Cited by 22COVID-19 and Mental HealthPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Assessment of Acceptability and Initial Effectiveness of a Unified Protocol Prevention Program to Train Emotional Regulation Skills in Female Nursing Professionals during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Open access
Ferreres-Galán, Vanesa, Navarro-Haro, María Vicenta, Peris-Baquero, Óscar, Guillén-Marín, Silvia, de Luna-Hermoso, Jordi, Osma, Jorge·2022·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Healthcare professionals, especially women, have shown increases in anxious-depressive symptoms as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of a Unified Protocol (UP) prevention program to provide emotional regulation skills to cope with stressful situations. The sample consisted of 27 nursing professionals (100% women; mean age: 45.67; SD = 7.71) working in a Spanish public hospital during COVID-19, who were randomized to an immediate treatment group (ITG, n = 13) or to a delayed treatment group (DTG, n = 14, which served as the waiting list control group and received the program 5 weeks after the ITG had received it). The program consisted of five-weekly, two-hour, UP-based group sessions. Variables related to emotional symptomatology, emotional regulation, personality, burnout, and perceived quality of life were evaluated at the following time points: pre- and post-intervention and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups. Statistically significant between-group differences showed lower emotional exhaustion and personal accomplishment in favor of the ITG after the intervention. Regarding the effect over time for all participants who received the UP (n = 27), statistically significant reductions were observed in neuroticism, personal accomplishment, and subjective distress caused by traumatic events (−0.23 ≤ d ≤ −0.73). A statistically significant interaction “Time*Condition” was found in anxiety, with increases in the DTG. Participants showed high satisfaction with the UP. These findings show good acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of the UP to reduce the emotional impact of the pandemic in female nursing workers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph19095715

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Preliminary data show that the UP during the pandemic improved loneliness, anxiety, and emotion regulation.

    “Preliminary data on the efficacy of the UP during the pandemic is encouraging as it has demonstrated improvements in many difficulties, including loneliness, anxiety, and emotion regulation (Ferreres-Galán et al., 2022;Southward et al., 2022;Yan et al., 2022).”

    From RESILIENCE, COPING, AND THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ACROSS THE GLOBE – AN UPDATE: WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED? (2023) · cites this paper as Ferreres-Galán et al., 2022

    The Discussion reports reductions in anxiety in the immediate-treatment group, supporting that part of the preliminary claim. It also says there were no significant between-group improvements in emotion regulation and that apparent gains were not maintained long-term. The paper does not report a loneliness outcome (searched: loneliness). Section labels are available in our copy, but page numbers are not. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [40]Maslach C. Jackson S.E. Leiter M.P. MBI: Maslach Burnout Inventory Consulting Psychologists Press Palo Alto, CA, USA 1996 0810832313
  2. [50]Carvajal A. Centeno C. Watson R. Martínez M. Rubiales A.S. How is an instrument for measuring health to be validated? An. Sist. Sanit. Navar. 2011 34 63 72 21532647

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferreres-Galán, V., Navarro-Haro, M. V., Peris-Baquero, Ó., Guillén-Marín, S., de Luna-Hermoso, J., & Osma, J.
Affiliations
  • Mental Health Unit of the Hospital Comarcal of Vinaròs, 12500 Vinaròs, Spain
  • Health Research Institute of Aragón, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
  • Universidad de Zaragoza (ES)
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-05-07
Volume
19
Issue
9
Pages
5715
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4229334246
Cited by
21
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1
FWCI
4.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Zaguan (University of Zaragoza Repository) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Gobierno de Aragón (Departamento de Innovación, Investigación y Universidad) (S31_20D)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
Unified Protocol, emotion regulation, prevention programs, female nurses, COVID-19 pandemic, burnout, emotional exhaustion, personal accomplishment, anxiety, neuroticism, quality of life, program acceptability, group intervention, occupational stress
MeSH terms
Emotional Regulation, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Quality of Life, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review