Cited by 305Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionWorkplace Violence and BullyingHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

Integrating Traditional Bullying and Cyberbullying: Challenges of Definition and Measurement in Adolescents – a Review

Open access
Thomas, Hannah J., Connor, Jason P., Scott, James G.·2015·Educational Psychology Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10648-014-9261-7

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cyberbullying occurs online, enabling victims to become bullies more easily due to the absence of physical disadvantage.

    “Unlike traditional bullying, which often involves physical disparities142, cyberbullying occurs online, enabling victims to become bullies more easily due to the absence of physical disadvantage143.”
  • In the cyber world, the potential for anonymity, including the ability to assume a new persona, means that physical, psychological, and social characteristics of perpetrators and victims are less relevant.

    “Power in the physical world is delineated by the physical, psychological, and social characteristics of perpetrators and victims but consistent with previous studies, findings suggest that in the cyber world the potential for anonymity, including the ability to assume a new persona, means that these characteristics are less relevant (Dooley et al., 2009;Langos, 2012;Thomas et al., 2015;Tokunaga, 2”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thomas, H. J., Connor, J. P., & Scott, J. G.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Thomas, Hannah J.
Venue
Educational Psychology Review
Published
2014-03-07
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
135-152
ISSN
  • 1040-726X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-336X
OpenAlex
W1986586078
Cited by
305
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 2
FWCI
25.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Educational Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • Own your potential (DEAKIN) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
traditional bullying, cyberbullying, definition of bullying, bullying measurement, adolescents, self-report questionnaire, bullying perpetration, bullying victimization, anonymity, power imbalance, intentionality, school-age adolescents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review