The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Future Prospects for Scaffolding Methods and Biomaterials in Skin Tissue Engineering: A Review
Open accessAbstract
Over centuries, the field of regenerative skin tissue engineering has had several advancements to facilitate faster wound healing and thereby restoration of skin. Skin tissue regeneration is mainly based on the use of suitable scaffold matrices. There are several scaffold types, such as porous, fibrous, microsphere, hydrogel, composite and acellular, etc., with discrete advantages and disadvantages. These scaffolds are either made up of highly biocompatible natural biomaterials, such as collagen, chitosan, etc., or synthetic materials, such as polycaprolactone (PCL), and poly-ethylene-glycol (PEG), etc. Composite scaffolds, which are a combination of natural or synthetic biomaterials, are highly biocompatible with improved tensile strength for effective skin tissue regeneration. Appropriate knowledge of the properties, advantages and disadvantages of various biomaterials and scaffolds will accelerate the production of suitable scaffolds for skin tissue regeneration applications. At the same time, emphasis on some of the leading challenges in the field of skin tissue engineering, such as cell interaction with scaffolds, faster cellular proliferation/differentiation, and vascularization of engineered tissues, is inevitable. In this review, we discuss various types of scaffolding approaches and biomaterials used in the field of skin tissue engineering and more importantly their future prospects in skin tissue regeneration efforts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Altman, G. H., Diaz, F., Jakuba, C., Calabro, T., Horan, R. L., Chen, J., Lu, H., Richmond, J., & Kaplan, D. L. (2003) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00353-8 · Cited by 3,458
Designing materials for biology and medicine
Langer, R., & Tirrell, D. A. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02388 · Cited by 3,198
Decellularization of tissues and organs
Gilbert, T. W., Sellaro, T. L., & Badylak, S. F. (2006) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.014 · Cited by 2,222
Scaffolding in tissue engineering: general approaches and tissue-specific considerations
Chan, B. P., & Leong, K. W. (2008) · European Spine Journal · doi:10.1007/s00586-008-0745-3 · Cited by 1,708
Fiber-based tissue engineering: progress, challenges, and opportunities
Tamayol, A., Akbari, M., Annabi, N., Paul, A., Khademhosseini, A., & Juncker, D. (2013) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.11.007 · Cited by 458
Dermal Matrices and Bioengineered Skin Substitutes: A Critical Review of Current Options
Debels, H., Hamdi, M., Abberton, K., & Morrison, W. (2015) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open · doi:10.1097/gox.0000000000000219 · Cited by 227
Akbarzadeh, R., & Yousefi, A. (2014) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials · doi:10.1002/jbm.b.33101 · Cited by 208
Photochemical crosslinking improves the physicochemical properties of collagen scaffolds
Chan, B. P., & So, K. ‐. (2005) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.30469 · Cited by 96
Cited by
Recent advances on antimicrobial wound dressing: A review
Simões, D., Miguel, S. P., Ribeiro, M. P., Coutinho, P., Mendonça, A. G., & Correia, I. J. (2018) · European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.02.022 · Cited by 935
Bone biomaterials and interactions with stem cells
Gao, C., Peng, S., Feng, P., & Shuai, C. (2017) · Bone Research · doi:10.1038/boneres.2017.59 · Cited by 720
Nanocomposite scaffolds for accelerating chronic wound healing by enhancing angiogenesis
Nosrati, H., Aramideh Khouy, R., Nosrati, A., Khodaei, M., Banitalebi-Dehkordi, M., Ashrafi-Dehkordi, K., Sanami, S., & Alizadeh, Z. (2021) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12951-020-00755-7 · Cited by 720
Zhang, X., Chen, X., Hong, H., Hu, R., Liu, J., & Liu, C. (2022) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.09.014 · Cited by 680
Re-epithelialization of adult skin wounds: Cellular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies
Rousselle, P., Braye, F., & Dayan, G. (2019) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2018.06.019 · Cited by 640
Metadata
- Authors
- Chaudhari, A., Vig, K., Baganizi, D., Sahu, R., Dixit, S., Dennis, V., Singh, S., & Pillai, S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2016-11-25
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1974
- ISSN
- 1422-0067 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2551182232
- Cited by
- 604
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 43.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Future Prospects for Scaffolding Methods and Biomaterials in Skin Tissue Engineering: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/ijms17121974
- The paper
- Chaudhari, A., Vig, K., Baganizi, D., Sahu, R., Dixit, S., Dennis, V., Singh, S., & Pillai, S. (2016). Future Prospects for Scaffolding Methods and Biomaterials in Skin Tissue Engineering: A Review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17121974
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
