Cited by 12Phytochemical Studies and BioactivitiesFood and Agricultural SciencesPlant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties

Urinary Excretion of Ecdysterone and Its Metabolites Following Spinach Consumption

Open access
Yuliandra, Tasha, Touvleliou, Konstantina, de la Torre, Xavier, Botrè, Francesco, Loke, Steffen, Isenmann, Eduard, Valder, Sarah, Diel, Patrick +1 more·2023·Molecular Nutrition & Food Research

Abstract

Scope: The phytosteroid ecdysterone is present in spinach. In this study, the urinary elimination of ecdysterone and its metabolites in humans is investigated following spinach consumption of two different culinary preparations. Methods and results: Eight participants (four males, four females) ingested 950 (27.1) g sautéed spinach (average [±standard deviation (SD)]) and 912 (70.6) g spinach smoothie as second intervention after washout. Post‐administration urines are analyzed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC‐MS/MS). After intake of both preparations, ecdysterone and two metabolites, 14‐deoxy‐ecdysterone, and 14‐deoxy‐poststerone, are excreted in urine. The maximum concentration of ecdysterone is ranging from 0.09 to 0.41 µg mL−1 after sautéed spinach and 0.08–0.74 µg mL−1 after smoothie ingestion. The total excreted amount (mean% [±SD]) in the urine as a parent drug plus the metabolites is only 1.4 (1.0) for both sautéed spinach and smoothie. The apparent sex related differences in 14‐deoxy‐poststerone excretion will need further investigations. Conclusion: Only a small proportion of ecdysterone from spinach is excreted into urine. No significant differences are found in concentration and recovered amount (%) of ecdysterone, 14‐deoxy‐ecdysterone, and 14‐deoxy‐poststerone in urine between sautéed spinach and smoothie ingestion. A discrimination between ecdysterone from food or preparations will be challenging based on urinary concentrations only, at least for later post‐administration samples.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mnfr.202200518

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Administration of 50 mg pure 20-hydroxyecdysone resulted in approximately 50% recovery in urine.

    “administration of 50 mg of pure 20E resulted in approximately 50% recovery in urine”

    From How reliable is the labeling of a commercial phytosteroid product? A 12-week randomized double-blind training study (2025) · cites this paper as [41]

    Section 3.2 mentions administration of 50 mg of pure ecdysterone, but gives a urinary concentration rather than a recovery percentage. Section 3.3 reports 21.1% (SD 13.3%) urinary recovery for pure ecdysterone plus its metabolites, not approximately 50%. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Only 1-3% of 20-hydroxyecdysone and its metabolites are absorbed after consumption of large amounts of spinach and quinoa.

    “only 1–3% of 20E and its metabolites are absorbed.”

    From How reliable is the labeling of a commercial phytosteroid product? A 12-week randomized double-blind training study (2025) · cites this paper as [41]

    Section 3.3 (page not provided) reports that a mean of 1.4% of ingested ecdysterone was recovered in urine as ecdysterone and its metabolites after spinach consumption, and suggests absorption from spinach is poor. Urinary recovery is not a direct measurement of the percentage absorbed, and the study did not test quinoa. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • After ingestion of regular meals containing spinach, ecdysterone concentrations up to 700 ng/mL were detected in urine.

    “In two recent studies, it was demonstrated that after the ingestion of regular meals containing, for example, spinach, considerable concentrations (up to 700 ng/mL) of ECDY were detected in urine.12,13”

    From Investigations into the human metabolism of ecdysterone. (2023) · cites this paper as [13]

    Section 3.2 (p. 4) reports urinary ecdysterone concentrations up to 0.74 µg/mL (740 ng/mL) after a spinach smoothie, broadly supporting the stated concentration. But the Dosage Regimen describes portions averaging 912–950 g of spinach; the study does not establish that ordinary meals containing spinach produce those concentrations. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Urinary concentrations of ECDY found after ingestion of spinach and other ECDY-containing foods reached a maximum of 0.7 μg/mL and reflected significant interindividual variation.

    “For comparison, the urinary concentrations of ECDY found after the ingestion of spinach and other ECDY-containing foods also reached a maximum of 0.7 μg/mL and reflected significant interindividual variation in the reported urinary concentrations, too.12,13”

    From Investigations into the human metabolism of ecdysterone. (2023) · cites this paper as [13]

    Section 3.2 (p. 4) reports peak urinary ecdysterone concentrations of 0.09–0.41 µg/mL after sautéed spinach and 0.08–0.74 µg/mL after a spinach smoothie, consistent with an approximately 0.7 µg/mL maximum and variation among participants. The paper studies spinach preparations, not other ECDY-containing foods, so it does not support that part of the sentence. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Urinary concentrations of ECDY after ingestion of spinach or tea demonstrate significant overlap with those after administration.

    “Comparing this to the urinary concentrations found for ECDY after the ingestion of spinach or tea demonstrates a significant overlap.12,13”

    From Investigations into the human metabolism of ecdysterone. (2023) · cites this paper as [13]

    Section 3.2 reports urinary ECDY concentrations after spinach that overlap the reported range during multiple-dose ECDY supplement administration. The paper studies sautéed spinach and spinach smoothies, not tea; it also reports much higher peak concentrations after a single 50 mg dose of pure ECDY. Thus it supports overlap for spinach and multiple-dose administration, but not the full unqualified claim. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. M. Báthory, I. Tóth, K. Szendrei, J. Reisch, Phytochemistry 1982, 21, 236.
  2. R. J. Grebenok, P. V. Ripa, J. H. Adler, Lipids 1991, 26, 666.
  3. J. Gorelick, R. H. Iraqi, N. Bernstein, Plants (Basel) 2020, 9, 1.
  4. A. Bakrim, A. Maria, F. Sayah, R. Lafont, N. Takvorian, Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2008, 46, 844.
  5. R. J. Grebenok, J. H. Adler, Phytochemistry 1991, 30, 2905.
  6. R. J. Grebenok, J. H. Adler, Phytochemistry 1993, 33, 341.
  7. X. Fang, R. Szołtysik, J. Tang, S. Bajkacz, J. Food Compost. Anal. 2022, 110, 104580.
  8. D. M. Cheng, G. G. Yousef, M. A. Lila, HortScience 2010, 45, 1634.
  9. L. Dinan, T. Savchenko, P. Whiting, Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2001, 58, 1121.
  10. S. Bajkacz, K. Rusin, A. Wolny, J. Adamek, K. Erfurt, A. Chrobok, Molecules 2020, 25, 4736.
  11. K. Grucza, M. Wicka, A. Drapała, D. Kwiatkowska, Separations 2021, 9, 8.
  12. J. Gorelick-Feldman, D. Maclean, N. Ilic, A. Poulev, M. A. Lila, D. Cheng, I. Raskin, J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 3532.
  13. R. Lafont, L. Dinan, J. Insect Sci. 2003, 3, 1.
  14. A. Bajguz, I. B ąkała, M. Talarek, in: Studies in Natural Products Chem- istry (Ed: R. Atta ur), Elsevier 2015, p. 121.
  15. M. Bathori, N. Toth, A. Hunyadi, A. Marki, E. Zador, Curr. Med. Chem. 2008, 15, 75.
  16. L. Dinan, N. Z. Mamadalieva, R. Lafont, Handbook of Dietary Phyto- chemicals, Springer, Singapore 2019, p. 1.
  17. L. Dinan, Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2009, 72, 126.
  18. S. Pérez-Piñero, V. Ávila-Gandía, J. A. Rubio Arias, J. C. Muñoz- Carrillo, P. Losada-Zafrilla, F. J. López-Román, Nutrients 2021, 13, 4373.
  19. E. Isenmann, G. Ambrosio, J. F. Joseph, M. Mazzarino, X. De La Torre, P. Zimmer, R. Kazlauskas, C. Goebel, F. Botrè, P. Diel, M. K. Parr, Arch. Toxicol. 2019, 93, 1807.
  20. M. Parr, F. Botrè, A. Naß, J. Hengevoss, P. Diel, G. Wolber, Biol. Sport 2015, 32, 169.
  21. M. K. Parr, P. Zhao, O. Haupt, S. T. Ngueu, J. Hengevoss, K. H. Fritzemeier, M. Piechotta, N. Schlörer, P. Muhn, W. Ya Zheng, M. Y. Xie, P. Diel, Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2014, 58, 1861.
  22. A. Hunyadi, I. Herke, K. Lengyel, M. Báthori, Z. Kele, A. Simon, G. Tóth, K. Szendrei, Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 37322.
  23. S. Kumpun, J. P. Girault, L. Dinan, C. Blais, A. Maria, C. Dauphin- Villemant, B. Yingyongnarongkul, A. Suksamrarn, R. Lafont, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2011, 126, 1.
  24. M. Bathori, Mini Rev Med Chem 2002, 2, 285.
  25. G. Ambrosio, T. Yuliandra, B. Wuest, M. Mazzarino, X. De La Torre, F. Botrè, P. Diel, E. Isenmann, M. K. Parr, Metabolites 2021, 11, 366.
  26. M. K. Parr, G. Ambrosio, B. Wuest, M. Mazzarino, X. De La Torre, F. Sibilia, J. F. Joseph, P. Diel, F. Botrè, Forensic Toxicol. 2019, 38, 172.
  27. S. Kraiem, M. Y. Al-Jaber, H. Al-Mohammed, A. S. Al-Menhali, N. Al-Thani, M. Helaleh, W. Samsam, S. Touil, A. Beotra, C. Georgakopoulas, S. Bouabdallah, V. Mohamed-Ali, M. Al Maadheed, Drug Test Anal. 2021, 13, 1341.
  28. C. Tsitsimpikou, G. D. Tsamis, P. A. Siskos, M. H. E. Spyridaki, C. G. Georgakopoulos, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2001, 15, 1796.
  29. G. Ambrosio, T. Yuliandra, B. Wuest, M. Mazzarino, X. de la Torre, F. Botrè, P. Diel, E. Isenmann, M. K. Parr, Metabolites 2021, 11, 366.
  30. M. K. Parr, G. Ambrosio, B. Wuest, M. Mazzarino, X. De La Torre, F. Sibilia, J. F. Joseph, P. Diel, F. Botrè, Forensic Toxicol. 2020, 38, 172.
  31. M. Conlon, A. Bird, Nutrients 2014, 7, 17.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yuliandra, T., Touvleliou, K., de la Torre, X., Botrè, F., Loke, S., Isenmann, E., Valder, S., Diel, P., & Parr, M. K.
Affiliations
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
  • Laboratorio Antidoping FMSI Largo Giulio Onesti 1 Rome 00197 Italy
  • Federazione Medico Sportiva Italiana (IT)
  • German Sport University Cologne (DE)
Corresponding author
Parr, Maria Kristina
Venue
Molecular Nutrition & Food Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-05-24
Volume
67
Issue
14
Pages
e2200518-e2200518
ISSN
  • 1613-4125 (ISSN-L)
  • 1613-4133
OpenAlex
W4376105160
Cited by
12
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Nutrition & Food Research (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Universitätsbibliothek der FU Berlin Hochschulschriftenstelle u. Dokumentenserver
Funders
World Anti-Doping Agency (20C07MP)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Phytochemical Studies and Bioactivities
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties
Keywords
20-hydroxyecdysone, spinach, urinary excretion, phytosteroids, cooking, sex differences, dietary biomarkers
MeSH terms
Chromatography, Liquid, Ecdysterone, Female, Humans, Male, Spinacia oleracea, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review