Efficient Extraction and Sensitive HPLC-MS/MS Quantification of Selected Ecdysteroids in Plants
Open accessAbstract
Ecdysones, analogs of the insect molting hormone ecdysone, have been found in many plant species. Plants usually contain one or two dominant ecdysones, in addition to a few structurally related compounds in smaller amounts. The most well-known plant ecdysone is 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E). Phytoecdysones have long been recognized for their multiple potential health benefits in mammals including humans. There are thus high hopes that these compounds and the raw materials in which they dominate may be successfully used in phytotherapy. Species from the Chenopodiaceae family, e.g., spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.), show a high content of phytoecdysones. However, our knowledge of ecdysones in plants is limited as only 20E has been studied in-depth, whereas other important ecdysones have not been systematically examined. This study aimed to develop a new analytical approach for the simultaneous determination of four ecdysones (muristerone A, makisterone A, 20E, and ponasterone A) in plants using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). Several extraction processes were evaluated and optimized and the best performing method, involving solid-liquid extraction (SLE) (a mixture of methanol:ethanol:water (30:25:45; v/v/v)) and solid-phase extraction (SPE) (C18), was validated and used to analyze different plant samples (e.g., spinach, arugula, and lamb's lettuce). 20E (0.52–428 µg/g) was found in higher concentration than makisterone A (2.18–67.2 µg/g), while ponasterone A and muristerone A were not detected in any plant. The spinach samples contained the highest levels of these compounds. Moreover, the impact of culinary practices (cooking and freezing) on ecdysone stability was evaluated. In general, the compounds were stable during cooking (reductions < 10%). The freezing of samples affected the content of ecdysteroids in plants more negatively (reductions of 46% for 20E and 94% for MaA). The results demonstrated that the newly developed analytical method was effective, sensitive, and selective for the determination of the selected ecdysones (20E and makisterone A) in plants. Moreover, as far as we know, the content of makisterone A was reported for the first time in spinach.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
A new SLE-SPE followed by HPLC-MS/MS method was developed and validated for simultaneous determination of muristerone A, makisterone A, 20-hydroxyecdysone, and ponasterone A in plants. In the analyzed samples, 20E and MaA were detected, with spinach containing the highest levels, while MuA and PoA were not detected.
Key findings
- The validated method showed good linearity (R² > 0.9924), intra-day precision 0.87–5.41% RSD, inter-day precision 1.78–8.73% RSD, recovery 75.2–98.7% (SD ≤ 5.72%), and negligible matrix effects (1.36–6.47%).
- 20E ranged from 0.52 to 428 µg/g dry mass and MaA from 2.18 to 67.2 µg/g dry mass; MuA and PoA were not detected in any plant. Spinach samples contained the highest levels, with 20E between 79.6 and 428 µg/g and MaA up to 67.2 µg/g.
- Cooking affected 20E only slightly in two spinach samples (3–10% decrease; one sample increased 2%), but MaA decreased by 1.5%, 67%, and 82% across three groups. Freezing reduced 20E by 46% and MaA by 94%.
- The paper reports the first detection of MaA in spinach, as far as the authors know.
Methods
- Extraction was optimized using a simplex-centroid mixture design for solvent composition and a central composite design for mixing speed, extraction time, and solid/liquid ratio. The final SLE conditions were 200 mg plant sample, 15 mL methanol:ethanol:water (30:25:45, v/v/v), 2 h extraction, and 700 rpm mixing, followed by C18 SPE clean-up.
- HPLC-MS/MS used a Poroshell 120 SB-C18 column with 0.1% formic acid in water and acetonitrile, positive ESI, and scheduled MRM with two transitions per compound.
- Plant samples included spinach, arugula, lamb’s lettuce, curly kale, green lettuce, black kale, and mixed salad, purchased in Poland; fresh, cooked, and frozen spinach were also analyzed. Validation covered calibration linearity, LOD/LOQ, intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy, recovery, and matrix effect.
Limitations
- Stated: the authors note there is no literature information on MaA content in spinach or the other studied plants, and no literature on the effect of processing on ecdysteroid content in spinach; they also suggest small differences after cooking may be due to measurement error.
- Evident: MuA and PoA were not detected in any plant, so the study provides no plant-content or processing-stability data for those two analytes.
- Evident: the paper has no formal limitations section, and the plant sample set is limited to selected vegetables bought in local Polish markets and supermarkets.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 6 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Most of the selected solvents were capable of at least partially extracting ecdysteroids from plant samples.
“The results showed that most of the selected solvents were capable of at least partially extracting ecdysteroids from plant samples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All selected compounds produced stronger and more reproducible ions in positive ion mode.
“It was noted that all the selected compounds produced stronger and more reproducible ions in positive ion mode.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All responses, for both mixtures 1 and 2, increased with methanol proportion.
“All responses, for both mixtures 1 and 2, increased with methanol proportion; these results show that methanol is an adequate solvent to extract these compounds from plant samples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Analytical recoveries for C18, Oasis HLB, Bond Elut C18 LO, and Bond Elut PPL were within 97-107%.
“Analytical recoveries were within the following ranges: 99.0 -105% for C18, 97.0 -103% for Oasis HLB, 98.0 -103 for Bond Elut C18 LO, and 102 -107% for Bond Elut PPL.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The extract corresponding to the tertiary mixture presented a higher value than predicted by the model (93.2% for 20E, 84.0% for MaA).
“In regard to the multiresponse optimization (Fig. 4), it was verified that the extract corresponding to the tertiary mixture presented a higher value than the value predicted by the model (93.2% for 20E, 84.0% for MaA), indicating the efficiency of the mixture in extracting these phytocompounds.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingreasoning
Depending on the compounds, the effects indicated by the Pareto charts had a significant impact on the conversion efficiency.
“Based on these results, it can be stated that, depending on the compounds, the effects indicated by the charts had a significant impact on the conversion efficiency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Precision values were between 0.87% and 5.41% for intra-day and 1.78-8.73% for inter-day measurements.
“The precision values, expressed as the relative standard deviation of the measurements, were between 0.87% and 5.41% for intra-day and 1.78-8.73%for the inter-day measurements (Table 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
120 min was chosen as the optimum extraction time based on economics and ecdysteroid yield.
“From the point of view of economics, and also taking into consideration the yield of ecdysteroids, 120 min was chosen as the optimum extraction time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The compounds were stable during cooking, with reductions less than 10%.
“In general, the compounds were stable during cooking (reductions < 10%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For mixture 2, ethanol:water binary solvent system was more efficient in extraction of ecdysteroids than pure ethanol or pure water.
“In the case of mixture 2, the ethanol:water binary solvent system was more efficient in the extraction of ecdysteroids from plant material in comparison to either pure ethanol or pure water.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The Bond Elut AccuCAT column gave much worse recoveries (12-56%) than the other tested SPE cartridges.
“Much worse results were obtained with the Bond Elut AccuCAT column (12 -56%) (Fig. 8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The best chromatographic performance (sensitivity and resolution) for quantification was obtained with the Poroshell 120 SB-C18 column.
“The best chromatographic performance (in terms of both sensitivity and resolution) for the quantification of the analytes was obtained with the Poroshell 120 SB-C18 column.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ponasterone A and muristerone A were not detected in any plant.
“while ponasterone A and muristerone A were not detected in any plant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Extraction using the first four tested SPE cartridges (C18, Oasis HLB, Bond Elut C18 LO, and Bond Elut PPL) was very effective.
“Extraction using the first four columns was very effective.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The method exhibited high sensitivity, with LOQs ranging from 6.0 to 45 ng/g.
“The method proposed above exhibited high sensitivity, with the LOQs ranging from 6.0 to 45 ng/g.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Optimum chromatographic separation and maximum response of the four target analytes was observed with acetonitrile and water containing 0.1% formic acid as mobile phases.
“Optimum chromatographic separation and the maximum response of the four target analytes was observed with acetonitrile and water containing 0.1% formic acid as the mobile phases, the peaks and separation effects for each compound being better.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The solid-liquid ratio substantially influences the extraction yield.
“The solid-liquid ratio substantially influences the yield of /mL), and its effect on the response was studied, the results being shown in Fig. 6.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For mixture 1, methanol extract showed higher content of ecdysteroids than mixtures of methanol with acetone or ethyl acetate.
“For mixture 1, the methanol extract (assay 1) showed a higher content of ecdysteroids, whereas extracts obtained with a mixture of methanol with acetone or ethyl acetate showed a lower extraction efficiency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
As the solid-liquid ratio decreased from 1000:15 to 200:15 mg/mL, the extraction yield increased.
“As the solid-liquid ratio decreased from 1000:15-200:15 mg/mL, the extraction yield was found to increase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At a fixed time of 120 min, an increase in mixing speed had little effect on the yield.
“At a fixed time of 120 min, an increase in mixing speed had little effect on the yield, therefore for further study 700 rpm was selected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Comparing the two best extractants, the most effective for extraction of ecdysteroids was the methanol:ethanol:water (1:1:1) mixture.
“Comparing the two best extractants, we found that the most effective for the extraction of the ecdysteroids was the methanol:ethanol:water (1:1:1; v/v/v) mixture.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For all analytes, the matrix effect was negligible for the assay (ME = 1.36-6.47%).
“Moreover, for all analytes, the matrix effect was negligible for the assay (ME=1.36-6.47%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In Pareto charts, variables whose bars exceed the significance line exerted a statistically significant influence on the obtained results.
“In Pareto charts (Fig. 7), the bars (variables) that graphically exceed the significance line show that the associated variable exerted a statistically significant influence on the obtained results.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Spinach samples contained the highest levels of these compounds.
“The spinach samples contained the highest levels of these compounds.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The highest concentration of analytes was obtained using methanol:water binary solvent system.
“This conclusion was also obtained when methanol was used in place of ethanol, as the highest concentration of analytes was obtained using the methanol:water binary solvent system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
MuA and PoA were not detected in spinach samples.
“MuA and PoA were not detected in spinach samples, so they were not used during the SLE-SPE optimization procedure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Heating only resulted in a limited decrease of 20E.
“Interestingly, heating only resulted in a limited decrease of 20E.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The content of 20E and MaA in different samples of spinach was significantly different.
“The content of 20E and MaA in different samples of spinach was significantly different.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the three groups of samples studied, MaA content after heating decreased by 1.5%, 67%, and 82%, respectively.
“In the three groups of samples studied, the MaA content after heating decreased by 1.5%, 67%, and 82%, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Compared to 20E, MaA was more affected by heat damage.
“Compared to 20E, MaA was more affected by heat damage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Freezing was more damaging to ecdysone, with 20E and MaA decreasing by 46% and 94%, respectively, after freezing the spinach sample.
“Unexpectedly, freezing was more damaging to ecdysone, with 20E and MaA decreasing by 46% and 94%, respectively, after freezing the spinach sample.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The combination of HPLC with ESI-MS/MS allowed rapid quantification of the selected compounds in spinach, arugula, and lamb's lettuce.
“Secondly, the combination of HPLC with ESI-MS/MS allowed for the rapid quantification of the selected compounds in spinach, arugula, and lamb's lettuce.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The amount of 20E in spinach was relatively higher (79.6-428 μg/g) than in other plants (0.52-0.67 μg/g).
“The amount of 20E in the spinach was relatively higher (ranging between 79.6 and 428 µg/g) than in other plants (ranging between 0.52 and 0.67 µg/g).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
A method based on SLE-SPE extraction combined with HPLC-MS/MS analysis was developed for the determination of four ecdysteroids in plants.
“In this study, a method based on SLE-SPE extraction combined with HPLC-MS/MS analysis was developed for the determination of four ecdysteroids in plants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
MuA and PoA were not found in any of the plants studied.
“MuA and PoA were not found in any of the plants studied.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The validation parameters of the developed method were acceptable.
“These data confirmed that the validation parameters of the developed method were acceptable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
This result confirmed the best system of solvents for extraction of ecdysteroids from the leaves of plants.
“This result confirmed the best system of solvents for extraction of ecdysteroids from the leaves of plants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The content of MaA was reported for the first time in spinach.
“Moreover, as far as we know, the content of makisterone A was reported for the first time in spinach.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The average recovery values obtained during method validation were within the SANTEE Guideline acceptable range of 70-120%.
“Comparing these values to the SANTEE Guideline, the average recovery values obtained during the method validation were within the acceptable range (70-120%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Methanol is an adequate solvent to extract these compounds from plant samples.
“All responses, for both mixtures 1 and 2, increased with methanol proportion; these results show that methanol is an adequate solvent to extract these compounds from plant samples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The content of 20E assayed in spinach was of the same order of magnitude as that given in the literature.
“The content of the 20E assayed in spinach was of the same order of magnitude as that given in the literature (Bajkacz et al., 2020;Bakrim et al., 2008;Gorelick et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationown data
High sensitivity is especially valuable for the evaluation of MaA, which was present in the analyzed samples in small amounts.
“High sensitivity is especially valuable for the evaluation of MaA, which was present in the analyzed samples in small amounts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The reduction in ecdysteroids may be due to enzymes involved in 3-epimerization, such as ecdysone oxidase and 3-oxoecdysteroid 3a-reductase.
“The reduction may be due to, among others, enzymes involved in the 3-epimerization of ecdysteroids such as ecdysone oxidase and 3-oxoecdysteroid 3a-reductase (Webb et al., 1995).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Webb et al., 1995 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The most probable explanation for the decrease in ecdysone content is degradation during cooking or freezing.
“The most probable explanation for decrease of content of ecdysones could be degradation of these during the cooking or freezing procedure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Multi-response optimization using the desirability function was a useful approach for obtaining optimum SLE-SPE extraction conditions.
“Firstly, a multi-response optimization using the desirability function was shown to be a useful approach in obtaining optimum SLE-SPE extraction conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 29
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 2
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe C18 sorbent was selected for further research because it gave the best removal of interferents from the matrix and the lowest matrix effect.
“Finally, the C18 sorbent was selected for further research due to it giving the best removal of interferents from the matrix and also the lowest matrix effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor all four ecdysteroids, the R2 values of the calibration curves were higher than 0.9924, showing good linearity.
“For all four ecdysteroids, the R 2 values of the calibration curves were higher than 0.9924, which showed good linearity (Table 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFreezing of samples reduced 20E content by 46% and MaA content by 94%.
“The freezing of samples affected the content of ecdysteroids in plants more negatively (reductions of 46% for 20E and 94% for MaA).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataExtraction efficiency was good, with recoveries in the range 75.2-98.7% and SD ≤ 5.72%.
“The extraction efficiency of all the analytes was good, with acceptable and appropriate recoveries in the range of 75.2-98.7%with SD≤ 5.72% (Table 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataExtraction efficiency was higher after use of mixture 2 compared to mixture 1, by 46% for 20E and by 15% for MaA.
“The extraction efficiency was higher after the use of mixture 2 compared to mixture 1, by 46% for 20E and by 15% for MaA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPure ethyl acetate extracted no analytes, and acetone extracted only a small amount.
“The exceptions were pure ethyl acetate (no responses for all analytes, mixture 1, assay 6) and acetone (a small amount of extracted analytes, mixture 1, assay 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth intra- and inter-day measurements showed excellent concordance.
“Both intra-and inter-day measurements showed excellent concordance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe highest extraction efficiency and best removal of interferences was obtained using the C18 column (200 mg, 3 mL).
“The highest extraction efficiency and the best removal of interferences was obtained using the C18 column (200 mg, 3 mL), so this column was selected for the clean-up procedure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe ANOVA model for extraction yield had R2 and adjusted R2 of 0.9888 and 0.9721 for 20E and 0.9295 and 0.8239 for MaA.
“The ANOVA results of the model (Table S1) indicated a good performance with R 2 and R 2adjusted of 0.9888 and 0.9721 for 20E and 0.9295 and 0.8239 for MaA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningExtraction yield improved with an increase in time to 120 min, but a further increase to 240 min did not significantly augment the content of analytes in the extract.
“The extraction yields improved with an increase in time to 120 min, but a further increase to 240 min did not significantly augment the content of analytes in the extract.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data20E was found in higher concentration than makisterone A in plant samples, with 20E ranging from 0.52 to 428 μg/g and MaA from 2.18 to 67.2 μg/g.
“20E (0.52-428 µg/g) was found in higher concentration than makisterone A (2.18-67.2µg/g), while ponasterone A and muristerone A were not detected in any plant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAccuracy ranged from -5.78% to 4.89% for intra-day and from -8.14% to 6.39% for inter-day measurements.
“The accuracy ranged from -5.78-4.89%and from -8.14-6.39%for intraand inter-day measurements, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor mixture 1, best results were obtained for methanol as extraction solvent; for mixture 2, most effective was methanol:ethanol:water (1:1:1).
“In conclusion, for mixture 1 the best results were obtained for methanol as extraction solvent, but for mixture 2 the most effective for isolation of ecdysteroids from plants was the methanol:ethanol:water (1:1:1; v/v/v) mixture.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere was no significant difference in degree of separation between methanol-water and acetonitrile-water, but peaks were sharper and more symmetrical with acetonitrile-water mobile phase.
“There was no significant difference in the degree of separation, but the peaks was sharper and more symmetrical with the acetonitrile-water mobile phase, so this mixture was selected as the mobile phase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe method was linear in the concentration range 50-1000 ng/g for 20E and MaA, 200-1000 ng/g for MuA, and 100-1000 ng/g for PoA.
“The linearity of the method was established in the concentration range 50-1000 ng/g for 20E and MaA, 200-1000 ng/g for MuA, and 100-1000 ng/g for PoA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe best results were obtained with a simple, linear gradient with the first analyte eluting after 1.3 min and the last before 3.0 min.
“The best results were obtained with a simple, linear gradient with the first analyte eluting after 1.3 min and the last before 3.0 min (Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMaximum yields of ecdysones were obtained with ternary solvent mixture 2 (assay 4), followed by methanol:water (assay 3) and ethanol:water (assay 7).
“The maximum yields of ecdysones were obtained with ternary solvent mixture 2 (assay 4), which were followed by yields from the methanol:water (assay 3) and ethanol:water (assay 7) binary mixtures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFresh spinach contained the highest amount of ecdysones, 0.042% of dry mass, while the other studied plants contained below 0.008% of dry mass.
“According to our analysis, fresh spinach contained the highest amount of ecdysones, 0.042% of dry mass, while in the other studied plants, the content of ecdysones was below 0.008% of dry mass.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe content of ecdysone in the different plants studied was very variable, and the quantitative ecdysone profiles of the studied plants were significantly different.
“As shown in Table 5, the content of ecdysone in the different plants was very variable.”
- Also stated in: § 3.4. Analysis of plant extract samples · hedged
“As a summary of the analysis of studied plants, it may be conducted that their quantitative ecdysone profiles are significantly different.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 3.4. Analysis of plant extract samples · hedged
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe analyzed plant samples had 20E content ranging from 0.52 μg/g in arugula to 428 μg/g in spinach and MaA content ranging from 2.18 μg/g in spinach (leaves after cooking) to 67.2 μg/g in spinach (fresh leaves).
“The analyzed plant samples had an 20E and MaA content ranging from 0.52 µg/g in arugula to 428 µg/g in spinach and from 2.18 µg/g in spinach (leaves after cooking) to 67.2 µg/g in spinach (fresh leaves), respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe content of individual ecdysones depended on the plant type and the area of cultivation.
“Furthermore, our research on plant samples showed that the content of individual ecdysones depended on the plant type and the area of cultivation, which could be practically used in the verification of prohealth properties.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong three spinach samples, 20E content declined after cooking in two samples (3-10%) and increased in one sample (2%), with differences very slight and possibly due to measurement error.
“Among the three spinach samples, the content of 20E in two of them declined after cooking (3-10%), and one (spinach 3) increased instead (2%); however, the differences were very slight and may be due to measurement error.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMost methods available in the literature concern determination of 20E, and there are no accurate data on content of other ecdysones in plant tissues.
“Most of the methods available in the literature concern the determination of 20E, and there are no accurate data on the content of other ecdysones in plant tissues (Glazowska et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Glazowska et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenEach sample was analyzed in triplicate.
“Each sample was analyzed in triplicate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBecause the Bond Elut AccuCAT mixed-mode SCX/SAX sorbent is effective for acidic or basic compounds, ecdysone recoveries with it were relatively low.
“Such a mixture is effective for the extraction of acidic or basic compounds, so the recoveries of ecdysones were relatively low.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Mixed-mode SCX/SAX sorbents are effective for the extraction of acidic or basic compounds.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe adjusted R2 values of 0.97 and 0.82 imply that 97% and 82% of the variation in extraction yield is attributed to the selected independent variables.
“The model R 2 -adjusted values of 0.97 and 0.82 imply that 97% and 82% of the variations associated with extraction yield are attributed to the selected independent variables (extraction time, temperature, and solid/ liquid ratio).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBoth non-polar sorbents and sorbents with hydrophilic-hydrophobic properties are suitable for ecdysteroid extraction.
“Therefore, both non-polar sorbents and those with hydrophilic-hydrophobic properties are suitable for their extraction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Ecdysteroids are intermediate polar compounds with logP 2.01 for MaA and 1.98 for 20E.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe newly developed analytical method was effective, sensitive, and selective for determination of 20E and MaA in plants.
“The results demonstrated that the newly developed analytical method was effective, sensitive, and selective for the determination of the selected ecdysones (20E and makisterone A) in plants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Arugula used as a blank sample contained no ecdysones.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWith the advantages of time-efficiency and detection limits as low as 50 ng/g sample, the method shows promise for many other plants and large sample sets.
“With the advantages of time-efficiency and detection limits as low as 50 ng/g sample, this method shows promise for many other plants and large sample sets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationGrucza et al. (2022) reported lower 20E content in spinach (10 μg/100 g), but that amount was given for 100 g fresh spinach, not for dry mass as in this work.
“Grucza et al. (2022) reported lower content of 20E in spinach sample (10 µg/100 g), however the amount of 20E was given for 100 g of fresh spinach, not for dry mass, as in this work.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grucza et al. (2022) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningMetabolic reactions within the plants may also explain the ecdysteroid decrease due to the process.
“Metabolic reactions (e.g.attachment of hydroxyl groups, detachment of hydroxyl groups, oxidation, epimerization) within the plants may also explain the ecdysteroids decrease due to the process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Arugula used as a blank sample contained no ecdysones.
“The arugula was used as a blank sample because its leaves are similar to spinach, but contained no ecdysones.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The procedures described so far mainly used a non-selective spectrophotometric detector.
“Moreover, the procedures described so far mainly used a non-selective spectrophotometric detector.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The literature lacks information on the influence of processing (cooking or freezing) on the content of ecdysteroids in spinach samples.
“The literature also lacks information on the influence of processing (cooking or freezing) on the content of ecdysteroids in spinach samples.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Spinach contains high levels of phytoecdysones, particularly 20E.
“Species from the Chenopodiaceae family, e.g., spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.), show a high content of phytoecdysones.”
“Spinach is rich in 20-ecdysone (20E), which acts as an antifeedant against herbivorous insects and is a natural ecdysone that plays an important role in the normal physiological metabolism of arthropods.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Ecdysteroids are intermediate polar compounds with logP 2.01 for MaA and 1.98 for 20E.
“Based on the logP values, ecdysteroids can be considered as intermediate polar compounds (logP=2.01 for MaA, logP=1.98 for 20E).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Mixed-mode SCX/SAX sorbents are effective for the extraction of acidic or basic compounds.
“Such a mixture is effective for the extraction of acidic or basic compounds, so the recoveries of ecdysones were relatively low.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The reported content of 20-hydroxyecdysone in spinach leaves ranges from 17.1 to 885 μg/g.
“The reported content of 20HE in spinach leaves ranges from 17.1 to 885 µg/g [158,159].”
From Ecdysterone and Turkesterone—Compounds with Prominent Potential in Sport and Healthy Nutrition (2024) · cites this paper as [159]
Section 3.4 reports 20E in the spinach samples at 79.6–428 µg/g, not 17.1–885 µg/g. Table 5 (listed under Conclusions; page unavailable) gives the individual measurements in µg/g dry mass and contains neither claimed endpoint. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe finding that none of the prepared plant extracts contained PA is consistent with the study by Fang et al. in 2022, which reported that various types of spinach did not contain PA.
“This finding is consistent with the study by Fang et al. in 2022, which reported that various types of spinach did not contain PA [4].”
From Phytoecdysteroids: Quantification in Selected Plant Species and Evaluation of Some Effects on Gastric Smooth Muscles (2024) · cites this paper as [4]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Abstract says cooking reductions were below 10%, but MaA fell much more
MajorThe abstract characterizes the compounds as stable during cooking, with reductions below 10%. The results report MaA reductions of 67% and 82% in two of the three heated spinach samples.
“In general, the compounds were stable during cooking (reductions < 10%).”
“In the three groups of samples studied, the MaA content after heating decreased by 1.5%, 67%, and 82%, respectively.”
Chosen extraction-solvent composition differs from the stated procedure
MajorIn methanol:ethanol:water order, the mixture described as chosen for continued study is 25:20:45, not the 30:25:45 mixture specified for the SLE procedure. The two passages give different compositions for the selected extractant.
“Finally, based on the experimental results, a ternary mixture of water, methanol, and ethanol (45:25:20; v/ v/v) was chosen for the continuation of the study.”
“The SLE procedure used for the isolation of selected ecdysones from plant samples was as follows: 200 mg of plant sample, 15 mL mixture methanol:ethanol:water (30:25:45; v/v/v) as extraction solvent, extraction time 2 h, and mixing speed 700 rpm.”
Arugula is called analyte-free but is reported to contain 20E
MajorThe calibration procedure describes arugula as a blank containing no ecdysones, whereas Table 5 reports 0.52 μg/g of 20E in arugula. The text does not establish that the arugula used for calibration was the same sample, but the unqualified claim that arugula leaves contained no ecdysones conflicts with the reported result.
“The arugula was used as a blank sample because its leaves are similar to spinach, but contained no ecdysones.”
“| arugula (fresh leaves) | 0.52 | nd | nd | nd |”
The stated ranking of binary extraction solvents reverses Table 2
MinorFor mixture 2, Table 2 gives ethanol:water (assay 7) higher responses than methanol:water (assay 3) for both 20E (0.99 versus 0.87) and MaA (0.88 versus 0.78). The text ranks assay 3 ahead of assay 7.
“The maximum yields of ecdysones were obtained with ternary solvent mixture 2 (assay 4), which were followed by yields from the methanol:water (assay 3) and ethanol:water (assay 7) binary mixtures.”
“| 3 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 | 0.87 | 0.78 | | 4 | 0.333 | 0.333 | 0.333 | 1.00 | 1.00 | | 5 | 0 | 1* | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.11 | 0.12 | | 7 | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.99 | 0.88 |”
Cites
Ward, B. W., & Schiller, J. S. (2013) · Preventing Chronic Disease · doi:10.5888/pcd10.120203 · Cited by 578 · see citing works
Functional Properties of Spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) Phytochemicals and Bioactives
Roberts, J. L., & Moreau, R. (2016) · Food & Function · doi:10.1039/c6fo00051g · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Practical uses for ecdysteroids in mammals including humans: And update
Lafont, R., & Dinan, L. (2003) · Journal of Insect Science · doi:10.1673/031.003.0701 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Practical uses for ecdysteroids in mammals including humans: and update
Lafont, R., & Dinan, L. (2003) · Journal of Insect Science · doi:10.1093/jis/3.1.7 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Koh, E., Charoenprasert, S., & Mitchell, A. E. (2012) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf300051f · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Isenmann, E., Ambrosio, G., Joseph, J. F., Mazzarino, M., de la Torre, X., Zimmer, P., Kazlauskas, R., Goebel, C., Botrè, F., Diel, P., et al. (2019) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-019-02490-x · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Ecdysteroids from Chenopodium quinoa Willd., an Ancient Andean Crop of High Nutritional Value
Kumpun, S., Maria, A., Crouzet, S., Evrard-Todeschi, N., Girault, J.-P., & Lafont, R. (2011) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.10.039 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Ecdysteroids: Production in plant in vitro cultures
Thiem, B., Kikowska, M., Maliński, M. P., Kruszka, D., Napierała, M., & Florek, E. (2017) · Phytochemistry Reviews · doi:10.1007/s11101-016-9483-z · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Ecdysteroids in Spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.): Biosynthesis, Transport and Regulation of Levels
Bakrim, A., Maria, A., Sayah, F., Lafont, R., & Takvorian, N. (2008) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2008.06.002 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Ecdysteroid distribution during development of spinach
Grebenok, R. J., & Adler, J. H. (1991) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0031-9422(00)98222-0 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Ecdysteroids in Plants and their Pharmacological Effects in Vertebrates and Humans
(2015) · Studies in Natural Products Chemistry · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-63473-3.00005-8 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Ecdysteroid biosynthesis during the ontogeny of spinach leaves
Grebenok, R. J., & Adler, J. H. (1993) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/0031-9422(93)85514-r · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Vardanega, R., Carvalho, P. I. N., Santos, D., & Meireles, M. (2017) · Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.ifset.2017.05.007 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Ecdysteroids: Isolation, Chemical Transformations, and Biological Activity
Savchenko, R. G., Veskina, N. A., Odinokov, V. N., Benkovskaya, G. V., & Parfenova, L. V. (2022) · Phytochemistry Reviews · doi:10.1007/s11101-021-09792-y · Cited by 39 · see citing works
On the origin and dispersal of cultivated spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)
Ribera, A., van Treuren, R., Kik, C., Bai, Y., & Wolters, A. A. (2020) · Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution · doi:10.1007/s10722-020-01042-y · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Bajkacz, S., Rusin, K., Wolny, A., Adamek, J., Erfurt, K., & Chrobok, A. (2020) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules25204736 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationWebb, T. J., Powls, R., & Rees, H. H. (1995) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj3120561 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Wilson, I. D., Morgan, E. D., & Murphy, S. J. (1990) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/s0003-2670(00)83308-5 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Glazowska (2018) · doi:10.1002/jssc.201800506 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Destrez, B., Dervilly, G., Bichon, E., Monteau, F., Lafont, R., & Bizec, B. L. (2008) · Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/rcm.3816 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Ecdysteroid Content and Therapeutic Activity in Elicited Spinach Accessions
Gorelick, J., Iraqi, R. H., & Bernstein, N. (2020) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants9060727 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
da Rosa, H. S., Koetz, M., Santos, M. C., Jandrey, E. H. F., Folmer, V., Henriques, A. T., & Mendez, A. S. L. (2018) · Steroids · doi:10.1016/j.steroids.2018.01.014 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Rostagno, M., Debien, I. C. N., Vardanega, R., Nogueira, G. C., Barbero, G., & Meireles, M. (2014) · Analytical Methods · doi:10.1039/c3ay42276c · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Dinan, L., Balducci, C., Guibout, L., & Lafont, R. (2020) · Phytochemical Analysis · doi:10.1002/pca.2930 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Grucza, K., Wicka, M., Drapała, A., & Kwiatkowska, D. (2021) · Separations · doi:10.3390/separations9010008 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Chen, Y.-S., & Feng, Y. (2021) · Journal of Analysis and Testing · doi:10.1007/s41664-021-00179-8 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Extraction and Monitoring of Phytoecdysteroids Through HPLC
Ghosh, D., & Laddha, K. S. (2006) · Journal of Chromatographic Science · doi:10.1093/chromsci/44.1.22 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Píš, J., Hykl, J., Vaisar, T., & Harmatha, J. (1994) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/0021-9673(94)85208-1 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Proposal for fractionating Brazilian ginseng extracts: Process intensification approach
Vardanega, R., Santos, D., & Meireles, M. (2017) · Journal of Food Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2016.10.018 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Cao, V. D., Riu, K.-Z., & Boo, K.-H. (2018) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.06.027 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Rybin, 2007, Application of high-performance liquid chromatography for simultaneous identification of integristerone а, 20-hydroxyecdysone, ecdysone and 2-deoxy-20-hydroxyecdysone, Nat. Prod. Commun., 2, 1101
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ecdysterone and Turkesterone—Compounds with Prominent Potential in Sport and Healthy Nutrition
Todorova, V., Ivanova, S., Chakarov, D., Kraev, K., & Ivanov, K. (2024) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu16091382 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Urinary Excretion of Ecdysterone and Its Metabolites Following Spinach Consumption
Yuliandra, T., Touvleliou, K., de la Torre, X., Botrè, F., Loke, S., Isenmann, E., Valder, S., Diel, P., & Parr, M. K. (2023) · Molecular Nutrition & Food Research · doi:10.1002/mnfr.202200518 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Zhang, W., Zheng, M., Zhu, Y., Li, H., Dong, D., Yu, X., & Li, X. (2024) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.4c07074 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Impact of Maize Nutrient Composition on the Developmental Defects of Spodoptera frugiperda
Zhang, W., Li, H., Zhang, C. L., Hou, J., Guo, X., Dong, D., & Li, X. (2024) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy14081690 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Todorova, V., Ivanova, S., Yotov, V., Zaytseva, E., Ardasheva, R., Turiyski, V., Prissadova, N., & Ivanov, K. (2024) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules29215145 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Isenmann, E., Yuliandra, T., Touvleliou, K., Broekmann, M., de la Torre, X., Botrè, F., Diel, P., & Parr, M. K. (2024) · Archiv der Pharmazie · doi:10.1002/ardp.202300689 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Sun, H., Chang, Y., Sun, B., Wang, K., Chen, G., Li, H., & Dai, Y. (2024) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2023.130624 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Analytical characterization of herbal biomolecules using hyphenated techniques
Kher, M. N., Shah, R. N., Gajjar, A. K., Chhabria, M. T., & Rakholiya, K. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-15383-9.00026-3 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Qin, L., Guo, H., Wang, Y., Hou, X., Wu, F., Du, H., & Li, Z. (2024) · Journal of Food Composition and Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jfca.2024.107151 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Isenmann, E., Yuliandra, T., Touvleliou, K., Broekmann, M., Torre, X. D. L., Botrè, F., Diel, P., & Parr, M. K. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.10.10.560427 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Dissemond, J., Havers, T., Held, S., Geisler, S., Kostov, T., Diel, P., Türschmann, S., Parr, M. K., & Isenmann, E. (2025) · Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · doi:10.1080/15502783.2025.2540408 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Volodin, V. V., Volodina, S. O., Nekrasova, E. V., Loan, V. T., Serebryakov, E. B., Frolova, D. A., & Ufimtsev, K. G. (2025) · Phytochemical Analysis · doi:10.1002/pca.3511 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Sources of Environmental Exposure to the Naturally Occurring Anabolic Steroid Ecdysterone in Horses
Sillence, M. N., Holt, K., Li, F. I., Harris, P. A., Coyle, M. P., & Fitzgerald, D. M. (2025) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani15142120 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Pharmacokinetics and Tissue Distribution of Baicalin In Type 2 Diabetic RatsPreprint
Jiang, S., Li, J., Wang, S., Zuang, Y., Weng, W., Ma, J., Zhang, C., & Guo, J. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4788600
Extraction, Isolation and Purification of Kaempferol from Cassia fistula L. Flowers
Arland, S. E., & Kumar, J. (2024) · Journal of Mines Metals and Fuels · doi:10.18311/jmmf/2023/47322
Caproni, D. T. R., Torres-Silva, G., Batista, D. S., da Cruz, A. C. F., Felipe, S. H. S., Chagas, K., Pinheiro, M. V. M., & Otoni, W. C. (2025) · Vegetos · doi:10.1007/s42535-025-01218-w
Shirke, H. A., Vasav, A. P., Darshetkar, A. M., Godbole, R. C., Kadam, S. B., Patil, S. S., Naikawadi, V. B., Kishor, P. B. K., Nikam, T. D., & Barvkar, V. T. (2025) · Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants · doi:10.1007/s12298-025-01656-5
Ecdysteroid hormones in molting cycle of mud crab (Scylla paramamosain Estampador, 1950)
Aiemsomboon, K., Techa, S., & Jaiman, P. (2025) · Agriculture and Natural Resources · doi:10.34044/j.anres.2025.59.6.12
Todorova, V., Ivanova, S., Ardasheva, R., & Ivanov, K. (2026) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules31071090
kovvali, M., & Lanka, S. (2026) · International Journal of Drug Delivery Technology · doi:10.25258/ijddt.16.18s.40
Ecdysterone: A Component of Dietary Supplements with Ergogenic Potential?
León, S. A., Robayna, B. P., Romero, C. D., & Brito, N. B. (2026) · Nutraceuticals · doi:10.3390/nutraceuticals6020031
Steroids—High-Precision Metabolic Profiling
Vansia, H., & Naik, A. (2026) · Springer protocols handbooks/Springer protocols · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-5400-2_18
- Authors
- Fang, X., Szołtysik, R., Tang, J., & Bajkacz, S.
- Affiliations
- Ningbo University (CN)
- Silesian University of Technology (PL)
- Corresponding author
- Bajkacz, Sylwia
- ORCID
- Bajkacz, Sylwia
- Venue
- Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-07
- Volume
- 110
- Pages
- 104580
- ISSN
- 0889-1575 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4223960660
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 1.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Food Composition and Analysis (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Silesian University of Technology (04/010/RGJ20/0122)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Phytochemical Studies and Bioactivities
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
- Keywords
- ecdysteroids, phytoecdysone, 20-hydroxyecdysone, makisterone A, ponasterone A, spinach, Eruca sativa, lamb's lettuce, solid-phase extraction, solid-liquid extraction, herbal medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review