The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative Evaluation of Various Total Antioxidant Capacity Assays Applied to Phenolic Compounds with the CUPRAC Assay
Open accessAbstract
It would be desirable to establish and standardize methods that can measure the total antioxidant capacity level directly from vegetable extracts containing phenolics. Antioxidant capacity assays may be broadly classified as electron transfer (ET)− and hydrogen atom transfer (HAT)−based assays. The majority of HAT assays are kinetics-based, and involve a competitive reaction scheme in which antioxidant and substrate compete for peroxyl radicals thermally generated through the decomposition of azo compounds. ET−based assays measure the capacity of an antioxidant in the reduction of an oxidant, which changes colour when reduced. ET assays include the ABTS/TEAC, CUPRAC, DPPH, Folin-Ciocalteu and FRAP methods, each using different chromogenic redox reagents with different standard potentials. This review intends to offer a critical evaluation of existing antioxidant assays applied to phenolics, and reports the development by our research group of a simple and low-cost antioxidant capacity assay for dietary polyphenols, vitamins C and E, and human serum antioxidants, utilizing the copper(II)-neocuproine reagent as the chromogenic oxidizing agent, which we haved named the CUPRAC (cupric ion reducing antioxidant capacity) method. This method offers distinct advantages over other ET−based assays, namely the selection of working pH at physiological pH (as opposed to the Folin and FRAP methods, which work at alkaline and acidic pHs, respectively), applicability to both hydrophilic and lipophilic antioxidants (unlike Folin and DPPH), completion of the redox reactions for most common flavonoids (unlike FRAP), selective oxidation of antioxidant compounds without affecting sugars and citric acid commonly contained in foodstuffs and the capability to assay –SH bearing antioxidants (unlike FRAP). Other similar ET–based antioxidant assays that we have developed or modified for phenolics are the Fe(III)− and Ce(IV)−reducing capacity methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Colorimetry of Total Phenolics with Phosphomolybdic-Phosphotungstic Acid Reagents
Singleton, V. L., & Rossi, J. A. (1965) · American Journal of Enology and Viticulture · doi:10.5344/ajev.1965.16.3.144 · Cited by 24,852
Structure-antioxidant activity relationships of flavonoids and phenolic acids
Rice-Evans, C. A., Miller, N. J., & Paganga, G. (1996) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/0891-5849(95)02227-9 · Cited by 9,085
The Chemistry behind Antioxidant Capacity Assays
Huang, D., Ou, B., & Prior, R. L. (2005) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf030723c · Cited by 6,162
Advances in flavonoid research since 1992
Harborne, J. B., & Williams, C. A. (2000) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0031-9422(00)00235-1 · Cited by 3,956
Antioxidant activity of plant extracts containing phenolic compounds
Kähkönen, M. P., Hopia, A. I., Vuorela, H. J., Rauha, J.-P., Pihlaja, K., Kujala, T. S., & Heinonen, M. (1999) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf990146l · Cited by 3,854 · cited 2×
“[99] found remarkably high antioxidant activity and high phenolic content (gallic acid equivalents > 20 mg g) for berries, though these two parameters did not have the same meaning for all samples.”
Background
Cited by
Antioxidant assays for plant and food components
Moon, J.-K., & Shibamoto, T. (2009) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf803537k · Cited by 958
Review of methods to determine antioxidant capacities
Karadag, A., Ozcelik, B., & Saner, S. (2009) · Food Analytical Methods · doi:10.1007/s12161-008-9067-7 · Cited by 753
Antioxidants in wild mushrooms
Ferreira, I., Barros, L., & Abreu, R. (2009) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/092986709787909587 · Cited by 670
Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Defense
Demirci-Çekiç, S., Özkan, G., Avan, A. N., Uzunboy, S., Çapanoğlu, E., & Apak, R. (2022) · Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2021.114477 · Cited by 587
Self-citationApak, R., Gorinstein, S., Böhm, V., Schaich, K. M., Özyürek, M., & Güçlü, K. (2013) · Pure and Applied Chemistry · doi:10.1351/pac-rep-12-07-15 · Cited by 586
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Apak, R., Güçlü, K., Demirata, B., Özyürek, M., Çelik, S. E., Bektaşoğlu, B., Berker, K. I., & Özyurt, D.
- Venue
- Molecules
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2007-07-19
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1496-1547
- ISSN
- 1420-3049 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2114781275
- Cited by
- 1,248
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 10.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative Evaluation of Various Total Antioxidant Capacity Assays Applied to Phenolic Compounds with the CUPRAC Assay. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/12071496
- The paper
- Apak, R., Güçlü, K., Demirata, B., Özyürek, M., Çelik, S. E., Bektaşoğlu, B., Berker, K. I., & Özyurt, D. (2007). Comparative Evaluation of Various Total Antioxidant Capacity Assays Applied to Phenolic Compounds with the CUPRAC Assay. Molecules. https://doi.org/10.3390/12071496
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.