The DOI matches its Crossref record; 107 of the 111 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Power to the Teachers: An Exploratory Review on Artificial Intelligence in Education
Open accessAbstract
This exploratory review attempted to gather evidence from the literature by shedding light on the emerging phenomenon of conceptualising the impact of artificial intelligence in education. The review utilised the PRISMA framework to review the analysis and synthesis process encompassing the search, screening, coding, and data analysis strategy of 141 items included in the corpus. Key findings extracted from the review incorporate a taxonomy of artificial intelligence applications with associated teaching and learning practice and a framework for helping teachers to develop and self-reflect on the skills and capabilities envisioned for employing artificial intelligence in education. Implications for ethical use and a set of propositions for enacting teaching and learning using artificial intelligence are demarcated. The findings of this review contribute to developing a better understanding of how artificial intelligence may enhance teachers’ roles as catalysts in designing, visualising, and orchestrating AI-enabled teaching and learning, and this will, in turn, help to proliferate AI-systems that render computational representations based on meaningful data-driven inferences of the pedagogy, domain, and learner models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Despite these anticipated benefits, the integration of AI into everyday teaching practice remains complex, uneven and highly context-dependent (Lameras & Arnab, 2021).”
From Teachers' Experiences with AI in K–12 Education: Opportunities and Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as Lameras & Arnab, 2021
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Such interpretations align with constructivist perspectives in which teachers position themselves as facilitators who guide learning rather than merely transmit knowledge (Lameras & Arnab, 2021;Vygotsky, 1978).”
From Teachers' Experiences with AI in K–12 Education: Opportunities and Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as Lameras & Arnab, 2021
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“From a theoretical perspective, the findings resonate strongly with constructivist and sociocultural approaches, which conceptualize learning as an interactive and mediated process shaped by tools, social interaction, and professional judgment (Lameras & Arnab, 2021;Vygotsky, 1978).”
From Teachers' Experiences with AI in K–12 Education: Opportunities and Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as Lameras & Arnab, 2021
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Taking into account the abundance of new technological means and tools (e.g., Spatiotis et al. [17]), such as automated artificial intelligence systems, digital educational games, and virtual reality worlds, an instructional design model-either new or old-contributes to scientific knowledge (e.g., Lameras and Arnab [18]; and Soto [12]).”
From A Comparative Study of the ADDIE Instructional Design Model in Distance Education (2022) · cites this paper as Lameras and Arnab [18]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905 · cited 1×
“Self-assessment is also perceived as a self-regulatory feature that encourages students to assess progress, level of effort, and their own ways of learning in relation to personal learning goals and expectations (e.g., Hattie and Timperley [105]).”
BackgroundZawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 · Cited by 7,242 · cited 2×
“However, only recently there was an assumption that AIED tools could serve different cognitive purposes and learning needs related to learning, teaching, and institutional functions (e.g., Zawacki-Richter [68]).”
BackgroundThe global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2 · Cited by 6,220 · cited 1×
“To assist on mitigating such convoluted ethical requirements, Jobin et al. [121] conducted a study that investigated what constitutes ethical AI surrounding principles and best practices.”
BackgroundWhat video games have to teach us about learning and literacy
Gee, J. P. (2003) · Computers in Entertainment · doi:10.1145/950566.950595 · Cited by 5,735
Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis
Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543065003245 · Cited by 3,334
Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2019) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004 · Cited by 3,140
A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games
Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004 · Cited by 2,890
Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.021 · Cited by 2,628
VanLEHN, K. (2011) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.611369 · Cited by 2,323
Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education
Popenici, S. A. D., & Kerr, S. (2017) · Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning · doi:10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8 · Cited by 2,019
(1996) · Cited by 1,549
Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework
Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Shum, S. B., Santos, O. C., Rodrigo, M. T., Cukurova, M., Bittencourt, I. I., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1 · Cited by 1,437
(2016) · Open Research Online (The Open University) · Cited by 1,410
Evolution and Revolution in Artificial Intelligence in Education
Roll, I., & Wylie, R. (2016) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-016-0110-3 · Cited by 1,229
Multimodality and Literacy in School Classrooms
Jewitt, C. (2008) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x07310586 · Cited by 1,068
Effectiveness of Intelligent Tutoring Systems: A Meta-Analytic Review
Kulik, J. A., & Fletcher, J. D. (2016) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654315581420 · Cited by 930
Artificial intelligence in education : challenges and opportunities for sustainable development
Pedró, F., Subosa, M., Rivas, A., & Valverde, P. (2019) · MINISTERIO DE EDUCACIÓN · Cited by 902
Intelligent tutoring systems and learning outcomes: A meta-analysis
Ma, W., Adesope, O. O., Nesbit, J. C., & Liu, Q. (2014) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0037123 · Cited by 840 · cited 1×
“Ma et al. [79] conducted a meta-analysis that compared the outcomes on ITSs that were assimilated by students for developing subject domain understandings to those from non-ITS learning environments.”
ResultLaurillard, D. (2002) · Taylor & Francis eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203304846 · Cited by 828
Chatbots for learning: A review of educational chatbots for the Facebook Messenger
Smutny, P., & Schreiberova, P. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103862 · Cited by 770
Designing educational technologies in the age of AI: A learning sciences‐driven approach
Luckin, R., & Cukurova, M. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12861 · Cited by 694
Social and Emotional Learning in Schools: From Programs to Strategies and commentaries
Jones, S. M., & Bouffard, S. M. (2012) · Child Policy Nexus · doi:10.1002/j.2379-3988.2012.tb00073.x · Cited by 601
From Practice Fields to Communities of Practice
Land, S., Jonassen, D. H., Jonassen, D., & Land, S. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410603203-8 · Cited by 586
Translating Principles into Practices of Digital Ethics: Five Risks of Being Unethical
Floridi, L. (2019) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-019-00354-x · Cited by 524 · cited 1×
“Floridi [120] asserted that the plethora of different AI frameworks that have been proposed over the years have created confusion and inconsistency among the AI community in terms of the complexity and intricacy of adhering to specific AI ethical situations and contexts.”
BackgroundEthical governance is essential to building trust in robotics and artificial intelligence systems
Winfield, A. F. T., & Jirotka, M. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2018.0085 · Cited by 493
A Global Framework of Reference on Digital Literacy Skills for Indicator 4.4.2
Law, N. W. Y., Woo, D., TORRE, J. D. L., & Wong, G. K. W. (2018) · Cited by 485
Rediscovering the use of chatbots in education: A systematic literature review
Pérez, J. Q., Daradoumis, T., & Puig, J. M. M. (2020) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.22326 · Cited by 483
Letting Artificial Intelligence in Education Out of the Box: Educational Cobots and Smart Classrooms
Timms, M. J. (2016) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-016-0095-y · Cited by 465
AutoTutor and affective autotutor
D’Mello, S. K., & Graesser, A. C. (2012) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/2395123.2395128 · Cited by 440
Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age
Mayes, T., & de Freitas, S. (2007) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203961681 · Cited by 438
Hybrid-augmented intelligence: collaboration and cognition
Zheng, N., Liu, Z., Ren, P., Ma, Y., Chen, S., Yu, S., Xue, J., Chen, B., & Wang, F. (2017) · Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering · doi:10.1631/fitee.1700053 · Cited by 421
A multilevel analysis of what matters in the training of pre-service teacher's ICT competencies
Tondeur, J., Aesaert, K., Prestridge, S., & Consuegra, E. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.002 · Cited by 396
Mapping pedagogy and tools for effective learning design
Conole, G., Dyke, M., Oliver, M., & Seale, J. (2004) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2003.12.018 · Cited by 363
How Effective are Pedagogical Agents for Learning? A Meta-Analytic Review
Schroeder, N. L., Adesope, O., & Gilbert, R. B. (2013) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/ec.49.1.a · Cited by 303
Defining digital literacy development: An examination of pre-service teachers’ beliefs
List, A. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.009 · Cited by 290
Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction
(2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315736419 · Cited by 289
Kim, J., Merrill, K., Xu, K., & Sellnow, D. D. (2020) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1801227 · Cited by 288
Instruction Based on Adaptive Learning Technologies
Aleven, V., Mclaughlin, E., Glenn, A., & Koedinger, K. (2016) · doi:10.4324/9781315736419.ch24 · Cited by 273
Exploring feedback and student characteristics relevant for personalizing feedback strategies
Narciss, S., Sosnovsky, S., Schnaubert, L., Andrès, E., Eichelmann, A., Goguadze, G., & Melis, E. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.011 · Cited by 260
Lui, A. T., & Lamb, G. W. (2018) · Information & Communications Technology Law · doi:10.1080/13600834.2018.1488659 · Cited by 259
Interactivity in online discussions and learning outcomes
Kent, C., Laslo, E., & Rafaeli, S. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.002 · Cited by 250
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2003) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471264385.wei0704 · Cited by 242
Student Learning Benefits of a Mixed-Reality Teacher Awareness Tool in AI-Enhanced Classrooms
Holstein, K., McLaren, B. M., & Aleven, V. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_12 · Cited by 235
Artificial Intelligence as an Effective Classroom Assistant
du Boulay, B. (2016) · IEEE Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/mis.2016.93 · Cited by 213 · cited 1×
“Drawing on du Boulay’s [77] four examples of AIED systems that are employed to help students to understand basic scientific concepts through problem-based situations, the assumption is made that such systems should go beyond focusing on knowledge outcomes by analysing inferences and relationships…”
BackgroundFrom Design to Implementation to Practice a Learning by Teaching System: Betty’s Brain
Biswas, G., Segedy, J. R., & Bunchongchit, K. (2015) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-015-0057-9 · Cited by 182
Baylari, A., & Montazer, G. A. (2009) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.080 · Cited by 182
Emotional AI and EdTech: serving the public good?
McStay, A. (2019) · Learning Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2020.1686016 · Cited by 173
Contemporary Perspectives in E-Learning Research
Dyke, M., Conole, G., Ravenscroft, A., & de Freitas, S. (2006) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203966266 · Cited by 171
Basu, S., Biswas, G., & Kinnebrew, J. S. (2017) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-017-9187-0 · Cited by 169
AI in Education needs interpretable machine learning: Lessons from Open Learner ModellingPreprint
Conati, C., Porayska‐Pomsta, K., & Mavrikis, M. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.00154 · Cited by 163
Towards an Agile Approach to Adapting Dynamic Collaboration Support to Student Needs
Adamson, D., Dyke, G., Jang, H., & Rosé, C. P. (2014) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-013-0012-6 · Cited by 156
Personalisation in educational technology: The absence of underlying pedagogies
Bartolomé, A., Castañeda, L., & Adell, J. (2018) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-018-0095-0 · Cited by 150
Using technology to develop teachers as designers of TEL: Evaluating the learning designer
Laurillard, D., Kennedy, E., Charlton, P., Wild, J., & Dimakopoulos, D. (2018) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12697 · Cited by 144
Practical ethics for building learning analytics
Kitto, K., & Knight, S. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12868 · Cited by 139
Niels Pinkwart, C. (2016) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-016-0099-7 · Cited by 138
The Evolution of Research on Digital Education
Dillenbourg, P. (2016) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-016-0106-z · Cited by 136
The NISPI framework: Analysing collaborative problem-solving from students' physical interactions
Cukurova, M., Luckin, R., Millán, E., & Mavrikis, M. (2017) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.007 · Cited by 130
Personalized curriculum sequencing utilizing modified item response theory for web-based instruction
Chen, C., LIU, C., & Chang, J. M. (2005) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2005.07.029 · Cited by 126
Gender-Specific Approaches to Developing Emotionally Intelligent Learning Companions
Burleson, W., & Picard, R. W. (2007) · IEEE Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/mis.2007.69 · Cited by 122
Intelligent assistance for teachers in collaborative e-learning environments
Casamayor, A., Amandi, A., & Campo, M. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.025 · Cited by 106
Affective learning: Improving engagement and enhancing learning with affect-aware feedback
Grawemeyer, B., Mavrikis, M., Holmes, W., Gutiérrez-Santos, S., Wiedmann, M., & Rummel, N. (2017) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-017-9188-z · Cited by 105 · cited 2×
“There is consensus that ELEs enable formative adaptive feedback as a means to scaffold students’ efforts to learn and consolidate knowledge from ill-defined tasks and open-ended activities (e.g., Grawemeyer et al. [66]; Holstein et al. [98]).”
BackgroundA Teachable Agent Game Engaging Primary School Children to Learn Arithmetic Concepts and Reasoning
Pareto, L. (2014) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-014-0018-8 · Cited by 104
Zhou, X., Van Brummelen, J., & Lin, P. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.10228 · Cited by 104
Design framework of adaptive intelligent tutoring systems
Erümit, A. K., & Çetin, İ. (2020) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10182-8 · Cited by 102
Walker, E., Rummel, N., & Koedinger, K. R. (2011) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-011-9111-2 · Cited by 99
Rienties, B., Simonsen, H. K., & Herodotou, C. (2020) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2020.00128 · Cited by 98
Sabourin, J. L., Shores, L. R., Mott, B., & Lester, J. C. (2013) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-013-0004-6 · Cited by 97
Enhancing learning outcomes through self-regulated learning support with an Open Learner Model
Long, Y., & Aleven, V. (2017) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-016-9186-6 · Cited by 95
Describing learning activities: Tools and resources to guide practice
Conole, G. C. (2007) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203961681-16 · Cited by 88
Ruan, S., Willis, A., Xu, Q., Davis, G. M., Jiang, L., Brunskill, E., & Landay, J. A. (2019) · Proceedings of the Sixth (2019) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale · doi:10.1145/3330430.3333643 · Cited by 81
Escape from the Skinner Box: The case for contemporary intelligent learning environments
du Boulay, B. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12860 · Cited by 80
Veletsianos, G., & Miller, C. (2008) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00797.x · Cited by 75
New Directions in Formative Feedback in Interactive Learning Environments
Goldin, I. M., Narciss, S., Foltz, P. W., & Bauer, M. I. (2017) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-016-0135-7 · Cited by 75
Jill Watson Doesn't Care if You're Pregnant
Eicher, B. L., Polepeddi, L., & Goel, A. K. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3278721.3278760 · Cited by 74
Mavrikis, M., Geraniou, E., Santos, S., & Poulovassilis, A. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12876 · Cited by 74
Enhancing Scientific Reasoning and Discussion with Conversational Agents
Dyke, G., Adamson, D., Howley, I. K., & Rosé, C. P. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2013.25 · Cited by 72
An Educational System for Learning Search Algorithms and Automatically Assessing Student Performance
Grivokostopoulou, F., Perikos, I., & Hatzilygeroudis, I. (2017) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-016-0116-x · Cited by 71
A comparative survey of Personalised Information Retrieval and Adaptive Hypermedia techniques
Steichen, B., Ashman, H., & Wade, V. (2012) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2011.12.004 · Cited by 70
Artificial Intelligence and Second Language Learning: An Efficient Approach to Error Remediation
Dodigovic, M. (2007) · Language Awareness · doi:10.2167/la416.0 · Cited by 68 · cited 1×
“…mind processes information and knowledge from a cognitive and socio-cultural perspective has been embraced by Zanetti et al. [14] and Dodigovic [15] referring to AI as an interdisciplinary area of knowledge and research, whose aim is to understand how the human mind works and then emulate this…”
BackgroundUsing Mobile Technology to Create Flexible Learning Contexts
Luckin, R., du Boulay, B., Smith, H., Underwood, J., Fitzpatrick, G., Holmberg, J., Kerawalla, L., Tunley, H., Brewster, D., & Pearce, D. (2005) · Journal of Interactive Media in Education · doi:10.5334/2005-22 · Cited by 67
Richards, D., & Dignum, V. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12863 · Cited by 63
Conati, C., & Kardan, S. (2013) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1609/aimag.v34i3.2483 · Cited by 62
From data to personal user models for life‐long, life‐wide learners
Kay, J., & Kummerfeld, B. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12878 · Cited by 61 · cited 1×
“Kay and Kammerfield [107] introduced a conceptual model for helping students with metacognitive processes of self-monitoring, reflection, and planning through designing learning data that provide students with control and meaning beyond data access and mechanistic predictions.”
BackgroundComputer Supported Collaborative Learning and Intelligent Tutoring Systems
Tchounikine, P., Rummel, N., & McLaren, B. M. (2010) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14363-2_22 · Cited by 60
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Conati, C., Heffernan, N. T., Mitrović, A., & Verdejo, F. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9 · Cited by 56
Chatbot and Conversational Analysis to Promote Collaborative Learning in Distance Education
Neto, A. J. M., & Fernandes, M. A. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) · doi:10.1109/icalt.2019.00102 · Cited by 55
Reinforcing Math Knowledge by Immersing Students in a Simulated Learning-By-Teaching Experience
Lenat, D. B., & Durlach, P. J. (2014) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-014-0016-x · Cited by 53
Teaching AI agents ethical values using reinforcement learning and policy orchestration
Noothigattu, R., Bouneffouf, D., Mattei, N., Chandra, R., Madan, P., Varshney, K. R., Campbell, M. S., Singh, M., & Rossi, F. (2019) · IBM Journal of Research and Development · doi:10.1147/jrd.2019.2940428 · Cited by 49
Thalmann, S. (2014) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.235 · Cited by 39
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Barana, A., Di, L., Fioravera, M., Marchisio, M., & Rabellino, S. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93846-2 · Cited by 39
Modeling and Analyzing Inquiry Strategies in Open-Ended Learning Environments
Käser, T., & Schwartz, D. L. (2020) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-020-00199-y · Cited by 38
Assessing the Effects of Open Models of Learning and Enjoyment in a Digital Learning Game
Hou, X., Nguyen, H. A., Richey, J. E., Harpstead, E., Hammer, J., & McLaren, B. M. (2021) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-021-00250-6 · Cited by 34
A “psychopathic” Artificial Intelligence: the possible risks of a deviating AI in Education
Zanetti, M., Iseppi, G., & Cassese, F. P. (2019) · Research on Education and Media · doi:10.2478/rem-2019-0013 · Cited by 32
Design and Redesign of a Multimodal Classroom Task – Implications for Teaching and Learning
Öman, A., & Hashemi, S. S. (2015) · Journal of Information Technology Education Research · doi:10.28945/2127 · Cited by 32
Investigating Collaboration as a Process with Theory-driven Learning Analytics
Kent, C., & Cukurova, M. (2020) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2020.71.5 · Cited by 31
Open Learner Models Working in Symbiosis With Self-Regulating Learners: A Research Agenda
Winne, P. H. (2020) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-020-00212-4 · Cited by 30
Studying the Effect of a Competitive Game Show in a Learning by Teaching Environment
Matsuda, N., Yarzebinski, E., Keiser, V., Raizada, R., Stylianides, G. J., & Koedinger, K. R. (2013) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-013-0009-1 · Cited by 25
An Architectural Design of ScratchThAI
Katchapakirin, K., & Anutariya, C. (2018) · doi:10.1145/3291280.3291787 · Cited by 22
An Automated Feedback System Based on Adaptive Testing: Extending the Model
Barker, T. (2010) · International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) · doi:10.3991/ijet.v5i2.1235 · Cited by 21
A separation of concerns for engineering intelligent support for exploratory learning environments
Gutiérrez-Santos, S., Mavrikis, M., & Magoulas, G. D. (2012) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 18
Potential risks of Artificial Intelligence in education
Zanetti, M., Rendina, S., Piceci, L., & Cassese, F. P. (2020) · Form re - Open Journal per la formazione in rete · doi:10.13128/form-8113 · Cited by 18
Towards the Development of a Digital Competency Framework for Digital Teaching and Learning
Lameras, P., & Moumoutzis, N. (2021) · IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) · doi:10.1109/educon46332.2021.9454027 · Cited by 16
Self-citationBaker, F. S. (2013) · Early Child Development and Care · doi:10.1080/03004430.2013.792254 · Cited by 15
Problematizing Helps! A Classroom Study of Computer-Based Guidance for Invention Activities
Chase, C. C., Connolly, H., Lamnina, M., & Aleven, V. A. W. M. M. (2019) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-019-00178-y · Cited by 14
Purpose and Level of Feedback in an Exploratory Learning Environment for Fractions
Holmes, W., Mavrikis, M., Hansen, A., & Grawemeyer, B. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_76 · Cited by 14
Principles for Teaching, Leading, and Participatory Learning with a New Participant: AI
Kowch, E. G., & Liu, J. (2018) · International Joint Conference on Information, Media and Engineering (IJCIME) · doi:10.1109/icime.2018.00075 · Cited by 9
Wiese, E. S., & Koedinger, K. R. (2017) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-016-0133-9 · Cited by 8
Experiences of Multimodal Teaching Through a Serious Game: Meanings, Practices and Discourses
Lameras, P., & Papageorgiou, V. (2020) · Cognition and exploratory learning in the digital age · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-48194-0_10 · Cited by 4
Self-citationAre Theories of Learning Necessary?
Skinner, B. F. (n.d.) · Cumulative record (enlarged ed.). · doi:10.1037/11324-005
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Seldon, A., and Abidoye, O. (2018). The Fourth Education Revolution: Will Artificial Intelligence Liberate or Infantilise Humanity, The University of Buckingham Press.
- Puentedura, R. (2013, January 29). SAMR: Moving from Enhancement to Transformation. Proceedings of the 2013 AIS ICT Management and Leadership Conference, Canberra, Australia.
- Cameron, R.M. (2019). A.I.—101: A Primer on Using Artifical Intelligence in Education, Exceedly Press.
- Piaget, J. (1970). Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child, Orion Press.
- Vygotsky, L.S., and Cole, M. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Harvard University Press.
- Ellis, R.A., and Goodyear, P. (2010). Students’ Experiences of e-Learning in Higher Education: The Ecology of Sustainable Innovation, Routledge.
- Beetham, H., and Sharpe, R. (2007). Designing for Practice: Practicing Design in the Social Sciences. Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age, Routledge. · DOI
- Chatterjee Singh, N., and Duraiappah, A.K. (2020). Rethinking Learning: A Review of Social and Emotional Learning Frameworks for Education Systems, UNESCO MGIEP.
- Mavrikis, M., Maciocia, A., and Lee, J. Towards Predictive Modelling of Student Affect from Web-Based Interactions. Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Building Technology Rich Learning Contexts That Work.
- Bosch, N., D’Mello, S.K., Baker, R.S., Ocumpaugh, J., Shute, V., Ventura, M., Wang, L., and Zhao, W. (2016, January 9–15). Detecting Student Emotions in Computer-Enabled Classrooms. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI’16, New York, NY, USA.
- Aiken, 2000, Ethical Guidelines for AI in Education: Starting a Conversation, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., 11, 163
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Examining Science Education in ChatGPT: An Exploratory Study of Generative Artificial Intelligence
Cooper, G. (2023) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y · Cited by 1,263
“It has even been described as the “Cinderella of the AI story”, alluding to its underdeveloped and often ignored status in education (Lameras & Arnab, 2021).”
BackgroundAI‐driven adaptive learning for sustainable educational transformation
Strielkowski, W., Grebennikova, V., Lisovskiy, A., Rakhimova, G., & Vasileva, T. (2025) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.3221 · Cited by 581
Data-Driven Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Comprehensive Review
Ahmad, K., Iqbal, W., Elhassan, A., Qadir, J., Benhaddou, D., Ayyash, M., & Al‐Fuqaha, A. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2023.3314610 · Cited by 466
Exploring Artificial Intelligence in Academic Essay: Higher Education Student's Perspective
Malik, A. R., Pratiwi, Y., Andajani, K., Numertayasa, I. W., Suharti, S., Darwis, A., & Marzuki (2023) · International Journal of Educational Research Open · doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100296 · Cited by 418
Leading teachers' perspective on teacher-AI collaboration in education
Kim, J. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12109-5 · Cited by 376
Metadata
- Authors
- Lameras, P., & Arnab, S.
- Affiliations
- Coventry University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Lameras, Petros
- Venue
- Information
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2021-12-29
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14
- ISSN
- 2078-2489 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4200613005
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 105
- Citations by year
- 2026: 55 · 2025: 95 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 17
- FWCI
- 31.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Information (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Pure (Coventry University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- British Academy (SRG1920 / 100529)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in education, teacher role, teacher reflection, ethical use of AI, student model
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
