The DOI matches its Crossref record; 205 of the 217 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 204 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology
Open accessAbstract
Muscle and bone interact via physical forces and secreted osteokines and myokines. Physical forces are generated through gravity, locomotion, exercise, and external devices. Cells sense mechanical strain via adhesion molecules and translate it into biochemical responses, modulating the basic mechanisms of cellular biology such as lineage commitment, tissue formation, and maturation. This may result in the initiation of bone formation, muscle hypertrophy, and the enhanced production of extracellular matrix constituents, adhesion molecules, and cytoskeletal elements. Bone and muscle mass, resistance to strain, and the stiffness of matrix, cells, and tissues are enhanced, influencing fracture resistance and muscle power. This propagates a dynamic and continuous reciprocity of physicochemical interaction. Secreted growth and differentiation factors are important effectors of mutual interaction. The acute effects of exercise induce the secretion of exosomes with cargo molecules that are capable of mediating the endocrine effects between muscle, bone, and the organism. Long-term changes induce adaptations of the respective tissue secretome that maintain adequate homeostatic conditions. Lessons from unloading, microgravity, and disuse teach us that gratuitous tissue is removed or reorganized while immobility and inflammation trigger muscle and bone marrow fatty infiltration and propagate degenerative diseases such as sarcopenia and osteoporosis. Ongoing research will certainly find new therapeutic targets for prevention and treatment.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review synthesizes how muscle and bone communicate through mechanical forces and secreted factors, integrating mechanobiology with endocrine/paracrine signaling. It argues that loading maintains musculoskeletal homeostasis while unloading and chronic inflammation drive fatty infiltration and degenerative diseases such as sarcopenia and osteoporosis.
Key findings
- Mechanical impacts ranging from 0.1 to 100 kPa are sensed by adhesion molecules, ion channels, the primary cilium, and other mechanotransduction machinery, leading to bone formation, muscle hypertrophy, and enhanced ECM/cytoskeletal stiffness, fracture resistance, and muscle power.
- Muscle and bone act as endocrine organs via myokines/osteokines and extracellular vesicles; exosomes are 50–150 nm and microvesicles 50–1000 nm (up to 10 µm), carrying miRNA, proteins, and organelles that may mediate exercise-induced cross-talk.
- Unloading causes rapid loss: a meta-analysis of 75 simulated microgravity studies found moderate muscle changes within 7–14 days and large effects on muscle force, mass, and peak power after 35 days; 90-day 6° head-down tilt bed rest decreased muscle fiber cross-sectional area by 26%, with increased SOST and myostatin that was reversible upon reloading.
- Chronic inflammation and disuse promote muscle fatty infiltration and bone marrow adipose expansion; in the EFFECT study of 40 female acute hip fracture patients and 55 controls, soft tissue parameters discriminated hip fractures as well as trabecular BMD plus cortical thickness.
Methods
- Narrative review; no primary experimental data are reported. It synthesizes mechanistic, developmental, clinical, imaging, and spaceflight/bed-rest literature.
- Cites specific studies and meta-analyses, including 75 simulated microgravity studies, a 90-day bed-rest study, the EFFECT cross-sectional study of 40 female hip fracture patients and 55 controls, and imaging methods such as DXA, BIA, CT, MRI/Dixon, and MRS.
- Main analysis is conceptual integration of mechanotransduction, secretome/extracellular vesicle biology, immune and endothelial interactions, epigenetics, and disease mechanisms.
Limitations
- The paper states that more research is needed to dissect molecular events, define the borders between beneficial and harmful mechanical stimuli, and understand exercise resistance in disease; it also says it cannot provide an in-depth review of any pathology.
- Evident from the text: as a narrative review, no systematic search strategy or risk-of-bias assessment is described, and conclusions rely on selected cited literature rather than new data.
- Evident from the text: many mechanistic claims derive from mouse or in vitro studies and are not fully validated in humans; imaging lacks guidelines for which parameters to quantify, and direct comparison of CT muscle density with MRI Dixon fat fraction has not been published.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 204 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many interactions are not only bilateral but follow a multilateral or even organismic relationship, involving metabolism and the nervous system (Figure 1).”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 1. Introduction
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The acute effects of exercise induce the secretion of exosomes with cargo molecules that are capable of mediating the endocrine effects between muscle, bone, and the organism.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cells sense mechanical strain via adhesion molecules and translate it into biochemical responses, modulating the basic mechanisms of cellular biology such as lineage commitment, tissue formation, and maturation.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Lessons from unloading, microgravity, and disuse teach us that gratuitous tissue is removed or reorganized”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Secreted growth and differentiation factors are important effectors of mutual interaction.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Muscle and bone interact via physical forces and secreted osteokines and myokines.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Felsenthal, 2017, Mechanical regulation of musculoskeletal system development, Dev. source
- Not checked yetcites [2] Mikolajewicz, 2019, Transmission of Mechanical Information by Purinergic Signaling, Biophys. J. source
- Not checked yetcites [3] Vogel, 2018, Unraveling the Mechanobiology of Extracellular Matrix, Annu. Rev. Physiol. source
- Not checked yetcites [4] Ayad, 2019, Tissue mechanics, an important regulator of development and disease, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Boil. Sci. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and propagate degenerative diseases such as sarcopenia and osteoporosis.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recent information indicates that the reciprocity of mechanochemical interaction is extremely dynamic, including the cellular, the tissue, and the organismic level [1,2,3,4].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Felsenthal, 2017, Mechanical regulation of musculoskeletal system development, Dev. source
- Not checked yetcites [2] Mikolajewicz, 2019, Transmission of Mechanical Information by Purinergic Signaling, Biophys. J. source
- Not checked yetcites [3] Vogel, 2018, Unraveling the Mechanobiology of Extracellular Matrix, Annu. Rev. Physiol. source
- Not checked yetcites [4] Ayad, 2019, Tissue mechanics, an important regulator of development and disease, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Boil. Sci. source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The physical forces generated in the context of motion are extremely variable from very low to high impact.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.1. Physical Forces
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Connective tissues physically joining muscle and bone, especially tendons and ligaments, naturally play a critical role in this interaction, as addressed in a recent review article in detail [5].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [5] Nassari, 2017, Non-myogenic Contribution to Muscle Development and Homeostasis: The Role of Connective Tissues, Front. Cell Dev. Boil.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The variability of impact on the different levels of cell/cell, cell/tissue, and tissue/tissue interaction ranges from 0.1 to 100 kPa from development to adult life”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.1. Physical Forces
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [3] Vogel, 2018, Unraveling the Mechanobiology of Extracellular Matrix, Annu. Rev. Physiol. source
- Not checked yetcites [6] Mohammed, 2019, Innovative Tools for Mechanobiology: Unraveling Outside-In and Inside-Out Mechanotransduction, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. source
- Not checked yetcites [7] Moro, 2019, MicroRNA-dependent regulation of biomechanical genes establishes tissue stiffness homeostasis, Nat.
- Not checked yetcites [8] Uroz, 2018, Regulation of cell cycle progression by cell–cell and cell–matrix forces, Nat.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Intrinsic as well as extrinsic forces such as gravity generate adaptive changes of tissues, which modulate muscle power and fracture resistance.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 1. Introduction
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Long-term changes induce adaptations of the respective tissue secretome that maintain adequate homeostatic conditions.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Vibration certainly can also elicit cellular responses, which may be beneficial in terms of inducing and maintaining muscle hypertrophy and elevated bone mass under conditions of disuse or unloading in simulated microgravity [12,13,14].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.1. Physical Forces
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [12] Pagnotti, 2019, Combating osteoporosis and obesity with exercise: leveraging cell mechanosensitivity, Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. source
- Not checked yetcites [13] Stolzenberg, 2013, Whole-body vibration versus proprioceptive training on postural control in post-menopausal osteopenic women, Gait Posture source
- Not checked yetcites [14] Blottner, 2006, Human skeletal muscle structure and function preserved by vibration muscle exercise following 55 days of bed rest, Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In response to forces, all cells and tissues adapt their resistive forces as mediated through the strength and stiffness of their cytoskeleton and extracellular matrix (ECM).”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.1. Physical Forces
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For the time being, it is probably correct to state that vibration techniques if correctly applied may help to delay disuse-related and microgravity-related muscle and bone loss”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.1. Physical Forces
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Moreover, the weight-saving mode of construction of bone architecture allows for local adaptations to the directions of incoming forces (force lines); these are phenomena that for bone have been described earlier as Wolff’s law, in which form follows function [10,11].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.1. Physical Forces
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [10] Duncan, 1995, Transduction of mechanical strain in bone, ASGSB Bull. Publ. Am. Soc. Gravit. Space Boil.
- Not checked yetcites [11] Duncan, 1995, Mechanotransduction and the functional response of bone to mechanical strain, Calcif. Tissue Int. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“and produces a complex interactive network of physics and biochemistry involving both muscle and bone [3,6,7,8].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.1. Physical Forces
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [3] Vogel, 2018, Unraveling the Mechanobiology of Extracellular Matrix, Annu. Rev. Physiol. source
- Not checked yetcites [6] Mohammed, 2019, Innovative Tools for Mechanobiology: Unraveling Outside-In and Inside-Out Mechanotransduction, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. source
- Not checked yetcites [7] Moro, 2019, MicroRNA-dependent regulation of biomechanical genes establishes tissue stiffness homeostasis, Nat.
- Not checked yetcites [8] Uroz, 2018, Regulation of cell cycle progression by cell–cell and cell–matrix forces, Nat.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Cellular deformations induce adaptive signaling that provides adequate function, fulfilling the actual environmental needs/challenges. [22,23,24,25,26].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.1. Physical Forces
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] Alfieri, 2019, Flow-induced mechanotransduction in skeletal cells, Biophys. Rev. source
- Not checked yetcites [23] Quiroga, 2019, The plasma membrane as a mechanochemical transducer, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Boil. Sci. source
- Not checked yetcites [24] Lemke, 2017, Mechanical forces during muscle development, Mech. Dev. source
- Not checked yetcites [25] Sun, 2019, Integrin activation by talin, kindlin and mechanical forces, Nat.
- Not checked yetcites [26] Sun, 2016, Integrin-mediated mechanotransduction, J. Cell Boil. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Many molecular mechanisms of mechanosensing and mechanotransduction are common pathways for muscle and bone.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.1. Physical Forces
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The last three decades have seen an emancipation of mechanobiology as a modulator of cellular biochemistry, which is highly relevant for tissue formation already early in development and throughout the adult life cycle for tissue maintenance, remodeling, and regeneration [1,19].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.1. Physical Forces
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Mechanical stimulation enhances calcium flux into the cell (reviewed in [22])”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.1. Physical Forces
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] Alfieri, 2019, Flow-induced mechanotransduction in skeletal cells, Biophys. Rev. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Connexin 43 has functions beyond the physical mechanotransduction between cells, since its knockout in early osteoblasts causes impaired muscle formation in mice [28,29].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.1. Physical Forces
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Integrin-mediated mechanotransduction is but one of many molecular mechanisms that appear to be linked to successful muscle regeneration in health, aging, and disease [27].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.1. Physical Forces
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [27] Rozo, 2016, Targeting β1-integrin signaling enhances regeneration in aged and dystrophic muscle in mice, Nat. Med. source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Physical forces through muscular activity or vibration induce the cellular secretion of ATP and sphingosines, which are tightly involved in osteoblast, osteoclast, and osteocyte activity [2,63,64,65].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.2. Systemic Mutual Interactions of Skeletal Muscle and Bone
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [2] Mikolajewicz, 2019, Transmission of Mechanical Information by Purinergic Signaling, Biophys. J. source
- Not checked yetcites [63] Formigli, 2009, Regulation of transient receptor potential canonical channel 1 (TRPC1) by sphingosine 1-phosphate in C2C12 myoblasts and its relevance for a role of mechanotransduction in skeletal muscle differentiation, J. Cell Sci. source
- Not checked yetcites [64] Brotto, 2015, Bone and muscle: Interactions beyond mechanical, Bone source
- Not checked yetcites [65] Sassoli, C., Pierucci, F., Zecchi-Orlandini, S., and Meacci, E. (2019). Sphingosine 1-Phosphate (S1P)/ S1P Receptor Signaling and Mechanotransduction: Implications for Intrinsic Tissue Repair/Regeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 20. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Transcription activation is also variably dependent on the amplitude, frequency, and duration of mechanical stimuli [52,54].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.1. Physical Forces
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [52] Seefried, 2017, Dissection of mechanoresponse elements in promoter sites of the mechanoresponsive CYR61 gene, Exp. Cell Res. source
- Not checked yetcites [54] Seefried, 2017, Epidermal growth factor as a mechanosensitizer in human bone marrow stromal cells, Stem Cell Res. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Moreover, the sensitivity to mechanical signals in bone is of course strongly modulated by other signaling molecules, as it was for example shown for estrogens and the mechano-related effects on fracture healing [15,17].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.1. Physical Forces
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [15] Lackner, 2018, Effects of low-magnitude high-frequency vibration on osteoblasts are dependent on estrogen receptor α signaling and cytoskeletal remodeling, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. source
- Not checked yetcites [17] Wehrle, 2014, The impact of low-magnitude high-frequency vibration on fracture healing is profoundly influenced by the oestrogen status in mice, Dis. Model. Mech.
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“There is no evidence that mesenchymal tissues express the tools for classical regulated secretion”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.2. Systemic Mutual Interactions of Skeletal Muscle and Bone
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [66] Furber, K.L., Backlund, P.S., Yergey, A.L., and Coorssen, J.R. (2019). Unbiased Thiol-Labeling and Top-Down Proteomic Analyses Implicate Multiple Proteins in the Late Steps of Regulated Secretion. Proteomes, 7. source
- Not checked yetcites [67] Gerber, 2002, Molecular determinants of regulated exocytosis, Diabetes source
- Not checked yetcites [68] Park, 2008, How peptide hormone vesicles are transported to the secretion site for exocytosis, Mol. Endocrinol. source
- Not checked yetcites [69] Takamori, 2006, Molecular Anatomy of a Trafficking Organelle, Cell source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“since the inhibition of flagellar transport 88 protein abolished this osteogenic response [22].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.1. Physical Forces
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] Alfieri, 2019, Flow-induced mechanotransduction in skeletal cells, Biophys. Rev. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and the resulting calcium spikes may well be the adequate stimulus for the secretion of extracellular vesicles upon exercise as a basis for exercise-induced tissue cross-talk”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.1. Physical Forces
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It is rather its indirect effect via rickets-associated myopathy that influences muscle mass and function, while its direct effects on muscle cell proliferation, differentiation, and contractility may be neglectable [83,84].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.2. Systemic Mutual Interactions of Skeletal Muscle and Bone
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [83] Avin, 2018, Fibroblast growth factor 23 does not directly influence skeletal muscle cell proliferation and differentiation or ex vivo muscle contractility, Am. J. Physiol. Metab.
- Not checked yetcites [84] Edmonston, 2019, FGF23 at the crossroads of phosphate, iron economy and erythropoiesis, Nat. Rev. Nephrol. source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“indicating the putative in vivo relevance of vesicle-related information exchange between muscle and bone [74,75].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.2. Systemic Mutual Interactions of Skeletal Muscle and Bone
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [74] Trovato, 2019, Extracellular Vesicles: Delivery Vehicles of Myokines, Front. Physiol. source
- Not checked yetcites [75] Annibalini, 2019, Muscle and Systemic Molecular Responses to a Single Flywheel Based Iso-Inertial Training Session in Resistance-Trained Men, Front. Physiol. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Recent evidence links high SOST serum levels in Korean sarcopenic women with appendicular skeletal muscle mass [77].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.2. Systemic Mutual Interactions of Skeletal Muscle and Bone
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [77] Kim, 2019, Association of serum sclerostin levels with low skeletal muscle mass: The Korean Sarcopenic Obesity Study (KSOS), Bone source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“an in vitro study showed that osteocyte calcium oscillation as stimulated by mechanical loading induced the release of LAMP1 (lysosomal-associated membrane protein 1) containing EVs that regulate bone formation and mineralization [72].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.2. Systemic Mutual Interactions of Skeletal Muscle and Bone
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [72] Morrell, 2018, Mechanically induced Ca2+ oscillations in osteocytes release extracellular vesicles and enhance bone formation, Bone Res. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Annibalini et al. analyzed the serum content of microvesicles in subjects ahead and 2 h after exercise and found a 2-fold increase in microvesicles of around 80–200 nm in size”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.2. Systemic Mutual Interactions of Skeletal Muscle and Bone
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [74] Trovato, 2019, Extracellular Vesicles: Delivery Vehicles of Myokines, Front. Physiol. source
- Not checked yetcites [75] Annibalini, 2019, Muscle and Systemic Molecular Responses to a Single Flywheel Based Iso-Inertial Training Session in Resistance-Trained Men, Front. Physiol. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The study showed that it bypasses this pathway”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.2. Systemic Mutual Interactions of Skeletal Muscle and Bone
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [85] Yamamoto, 2015, Posttranslational processing of FGF23 in osteocytes during the osteoblast to osteocyte transition, Bone source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The injection of uncarboxylated osteocalcin in mice rescued their exercise capacity and rescued the age-associated loss of muscle mass (reviewed in [76].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.2. Systemic Mutual Interactions of Skeletal Muscle and Bone
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [76] Moser, S.C., and Van Der Eerden, B. (2019). Osteocalcin—A Versatile Bone-Derived Hormone. Front. Endocrinol., 9. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“there is high plausibility that these precursors can give rise to any mesenchyme-derived tissue type including e.g., bone, cartilage, muscle, tendon, ligament, and fat tissue [98,99,100].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.1. Role of Common Musculoskeletal Precursor’s Mechanotransduction during Development
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [98] Herrmann, 2019, Bone Marrow Niches for Skeletal Progenitor Cells and their Inhabitants in Health and Disease, Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther. source
- Not checked yetcites [99] Robey, 2017, “Mesenchymal stem cells”: Fact or fiction, and implications in their therapeutic use, F1000Research source
- Not checked yetcites [100] Sacchetti, 2016, No Identical “Mesenchymal Stem Cells” at Different Times and Sites: Human Committed Progenitors of Distinct Origin and Differentiation Potential Are Incorporated as Adventitial Cells in Microvessels, Stem Cell Rep. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“After 12 weeks of exercise, the same type of exercise bout induces a list of genes where collagens and remodeling-associated genes such as lysyl oxidase homolog 2 precursor (LOXL2), matrix-remodeling associated 5, and thrombospondin-4 (TSP-4) prevail, indicating constant ECM remodeling.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.2. Systemic Mutual Interactions of Skeletal Muscle and Bone
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [62] Pourteymour, 2017, Global mRNA sequencing of human skeletal muscle: Search for novel exercise-regulated myokines, Mol. Metab. source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Principal signaling cascades of bone formation involve canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling, the TGFβ receptor family, and its various ligands (above all BMPs), and the parathyroid hormone receptor (PTH1R) [111].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.2. Common Effectors of Muscle and Bone Interaction Modulate Tissue Formation and Remodeling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [111] Baron, 2013, WNT signaling in bone homeostasis and disease: from human mutations to treatments, Nat. Med. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“already very early in in skeletal development, there is evidence for an important role of mechanical forces in addition to other physical cues and soluble morphogens in controlling cellular fate determinations, patterning, and tissue development [45,46,110].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.2. Common Effectors of Muscle and Bone Interaction Modulate Tissue Formation and Remodeling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [45] Mammoto, 2013, Mechanobiology and Developmental Control, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Boil. source
- Not checked yetcites [46] Arvind, 2017, Mechanobiology of limb musculoskeletal development, Ann. New York Acad. Sci. source
- Not checked yetcites [110] Sharir, 2011, Muscle force regulates bone shaping for optimal load-bearing capacity during embryogenesis, Dev. source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“There is evidence from genome-wide association studies that pleiotropic genes may both regulate bone and muscle homoeostasis as recently reviewed [59].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [59] Bonewald, 2019, Use it or lose it to age: A review of bone and muscle communication, Bone source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Three main pathways of protein secretion by muscle cells could be identified, namely (1) conventional secretion, (2) secretion via nanovesicles with typical exosomal features, and (3) larger microvesicles (up to 200 nm in size) with distinct protein and mRNA cargo [89]”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.2. Systemic Mutual Interactions of Skeletal Muscle and Bone
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [89] Bigot, 2012, In-depth analysis of the secretome identifies three major independent secretory pathways in differentiating human myoblasts, J. Proteom. source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Next to mechanical stimuli, early bone regeneration is also associated with the secretion of proinflammatory factors showing again many parallels to the muscle regeneration mechanisms discussed below. It is supported by a proinflammatory reaction initiated by platelets in case of injury (platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and cytokine signaling) and/or by TLR 2 and 4 and their ligands such as S”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.2. Common Effectors of Muscle and Bone Interaction Modulate Tissue Formation and Remodeling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [91] Ebert, 2015, Acute phase serum amyloid A induces proinflammatory cytokines and mineralization via toll-like receptor 4 in mesenchymal stem cells, Stem Cell Res. source
- Not checked yetcites [122] Recknagel, 2012, Fracture healing under healthy and inflammatory conditions, Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. source
- Not checked yetcites [123] Einhorn, 2014, Fracture healing: Mechanisms and interventions, Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. source
- Not checked yetcites [124] Rauner, 2012, WNT5A is induced by inflammatory mediators in bone marrow stromal cells and regulates cytokine and chemokine production, J. Bone Miner. Res. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Notch signaling is also a crucial pathway for postnatal muscle regeneration.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.2. Common Effectors of Muscle and Bone Interaction Modulate Tissue Formation and Remodeling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [131] Baghdadi, 2018, Regulation and phylogeny of skeletal muscle regeneration, Dev. Boil. source
- Not checked yetcites [134] Mourikis, 2019, Notch signalling: Sensor and instructor of the microenvironment to coordinate cell fate and organ morphogenesis, Curr. Opin. Cell Boil. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Bone remodeling involves the removal of gratuitous or old and damaged bone by osteoclasts ahead of tissue restoration according to (new) physical strain conditions [118].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.2. Common Effectors of Muscle and Bone Interaction Modulate Tissue Formation and Remodeling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [118] Ma, 2019, The role of physical forces in osteoclastogenesis, J. Cell. Physiol. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Osteoclast activation responds to physical strain via the osteocyte receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) production in order to restore localized microstructural heterogeneities caused by aging or new lines of forces that generate regions of “micro-unloading” [121].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.2. Common Effectors of Muscle and Bone Interaction Modulate Tissue Formation and Remodeling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [121] Paul, 2018, Mechanical Stimuli in the Local In Vivo Environment in Bone: Computational Approaches Linking Organ-Scale Loads to Cellular Signals, Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Analogous to our findings in skeletal precursors, mechanically induced Notch signaling is involved in a protein network that regulates myostatin expression in the context of cytoskeletal rearrangements via integrin-mediated AKT/PKB and mTORC1 signaling [58,135].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.2. Common Effectors of Muscle and Bone Interaction Modulate Tissue Formation and Remodeling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [58] Ziouti, F., Ebert, R., Rummler, M., Krug, M., Müller-Deubert, S., Lüdemann, M., Jakob, F., Willie, B.M., and Jundt, F. (2019). NOTCH Signaling Is Activated through Mechanical Strain in Human Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells. Stem Cells Int., 2019. source
- Not checked yetcites [135] Rindom, 2016, Mechanosensitive Molecular Networks Involved in Transducing Resistance Exercise-Signals into Muscle Protein Accretion, Front. Physiol. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Satellite cells, located between the basement membrane and plasmalemma of the muscle fiber, are the principal muscle stem cells that organize muscle regeneration after injury.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.2. Common Effectors of Muscle and Bone Interaction Modulate Tissue Formation and Remodeling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [131] Baghdadi, 2018, Regulation and phylogeny of skeletal muscle regeneration, Dev. Boil. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Among others, slit guidance ligand 3 (SLIT3) usherin, Fraser syndrome 1 (Fras-1), atrial natriuretic peptide, afamin, collagen α-1 chain, laminin β2, angiotensin-converting enzyme, and ADAMTS-like protein 4 were identified in a screen as osteoclast-derived compounds that stimulate osteoblast activity.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.2. Common Effectors of Muscle and Bone Interaction Modulate Tissue Formation and Remodeling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [119] Kim, 2018, Coupling factors involved in preserving bone balance, Cell. Mol. Life Sci. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The orchestrating network transcription factor is paired box gene 3 (Pax3), which is the core transcription factor that initiates myogenic signaling through the family of myogenic regulatory factors (MRF), which includes MyoD, myogenin, Myf5, and MRF4.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.2. Common Effectors of Muscle and Bone Interaction Modulate Tissue Formation and Remodeling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [128] Buckingham, 2017, Gene regulatory networks and cell lineages that underlie the formation of skeletal muscle, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. source
- Not checked yetcites [129] Chal, 2017, Making muscle: Skeletal myogenesisin vivoandin vitro, Dev. source
- Not checked yetcites [130] Xu, 2019, Regulation of skeletal myogenesis by microRNAs, J. Cell. Physiol. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“systems such as sphingosine 1-phosphate and its receptor appear to be involved in mechanotransduction not only in development but also in adult life [65,120].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.2. Common Effectors of Muscle and Bone Interaction Modulate Tissue Formation and Remodeling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [65] Sassoli, C., Pierucci, F., Zecchi-Orlandini, S., and Meacci, E. (2019). Sphingosine 1-Phosphate (S1P)/ S1P Receptor Signaling and Mechanotransduction: Implications for Intrinsic Tissue Repair/Regeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 20. source
- Not checked yetcites [120] Alto, 2017, Semaphorins and their Signaling Mechanisms, Breast Cancer
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Intriguingly, the vitamin D receptor (VDR), an important steroid hormone receptor in both muscle and bone, also fundamentally changes DNA architecture via CTCF interaction [155,156].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.4. Epigenetic Changes Shape Individual Responses According to Lifestyle, Environment, and Aging
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Cells of both the innate and the adaptive immune system are intricately involved in the efficient regeneration in both muscle and bone [93,137].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.3. Influence of Tissue Resident Cell Populations on Tissue Regeneration and Mechanoadaptation–A Focus on Immune Cell Interactions and Angiogenesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [93] Sass, F.A., Fuchs, M., Pumberger, M., Geissler, S., Duda, G.N., Perka, C., and Schmidt-Bleek, K. (2018). Immunology Guides Skeletal Muscle Regeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 19. source
- Not checked yetcites [137] Chen, 2019, The role of satellite and other functional cell types in muscle repair and regeneration, J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Long-term bed-rest µG simulation over 90 days 6° head-down tilt was followed by a decrease of a muscle fiber cross-sectional area of 26% [167].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 4. Muscle and Bone Interactions in Disease—Lessons and Backflashes from Pathology > 4.1. Unloading–Lessons from Bed Rest Studies and Microgravity
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [167] Rittweger, 2005, Muscle atrophy and bone loss after 90 days’ bed rest and the effects of flywheel resistive exercise and pamidronate: Results from the LTBR study, Bone source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“This TF can obviously change nuclear architecture to dominantly set up the muscle cell differentiation program even in a preformed environment through cooperation with the architectural protein CTCF (CCCTC-binding factor) [154].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.4. Epigenetic Changes Shape Individual Responses According to Lifestyle, Environment, and Aging
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [154] Sartorelli, 2018, Shaping Gene Expression by Landscaping Chromatin Architecture: Lessons from a Master, Mol. Cell source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Moreover, the local delivery of VDR ligands via vitamin D metabolizing enzymes is influenced by power exercise in a rat model, providing very strong links between muscle and bone interaction and epigenetics [157].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.4. Epigenetic Changes Shape Individual Responses According to Lifestyle, Environment, and Aging
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [157] Buskermolen, 2019, Effects of different training modalities on phosphate homeostasis and local vitamin D metabolism in rat bone, PeerJ source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Finally, macrophages are remarkably influenced by physical cues, including oxygen and physical forces, as to their phenotype and function, rendering them important players in the interaction of muscle and bone [140].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.3. Influence of Tissue Resident Cell Populations on Tissue Regeneration and Mechanoadaptation–A Focus on Immune Cell Interactions and Angiogenesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [140] Jain, 2019, Mechanobiology of Macrophages: How Physical Factors Coregulate Macrophage Plasticity and Phagocytosis, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Endothelial cells (EC) are essential for tissue regeneration.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.3. Influence of Tissue Resident Cell Populations on Tissue Regeneration and Mechanoadaptation–A Focus on Immune Cell Interactions and Angiogenesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [146] Chen, 2016, Endothelial cells are progenitors of cardiac pericytes and vascular smooth muscle cells, Nat. Commun. source
- Not checked yetcites [147] Chopra, 2018, Insights into Endothelial Progenitor Cells: Origin, Classification, Potentials, and Prospects, Stem Cells Int. source
- Not checked yetcites [148] Kusumbe, 2014, Coupling of angiogenesis and osteogenesis by a specific vessel subtype in bone, Nat. source
- Not checked yetcites [149] Ramasamy, 2014, Endothelial Notch activity promotes angiogenesis and osteogenesis in bone, Nat. source
- Not checked yetcites [150] Sivaraj, 2016, Blood vessel formation and function in bone, Dev. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Careful studies on the molecular mechanisms revealed that the majority of regulated genes and proteins were related to insulin resistance, metabolism, and reduced protein synthesis [170,171,172].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 4. Muscle and Bone Interactions in Disease—Lessons and Backflashes from Pathology > 4.1. Unloading–Lessons from Bed Rest Studies and Microgravity
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [170] Gao, Y., Arfat, Y., Wang, H., and Goswami, N. (2018). Muscle Atrophy Induced by Mechanical Unloading: Mechanisms and Potential Countermeasures. Front. Physiol., 9. source
- Not checked yetcites [171] Salanova, 2014, Disuse deterioration of human skeletal muscle challenged by resistive exercise superimposed with vibration: evidence from structural and proteomic analysis, FASEB J. source
- Not checked yetcites [172] Salanova, 2015, Vibration mechanosignals superimposed to resistive exercise result in baseline skeletal muscle transcriptome profiles following chronic disuse in bed rest, Sci. Rep. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“A series of carefully designed studies on the effects of serum biomarkers for muscle and bone turnover regulation has been conducted, which confirmed that a continuous loss of both muscle and bone mass could be observed during simulated µG.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 4. Muscle and Bone Interactions in Disease—Lessons and Backflashes from Pathology > 4.1. Unloading–Lessons from Bed Rest Studies and Microgravity
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [167] Rittweger, 2005, Muscle atrophy and bone loss after 90 days’ bed rest and the effects of flywheel resistive exercise and pamidronate: Results from the LTBR study, Bone source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Yet, the unloading of muscle and skeleton causes muscle wasting and bone loss even in younger subjects.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 4. Muscle and Bone Interactions in Disease—Lessons and Backflashes from Pathology > 4.1. Unloading–Lessons from Bed Rest Studies and Microgravity
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [12] Pagnotti, 2019, Combating osteoporosis and obesity with exercise: leveraging cell mechanosensitivity, Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. source
- Not checked yetcites [165] Koedijk, 2017, Sedentary behaviour and bone health in children, adolescents and young adults: a systematic review-supplementary presentation, Osteoporos. Int. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Intra- and extramyocellular lipids, IMCL and smaller EMCL agglomerations, are not captured by IMAT as measured by MRI (Figure 4).”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 4. Muscle and Bone Interactions in Disease—Lessons and Backflashes from Pathology > 4.2. Inflammation and Fatty Degeneration—Lessons from Imaging and Structural Analyses
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, in muscle, FF reflects all EMCL and IMCL.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 4. Muscle and Bone Interactions in Disease—Lessons and Backflashes from Pathology > 4.2. Inflammation and Fatty Degeneration—Lessons from Imaging and Structural Analyses
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“With MR Dixon sequences that generate so-called fat and water fraction images (Figure 3 bottom) [182], the fat fraction which is the combined %fat of the analyzed VOI and can be quantified.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 4. Muscle and Bone Interactions in Disease—Lessons and Backflashes from Pathology > 4.2. Inflammation and Fatty Degeneration—Lessons from Imaging and Structural Analyses
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [182] Grimm, 2018, Repeatability of Dixon magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy for quantitative muscle fat assessments in the thigh, J. Cachex- Sarcopenia Muscle source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Exercise and mechanotransduction can be a countermeasure for this type of chronic inflammatory tissue degeneration.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 4. Muscle and Bone Interactions in Disease—Lessons and Backflashes from Pathology > 4.2. Inflammation and Fatty Degeneration—Lessons from Imaging and Structural Analyses
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, there is a disassociation between muscle strength or power and lean mass or muscle size with respect to exercise intervention and age-dependent changes, because the contractile muscle capacity is strongly influenced by the EMCL and IMCL distribution [190,191,192,193,194].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 4. Muscle and Bone Interactions in Disease—Lessons and Backflashes from Pathology > 4.2. Inflammation and Fatty Degeneration—Lessons from Imaging and Structural Analyses
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [190] Addison, 2014, Intramuscular fat and inflammation differ in older adults: the impact of frailty and inactivity, J. Nutr. Heal. Aging source
- Not checked yetcites [191] Addison, 2014, Intermuscular Fat: A Review of the Consequences and Causes, Int. J. Endocrinol. source
- Not checked yetcites [192] Loenneke, 2019, Exercise-Induced Changes in Muscle Size do not Contribute to Exercise-Induced Changes in Muscle Strength, Sports Med. source
- Not checked yetcites [193] Morales, 2017, Muscle Lipid Metabolism: Role of Lipid Droplets and Perilipins, J. Diabetes Res. source
- Not checked yetcites [194] Tieland, 2017, Skeletal muscle performance and ageing, J. Cachex- Sarcopenia Muscle source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Computed tomography is an alternative 3D modality for muscle imaging [185].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 4. Muscle and Bone Interactions in Disease—Lessons and Backflashes from Pathology > 4.2. Inflammation and Fatty Degeneration—Lessons from Imaging and Structural Analyses
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [185] Engelke, 2018, Quantitative analysis of skeletal muscle by computed tomography imaging-State of the art, J. Orthop. Transl.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Spaceflight observations are proof of principle test conditions for Zero-G, and such reports confirm the rapid loss of muscle volume and all types of muscle fibers even in short-term spaceflights already after a short time in space of 5–111 days (reviewed in [170].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 4. Muscle and Bone Interactions in Disease—Lessons and Backflashes from Pathology > 4.1. Unloading–Lessons from Bed Rest Studies and Microgravity
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [170] Gao, Y., Arfat, Y., Wang, H., and Goswami, N. (2018). Muscle Atrophy Induced by Mechanical Unloading: Mechanisms and Potential Countermeasures. Front. Physiol., 9. source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Apart from chronic inflammatory rheumatic and intestinal diseases, so-called subclinical inflammation is also a driver of tissue-related “inflammaging”.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 4. Muscle and Bone Interactions in Disease—Lessons and Backflashes from Pathology > 4.2. Inflammation and Fatty Degeneration—Lessons from Imaging and Structural Analyses
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [91] Ebert, 2015, Acute phase serum amyloid A induces proinflammatory cytokines and mineralization via toll-like receptor 4 in mesenchymal stem cells, Stem Cell Res. source
- Not checked yetcites [107] Gilbert, 2019, The consequences of ageing, progeroid syndromes and cellular senescence on mechanotransduction and the nucleus, Exp. Cell Res. source
- Not checked yetcites [108] Serrano, 2014, Cellular senescence: from physiology to pathology, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Boil. source
- Not checked yetcites [109] Czarkwiani, 2018, Out with the old, in with the new: senescence in development, Curr. Opin. Cell Boil. source
- Not checked yetcites [177] Schell, 2011, Inflammatory phase of bone healing initiates the regenerative healing cascade, Cell Tissue Research
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Differentiation between these components is only possible with MR spectroscopy (MRS) [183,184], which is not an imaging method.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 4. Muscle and Bone Interactions in Disease—Lessons and Backflashes from Pathology > 4.2. Inflammation and Fatty Degeneration—Lessons from Imaging and Structural Analyses
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [183] Xiao, 2011, Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance spectroscopy: A novel approach to investigate intramyocellular lipids, Magn. Reson. Med. source
- Not checked yetcites [184] Boesch, 1997, In vivo determination of intra-myocellular lipids in human muscle by means of localized 1H-MR-spectroscopy, Magn. Reson. Med. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In men, a decrease in subcutaneous fat thickness increased hip fracture risk independent of area bone mineral density (BMD) [196], but in women, independent contributions of DXA fat or lean measurements on fracture risk could not be shown so far [197,198,199].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 4. Muscle and Bone Interactions in Disease—Lessons and Backflashes from Pathology > 4.2. Inflammation and Fatty Degeneration—Lessons from Imaging and Structural Analyses
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [197] McLean, 2018, Lower Lean Mass Measured by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) is Not Associated with Increased Risk of Hip Fracture in Women: The Framingham Osteoporosis Study, Calcif. Tissue Int. source
- Not checked yetcites [198] Schott, 1998, How Hip and Whole-Body Bone Mineral Density Predict Hip Fracture in Elderly Women: The EPIDOS Prospective Study, Osteoporos. Int. source
- Not checked yetcites [199] Zaslavsky, 2016, Association between body composition and hip fractures in older women with physical frailty, Geriatr. Gerontol. Int. source
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Decreasing physical input leads to muscle atrophy and bone loss, as is most impressively documented under zero-G in space missions.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 5. Conclusions and Perspectives
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Muscle and bone interact in order to provide adaptive modeling and remodeling mechanisms in an environment that is physically challenging.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 5. Conclusions and Perspectives
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“In men, a decrease in subcutaneous fat thickness increased hip fracture risk independent of area bone mineral density (BMD) [196], but in women, independent contributions of DXA fat or lean measurements on fracture risk could not be shown so far [197,198,199].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 4. Muscle and Bone Interactions in Disease—Lessons and Backflashes from Pathology > 4.2. Inflammation and Fatty Degeneration—Lessons from Imaging and Structural Analyses
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [196] Malkov, 2015, Hip Fractures Risk in Older Men and Women Associated With DXA-Derived Measures of Thigh Subcutaneous Fat Thickness, Cross-Sectional Muscle Area, and Muscle Density, J. Bone Miner. Res. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 59
- Probably not a substantial claim. 15
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
In the paper
“After adjustment for BMD and cortical thickness, the hip fracture group was characterized by the lower relative adipose tissue volume of the upper thigh and some of the texture parameters discriminated the osteoporotic hip fracture [204].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 4. Muscle and Bone Interactions in Disease—Lessons and Backflashes from Pathology > 4.2. Inflammation and Fatty Degeneration—Lessons from Imaging and Structural Analyses
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [204] Museyko, 2019, Three-dimensional Distribution of Muscle and Adipose Tissue of the Thigh at CT: Association with Acute Hip Fracture, Radiol. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Physical forces are generated through gravity, locomotion, exercise, and external devices.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This may result in the initiation of bone formation, muscle hypertrophy, and the enhanced production of extracellular matrix constituents, adhesion molecules, and cytoskeletal elements.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“immobility and inflammation trigger muscle and bone marrow fatty infiltration”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Bone and muscle mass, resistance to strain, and the stiffness of matrix, cells, and tissues are enhanced, influencing fracture resistance and muscle power.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The former prevail in muscle while bone strongly (but not exclusively) responds to fluid flow in the osteocyte canalicular network [9].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.1. Physical Forces
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [9] Nachury, 2019, Establishing and regulating the composition of cilia for signal transduction, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Boil. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
““virtually every step of cell and tissue biology depends upon mechanochemical events””
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.1. Physical Forces
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [18] Storm, 2017, Mechanoreciprocity in cell migration, Nat.
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The clinical result of physical impact is high bone and muscle mass, resulting in enhanced fracture resistance and muscle power (see also Figure 2A,B).”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.1. Physical Forces
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Mechanical stimuli can be transmitted through deformation (stretching and compression) and/or shear strain applied by fluids that pass by.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.1. Physical Forces
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is no doubt that external mechanical vibration may variably substitute for gravity and add up to active muscle contraction both in space missions and as dedicated types of exercise.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.1. Physical Forces
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In human myoblasts, Cav3 deficiency was associated with the hyperactivation of IL-6-STAT3 signaling (interleukin-6, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3), which is a pathway that in the presence of WT Cav3 turned out to be regulated by mechanical strain in a Cav3-dependent manner [35].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.1. Physical Forces
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [35] Dewulf, 2019, Dystrophy-associated caveolin-3 mutations reveal that caveolae couple IL6/STAT3 signaling with mechanosensing in human muscle cells, Nat. Commun. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Mechanical bending/deflection of the cilium was reported to enhance prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2 alias COX2) expression and prostaglandin production as well as bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP 2) and osteopontin expression.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.1. Physical Forces
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Secreted proteins and signaling molecules are the basis of mutual interaction between muscle and bone both in a paracrine and also an endocrine setting.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.2. Systemic Mutual Interactions of Skeletal Muscle and Bone
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In muscle, mechanosensing is mainly transduced via deformation strains, but still, the primary cilium has been related to satellite cell self-renewal and muscle cell differentiation in mice [42].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.1. Physical Forces
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [42] Marican, 2016, Asymmetric Distribution of Primary Cilia Allocates Satellite Cells for Self-Renewal, Stem Cell Rep. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The primary cilium is a unique subcellular organelle composed of nine (+0) axonema structures (Figure 2B).”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.1. Physical Forces
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In bone, the primary cilium appears to be an important mediator of gravity and consecutive osteogenic response, because in simulated microgravity, the cilium gradually shrinks and inhibition of this shrinkage using cytochalasin D maintains osteoblast differentiation capacity (reviewed in [40]).”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.1. Physical Forces
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [40] Shi, 2019, Novel functions of the primary cilium in bone disease and cancer, Cytoskelet. source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“IGF-1 and also FGF2 are growth factors that are actively secreted at the muscle and bone interface and if delivered into the circulation may have distant effects on bone formation and remodeling.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.2. Systemic Mutual Interactions of Skeletal Muscle and Bone
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“EVs may transport myokines/osteokines, miRNA, and organelles and are involved in the regeneration of both bone and muscle tissue after exercise and injury [70,71,72,73,74].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.2. Systemic Mutual Interactions of Skeletal Muscle and Bone
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [70] Bittel, 2019, Contribution of Extracellular Vesicles in Rebuilding Injured Muscles, Front. Physiol. source
- Not checked yetcites [71] Lauritzen, 2013, Contraction and AICAR Stimulate IL-6 Vesicle Depletion From Skeletal Muscle Fibers In Vivo, Diabetes source
- Not checked yetcites [72] Morrell, 2018, Mechanically induced Ca2+ oscillations in osteocytes release extracellular vesicles and enhance bone formation, Bone Res. source
- Not checked yetcites [73] Murray, 2018, Concise Review: Intercellular Communication Via Organelle Transfer in the Biology and Therapeutic Applications of Stem Cells, STEM CELLS source
- Not checked yetcites [74] Trovato, 2019, Extracellular Vesicles: Delivery Vehicles of Myokines, Front. Physiol. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Muscle cells, very much like bone, do not express the molecular components of the regulated secretory pathway (RSP), and the vesicle release upon exercise may be the relevant mechanism to deliver IL-6 into the circulation.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.2. Systemic Mutual Interactions of Skeletal Muscle and Bone
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Exercise was reported to downregulate both SOST and DKK-1 serum levels, which marks an important link between muscle and bone via physical impact [78,79].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.2. Systemic Mutual Interactions of Skeletal Muscle and Bone
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [78] Davoodi, 2019, Improved carotid intima-media thickness-induced high-intensity interval training associated with decreased serum levels of Dkk-1 and sclerostin in type 2 diabetes, J. Diabetes its Complicat.
- Not checked yetcites [79] Picke, 2018, Differential effects of high-fat diet and exercise training on bone and energy metabolism, Bone source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“One example is the immediate rise of muscle insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) mRNA after an exercise bout and the significant rise of peripheral blood IGF-1 protein levels after 24 h (not yet significant after 2 h) post exercise, which was gone after 48 h [75].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.2. Systemic Mutual Interactions of Skeletal Muscle and Bone
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [75] Annibalini, 2019, Muscle and Systemic Molecular Responses to a Single Flywheel Based Iso-Inertial Training Session in Resistance-Trained Men, Front. Physiol. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Small vesicles in muscle, which contain immunoreactive IL-6 and are depleted during exercise, have indeed been described in mice [71].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.2. Systemic Mutual Interactions of Skeletal Muscle and Bone
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [71] Lauritzen, 2013, Contraction and AICAR Stimulate IL-6 Vesicle Depletion From Skeletal Muscle Fibers In Vivo, Diabetes source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Similarly, the Hippo pathway has gained attention as an important pathway in mechanotransduction and skeletal physiology. Downstream YAP/TAZ regulation is in fact tightly involved in mechanosensing and mechanotransduction both in bone and muscle as well as in many other cells, especially endothelial cells (see Section 3.3).”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.2. Common Effectors of Muscle and Bone Interaction Modulate Tissue Formation and Remodeling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [55] Dasgupta, 2019, Control of cellular responses to mechanical cues through YAP/TAZ regulation, J. Boil. Chem. source
- Not checked yetcites [115] Meng, 2018, RAP2 mediates mechanoresponses of the Hippo pathway, Nat. source
- Not checked yetcites [116] Xiang, 2018, The versatile hippo pathway in oral-maxillofacial development and bone remodeling, Dev. Boil. source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In conclusion, there is convincing evidence that during development, the interaction between physics and biology is boosted by EMT and the acquisition of migratory capacity, and every step of interaction causes and supports biological consequences in terms of lineage commitment and maturation.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.1. Role of Common Musculoskeletal Precursor’s Mechanotransduction during Development
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Irisin, a cleaved product of fibronectin type III domain containing (FNDC5) with stimulating effects on bone formation, is also delivered from muscle into the circulation after exercise but may have a dual mode of delivery, shedding of preformed polypeptides and de novo synthesis [81].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.2. Systemic Mutual Interactions of Skeletal Muscle and Bone
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [81] Li, 2019, Muscle-bone crosstalk and potential therapies for sarco-osteoporosis, J. Cell. Biochem. source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Above all, the PTH1R signaling cascade is especially sensitive to mechanical loading. Anabolic PTH1R signals elicited through bone anabolic treatment using intermittent 1-34 PTH (teriparatide) are almost ineffective under conditions of unloading [113].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.2. Common Effectors of Muscle and Bone Interaction Modulate Tissue Formation and Remodeling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [113] Tu, 2016, Control of Bone Anabolism in Response to Mechanical Loading and PTH by Distinct Mechanisms Downstream of the PTH Receptor, J. Bone Miner. Res.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“TSP-4 is expressed in muscle and bone, has different functions compared to TSP-1 (antiangiogenic), and recently has been assigned to angiogenesis and matrix remodeling [94].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.2. Systemic Mutual Interactions of Skeletal Muscle and Bone
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [94] Stenina-Adognravi, O., and Plow, E.F. (2019). Thrombospondin-4 in tissue remodeling. Matrix Boil., 300–313. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Joint structures as important features of the musculoskeletal functional unit develop under the influence of respective core signaling cascades of osteogenic, chondrogenic, and ligamentogenic pathways. This process is fundamentally influenced by mechanical forces already in utero, directed by movement of the fetus [45,101].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.1. Role of Common Musculoskeletal Precursor’s Mechanotransduction during Development
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These data demonstrate that there are genes whose expression is relevant for tissue formation in both bone and muscle, and others cause antagonistic effects in the brother tissues.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Notch signaling has also been reported to be involved in skeletal physiology. We and others recently reported that this pathway is mechanosensitive in skeletal precursors [58,114].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.2. Common Effectors of Muscle and Bone Interaction Modulate Tissue Formation and Remodeling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [58] Ziouti, F., Ebert, R., Rummler, M., Krug, M., Müller-Deubert, S., Lüdemann, M., Jakob, F., Willie, B.M., and Jundt, F. (2019). NOTCH Signaling Is Activated through Mechanical Strain in Human Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells. Stem Cells Int., 2019. source
- Not checked yetcites [114] Canalis, 2018, Notch in skeletal physiology and disease, Osteoporos. Int. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Interestingly, the early genes such as proinflammatory cytokines IL-1b, IL-6, IL-8, the toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) ligands serum amyloid A1 (SAA1) and SAA2, CYR61/CCN1, connective tissue growth factor (CTGF/CCN2), angiopoietin-like 4 (ANGPTL4) and ANGPTL2 very closely resemble genes that are also relevant in the initial phase of osteogenic differentiation and contribute to angiogenesis in fract”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.2. Systemic Mutual Interactions of Skeletal Muscle and Bone
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [91] Ebert, 2015, Acute phase serum amyloid A induces proinflammatory cytokines and mineralization via toll-like receptor 4 in mesenchymal stem cells, Stem Cell Res. source
- Not checked yetcites [92] Loi, 2016, Inflammation, fracture and bone repair, Bone source
- Not checked yetcites [93] Sass, F.A., Fuchs, M., Pumberger, M., Geissler, S., Duda, G.N., Perka, C., and Schmidt-Bleek, K. (2018). Immunology Guides Skeletal Muscle Regeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 19. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The lists of muscle-related transcripts and secreted proteins comprised 149 proteins of unassigned functions as putative interactors with other tissues and 123 transcripts that corresponded to putative myokines including BMPs, chemokines, cytokines, growth/differentiation factors (GDFs), and members of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family of secreted proteins and ligands for Wnt signaling (Suppl”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 2. Principles of Interaction between Muscle and Bone > 2.2. Systemic Mutual Interactions of Skeletal Muscle and Bone
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [90] Zhang, 2018, Transcriptional profiling reveals extraordinary diversity among skeletal muscle tissues, eLife source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Bone formation and bone resorption are both part of the adaptive refinement and remodeling processes, which are mechanically guided and where both osteoblasts and osteoclasts respond to physical forces [117,118].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.2. Common Effectors of Muscle and Bone Interaction Modulate Tissue Formation and Remodeling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [117] Amarasekara, D.S., Yun, H., Kim, S., Lee, N., Kim, H., and Rho, J. (2018). Regulation of Osteoclast Differentiation by Cytokine Networks. Immune Netw., 18. source
- Not checked yetcites [118] Ma, 2019, The role of physical forces in osteoclastogenesis, J. Cell. Physiol. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, there are some other populations that substantially contribute to regeneration such as the Sca1+/CD34+ fibro-adipogenic progenitors (FAPs) residing in the muscle interstitium. Following injury, satellite cells re-enter the cell cycle and proliferate to give rise to myoblasts that differentiate and fuse to restore the damaged fiber or generate myofibers de novo, while FAPs support their”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.2. Common Effectors of Muscle and Bone Interaction Modulate Tissue Formation and Remodeling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [131] Baghdadi, 2018, Regulation and phylogeny of skeletal muscle regeneration, Dev. Boil. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Very much in analogy with bone and probably many other tissues, the initial phase of regeneration is governed by intrinsic inflammatory signals and is further induced by cells of the innate immune system, e.g. sequentially recruited neutrophils and resident macrophages. Cytokines already known from bone regeneration such as IL-1, 6, and 8 are involved in innate immune cell recruitment until the”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.2. Common Effectors of Muscle and Bone Interaction Modulate Tissue Formation and Remodeling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [132] Dort, J., Fabre, P., Molina, T., and Dumont, N.A. (2019). Macrophages Are Key Regulators of Stem Cells during Skeletal Muscle Regeneration and Diseases. Stem Cells Int., 2019. source
- Not checked yetcites [133] Mukund, 2019, Skeletal muscle: A review of molecular structure and function, in health and disease, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Boil. Med. source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Both Pax7-deficient and satellite cell-deficient mice fail to regenerate muscle [131].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.2. Common Effectors of Muscle and Bone Interaction Modulate Tissue Formation and Remodeling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [131] Baghdadi, 2018, Regulation and phylogeny of skeletal muscle regeneration, Dev. Boil. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Not only is this condition in common for regenerating tissues in the early phase, but it also somehow mimics the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) of presenescent and senescent cells. It appears to be beneficial if intermittent, but it causes pathology if chronically active.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.2. Common Effectors of Muscle and Bone Interaction Modulate Tissue Formation and Remodeling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [109] Czarkwiani, 2018, Out with the old, in with the new: senescence in development, Curr. Opin. Cell Boil. source
- Not checked yetcites [125] Farr, 2019, Cellular senescence in bone, Bone source
- Not checked yetcites [126] He, 2017, Senescence in Health and Disease, Cell source
- Not checked yetcites [127] Rhinn, 2019, Cellular senescence in development, regeneration and disease, Dev. source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Satellite stem cell development in addition to Pax3 expression is largely dependent on the expression of Pax7 in the pre- and perinatal periods and modulated by mechanical strain [32].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.2. Common Effectors of Muscle and Bone Interaction Modulate Tissue Formation and Remodeling
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32] Jin, 2019, Physicochemical Niche Conditions and Mechanosensing by Osteocytes and Myocytes, Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In case of bone, we and others have recently reported that there are no significant associations to epigenetic marks or aging associated DNA signatures in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in age-related osteoporosis, while others claim to see such associations, and the debate is ongoing [159,160,161].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.4. Epigenetic Changes Shape Individual Responses According to Lifestyle, Environment, and Aging
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [159] Riancho, 2018, Epigenetics of Skeletal Diseases, Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. source
- Not checked yetcites [160] Eipel, 2017, Primary Osteoporosis Is Not Reflected by Disease-Specific DNA Methylation or Accelerated Epigenetic Age in Blood, J. Bone Miner. Res.
- Not checked yetcites [161] Jakob, 2018, Response to Letter to the Editor: Epigenetic Aging in Osteoporosis, J. Bone Miner. Res. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In conclusion, there are basically two systems to mutually communicate between muscle and bone where physics and biochemistry meet. Physical forces exerted by physical load, muscle activity (contraction and relaxation), and fluid flow are translated into biochemical signals and the biology of cells and tissues. The primary biological response to physical cues changes the receiving biological”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.5. Conclusions–Two Systems of Mutual Communication between Muscle and Bone
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“muscle satellite cells attract and cross-talk with EC via vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) secretion, while the EC-derived Notch ligand Dll4 causes muscle stem cell quiescence and creates a vascular niche [151].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.3. Influence of Tissue Resident Cell Populations on Tissue Regeneration and Mechanoadaptation–A Focus on Immune Cell Interactions and Angiogenesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [151] Verma, 2018, Muscle Satellite Cell Cross-Talk with a Vascular Niche Maintains Quiescence via VEGF and Notch Signaling, Cell Stem Cell source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When focusing on muscle and bone, the most obvious mechanisms that trigger diseases in both compartments are unloading and chronic inflammation, which will be discussed in the following sections for translational perspectives.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 4. Muscle and Bone Interactions in Disease—Lessons and Backflashes from Pathology
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In addition, evidence showed that macrophage PPARƴ (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ) expression controls the delivery of growth differentiation factor-3 (GDF3) and is almost essential for muscle regeneration [139].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.3. Influence of Tissue Resident Cell Populations on Tissue Regeneration and Mechanoadaptation–A Focus on Immune Cell Interactions and Angiogenesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [139] Varga, 2016, Macrophage PPARγ, a Lipid Activated Transcription Factor Controls the Growth Factor GDF3 and Skeletal Muscle Regeneration, Immun. source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For bone, it has been demonstrated that endothelial specification strongly contributes to microarchitectural structures—for example, cortical versus trabecular bone. Moreover, there is again an important contribution of Notch signaling since the process of endothelium specification and its mutual interaction with osteogenesis is Notch dependent [146,147,148,149,150].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.3. Influence of Tissue Resident Cell Populations on Tissue Regeneration and Mechanoadaptation–A Focus on Immune Cell Interactions and Angiogenesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [146] Chen, 2016, Endothelial cells are progenitors of cardiac pericytes and vascular smooth muscle cells, Nat. Commun. source
- Not checked yetcites [147] Chopra, 2018, Insights into Endothelial Progenitor Cells: Origin, Classification, Potentials, and Prospects, Stem Cells Int. source
- Not checked yetcites [148] Kusumbe, 2014, Coupling of angiogenesis and osteogenesis by a specific vessel subtype in bone, Nat. source
- Not checked yetcites [149] Ramasamy, 2014, Endothelial Notch activity promotes angiogenesis and osteogenesis in bone, Nat. source
- Not checked yetcites [150] Sivaraj, 2016, Blood vessel formation and function in bone, Dev. source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“With respect to exercise as a countermeasure of bone and muscle loss, there is evidence that exercise is followed by epigenetic changes that besides modulating the accessibility of chromatin regions for adaptive signaling even determine the availability of metabolic intermediates for acetylation and methylation. Moreover, many of these epigenetic effects remain as signatures that may even have a”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.4. Epigenetic Changes Shape Individual Responses According to Lifestyle, Environment, and Aging
What the sources say
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“EC do strongly respond to mechanical cues, and one important target for their mechanoresponse is again the Notch pathway [152].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.3. Influence of Tissue Resident Cell Populations on Tissue Regeneration and Mechanoadaptation–A Focus on Immune Cell Interactions and Angiogenesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [152] Mack, 2018, NOTCH regulation of the endothelial cell phenotype, Curr. Opin. Hematol. source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“What appears to be quite obvious is that skeletal precursors obtained from the bone marrow of osteoporotic patients harbor an almost diagnostic signature of their transcriptome, while the putatively epigenetic hubs of regulation await further identification [162].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.4. Epigenetic Changes Shape Individual Responses According to Lifestyle, Environment, and Aging
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [162] Benisch, P., Schilling, T., Klein-Hitpass, L., Frey, S.P., Seefried, L., Raaijmakers, N., Krug, M., Regensburger, M., Zeck, S., and Schinke, T. (2012). The Transcriptional Profile of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Populations in Primary Osteoporosis Is Distinct and Shows Overexpression of Osteogenic Inhibitors. PLOS ONE, 7. source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A recently published meta-analysis including 75 µG simulation studies reported moderate changes on muscle parameters within 7–14 days of µG and large effects on muscle force, mass, and peak power after 35 days [166].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 4. Muscle and Bone Interactions in Disease—Lessons and Backflashes from Pathology > 4.1. Unloading–Lessons from Bed Rest Studies and Microgravity
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [166] Winnard, 2019, Effect of Time on Human Muscle Outcomes During Simulated Microgravity Exposure Without Countermeasures—Systematic Review, Front. Physiol. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Overall, tissue regeneration appears to be a teamwork that requires the interactions of several cell populations including tissue-specific precursors, immune cells, and endothelial precursors, whereby also the latter seem to be tissue specific, and this applies to both muscle and bone [153].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.3. Influence of Tissue Resident Cell Populations on Tissue Regeneration and Mechanoadaptation–A Focus on Immune Cell Interactions and Angiogenesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [153] Wosczyna, 2018, A Muscle Stem Cell Support Group: Coordinated Cellular Responses in Muscle Regeneration, Dev. Cell source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, very much in analogy to bone regeneration, also muscle regeneration starts with an inflammatory reaction that activates the myofiber-specific amplification and differentiation process and ends up in tissue remodeling according to mechanical challenge.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.2. Common Effectors of Muscle and Bone Interaction Modulate Tissue Formation and Remodeling
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Restorative macrophages even orchestrate the interaction between myogenic cells and endothelial precursors during muscle regeneration. Interestingly, the main signaling molecules involved were apelin (APLN), oncostatin M (OSM), and periostin (POSTN), which are also important for bone regeneration [138].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 3. Common Effector Mechanisms in Muscle and Bone from Development to Postnatal Regeneration > 3.3. Influence of Tissue Resident Cell Populations on Tissue Regeneration and Mechanoadaptation–A Focus on Immune Cell Interactions and Angiogenesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [138] Latroche, 2017, Coupling between Myogenesis and Angiogenesis during Skeletal Muscle Regeneration Is Stimulated by Restorative Macrophages, Stem Cell Rep. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“None of the modalities can actually measure muscle mass, but lean mass and muscle volume are used as surrogates.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 4. Muscle and Bone Interactions in Disease—Lessons and Backflashes from Pathology > 4.2. Inflammation and Fatty Degeneration—Lessons from Imaging and Structural Analyses
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Bioimpedance analysis systems estimate fat and fat-free mass from the electrical impedance measurements of trunk, arms, and legs using age, gender, and ethnic-specific algorithms validated in previous studies, albeit with large prediction errors for individuals [180].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 4. Muscle and Bone Interactions in Disease—Lessons and Backflashes from Pathology > 4.2. Inflammation and Fatty Degeneration—Lessons from Imaging and Structural Analyses
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [180] Kyle, 2004, Bioelectrical impedance analysis?part I: review of principles and methods, Clin. Nutr. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Inflammation and disuse also propagate muscle fatty infiltration and bone marrow adipose expansion, which even more contributes to inflammatory activity initiating a vicious cycle.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 4. Muscle and Bone Interactions in Disease—Lessons and Backflashes from Pathology > 4.2. Inflammation and Fatty Degeneration—Lessons from Imaging and Structural Analyses
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [91] Ebert, 2015, Acute phase serum amyloid A induces proinflammatory cytokines and mineralization via toll-like receptor 4 in mesenchymal stem cells, Stem Cell Res. source
- Not checked yetcites [107] Gilbert, 2019, The consequences of ageing, progeroid syndromes and cellular senescence on mechanotransduction and the nucleus, Exp. Cell Res. source
- Not checked yetcites [108] Serrano, 2014, Cellular senescence: from physiology to pathology, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Boil. source
- Not checked yetcites [109] Czarkwiani, 2018, Out with the old, in with the new: senescence in development, Curr. Opin. Cell Boil. source
- Not checked yetcites [177] Schell, 2011, Inflammatory phase of bone healing initiates the regenerative healing cascade, Cell Tissue Research
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“T1 images are used for the assessment of intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT), which is the ensemble of ‘white voxels’ within the fascia lata (FL) [181].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 4. Muscle and Bone Interactions in Disease—Lessons and Backflashes from Pathology > 4.2. Inflammation and Fatty Degeneration—Lessons from Imaging and Structural Analyses
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [181] Karampinos, 2011, Characterization of the regional distribution of skeletal muscle adipose tissue in type 2 diabetes using chemical shift-based water/fat separation, J. Magn. Reson. Imaging source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Neither DXA nor BIA can provide three-dimensional (3D) measurements.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 4. Muscle and Bone Interactions in Disease—Lessons and Backflashes from Pathology > 4.2. Inflammation and Fatty Degeneration—Lessons from Imaging and Structural Analyses
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As expected, the adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) that functions as a main signal transduction mechanism for muscle hypertrophy was identified [173].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 4. Muscle and Bone Interactions in Disease—Lessons and Backflashes from Pathology > 4.1. Unloading–Lessons from Bed Rest Studies and Microgravity
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [173] Vilchinskaya, N.A., Krivoi, I.I., and Shenkman, B.S. (2018). AMP-Activated Protein Kinase as a Key Trigger for the Disuse-Induced Skeletal Muscle Remodeling. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 19. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“The former provides a quantitative measurement of lean (but not of muscle) mass and of fat mass of the total body or a sub part of it (Table 2).”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 4. Muscle and Bone Interactions in Disease—Lessons and Backflashes from Pathology > 4.2. Inflammation and Fatty Degeneration—Lessons from Imaging and Structural Analyses
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [178] Buckinx, 2018, Pitfalls in the measurement of muscle mass: a need for a reference standard, J. Cachex- Sarcopenia Muscle source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“While inflammation is an essential part of the initial phase of tissue regeneration, the failure of timely resolution through anti-inflammatory cytokines is key for these roadblocks and it also drives aging and the manifestations of an inflammatory senescence-associated phenotype (SASP) [91,107,108,109,177].”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 4. Muscle and Bone Interactions in Disease—Lessons and Backflashes from Pathology > 4.2. Inflammation and Fatty Degeneration—Lessons from Imaging and Structural Analyses
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [91] Ebert, 2015, Acute phase serum amyloid A induces proinflammatory cytokines and mineralization via toll-like receptor 4 in mesenchymal stem cells, Stem Cell Res. source
- Not checked yetcites [107] Gilbert, 2019, The consequences of ageing, progeroid syndromes and cellular senescence on mechanotransduction and the nucleus, Exp. Cell Res. source
- Not checked yetcites [108] Serrano, 2014, Cellular senescence: from physiology to pathology, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Boil. source
- Not checked yetcites [109] Czarkwiani, 2018, Out with the old, in with the new: senescence in development, Curr. Opin. Cell Boil. source
- Not checked yetcites [177] Schell, 2011, Inflammatory phase of bone healing initiates the regenerative healing cascade, Cell Tissue Research
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In analogy to Dixon imaging, with CT, a muscle density measured in Hounsfield units (HU) (0 HU for water and–1000 HU for air) can be quantified.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 4. Muscle and Bone Interactions in Disease—Lessons and Backflashes from Pathology > 4.2. Inflammation and Fatty Degeneration—Lessons from Imaging and Structural Analyses
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The value of muscle tissue (about 50–60 HU) is lowered by the infiltration of lipids.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 4. Muscle and Bone Interactions in Disease—Lessons and Backflashes from Pathology > 4.2. Inflammation and Fatty Degeneration—Lessons from Imaging and Structural Analyses
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In clinical routine, the preferred method is semi-quantitative assessment of muscle and adipose tissue area or volume from T1 weighted MR images, which show very good contrast between these two tissues (see Figure 3 top left and top right showing T1 weighted images from a young healthy normal male and from an elderly male with sarcopenia).”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 4. Muscle and Bone Interactions in Disease—Lessons and Backflashes from Pathology > 4.2. Inflammation and Fatty Degeneration—Lessons from Imaging and Structural Analyses
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It impairs mechanotransduction and triggers the production of inhibitors of regeneration in both compartments, namely myostatin, activin, SOST, and DKK-1 under various clinical conditions.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 4. Muscle and Bone Interactions in Disease—Lessons and Backflashes from Pathology > 4.2. Inflammation and Fatty Degeneration—Lessons from Imaging and Structural Analyses
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [91] Ebert, 2015, Acute phase serum amyloid A induces proinflammatory cytokines and mineralization via toll-like receptor 4 in mesenchymal stem cells, Stem Cell Res. source
- Not checked yetcites [107] Gilbert, 2019, The consequences of ageing, progeroid syndromes and cellular senescence on mechanotransduction and the nucleus, Exp. Cell Res. source
- Not checked yetcites [108] Serrano, 2014, Cellular senescence: from physiology to pathology, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Boil. source
- Not checked yetcites [109] Czarkwiani, 2018, Out with the old, in with the new: senescence in development, Curr. Opin. Cell Boil. source
- Not checked yetcites [177] Schell, 2011, Inflammatory phase of bone healing initiates the regenerative healing cascade, Cell Tissue Research
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Chronic inflammation can be both a cause and consequence of disuse and atrophy in muscle and bone.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 4. Muscle and Bone Interactions in Disease—Lessons and Backflashes from Pathology > 4.2. Inflammation and Fatty Degeneration—Lessons from Imaging and Structural Analyses
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [91] Ebert, 2015, Acute phase serum amyloid A induces proinflammatory cytokines and mineralization via toll-like receptor 4 in mesenchymal stem cells, Stem Cell Res. source
- Not checked yetcites [107] Gilbert, 2019, The consequences of ageing, progeroid syndromes and cellular senescence on mechanotransduction and the nucleus, Exp. Cell Res. source
- Not checked yetcites [108] Serrano, 2014, Cellular senescence: from physiology to pathology, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Boil. source
- Not checked yetcites [109] Czarkwiani, 2018, Out with the old, in with the new: senescence in development, Curr. Opin. Cell Boil. source
- Not checked yetcites [177] Schell, 2011, Inflammatory phase of bone healing initiates the regenerative healing cascade, Cell Tissue Research
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Both tissues sense mechanical strain, transduce biochemical signals in response, and mutually influence the respective tissue architecture to balance muscle power and fracture resistance.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 5. Conclusions and Perspectives
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Epigenetics is strongly involved in aging phenomena, and recent research indicates that both positive exercise and training effects and also exercise resistance and degeneration can be modulated by epigenetic mechanisms.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 5. Conclusions and Perspectives
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Continuous adaptive remodeling appears to be the key to delay aging-associated degeneration; hence, exercise and locomotion in concerted interaction between muscle and bone are core phenomena of health maintenance in higher organisms.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 5. Conclusions and Perspectives
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Interestingly, the combination of soft tissue parameters discriminated hip fractures as well as a combination of trabecular BMD and cortical thickness, documenting a strong interaction between muscle and bone structure using fatty infiltration and other soft tissue architectural parameters as surrogate parameters.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 4. Muscle and Bone Interactions in Disease—Lessons and Backflashes from Pathology > 4.2. Inflammation and Fatty Degeneration—Lessons from Imaging and Structural Analyses
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Physical strain is transformed into a multitude of biochemical signals that causes modeling or remodeling until a new state of homeostasis is reached as long as the physical input remains in a steady state.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 5. Conclusions and Perspectives
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is physical strain that strongly modulates the biology of cells along their lineage commitment and maturation as well as the hypertrophy versus atrophy of tissues according to physical challenge.”
§ Interactions between Muscle and Bone—Where Physics Meets Biology > 5. Conclusions and Perspectives
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Muscle and bone are derived from common precursors during development.
“Muscle and bone are derived from common precursors during development, indicating a close relationship and interaction.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are currently no guidelines by which imaging parameter(s) should be quantified to address a given muscle composition question.
“Currently, there are no guidelines by which imaging parameter(s) should be quantified to address a given muscle composition question.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Comparative studies on imaging parameters for muscle composition are still missing.
“Comparative studies are still missing.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A direct comparison of CT muscle density with MRI Dixon FF results has not been published.
“Interestingly, to the best of our knowledge, a direct comparison of CT muscle density with MRI Dixon FF results has not been published so far.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The borders to pathology, which stimulus hurts cells, and which one stimulates adaptive remodeling are not yet exactly known.
“We are beginning to understand the mechanisms of regulation, but we do not yet exactly know where the borders to pathology begin, which stimulus hurts cells, and which one stimulates adaptive remodeling.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The principal products secreted from bone that influence the formation, maintenance and regeneration of muscle are the osteocalcin, a marker protein of osteoblasts, and FGF23, a phosphatonin derived from osteocytes, as well as the inhibitors of the osteogenic wingless (Wnt) signaling pathway, sclerostin [136].”
From Exerkines and Sarcopenia: Unveiling the Mechanism Behind Exercise-Induced Mitochondrial Homeostasis (2025) · cites this paper as [136]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Terry et al. publication year conflicts with the reference list
MinorThe text says the work by both Le Bihan et al. and Terry et al. was published in 2012, but reference 90 lists the Terry et al. paper as published in 2018.
“Seminal work on the muscle cell secretory transcriptome and proteome was published in 2012 by Le Bihan et al. and Terry et al [89,90]”
“90. E Terry E. Zhang X. Hoffmann C. Hughes L.D. A Lewis S. Li J. Wallace M.J. A Riley L. Douglas C.M. A Gutierrez-Monreal M. Transcriptional profiling reveals extraordinary diversity among skeletal muscle tissues eLife 2018 7 e34613”
Citations
Cites
Shedding light on the cell biology of extracellular vesicles
van Niel, G., D'Angelo, G., & Raposo, G. (2018) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.125 · Cited by 8,369
Epidemiology of Sarcopenia among the Elderly in New Mexico
Baumgartner, R. N., Koehler, K. M., Gallagher, D., Romero, L., Heymsfield, S. B., Ross, R. R., Garry, P. J., & Lindeman, R. D. (1998) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009520 · Cited by 4,004
Bioelectrical impedance analysis?part I: review of principles and methods
KYLE, U. (2004) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2004.06.004 · Cited by 3,200 · cited 1×
“Bioimpedance analysis systems estimate fat and fat-free mass from the electrical impedance measurements of trunk, arms, and legs using age, gender, and ethnic-specific algorithms validated in previous studies, albeit with large prediction errors for individuals [180].”
MethodCellular senescence: from physiology to pathology
Muñoz-Espín, D., & Serrano, M. (2014) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3823 · Cited by 2,818
Muscle as an Endocrine Organ: Focus on Muscle-Derived Interleukin-6
Pedersen, B. K., & Febbraio, M. A. (2008) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.90100.2007 · Cited by 2,388
Molecular anatomy of a trafficking organelle
Takamori, S., Holt, M., Stenius, K., Lemke, E. A., Grønborg, M., Riedel, D., Urlaub, H., Schenck, S., Brügger, B., Ringler, P., et al. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.10.030 · Cited by 2,373
Coupling of angiogenesis and osteogenesis by a specific vessel subtype in bone
Kusumbe, A. P., Ramasamy, S. K., & Adams, R. H. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13145 · Cited by 2,155
WNT signaling in bone homeostasis and disease: From human mutations to treatments
Baron, R., & Kneissel, M. (2013) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3074 · Cited by 2,093
Fracture healing: mechanisms and interventions
Einhorn, T. A., & Gerstenfeld, L. C. (2014) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2014.164 · Cited by 1,902
Senescence in Health and Disease
He, S., & Sharpless, N. E. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.015 · Cited by 1,766
Flagged first, then by citations
12 of the 217 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Novel approaches to target the microenvironment of bone metastasis
Hofbauer, L. C., Bözec, A., Rauner, M., Jakob, F. J., Perner, S., & Pantel, K. (2021) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-021-00499-9 · Cited by 223
Self-citationMolecular mechanisms of exercise contributing to tissue regeneration
Chen, J., Zhou, R. J., Ye, F., & Cheng, L. (2022) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-022-01233-2 · Cited by 185
Xu, X., Liu, S., Liu, H., Ru, K., Jia, Y., Wu, Z., Liang, S., Khan, Z., Chen, Z., Qian, A., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22126429 · Cited by 119
KEMMLER, W. K., Kohl, M., Jakob, F. J., Engelke, K., & von Stengel, S. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12082341 · Cited by 88
Self-citationEngelke, K., Chaudry, O., Gast, L. V., Eldib, M., Wang, L., Larédo, J.-D., Schett, G. A., & Nagel, A. M. (2023) · Journal of Orthopaedic Translation · doi:10.1016/j.jot.2023.07.005 · Cited by 82
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Herrmann, M., Engelke, K., Ebert, R., Müller-Deubert, S., Rudert, M., Ziouti, F., Jundt, F., Felsenberg, D., & Jakob, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Würzburg (DE)
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
- Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (DE)
- Privatpraxis für Muskel- und Knochenkrankheiten, 12163 Berlin Germany
- Corresponding author
- Jakob, Franz
- ORCID
- Venue
- Biomolecules
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-03-10
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 432
- ISSN
- 2218-273X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7175139
- OpenAlex
- W3010713274
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 217
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 6
- FWCI
- 2.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Biomolecules (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Online Publication Service of Würzburg University (Würzburg University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- OPUS Repository (Kooperativer Bibliotheksverbund Berlin-Brandenburg) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (TRR 225, JU426/5-1, 326998133, 01EC1402C, D-361)
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (326998133-TRR 225, 01EC1402C, 326998133)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Spaceflight effects on biology
- Keywords
- muscle-bone interaction, mechanotransduction, osteokines, myokines, exosomes, extracellular matrix, muscle hypertrophy, bone formation, physical activity, microgravity, disuse, sarcopenia, osteoporosis, bone marrow adiposity, tissue stiffness
- MeSH terms
- Bone and Bones, Extracellular Matrix, Humans, Osteoporosis, Exercise, Muscle, Skeletal, Mechanotransduction, Cellular, Sarcopenia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review