Cited by 325Seed and Plant BiochemistryFood composition and propertiesProteins in Food Systems

Physicochemical and functional characterization of by-products from chia (Salvia hispanica L.) seeds of Argentina

Open access
Capitani, M.I., Spotorno, V., Nolasco, S.M., Tomás, M.C.·2012·LWT - Food Science and Technology

Abstract

The objective of this study was to characterize the physicochemical and functional properties of meals (M) and fibrous fractions (FRF) of chia seeds (Salvia hispanica L.), and to compare the effect of oil extraction methods (pressing -p- and solvent extraction -s-) and sieving process on these properties. Both processes affect the physicochemical and functional properties of residual meals and their corresponding fibrous fractions. Mp and FRFp showed a significantly higher residual oil content than Ms and FRFs (11.39, 10.85, 0.21 and 0.21 g/100 dry base, respectively). The sieving process of both meals allowed to obtain fibrous fractions with a significant increase of crude fiber (27.57, 32.84, 23.81 and 28.35 g/100 g in Ms, FRFs, Mp and FRFp, respectively), and a marked decrease of protein content (41.36, 35.32, 35.00 and 33.74 g/100 g in Ms, FRFs, Mp and FRFp, respectively). Total dietary fiber and their respective components (soluble and insoluble dietary fiber) were significantly higher in FRF. All the samples exhibited a high antioxidant activity due to the presence of phenolic compounds and tocopherols in the case of Mp and FRFp. Ms and FRFs presented a better oil-holding capacity, organic molecule absorption capacity, emulsifying activity and emulsion stability than Mp and FRFp, and allowed to achieve more stable emulsions. FRFs showed the highest values of water absorption and adsorption capacity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lwt.2011.07.012

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Capitani, M. I., Spotorno, V., Nolasco, S. M., & Tomás, M. C.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
  • National Agricultural Technology Institute (AR)
  • Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (AR)
Corresponding author
  • Nolasco, S.M.
  • Tomás, M.C.
Venue
LWT - Food Science and Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
94-102
ISSN
0023-6438 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004705730
Cited by
325
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
FWCI
13.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • LWT (publishedVersion)
  • Conicet (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Seed and Plant Biochemistry
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
Keywords
Salvia hispanica, seed meal, oil extraction, pressing, solvent extraction, sieving, dietary fiber, crude fiber, protein content, residual oil content, antioxidant activity, phenolic compounds, tocopherols, emulsifying activity, emulsion stability, oil absorption capacity, water absorption capacity, adsorption capacity, functional properties

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review