Cited by 40Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

A Multi-Wavelength Opto-Electronic Patch Sensor to Effectively Detect Physiological Changes against Human Skin Types

Open access
Yan, Liangwen, Hu, Sijung, Alzahrani, Abdullah, Alharbi, Samah, Blanos, Panagiotis·2017·Biosensors

Abstract

Different skin pigments among various ethnic group people have an impact on spectrometric illumination on skin surface. To effectively capture photoplethysmographic (PPG) signals, a multi-wavelength opto-electronic patch sensor (OEPS) together with a schematic architecture of electronics were developed to overcome the drawback of present PPG sensor. To perform a better in vivo physiological measurement against skin pigments, optimal illuminations in OEPS, whose wavelength is compatible with a specific skin type, were optimized to capture a reliable physiological sign of heart rate (HR). A protocol was designed to investigate an impact of five skin types in compliance with Von Luschan’s chromatic scale. Thirty-three healthy male subjects between the ages of 18 and 41 were involved in the protocol implemented by means of the OEPS system. The results show that there is no significant difference (p: 0.09, F = 3.0) in five group tests with the skin types across various activities throughout a series of consistent measurements. The outcome of the present study demonstrates that the OEPS, with its multi-wavelength illumination characteristics, could open a path in multiple applications of different ethnic groups with cost-effective health monitoring.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/bios7020022

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inaccurate PPG heart rate measurements occur up to 15% more frequently in dark skin than in light skin.

    “previous research demonstrated that inaccurate PPG HR measurements occur up to 15% more frequently in dark skin as compared to light skin”

    From Investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors (2020) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Introduction says skin pigmentation can affect PPG signal quality and mentions anecdotal errors of 3–5% in black skin. It does not report that inaccurate PPG heart-rate measurements occur 15% more frequently in dark skin than in light skin. The Discussion reports no significant effect of skin type on heart-rate measurements with the sensor tested (p = 0.09). (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Darker skin contains more melanin, which absorbs more green light than lighter skin.

    “likely because darker skin contains more melanin which absorbs more green light than lighter skin.”

    From Investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors (2020) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) links darker skin with higher melanin levels and says melanin attenuates incident light. It does not establish that darker skin absorbs more green light than lighter skin; its green-light discussion concerns heart-rate detection, not a direct absorption comparison. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [12]Lim H.W. Soter N.A. Clinical Photomedicine CRC Press New York, NY, USA 1993

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yan, L., Hu, S., Alzahrani, A., Alharbi, S., & Blanos, P.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai University (CN)
  • Loughborough University (GB)
Corresponding author
Hu, Sijung
Venue
Biosensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2017-06-21
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
22
ISSN
2079-6374 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2675618241
Cited by
40
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biosensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
photoplethysmography, multi-wavelength illumination, skin pigmentation, skin type, heart rate monitoring, physiological signal detection, wearable sensors, health monitoring, ethnic groups
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Humans, Male, Pigments, Biological, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Skin, Skin Pigmentation, Biosensing Techniques, Photoplethysmography, Optics and Photonics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review