Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 541

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Kombucha Beverage from Green, Black and Rooibos Teas: A Comparative Study Looking at Microbiology, Chemistry and Antioxidant Activity

Open access
Gaggìa, Francesca, Baffoni, Loredana, Galiano, Michele, Nielsen, Dennis Sandris, Jakobsen, Rasmus Riemer, Castro-Mejía, Josue Leonardo, Bosi, Sara, Truzzi, Francesca, Musumeci, Federica, Dinelli, Giovanni, Di Gioia, Diana·2018·Nutrients

Abstract

Kombucha is usually obtained from the fermentation of black or green tea by a consortium of acetic acid bacteria and yeasts. In this study, kombucha was prepared from the same starter consortium using green and black teas as well as, for the first time, an infusion of rooibos leaves (Aspalathus linearis). Microbial diversity was analysed during fermentation both in the biofilm and in the corresponding kombuchas, using culture-dependent and -independent methods. Polyphenols, flavonoids, ethanol, and acids were quantified and anti-oxidant activities were monitored. All of the Kombuchas showed similarity in bacterial composition, with the dominance of Komagataeibacter spp. Beta diversity showed that the yeast community was significantly different among all tea substrates, between 7 and 14 days of fermentation and between biofilm and kombucha, indicating the influence of the substrate on the fermenting microbiota. Kombucha from rooibos has a low ethanol concentration (1.1 mg/mL), and a glucuronic acid amount that was comparable to black tea. Although antioxidant activity was higher in black and green kombucha compared to rooibos, the latter showed an important effect on the recovery of oxidative damage on fibroblast cell lines against oxidative stress. These results make rooibos leaves interesting for the preparation of a fermented beverage with health benefits.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nu11010001

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. Jarrell, 2000, The Kombucha consortia of yeasts and bacteria, Mycologist, 14, 166, 10.1016/S0269-915X(00)80034-8 · DOI
  2. Troise, 2018, Different temperatures select distinctive acetic acid bacteria species and promotes organic acids production during Kombucha tea fermentation, Food Microbiol., 73, 11, 10.1016/j.fm.2018.01.008 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Dufresne, 2000, Tea, kombucha, and health: A review, Food Res. Intern., 33, 409, 10.1016/S0963-9969(00)00067-3 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Jayabalan, 2014, A review on kombucha tea-microbiology, composition, fermentation, beneficial effects, toxicity, and tea fungus, Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf., 13, 538, 10.1111/1541-4337.12073 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Kolarov, 2002, Sucrose and inulin balance during tea fungus fermentation, Roum. Biotechnol. Lett., 7, 573
  6. Kolarov, 2002, L-lactic, L-ascorbic, total and volatile acids contents in dietetic kombucha beverage, Roum. Biotechnol. Lett., 7, 891
  7. Vitas, 2013, The antioxidant activity of kombucha fermented milk products with stinging nettle and winter savory, CI CEQ, 19, 129, 10.2298/CICEQ120205048V · doi:10.2298/ciceq120205048v
  8. Valduga, A.T., Gonçalves, I.L., Magri, E., and Delalibera Finzer, J.R. (2018). Chemistry, pharmacology and new trends in traditional functional and medicinal beverages. Food Res. Int. · DOI
  9. Chu, 2006, Effects of origins and fermentation time on the antioxidant activities of kombucha, Food Chem., 98, 502, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.05.080 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Lin, 1996, Composition of polyphenols in fresh tea leaves and associations of their oxygen-radical absorbing capacity with antiproliferative actions in fibroblast cells, J. Agric. Food Chem., 44, 1387, 10.1021/jf950652k · DOI · Paper page
  11. Lin, 1998, Survey of catechins, gallic acid, and methylxanthines in green, oolong, puerh, and black teas, J. Agric. Food Chem., 46, 3635, 10.1021/jf980223x · DOI · Paper page
  12. Beaufort, 2018, Understanding kombucha tea fermentation: A review, J. Food Sci., 83, 580, 10.1111/1750-3841.14068 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Hiremath, 2002, Effect of Fermented tea on the blood sugar levels of NIDDM Subjects, Indian Pract., 55, 423
  14. Joubert, 2008, South African herbal teas: Aspalathus linearis, Cycilopia spp. and Athrixia phylicoides—A review, J. Ethnopharmacol., 119, 376, 10.1016/j.jep.2008.06.014 · DOI · Paper page
  15. McKay, 2007, A review of the bioactivity of South African herbal teas: Rooibos (Aspalathus linearis) and honeybush (Cyclopia intermedia), Phytoth. Res., 21, 1, 10.1002/ptr.1992 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Bhattacharya, 2013, Effect of Kombucha, a fermented black tea in attenuating oxidative stress mediated tissue damage in alloxan induced diabetic rats, Food Chem. Toxicol., 60, 328, 10.1016/j.fct.2013.07.051 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Mamlouk, 2013, Acetic acid bacteria: Physiology and carbon sources oxidation, Indian J. Microbiol., 53, 377, 10.1007/s12088-013-0414-z · DOI · Paper page
  18. Yamada, 1999, Identification of acetic acid bacteria isolated from Indonesian sources, especially of isolates classified in the genus Gluconobacter, J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol., 45, 23, 10.2323/jgam.45.23 · DOI
  19. Mazzola, 2016, Lactic acid bacteria as protective cultures in fermented pork meat to prevent Clostridium spp. growth, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 235, 53, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.06.019 · DOI
  20. Baffoni, 2015, Microbial investigation on honey bee larvae showing atypical symptoms of European foulbrood, Bull. Insectol., 68, 321
  21. Jeyarama, 2008, Molecular identification of yeast species associated with ‘Hamei’ - A traditional starter used for rice wine production in Manipur, India, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 124, 115, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.02.029 · DOI
  22. Jespersen, 2005, Occurrence and diversity of yeasts involved in fermentation of West African cocoa beans, FEMS Yeast Res., 5, 441, 10.1016/j.femsyr.2004.11.002 · DOI · Paper page
  23. (2018, June 06). Basic Local Alignment Search Tool, Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/.
  24. (2018, September 03). GenBank, NCBI Submission Portal, Available online: https://submit.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/subs/genbank.
  25. Krych, 2018, Have you tried spermine? A rapid and cost-effective method to eliminate dextran sodium sulfate inhibition of PCR and RT-PCR, J. Microbiol. Methods, 144, 1, 10.1016/j.mimet.2017.10.015 · DOI
  26. Haastrup, 2018, Cheese brines from Danish dairies reveal a complex microbiota comprising several halotolerant bacteria and yeasts, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 285, 173, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.08.015 · DOI
  27. Edgar, 2018, Updating the 97% identity threshold for 16S ribosomal RNA OTUs, Bioinformatics, 34, 2371, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty113 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Edgar, R. (2016). SINTAX: A simple non-Bayesian taxonomy classifier for 16S and ITS sequences. bioRxiv. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Kim, 2012, Introducing EzTaxon-e: A prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species, Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 62, 716, 10.1099/ijs.0.038075-0 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Nilsson, 2013, Towards a unified paradigm for sequence-based identification of fungi, Mol. Ecol., 22, 5271, 10.1111/mec.12481 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Paulson, 2013, Differential abundance analysis for microbial marker-gene surveys, Nat. Methods, 10, 1200, 10.1038/nmeth.2658 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Weiss, 2017, Normalization and microbial differential abundance strategies depend upon data characteristics, Microbiome, 5, 1, 10.1186/s40168-017-0237-y · DOI · Paper page
  33. McMurdie, P.J., and Holmes, S. (2014). Waste not, want not: WHY rarefying microbiome data is inadmissible. PLoS Comput. Biol., 10. · DOI · Paper page
  34. Crafack, 2013, Influencing cocoa flavour using Pichia kluyveri and Kluyveromyces marxianus in a defined mixed starter culture for cocoa fermentation, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 167, 103, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.06.024 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Singleton, 1999, Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent, Meth. Enzimol., 299, 152, 10.1016/S0076-6879(99)99017-1 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Adom, 2002, Antioxidant activity of grains, J. Agric. Food. Chem., 50, 6182, 10.1021/jf0205099 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Benzie, 1996, The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: THE FRAP assay, Anal. Biochem., 239, 70, 10.1006/abio.1996.0292 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Floegel, 2011, Comparison of ABTS/DPPH assays to measure antioxidant capacity in popular antioxidant-rich US foods, J. Food Compos. Anal., 24, 1043, 10.1016/j.jfca.2011.01.008 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Naldi, 2014, UHPLC determination of catechins for the quality control of green tea, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 88, 307, 10.1016/j.jpba.2013.08.054 · DOI
  40. Leoncini, E., Prata, C., Malaguti, M., Marotti, I., Segura-Carretero, A., Catizone, P., Dinelli, G., and Hrelia, S. (2012). Phytochemical profile and nutraceutical value of old and modern common wheat cultivars. PLoS ONE, 7. · DOI
  41. Smith, 2018, Aspalathus linearis (Rooibos)—A functional food targeting cardiovascular disease, Food Funct., 17, 5041, 10.1039/C8FO01010B · DOI
  42. Ku, 2015, Aspalathin and Nothofagin from Rooibos (Aspalathus linearis) inhibits high glucose-induced inflammation in vitro and in vivo, Inflammation, 38, 445, 10.1007/s10753-014-0049-1 · doi:10.1007/s10753-014-0049-1
  43. Chakravorty, 2016, Kombucha tea fermentation: Microbial and biochemical dynamics, Int. J. Food Microbial., 220, 63, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.12.015 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Ramana, 2015, Occurrence of Cellulose-Producing Gluconacetobacter spp. in fruit samples and Kombucha tea, and production of the biopolymer, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 176, 1162, 10.1007/s12010-015-1637-8 · doi:10.1007/s12010-015-1637-8
  45. Nguyen, 2015, Screening the optimal ratio of symbiosis between isolated yeast and acetic acid bacteria strain from traditional kombucha for high-level production of glucuronic acid, LWT Food Sci. Technol., 64, 1149, 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.07.018 · DOI
  46. Semjonovs, 2017, Cellulose synthesis by Komagataeibacter rhaeticus strain P 1463 isolated from Kombucha, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 101, 1003, 10.1007/s00253-016-7761-8 · DOI
  47. Kose, 2013, One-step production of nanofibrillated bacterial cellulose (NFBC) from waste glycerol using Gluconacetobacter intermedius NEDO-01, Cellulose, 20, 2971, 10.1007/s10570-013-0050-0 · DOI
  48. Hertel, 2000, Gluconacetobacter entanii sp. nov., isolated from submerged high-acid industrial vinegar fermentations, Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 50, 2013, 10.1099/00207713-50-6-2013 · DOI
  49. Reva, 2015, Metabarcoding of the kombucha microbial community grown in different microenvironments, AMB Express, 5, 35, 10.1186/s13568-015-0124-5 · DOI
  50. Schifferdecker, 2014, The wine and beer yeast Dekkera bruxellensis, Yeast, 31, 323, 10.1002/yea.3023 · DOI
  51. Brasileiro, 2007, Identification of Dekkera bruxellensis as a major contaminant yeast in continuous fuel ethanol fermentation, J. Appl. Microbiol., 102, 538
  52. Passoth, 2007, Dekkera bruxellensis and Lactobacillus vini form a stable ethanol-producing consortium in a commercial alcohol production process, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 73, 4354, 10.1128/AEM.00437-07 · DOI
  53. Shahbazi, 2018, Effect of medicinal plant type and concentration on physicochemical, antioxidant, antimicrobial, and sensorial properties of kombucha, Food Sci. Nutr., 6, 2568, 10.1002/fsn3.873 · DOI
  54. Linde, 2013, Glucuronic acid from fermented beverages: Biochemical functions in humans and its role in health protection, IJRRAS, 14, 217
  55. Vina, 2013, Glucuronic acid containing fermented functional beverages produced by natural yeasts and bacteria associations, Int. J. Res. Rev. Appl., 14, 17
  56. Ettayebi, 2003, Biodegradation of polyphenols with immobilized Candida tropicalis under metabolic induction, FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 223, 215, 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00380-X · DOI
  57. Tanaka, 2010, Chemistry of secondary polyphenols produced during processing of tea and selected foods, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 11, 14, 10.3390/ijms11010014 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Dipti, 2003, Lead induced oxidative stress: BENEFICIAL effects of Kombucha tea, Biomed. Environ. Sci., 16, 276
  59. Bhattacharya, 2011, Protective effect of kombucha tea against tertiary butyl hydroperoxide induced cytotoxicity and cell death in murine hepatocytes, Indian J. Exp. Biol., 49, 511
  60. Almajano, 2008, Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of tea infusions, Food Chem., 108, 55, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.10.040 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Lee, 2015, Ameliorative effect of aspalathin and nothofagin from Rooibos (Aspalathus linearis) on HMGB1-Induced septic responses in vitro and in vivo, Am. J. Chin. Med., 43, 991, 10.1142/S0192415X15500573 · DOI
  62. Sanderson, 2014, Effects of fermented rooibos (Aspalathus linearis) on adipocyte differentiation, Phytomedicine, 15, 109, 10.1016/j.phymed.2013.08.011 · DOI
  63. Pringle, 2018, Potential therapeutic benefits of green and fermented Rooibos (Aspalathus linearis) in dermal wound healing, Planta Med., 84, 645, 10.1055/a-0578-8827 · DOI

Cited by

See all 541

Metadata

Authors
Gaggìa, F., Baffoni, L., Galiano, M., Nielsen, D. S., Jakobsen, R. R., Castro-Mejía, J. L., Bosi, S., Truzzi, F., Musumeci, F., Dinelli, G., & Di Gioia, D.
Venue
Nutrients
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2018-12-20
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
1
ISSN
2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2903954635
Cited by
541
References
9
FWCI
63.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Funders
  • EU project FOODSTAR (GA 692276)
  • H2020 Food (GA 692276)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kombucha Beverage from Green, Black and Rooibos Teas: A Comparative Study Looking at Microbiology, Chemistry and Antioxidant Activity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/nu11010001
The paper
Gaggìa, F., Baffoni, L., Galiano, M., Nielsen, D. S., Jakobsen, R. R., Castro-Mejía, J. L., Bosi, S., Truzzi, F., Musumeci, F., Dinelli, G., & Di Gioia, D. (2018). Kombucha Beverage from Green, Black and Rooibos Teas: A Comparative Study Looking at Microbiology, Chemistry and Antioxidant Activity. Nutrients. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11010001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.