Cited by 26Primate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and ReproductionWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Social behavior and group formation in male Asian Elephants (Elephas maximus): the effects of age and musth in wild and zoo-housed animals

Open access
LaDue, Chase A., Vandercone, Rajnish P. G., Kiso, Wendy K., Freeman, Elizabeth W.·2022·Animals

Abstract

Asian elephants are endangered, and the long-term viability of the species depends on integrative approaches to address the sustainability of in-situ and ex-situ populations. Growing evidence shows that male elephants exhibit extensive and flexible social behavior that rivals the complexity of that of females. Male elephant sociality is expected to change dramatically around the unique sexual state of musth. However, data related to male Asian elephant sociality is lacking. Here, we conducted complementary observations in Wasgamuwa National Park, Sri Lanka, and North American zoos of male Asian elephant social behavior. Age and musth status, along with other factors, were associated with variation in social behavior and group formation of males. In wild male elephants, both musth status and age impacted elephant associations within all-male and mixed-sex groups: non-musth elephants were generally sighted less often in mixed-sex groups as they aged, while the inverse occurred with musth elephants. Musth status interacted with age to predict the number of conspecifics with which a wild male elephant associated: younger males were observed with more females during non-musth (but the opposite was true during musth), and male elephants between 20 and 30 years were observed with the highest number of male conspecifics except during musth. Finally, we found variation in aggression, prosocial behavior, and submissive behavior was influenced by intrinsic (age and musth status) and extrinsic factors (group size and type) in similar ways in both populations; prosocial behavior was most common and was influenced by the number of conspecifics present (both populations), and age, group type, and musth status (zoo population), while aggression was rare, especially among older elephants. We suggest that longitudinal studies of this threatened species will be particularly helpful to promote the reproduction and conservation of Asian elephants in in-situ and ex-situ environments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ani12091215

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 2017, males made up only 21% of the Asian elephant population in North America but will eventually approach 50%.

    “In 2017, males made up only 21% of the Asian elephant population in North America but will eventually approach 50%”

    From Continuing challenges of elephant captivity: the captive environment, health issues, and welfare implications (2024) · cites this paper as LaDue et al., 2022b

    The Conclusions state that males comprised 27% of the North American Asian elephant population in 2017, not 21%. They also state that the proportion will eventually approach 50%. The supplied passage has no page number. (LLM, conf=0.93)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Affiliation was the most common type of social behavior observed in the wild (72.5%) and in all-male groups of Asian elephants housed in zoos (68.5%).

    “Affiliation was also the most common type of social behavior observed in the wild (72.5%) and in all-male groups of Asian elephants housed in zoos (68.5%)”

    From Socializing a group of male Asian elephants in a semi-captive facility in Lao PDR (2025) · cites this paper as [56]

    The Results (§3.2; page not provided) identify prosocial behavior as the most frequent social behavior and report 72.5% for wild elephants and 68.5% for zoo-housed elephants. The 68.5% figure applies to zoo-housed elephants overall, not specifically to all-male zoo groups; the paper says prosocial behavior was more common in mixed-sex zoo groups. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Increasing evidence indicates that male elephants display extensive social behaviors that rival the complexity of those of females.

    “Increasing evidence indicates that male elephants display extensive social behaviors that rival the complexity of that of females”
  • The study animals exhibited behavior consistent with other populations.

    “indicating that the study animals exhibited behavior consistent with other populations [56].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [33]Williams C. Tiwari S.K. Goswami V.R. de Silva S. Kumar A. Baskaran N. Yoganand K. Menon V. Elephas maximus The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species IUCN Cambridge, UK 2020
  2. [56]Burnham K.P. Anderson D.R. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag New York, NY, USA 2002 488
  3. [73]Sukumar R. The Asian Elephant: Ecology and Management Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK 1989 255
  4. [89]Schulte B.A. Social structure and helping behavior in captive elephants Zoo Biol. 2000 19 447 459 10.1002/1098-2361(2000)19:5<447::AID-ZOO12>3.0.CO;2-# · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LaDue, C. A., Vandercone, R. P. G., Kiso, W. K., & Freeman, E. W.
Affiliations
  • George Mason University (US)
  • Rajarata University of Sri Lanka (LK)
  • White Oak Conservation Foundation, Yulee, FL 32097, USA
Corresponding author
LaDue, Chase A.
Venue
Animals
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-05-08
Volume
12
Issue
9
Pages
1215
ISSN
2076-2615 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4229335296
Cited by
26
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2
FWCI
5.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Animals (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • American Society of Mammalogists
  • Animal Behavior Society
  • Asian Elephant Support
  • Cosmos Club Foundation
  • Elephant Managers Association
  • The Explorers Club
  • Feld Entertainment, Inc.
  • Ringling Bros
  • Center for the Study and Conservation of the Asian Elephant
  • Fulbright US Student Program
  • George Mason University (Department of Biology, Office of the Provost, and School of Integrative Studies)
  • IDEA WILD
  • International Elephant Foundation
  • National Geographic Society
  • Oklahoma City Zoo Conservation Action Now
  • Saint Louis Zoo WildCare Institute
  • Virginia Academy of Science
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
Asian elephant, male social behavior, musth, group formation, age effects, aggression, prosocial behavior, submissiveness, in situ and ex situ conservation, group size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review