The rotation curve of the Milky Way measured by classical Cepheids from Gaia DR3
Open accessAbstract
We determine the rotation curve (RC) of the Milky Way in the range of $6< R < 18\ \rm {kpc}$ using a sample of 903 carefully selected classical Cepheids with precise proper motions and high-quality radial velocities from Gaia Data Release 3. Their distances can be accurately measured from the well-known Period–Wesenheit relations. The RC is computed from the three-dimensional velocities components of these Cepheids. Generally, the RC shows a slight decline with distance from the Galactic centre. On top of this general trend, the newly constructed RC shows a dip around $R\sim 10$–$11\ \rm {kpc}$, followed by a bump around $R\sim 13$–$14\ \rm {kpc}$. This feature has also been reported in other RC measurements, mostly in RCs traced by young tracers like Cepheids. To better constrain the Milky Way mass, an averaged RC is then constructed by combining measurements from this work and previous efforts. Due to the ambiguous nature of the dip-and-bump feature, this averaged RC is constructed only within the radial range where the RC appears to be less influenced by this feature. By using this averaged RC, we determine the circular velocity at solar position and also build a parametrized mass model of our Milky Way. The result for the circular velocity at the solar position is $V_{\mathrm{c}}(R_{0})=236.8\pm 0.8\ \rm {km\ s^{-1}}$, which is in good agreement with previous measurements. The local dark matter density and the enclosed dark matter halo mass within 18 kpc are estimated from the averaged RC under different baryonic models, yielding a series of consistent results: a local density of 0.33–$0.40\ \mathrm{GeV\ cm^{-3}}$ and an enclosed mass of 1.19–$1.45\times 10^{11}\ {\rm M}_{\odot }$.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Classical Cepheids have individual distances commonly precise at the few-percent to ∼10% level, depending on calibration and extinction treatment; the Gaia DR3 analysis of Feng et al. (2026) reports a typical uncertainty of about 7%.
“Their individual distances are commonly precise at the few-percent to ∼ 10% level, depending on calibration and extinction treatment; the Gaia DR3 analysis of Feng et al. (2026), for example, reports a typical uncertainty of about 7%.”
From The rotation curve of the Milky Way: State of the art, the Keplerian decline debate, and implications for dark matter (2026) · cites this paper as Feng et al. (2026)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The mass distribution and gravitational potential of the Milky Way
McMillan, P. J. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2759 · Cited by 1,099 · see citing works
The total stellar halo mass of the Milky Way
Deason, A. J., Belokurov, V., & Sanders, J. L. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2793 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Detection of the Keplerian decline in the Milky Way rotation curve
Jiao, Y., Hammer, F., Wang, H., Wang, J., Amram, P., Chemin, L., & Yang, Y. (2023) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347513 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
The Circular Velocity Curve of the Milky Way from 5–25 kpc Using Luminous Red Giant Branch Stars
Zhou, Y., Li, X., Huang, Y., & Zhang, H. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acadd9 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Self-citationMapping the Milky Way Disk with Gaia DR3: 3D Extended Kinematic Maps and Rotation Curve to ≈30 kpc
Wang, H.-F., Chrobáková, Ž., López-Corredoira, M., & Sylos Labini, F. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aca27c · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Spectrophotometric Parallaxes with Linear Models: Accurate Distances for Luminous Red-giant Stars
Hogg, D. W., Eilers, A.-C., & Rix, H.-W. (2019) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab398c · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 82
- Ablimit I., Zhao G., Flynn C., Bird S. A., 2020, ApJ, 895, L12 · DOI
- Antoja T., et al., 2018, Nature, 561, 360 · DOI · Paper page
- Battaglia G., et al., 2005, MNRAS, 364, 433 · DOI
- Battinelli P., Demers* S., Rossi** C., Gigoyan K. S., 2013, Astrophysics, 56, 68 · DOI
- Benjamin R. A., et al., 2005, ApJ, 630, L149 · DOI
- Beordo W., Crosta M., Lattanzi M. G., Re Fiorentin P., Spagna A., 2024, MNRAS, 529, 4681 · DOI · Paper page
- Binney J., Tremaine S., 1987, Galactic dynamics Bland-Hawthorn J., Gerhard O., 2016, ARA&A, 54, 529 · DOI · Paper page
- Bobylev V. V., Bajkova A. T., 2015, Astronomy Letters, 41, 473 · DOI
- Bovy J., Tremaine S., 2012, ApJ, 756, 89 · DOI
- Bovy J., Rix H.-W., Liu C., Hogg D. W., Beers T. C., Lee Y. S., 2012a, ApJ, 753, 148 · DOI
- Bovy J., et al., 2012b, ApJ, 759, 131 · DOI · Paper page
- Büdenbender A., van de Ven G., Watkins L. L., 2015, MNRAS, 452, 956 · DOI
- Butler R. P., 1993, ApJ, 415, 323 · DOI
- Chen B. Q., et al., 2017, MNRAS, 464, 2545 · DOI
- Cheng X., Liu C., Mao S., Cui W., 2019, ApJ, 872, L1 · DOI
- Clementini G., et al., 2019, A&A, 622, A60 · DOI
- Clementini G., et al., 2023, A&A, 674, A18 · DOI
- Drimmel R., et al., 2023, A&A, 670, A10 · DOI
- Dubinski J., 1994, ApJ, 431, 617 · DOI
- Eilers A.-C., Hogg D. W., Rix H.-W., Ness M. K., 2019, ApJ, 871, 120 · DOI · Paper page
- Fich M., Blitz L., Stark A. A., 1989, ApJ, 342, 272 · DOI
- Freeman K. C., 1970, ApJ, 160, 811 · DOI
- Fritz T. K., Di Cintio A., Battaglia G., Brook C., Taibi S., 2020, MNRAS, 494, 5178 · DOI
- GRAVITY Collaboration et al., 2021, A&A, 647, A59 · DOI
- Gaia Collaboration et al., 2016, A&A, 595, A2 · DOI
- Gaia Collaboration et al., 2018, A&A, 616, A1 · DOI · Paper page
- Gaia Collaboration et al., 2021, A&A, 649, A8 · DOI
- Gunn J. E., Knapp G. R., Tremaine S. D., 1979, AJ, 84, 1181 · DOI
- Huang Y., Liu X. W., Yuan H. B., Xiang M. S., Huo Z. Y., Chen B. Q., Zhang Y., Hou Y. H., 2015, MNRAS, 449, 162 · DOI
- Huang Y., et al., 2016, MNRAS, 463, 2623 · DOI
- Huang Y., et al., 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 1294 · DOI
- Hunt J. A. S., Vasiliev E., 2025, New Astron. Rev., 100, 101721 · DOI
- Jurić M., et al., 2008, ApJ, 673, 864 · DOI
- Kafle P. R., Sharma S., Lewis G. F., Bland-Hawthorn J., 2012, ApJ, 761, 98 · DOI
- Karukes E. V., Benito M., Iocco F., Trotta R., Geringer-Sameth A., 2020, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys., 2020, 033 · DOI
- Kawata D., Bovy J., Matsunaga N., Baba J., 2019, MNRAS, 482, 40 · DOI
- Klačka J., Šturc M., 2025, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2507.23551 · DOI · Paper page
- Küpper A. H. W., Balbinot E., Bonaca A., Johnston K. V., Hogg D. W., Kroupa P., Santiago B. X., 2015, ApJ, 803, 80 · DOI
- Lake G., 1989, AJ, 98, 1554 · DOI
- Levine E. S., Heiles C., Blitz L., 2008, ApJ, 679, 1288 · DOI
- Luo A. L., et al., 2015, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 15, 1095 · DOI
- Lux H., Read J. I., Lake G., Johnston K. V., 2012, MNRAS, 424, L16 · DOI
- Mackereth J. T., et al., 2017, MNRAS, 471, 3057 · DOI
- Mackereth J. T., et al., 2019, MNRAS, 489, 176 · DOI
- Majewski S. R., et al., 2017, AJ, 154, 94 · DOI · Paper page
- Malhan K., Ibata R. A., 2019, MNRAS, 486, 2995 · DOI
- Martinez-Medina L., Pichardo B., Peimbert A., Valenzuela O., 2019, MN- RAS, 485, L104 · DOI
- Mróz P., et al., 2019, ApJ, 870, L10 · DOI
- Navarro J. F., Frenk C. S., White S. D. M., 1995, MNRAS, 275, 56 · DOI
- Navarro J. F., Frenk C. S., White S. D. M., 1996, ApJ, 462, 563 · DOI · Paper page
- Navarro J. F., Frenk C. S., White S. D. M., 1997, ApJ, 490, 493 · DOI · Paper page
- Ou X., Eilers A.-C., Necib L., Frebel A., 2024, MNRAS, 528, 693 · DOI
- Ou X., Necib L., Wetzel A., Frebel A., Bailin J., Oeur M., 2025, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2503.05877 · DOI
- Põder S., Benito M., Pata J., Kipper R., Ramler H., Hütsi G., Kolka I., Thomas G. F., 2023, A&A, 676, A134 · DOI
- Piffl T., et al., 2014, A&A, 562, A91 · DOI
- Plummer H. C., 1911, MNRAS, 71, 460 · DOI
- Posti L., Helmi A., 2019, A&A, 621, A56 · DOI · Paper page
- Pouliasis E., Di Matteo P., Haywood M., 2017, A&A, 598, A66 · DOI
- Reid M. J., Brunthaler A., 2004, ApJ, 616, 872 · DOI
- Reid M. J., et al., 2014, ApJ, 783, 130 · DOI · Paper page
- Ripepi V., Molinaro R., Musella I., Marconi M., Leccia S., Eyer L., 2019, A&A, 625, A14 · DOI
- Ripepi V., et al., 2023, A&A, 674, A17 · DOI
- Rubin V. C., Ford Jr. W. K., Thonnard N., 1980, ApJ, 238, 471 · DOI
- Salucci P., Nesti F., Gentile G., Frigerio Martins C., 2010, A&A, 523, A83 · DOI
- Schönrich R., Binney J., Dehnen W., 2010, MNRAS, 403, 1829 · DOI
- Semczuk M., Dehnen W., Schönrich R., Athanassoula E., 2023, MNRAS, 519, 902 · DOI
- Sharma S., et al., 2014, ApJ, 793, 51 · DOI
- Skowron D. M., Drimmel R., Khanna S., Spagna A., Poggio E., Ramos P., 2025, ApJS, 278, 57 · DOI
- Sofue Y., 2009, PASJ, 61, 153 · DOI
- Sofue Y., Honma M., Omodaka T., 2009, PASJ, 61, 227 · DOI
- Spitler L. R., Forbes D. A., 2009, MNRAS, 392, L1 · DOI · Paper page
- Wan J.-C., Liu C., Deng L.-C., 2017, Research in Astronomy and Astro- physics, 17, 079 · DOI
- Wang H. F., Huang Y., Zhang H. W., López-Corredoira M., Cui W. Y., Chen B. Q., Guo R., Chang J., 2020, ApJ, 902, 70 · DOI
- Wang F., Zhang H. W., Huang Y., Chen B. Q., Wang H. F., Wang C., 2021, MNRAS, 504, 199 · DOI
- Watkins L. L., van der Marel R. P., Sohn S. T., Evans N. W., 2019, ApJ, 873, 118 · DOI · Paper page
- Weber M., de Boer W., 2010, A&A, 509, A25 · DOI
- Xiang M., et al., 2018, ApJS, 237, 33 · DOI
- Xue X. X., et al., 2008, ApJ, 684, 1143 · DOI
- Yang P., Wang H.-F., Luo Z.-Q., Tepper-García T., Luo Y.-P., 2023, AJ, 165, 110 · DOI
- Zhang L., Rix H.-W., van de Ven G., Bovy J., Liu C., Zhao G., 2013, ApJ, 772, 108 · DOI
- Zhou X., Chen X., Deng L., Wang S., 2024, ApJ, 965, 132 · DOI
- van Albada T. S., Bahcall J. N., Begeman K., Sancisi R., 1985, ApJ, 295, 305 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Melchiorri, A., & Ruchika (2026) · New Astronomy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.newar.2026.101758
- Authors
- Feng, Q., Huang, Y., Zhang, H., & Liu, J.
- Affiliations
- Peking University (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Huang, Yang
- Zhang, Huawei
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2026-01-07
- Volume
- 546
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W7118326742
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2
- FWCI
- 4.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development of China (2024YFA1611903)
- National Science Foundation of China (12422303)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Keywords
- Milky Way rotation curve, classical Cepheids, Gaia DR3, period-Wesenheit relation, dark matter halos, local dark matter density, galaxy mass
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review