Cited by 144Coffee research and impactsPrenatal Substance Exposure EffectsBirth, Development, and Health

Maternal caffeine intake from coffee and tea, fetal growth, and the risks of adverse birth outcomes: the Generation R Study

Open access
Bakker, Rachel, Steegers, Eric AP, Obradov, Aleksandra, Raat, Hein, Hofman, Albert, Jaddoe, Vincent WV·2010·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background Caffeine is a widely used and accepted pharmacologically active substance. The effect of caffeine intake during pregnancy on fetal growth and development is still unclear.Objective We examined the associations of maternal caffeine intake, on the basis of coffee and tea consumption, with fetal growth characteristics measured in each trimester of pregnancy and the risks of adverse birth outcomes.Design Associations were studied in 7346 pregnant women participating in a population-based prospective cohort study from early pregnancy onward in the Netherlands (2001-2005). Caffeine intake in the first, second, and third trimesters was on the basis of coffee and tea consumption and was assessed by questionnaires. Fetal growth characteristics were repeatedly measured by ultrasound. Information about birth outcomes was obtained from hospital records.Results We observed no consistent associations of caffeine intake with fetal head circumference or estimated fetal weight in any trimester. Higher caffeine intake was associated with smaller first-trimester crown-rump length, second- and third-trimester femur length, and birth length (P for trend <0.05). Offspring of mothers who consumed > or =6 caffeine units/d tended to have increased risks of small-for-gestational-age infants at birth.Conclusions Our results suggest that caffeine intake of > or =6 units/d during pregnancy is associated with impaired fetal length growth. Caffeine exposure might preferentially adversely affect fetal skeletal growth. Further studies are needed to assess these associations in non-European populations and to assess the postnatal consequences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28792

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Bakker et al. (2010) study, no clear dose-response associations were found for caffeine intakes during pregnancy and fetal growth.

    “No clear dose-response associations were found for caffeine intakes during pregnancy and fetal growth.”

    From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as Bakker et al., 2010

  • In the Bakker et al. (2010) study, caffeine intake was positively associated with the risks of delivering an SGA child.

    “Caffeine intake was positively associated with the risks of delivering an SGA child.”

    From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as Bakker et al., 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bakker, R., Steegers, E. A., Obradov, A., Raat, H., Hofman, A., & Jaddoe, V. W.
Affiliations
Erasmus MC (NL)
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-06
Volume
91
Issue
6
Pages
1691-1698
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2104607031
Cited by
144
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
8.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
Keywords
maternal caffeine intake, coffee consumption, tea consumption, fetal growth, adverse birth outcomes, small for gestational age, crown-rump length, femur length, birth length, pregnancy, Generation R Study
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Birth Weight, Caffeine, Coffee, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Tea, Cohort Studies, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Maternal Exposure, Fetal Development, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review