Cited by 34Ionic liquids properties and applicationsAnalytical chemistry methods developmentPesticide Residue Analysis and Safety

Highly Efficient Extraction Procedures Based on Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents or Ionic Liquids for Determination of 20-Hydroxyecdysone in Spinach

Open access
Bajkacz, Sylwia, Rusin, Kornelia, Wolny, Anna, Adamek, Jakub, Erfurt, Karol, Chrobok, Anna·2020·Molecules

Abstract

A novel, efficient extraction procedure based on natural deep eutectic solvents (NADES) and ionic liquids (ILs) for determination of 20-hydroxyecdysone (20-E) in spinach has been developed. NADES, the first green extraction agent, with different hydrogen bond donors and acceptors are screened in order to determine extraction efficiencies. NADES consisting of lactic acid and levulinic acid at a molar ratio of 1:1 exhibits the highest yields. ILs, the second green extraction agent, with various cations and anions are also investigated, where [TEA] [OAc]·AcOH, χAcOH = 0.75 displays the highest recovery. Moreover, NADES-SLE and IL-SLE (SLE, solid-liquid extraction) parameters are investigated. Using the obtained optimized method, the recoveries of the target compound in spinach are above 93% and 88% for NADES-SLE and IL-SLE procedure, respectively. The methods display good linearity within the range of 0.5–30 μg/g and LODs of 0.17 µg/g. The proposed NADES-SLE-UHPLC-UV and IL-SLE-UHPLC-UV procedures can be applied to the analysis of 20-E in real spinach samples, making it a potentially promising technique for food matrix. The main advantage of this study is the superior efficiency of the new, green extraction solvents, which results in a significant reduction of extraction time and solvents as compared to those in the literature.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/molecules25204736

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The reported content of 20-hydroxyecdysone in spinach leaves ranges from 17.1 to 885 μg/g.

    “The reported content of 20HE in spinach leaves ranges from 17.1 to 885 µg/g [158,159].”

    From Ecdysterone and Turkesterone—Compounds with Prominent Potential in Sport and Healthy Nutrition (2024) · cites this paper as [158]

    The Conclusions report 20-hydroxyecdysone levels of 17.1–885 µg/g in real spinach samples. Section 2.6 says those samples included leaves, stalks, and seeds, but the available passage does not establish that both endpoints apply to leaves specifically. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Deep eutectic solvents and ionic liquids are a recently introduced method for extracting phytoecdysteroids, with high extraction yields and fast.

    “A further, recently introduced method for the extraction of phytoecdysteroids is the use of deep eutectic solvents and ionic liquids [114], which possess high extraction yields and are fast.”

    From Ecdysteroids (2021) · cites this paper as [114]

  • The content of 20E assayed in spinach was of the same order of magnitude as that given in the literature.

    “The content of the 20E assayed in spinach was of the same order of magnitude as that given in the literature (Bajkacz et al., 2020;Bakrim et al., 2008;Gorelick et al., 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bajkacz, S., Rusin, K., Wolny, A., Adamek, J., Erfurt, K., & Chrobok, A.
Affiliations
  • Silesian University of Technology (PL)
  • Biotechnology Center of Silesian University of Technology, Krzywoustego 8, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
Corresponding author
Bajkacz, Sylwia
Venue
Molecules
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-10-15
Volume
25
Issue
20
Pages
4736
ISSN
1420-3049 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3092796971
Cited by
34
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecules (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Ionic liquids properties and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
Keywords
20-hydroxyecdysone, spinach, natural deep eutectic solvents, ionic liquids, solid-liquid extraction, green solvents, lactic acid, levulinic acid, extraction optimization, food analysis, insecticide residues
MeSH terms
Biological Products, Ecdysterone, Hydrogen Bonding, Plant Extracts, Solvents, Water, Spinacia oleracea, Ionic Liquids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review