Cited by 2Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaCosmology and Gravitation Theories

The rotation curve of the Milky Way measured by classical Cepheids from Gaia DR3

Open access
Feng, Qikang, Huang, Yang, Zhang, Huawei, Liu, Jifeng·2026·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We determine the rotation curve (RC) of the Milky Way in the range of $6< R < 18\ \rm {kpc}$ using a sample of 903 carefully selected classical Cepheids with precise proper motions and high-quality radial velocities from Gaia Data Release 3. Their distances can be accurately measured from the well-known Period–Wesenheit relations. The RC is computed from the three-dimensional velocities components of these Cepheids. Generally, the RC shows a slight decline with distance from the Galactic centre. On top of this general trend, the newly constructed RC shows a dip around $R\sim 10$–$11\ \rm {kpc}$, followed by a bump around $R\sim 13$–$14\ \rm {kpc}$. This feature has also been reported in other RC measurements, mostly in RCs traced by young tracers like Cepheids. To better constrain the Milky Way mass, an averaged RC is then constructed by combining measurements from this work and previous efforts. Due to the ambiguous nature of the dip-and-bump feature, this averaged RC is constructed only within the radial range where the RC appears to be less influenced by this feature. By using this averaged RC, we determine the circular velocity at solar position and also build a parametrized mass model of our Milky Way. The result for the circular velocity at the solar position is $V_{\mathrm{c}}(R_{0})=236.8\pm 0.8\ \rm {km\ s^{-1}}$, which is in good agreement with previous measurements. The local dark matter density and the enclosed dark matter halo mass within 18 kpc are estimated from the averaged RC under different baryonic models, yielding a series of consistent results: a local density of 0.33–$0.40\ \mathrm{GeV\ cm^{-3}}$ and an enclosed mass of 1.19–$1.45\times 10^{11}\ {\rm M}_{\odot }$.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stag011

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Classical Cepheids have individual distances commonly precise at the few-percent to ∼10% level, depending on calibration and extinction treatment; the Gaia DR3 analysis of Feng et al. (2026) reports a typical uncertainty of about 7%.

    “Their individual distances are commonly precise at the few-percent to ∼ 10% level, depending on calibration and extinction treatment; the Gaia DR3 analysis of Feng et al. (2026), for example, reports a typical uncertainty of about 7%.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 82

  1. Ablimit I., Zhao G., Flynn C., Bird S. A., 2020, ApJ, 895, L12 · DOI
  2. Antoja T., et al., 2018, Nature, 561, 360 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Battaglia G., et al., 2005, MNRAS, 364, 433 · DOI
  4. Battinelli P., Demers* S., Rossi** C., Gigoyan K. S., 2013, Astrophysics, 56, 68 · DOI
  5. Benjamin R. A., et al., 2005, ApJ, 630, L149 · DOI
  6. Beordo W., Crosta M., Lattanzi M. G., Re Fiorentin P., Spagna A., 2024, MNRAS, 529, 4681 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Binney J., Tremaine S., 1987, Galactic dynamics Bland-Hawthorn J., Gerhard O., 2016, ARA&A, 54, 529 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Bobylev V. V., Bajkova A. T., 2015, Astronomy Letters, 41, 473 · DOI
  9. Bovy J., Tremaine S., 2012, ApJ, 756, 89 · DOI
  10. Bovy J., Rix H.-W., Liu C., Hogg D. W., Beers T. C., Lee Y. S., 2012a, ApJ, 753, 148 · DOI
  11. Bovy J., et al., 2012b, ApJ, 759, 131 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Büdenbender A., van de Ven G., Watkins L. L., 2015, MNRAS, 452, 956 · DOI
  13. Butler R. P., 1993, ApJ, 415, 323 · DOI
  14. Chen B. Q., et al., 2017, MNRAS, 464, 2545 · DOI
  15. Cheng X., Liu C., Mao S., Cui W., 2019, ApJ, 872, L1 · DOI
  16. Clementini G., et al., 2019, A&A, 622, A60 · DOI
  17. Clementini G., et al., 2023, A&A, 674, A18 · DOI
  18. Drimmel R., et al., 2023, A&A, 670, A10 · DOI
  19. Dubinski J., 1994, ApJ, 431, 617 · DOI
  20. Eilers A.-C., Hogg D. W., Rix H.-W., Ness M. K., 2019, ApJ, 871, 120 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Fich M., Blitz L., Stark A. A., 1989, ApJ, 342, 272 · DOI
  22. Freeman K. C., 1970, ApJ, 160, 811 · DOI
  23. Fritz T. K., Di Cintio A., Battaglia G., Brook C., Taibi S., 2020, MNRAS, 494, 5178 · DOI
  24. GRAVITY Collaboration et al., 2021, A&A, 647, A59 · DOI
  25. Gaia Collaboration et al., 2016, A&A, 595, A2 · DOI
  26. Gaia Collaboration et al., 2018, A&A, 616, A1 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Gaia Collaboration et al., 2021, A&A, 649, A8 · DOI
  28. Gunn J. E., Knapp G. R., Tremaine S. D., 1979, AJ, 84, 1181 · DOI
  29. Huang Y., Liu X. W., Yuan H. B., Xiang M. S., Huo Z. Y., Chen B. Q., Zhang Y., Hou Y. H., 2015, MNRAS, 449, 162 · DOI
  30. Huang Y., et al., 2016, MNRAS, 463, 2623 · DOI
  31. Huang Y., et al., 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 1294 · DOI
  32. Hunt J. A. S., Vasiliev E., 2025, New Astron. Rev., 100, 101721 · DOI
  33. Jurić M., et al., 2008, ApJ, 673, 864 · DOI
  34. Kafle P. R., Sharma S., Lewis G. F., Bland-Hawthorn J., 2012, ApJ, 761, 98 · DOI
  35. Karukes E. V., Benito M., Iocco F., Trotta R., Geringer-Sameth A., 2020, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys., 2020, 033 · DOI
  36. Kawata D., Bovy J., Matsunaga N., Baba J., 2019, MNRAS, 482, 40 · DOI
  37. Klačka J., Šturc M., 2025, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2507.23551 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Küpper A. H. W., Balbinot E., Bonaca A., Johnston K. V., Hogg D. W., Kroupa P., Santiago B. X., 2015, ApJ, 803, 80 · DOI
  39. Lake G., 1989, AJ, 98, 1554 · DOI
  40. Levine E. S., Heiles C., Blitz L., 2008, ApJ, 679, 1288 · DOI
  41. Luo A. L., et al., 2015, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 15, 1095 · DOI
  42. Lux H., Read J. I., Lake G., Johnston K. V., 2012, MNRAS, 424, L16 · DOI
  43. Mackereth J. T., et al., 2017, MNRAS, 471, 3057 · DOI
  44. Mackereth J. T., et al., 2019, MNRAS, 489, 176 · DOI
  45. Majewski S. R., et al., 2017, AJ, 154, 94 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Malhan K., Ibata R. A., 2019, MNRAS, 486, 2995 · DOI
  47. Martinez-Medina L., Pichardo B., Peimbert A., Valenzuela O., 2019, MN- RAS, 485, L104 · DOI
  48. Mróz P., et al., 2019, ApJ, 870, L10 · DOI
  49. Navarro J. F., Frenk C. S., White S. D. M., 1995, MNRAS, 275, 56 · DOI
  50. Navarro J. F., Frenk C. S., White S. D. M., 1996, ApJ, 462, 563 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Navarro J. F., Frenk C. S., White S. D. M., 1997, ApJ, 490, 493 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Ou X., Eilers A.-C., Necib L., Frebel A., 2024, MNRAS, 528, 693 · DOI
  53. Ou X., Necib L., Wetzel A., Frebel A., Bailin J., Oeur M., 2025, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2503.05877 · DOI
  54. Põder S., Benito M., Pata J., Kipper R., Ramler H., Hütsi G., Kolka I., Thomas G. F., 2023, A&A, 676, A134 · DOI
  55. Piffl T., et al., 2014, A&A, 562, A91 · DOI
  56. Plummer H. C., 1911, MNRAS, 71, 460 · DOI
  57. Posti L., Helmi A., 2019, A&A, 621, A56 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Pouliasis E., Di Matteo P., Haywood M., 2017, A&A, 598, A66 · DOI
  59. Reid M. J., Brunthaler A., 2004, ApJ, 616, 872 · DOI
  60. Reid M. J., et al., 2014, ApJ, 783, 130 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Ripepi V., Molinaro R., Musella I., Marconi M., Leccia S., Eyer L., 2019, A&A, 625, A14 · DOI
  62. Ripepi V., et al., 2023, A&A, 674, A17 · DOI
  63. Rubin V. C., Ford Jr. W. K., Thonnard N., 1980, ApJ, 238, 471 · DOI
  64. Salucci P., Nesti F., Gentile G., Frigerio Martins C., 2010, A&A, 523, A83 · DOI
  65. Schönrich R., Binney J., Dehnen W., 2010, MNRAS, 403, 1829 · DOI
  66. Semczuk M., Dehnen W., Schönrich R., Athanassoula E., 2023, MNRAS, 519, 902 · DOI
  67. Sharma S., et al., 2014, ApJ, 793, 51 · DOI
  68. Skowron D. M., Drimmel R., Khanna S., Spagna A., Poggio E., Ramos P., 2025, ApJS, 278, 57 · DOI
  69. Sofue Y., 2009, PASJ, 61, 153 · DOI
  70. Sofue Y., Honma M., Omodaka T., 2009, PASJ, 61, 227 · DOI
  71. Spitler L. R., Forbes D. A., 2009, MNRAS, 392, L1 · DOI · Paper page
  72. Wan J.-C., Liu C., Deng L.-C., 2017, Research in Astronomy and Astro- physics, 17, 079 · DOI
  73. Wang H. F., Huang Y., Zhang H. W., López-Corredoira M., Cui W. Y., Chen B. Q., Guo R., Chang J., 2020, ApJ, 902, 70 · DOI
  74. Wang F., Zhang H. W., Huang Y., Chen B. Q., Wang H. F., Wang C., 2021, MNRAS, 504, 199 · DOI
  75. Watkins L. L., van der Marel R. P., Sohn S. T., Evans N. W., 2019, ApJ, 873, 118 · DOI · Paper page
  76. Weber M., de Boer W., 2010, A&A, 509, A25 · DOI
  77. Xiang M., et al., 2018, ApJS, 237, 33 · DOI
  78. Xue X. X., et al., 2008, ApJ, 684, 1143 · DOI
  79. Yang P., Wang H.-F., Luo Z.-Q., Tepper-García T., Luo Y.-P., 2023, AJ, 165, 110 · DOI
  80. Zhang L., Rix H.-W., van de Ven G., Bovy J., Liu C., Zhao G., 2013, ApJ, 772, 108 · DOI
  81. Zhou X., Chen X., Deng L., Wang S., 2024, ApJ, 965, 132 · DOI
  82. van Albada T. S., Bahcall J. N., Begeman K., Sancisi R., 1985, ApJ, 295, 305 · DOI

Authors
Feng, Q., Huang, Y., Zhang, H., & Liu, J.
Affiliations
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Huang, Yang
  • Zhang, Huawei
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2026-01-07
Volume
546
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W7118326742
Cited by
2
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
4.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development of China (2024YFA1611903)
  • National Science Foundation of China (12422303)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Keywords
Milky Way rotation curve, classical Cepheids, Gaia DR3, period-Wesenheit relation, dark matter halos, local dark matter density, galaxy mass

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review