CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 278Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionImpact of Technology on AdolescentsStudent Stress and Coping

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cyberbullying and Psychological Well-being in Young Adolescence: The Potential Protective Mediation Effects of Social Support from Family, Friends, and Teachers

Open access
Hellfeldt, Karin, López-Romero, Laura, Andershed, Henrik·2019·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
DOI 10.3390/ijerph17010045PMC PMC6981789
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

In the current study, we tested the relations between cyberbullying roles and several psychological well-being outcomes, as well as the potential mediation effect of perceived social support from family, friends, and teachers in school. This was investigated in a cross-sectional sample of 1707 young adolescents (47.5% girls, aged 10-13 years, self-reporting via a web questionnaire) attending community and private schools in a mid-sized municipality in Sweden. We concluded from our results that the Cyberbully-victim group has the highest levels of depressive symptoms, and the lowest of subjective well-being and family support. We also observed higher levels of anxiety symptoms in both the Cyber-victims and the Cyberbully-victims. Moreover, we conclude that some types of social support seem protective in the way that it mediates the relationship between cyberbullying and psychological well-being. More specifically, perceived social support from family and from teachers reduce the probability of depressive and anxiety symptoms, and higher levels of social support from the family increase the probability of higher levels of subjective well-being among youths being a victim of cyberbullying (i.e., cyber-victim) and being both a perpetrator and a victim of cyber bullying (i.e., cyberbully-victim). Potential implications for prevention strategies are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph17010045

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Mediation model of cyberbullying roles on psychological well-being through perceived social support. Root-Mean-Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.03; Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.92; Standardize Root Square Residual (SRMR) = 0.04. The model shows the standardized estimates for direct effects, covariance between mediators and dependent variables, and controlled effects for age and gender (in grey). Only statistically significant relationships are shown in the figure. * p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01. *** p < 0.001.
Figure 1 Mediation model of cyberbullying roles on psychological well-being through perceived social support. Root-Mean-Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.03; Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.92; Standardize Root Square Residual (SRMR) = 0.04. The model shows the standardized estimates for direct effects, covariance between mediators and dependent variables, and controlled effects for age and gender (in grey). Only statistically significant relationships are shown in the figure. * p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01. *** p < 0.001.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 278

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hellfeldt, K., López-Romero, L., & Andershed, H.
Affiliations
  • Örebro University (SE)
  • Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Corresponding author
Hellfeldt, Karin
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-12-19
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
45
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3390/ijerph17010045
PMC
PMC6981789
OpenAlex
W2995484715
Cited by
278
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 10
FWCI
24.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repositorio institucional da Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (University of Santiago de Compostela) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Karlstads universitet
  • Xunta de Galicia
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
cyberbullying, psychological well-being, adolescents, social support, family support, teacher support, peer support, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, subjective well-being, mediation, cyberbullying prevention
MeSH terms
Educational Personnel, Cyberbullying, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Anxiety, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schools, Social Support, Sweden, Crime Victims, Friends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review