Cited by 40Meat and Animal Product QualitySeed and Plant BiochemistryEdible Oils Quality and Analysis

Chia, Quinoa, and Their Coproducts as Potential Antioxidants for the Meat Industry

Open access
Fernández-López, Juana, Viuda-Martos, Manuel, Sayas-Barberá, María Estrella, Navarro-Rodríguez de Vera, Casilda, Lucas-González, Raquel, Roldán-Verdú, Alba, Botella-Martínez, Carmen, Pérez-Alvarez, Jose Angel·2020·Plants

Abstract

Chia and quinoa have gained popularity among consumers worldwide due to the wide variety of nutrients but also to the bioactive compounds that they contain. Lately, their processing has generated different coproducts (non-commercial grains, flour, partially deoiled flour, rich-fiber fraction, and oil, among others), which could be reincorporated to the food chain with important technological properties, antioxidant activity included. Both sets of ingredients have been revealed a great technological potential for meat product development and innovation, taking into account that oxidation is one of the main reactions responsible for their deterioration and shelf life reduction. This review focuses on the antioxidant compounds of chia and quinoa coproducts and on the strategies used to add them to meat products highlighting their effect on the lipid oxidation control. Apart from the different ways in which quinoa and chia can be incorporated into meat products and their antioxidant properties, innovative approaches for increasing this antioxidant effect and counteracting any negative alterations they may cause will be discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/plants9101359

Cites

116 of 116 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 117 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fernández-López, J., Viuda-Martos, M., Sayas-Barberá, M. E., Navarro-Rodríguez de Vera, C., Lucas-González, R., Roldán-Verdú, A., Botella-Martínez, C., & Pérez-Alvarez, J. A.
Affiliations
  • IPOA Research Group, Agro-Food Technology Department, Higher Polytechnic School of Orihuela, Miguel Hernández University, Orihuela, 03312-Alicante, Spain
  • Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx (ES)
Venue
Plants
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-10-14
Volume
9
Issue
10
Pages
1359
ISSN
2223-7747 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3092805814
Cited by
39
References
117
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Plants (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AGL2016-75687-C2-2-R” (MCI/AEI/FEDER,UE)
  • CYTED Ciencia y Tecnología para el Desarrollo (HealthyMeats CYTED (ref.119RT0568))
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Seed and Plant Biochemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
Keywords
chia, quinoa, coproducts, antioxidants, meat products, lipid oxidation, shelf life, bioactive compounds, fiber fractions, oil, meat product development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review