Cited by 449Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPsychological and Temporal Perspectives Research

Delay discounting: Trait variable?

Open access
Odum, Amy L.·2011·Behavioural Processes

Abstract

Delay discounting refers to the tendency for outcomes that are remote in time to have less value than more immediate outcomes. Steep discounting of delayed outcomes is associated with a variety of social maladies. The degree of sensitivity to delayed outcomes may be a stable and pervasive individual characteristic. In analyses of archival data, the present study found positive correlations between the degree of delay discounting for one outcome (as measured by the Area Under the Curve), and the degree of discounting for other outcomes. Along with additional evidence reviewed, these data suggest that delay discounting may be considered a personality trait. Recent research in epigenetics, neuroscience, and behavior suggests delay discounting may prove to be a beneficial target for therapeutic attempts to produce global reductions in impulsivity related to delay discounting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.02.007

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Odum, A. L.
Affiliations
Utah State University (US)
Corresponding author
Odum, Amy L.
Venue
Behavioural Processes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-05
Volume
87
Issue
1
Pages
1-9
ISSN
0376-6357 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985343122
Cited by
449
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 17
FWCI
13.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioural Processes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA029100)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
Keywords
delay discounting, personality traits, impulsivity, time preference, delayed rewards, area under the curve, trait stability
MeSH terms
Choice Behavior, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Personality, Reward, Time Factors, Area Under Curve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review