Perpiná, 2017, Cognitive flexibility and decision-making in eating disordersand obesity, Eat Weight Disord, 22, 10.1007/s40519-016-0331-3 · DOI
  21. Pignatti, 2006, Decision-making in obesity: a study using the Gambling Task, Eat Weight Disord, 11, 10.1007/bf03327557 · DOI
  22. Kulendran, 2016, Diagnostic validity of behavioural and psychometric impulsivity measures: an assessment in adolescent and adult populations, Person Indiv Diff, 90, 10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.026oi · DOI
  23. Veronese, 2017, Weight loss is associated with improvements in cognitive function among overweight and obese people: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 72, 87, 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.11.017 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Marques, 2014, Changes in neuropsychological tests and brain metabolism after bariatric surgery, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 99, 10.1210/jc.2014-2068 · DOI
  25. Luhmann, 2009, Temporal decision-making: insights from cognitive neuroscience, Front Behav Neurosci, 3, 10.3389/neuro.08.039.2009 · DOI
  26. Amlung, 2016, Steep discounting of delayed monetary and food rewards in obesity: a meta-analysis, Psychol Med, 46, 10.1017/S0033291716000866 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Johnson, 2002, Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting, J Exp Anal Behav, 77, 10.1901/jeab.2002.77-129 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Charlton, 2008, Commodity specific rates of temporal discounting: does metabolic function underlie differences in rates of discounting, Behav Process, 77, 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.08.002 · DOI
  29. Johnson, 2010, Delay discounting in current and former marijuana-dependent individuals, Exp Clin Psychopharmacol, 8, 99, 10.1037/a0018333 · DOI
  30. Odum, 2011, Delay discounting: trait variable, Behav Process, 87, 1, 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.02.007 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Kim, 2011, Effects of the BAS and BIS on decision-making in a gambling task, Person Individ Diff, 50, 10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.041 · DOI
  32. Singh, 2012, Decision making in the reward and punishment variants of the Iowa gambling task: evidence of “foresight” or “framing, Front Neurosci, 6, 10.3389/fnins.2012.00107 · DOI
  33. Rochat, 2019, Let’s open the decision-making umbrella: a framework for conceptualizing and assessing features of impaired decision making in addiction, Neuropsychol Rev, 29, 27, 10.1007/s11065-018-9387-3 · DOI
  34. Horstmann, 2012, Iowa gambling task: there is more to consider than long-term outcome. Using a linear equation model to disentangle the impact of outcome and frequency of gains and losses, Front Neurosci, 6, 10.3389/fnins.2012.00061 · DOI
  35. Buelow, 2009, Construct validity of the Iowa Gambling Task, Neuropsychol Rev, 19, 10.1007/s11065-009-9083-4 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Steingroever, 2013, Performance of healthy participants on the Iowa Gambling Task, Psychol Assess, 25, 10.1037/a0029929 · DOI
  37. Müller, 2017, Short- and long-term consequences in decision-making under risk: immediate feedback about long-term prospects benefits people tending to impulsive processing, J Cognit Psychol, 29, 10.1080/20445911.2016.1245660 · DOI
  38. Brand, 2007, Decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk: correlations with executive functions and comparisons of two different gambling tasks with implicit and explicit rules, J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, 29, 86, 10.1080/13803390500507196 · DOI
  39. Davis, 2008, Education level moderates learning on two versions of the Iowa Gambling Task, J Int Neuropsychol Soc, 14, 10.1017/S1355617708081204 · DOI
  40. Cassimiro, 2017, Decision-making in cognitively unimpaired illiterate and low-educated older women: results on the Iowa Gambling Task, Arch Clin Neuropsychol, 32, 71, 10.1093/arclin/acw080 · DOI
  41. Brand, 2005, Decision-making deficits of korsakoff patients in a new gambling task with explicit rules: associations with executive functions, Neuropsychol, 19, 267, 10.1037/0894-4105.19.3.267 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Baldofski, 2015, Nonnormative eating behaviors and psychopathology in prebariatric patients with binge-eating disorder and night eating syndrome, Surg Obes Relat Dis, 11, 10.1016/j.soard.2014.09.018 · DOI
  43. Myerson, 2001, Area under the curve as a measure of discounting, J Exp Anal Behav, 76, 10.1901/jeab.2001.76-235 · DOI
  44. Meule, 2011, Psychometric evaluation of the German Barratt Impulsivness Scale – short version (BIS-15), Diagnostica, 57, 10.1026/0012-1924/a000042 · DOI
  45. Spinella, 2007, Normative data and a short form of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, Int J Neurosci, 117, 10.1080/00207450600588881 · DOI
  46. Carver, 1994, Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: the BIS/BAS scales, J Pers Soc Psychol, 67, 10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Strobel, 2001, Eine deutschsprachige Version des BIS/BAS-Fragebogens von Carver und White [A German-language version of Carver and White’s BIS/BAS scales], Z Diff Diagn Psychol, 22, 10.1024//0170-1789.22.3.216 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Derryberry, 1988, Arousal, affect, and attention as components of temperament, J Pers Soc Psychol, 55, 10.1037//0022-3514.55.6.958 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Wiltink, 2006, Temperament and personality: the German version of the Adult Temperament Questionnaire (ATQ), Psychosoc Med, 3, Doc10
  50. Rösler, 2004, Instrumente zur Diagnostik der Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit-/Hyperaktivitätsstörung (ADHS) im Erwachsenenalter. Selbstbeurteilungsskala und Diagnosecheckliste [Tools for the diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults. Self-rating behaviour questionnaire and diagnostic checklist], Nervenarzt, 75, 10.1007/s00115-003-1622-2 · DOI
  51. 2013, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – DSM-5
  52. Fairburn, 2014, Eating Disorder Examination (17.0D)
  53. Hilbert, 2016, Eating Disorder Examination: Deutschsprachige Übersetzung
  54. Spitzer, 1999, Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study, JAMA, 282, 10.1001/jama.282.18.1737 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Löwe, 2002, PHQ-D. Gesundheitsfragebogen für Patienten [PHQ-D. Patient Health Questionnaire]
  56. Gratz, 2004, Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: development, factor structure, and initial validation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale, J Psychopathol Beh Assess, 26, 41, 10.1007/s10862-008-9102-4 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Ehring, 2008, Characteristics of emotion regulation in recovered depressed versus never depressed individuals, Pers Individ Dif, 44, 10.1016/j.paid.2008.01.013 · DOI
  58. Fairburn, 2008, Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (6.0)
  59. Hilbert, 2016, Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire: Deutschsprachige Übersetzung
  60. Cohen, 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
  61. Green, 1996, Temporal discounting in choice between delayed rewards: the role of age and income, Psychol Aging, 11, 79, 10.1037//0882-7974.11.1.79 · DOI
  62. Kittel, 2017, Executive functions in adolescents with binge-eating disorder and obesity, Int J Eat Disord, 50, 10.1002/eat.22714 · DOI
  63. Silverstein, 2020, The relationship between executive function deficits and DSM-5-defined ADHD symptoms, J Atten Disord, 24, 41, 10.1177/1087054718804347 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Mowinckel, 2015, Biele G. A meta-analysis of decision-making and attention in adults with ADHD, J Atten Disord, 19, 10.1177/1087054714558872 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Rinaldi, 2019, Decision-making of patients with major depressive disorder in the framework of action control, Cognit Neuropsychiat, 31, 1, 10.1080/13546805.2019.1685481 · DOI
  66. Cella, 2010, Impaired flexible decision-making in major depressive disorder, J Affect Disord, 124, 10.1016/j.jad.2009.11.013 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Dombrovski, 2013, Reward signals, attempted suicide, and impulsivity in late-life depression, JAMA Psychiatry, 70, 1, 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.75 · DOI · Paper page
  68. Hevey, 2017, Clinical depression and punishment sensitivity on the BART, Front Psychol, 8, 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00670 · DOI
  69. Eshel, 2010, Reward and punishment processing in depression, Biol Psychiatry, 68, 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.01.027 · DOI · Paper page
  70. Schäfer, 2017, Identifying prebariatric subtypes based on temperament traits, emotion dysregulation, and disinhibited eating: A latent profile analysis, Int J Eat Disord, 50, 10.1002/eat.22760 · DOI
  71. Eichen, 2016, Addiction vulnerability and binge eating in women: exploring reward sensitivity, affect regulation, impulsivity & weight/shape concerns, Pers Individ Dif, 100, 16, 10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.084 · DOI
  72. Xu, 2013, Assessment of risk-taking and impulsive behaviors: A comparison between three tasks, Soc Behav Pers, 41, 10.2224/sbp.2013.41.3.477 · DOI
  73. Buelow, 2018, Test-retest reliability of common behavioral decision making tasks, Arch Clin Neuropsychol, 33, 10.1093/arclin/acx038 · DOI
  74. Schmitz, 2020, Psychometrics of the Iowa and Berlin Gambling Tasks: unresolved issues with reliability and validity for risk taking, Assessment, 27, 10.1177/1073191117750470 · DOI
  75. Gill, 2019, The long-term effect of bariatric surgery on depression and anxiety, J Affect Disord, 246, 10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.113 · DOI · Paper page
  76. Herring, 2016, Changes in physical activity behaviour and physical function after bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Obes Rev, 17, 10.1111/obr.12361 · DOI
  77. Driscoll, 2016, Long-term health-related quality of life in bariatric surgery patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Obesity, 24, 60, 10.1002/oby.21322 · DOI
  78. Bruze, 2018, Associations of bariatric surgery with changes in interpersonal relationship status: results from 2 swedish cohort studies, JAMA Surg, 153, 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0215 · DOI
  79. Neovius, 2018, Risk of suicide and non-fatal self-harm after bariatric surgery: results from two matched cohort studies, Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 6, 197, 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30437-0 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 3

Metadata

Authors
Schäfer, L., Schmidt, R., Müller, S. M., Dietrich, A., & Hilbert, A.
Venue
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Published
2020-07-16
Volume
11
ISSN
1664-0640
DOI
10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00690
PMC
PMC7378783
Cited by
3
References
5
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (FKZ: 01EO1501)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review