Cited by 76Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Decision-Making Competence and Attempted Suicide

Open access
Szanto, Katalin, de Bruin, Wändi Bruine, Parker, Andrew M., Hallquist, Michael N., Vanyukov, Polina M., Dombrovski, Alexandre Y.·2015·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The propensity of people vulnerable to suicide to make poor life decisions is increasingly well documented. Do they display an extreme degree of decision biases? The present study used a behavioral-decision approach to examine the susceptibility of low-lethality and high-lethality suicide attempters to common decision biases that may ultimately obscure alternative solutions and deterrents to suicide in a crisis. METHOD: We assessed older and middle-aged (42-97 years) individuals who made high-lethality (medically serious) (n = 31) and low-lethality suicide attempts (n = 29). Comparison groups included suicide ideators (n = 30), nonsuicidal depressed participants (n = 53), and psychiatrically healthy participants (n = 28). Attempters, ideators, and nonsuicidal depressed participants had nonpsychotic major depression (DSM-IV criteria). Decision biases included sunk cost (inability to abort an action for which costs are irrecoverable), framing (responding to superficial features of how a problem is presented), underconfidence/overconfidence (appropriateness of confidence in knowledge), and inconsistent risk perception. Data were collected between June 2010 and February 2014. RESULTS: Both high- and low-lethality attempters were more susceptible to framing effects as compared to the other groups included in this study (P ≤ .05, ηp2 = 0.06). In contrast, low-lethality attempters were more susceptible to sunk costs than both the comparison groups and high-lethality attempters (P ≤ .01, ηp2 = 0.09). These group differences remained after accounting for age, global cognitive performance, and impulsive traits. Premorbid IQ partially explained group differences in framing effects. CONCLUSIONS: Suicide attempters' failure to resist framing may reflect their inability to consider a decision from an objective standpoint in a crisis. Failure of low-lethality attempters to resist sunk cost may reflect their tendency to confuse past and future costs of their behavior, lowering their threshold for acting on suicidal thoughts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.15m09778

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Problems with emotional and motivational components of decision-making can be partially compensated by the patient's intellectual abilities.

    “Также проблемы с эмоциональными и мотивационными компонентами принятия решений могут частично компенсироваться за счет интеллектуальных способностей пациента (Szanto et al., 2015).”

    From Когнитивные механизмы дисфункционального принятия решений при психических расстройствах (2025) · cites this paper as Szanto et al., 2015

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says that IQ partially explained suicide attempters’ greater susceptibility to framing effects and describes decision-making as a balance between deliberative and affective processes. It does not show that intellectual abilities compensate for problems with emotional or motivational components of decision-making; that compensatory claim goes beyond the finding. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [11]D'Zurilla TJ Chang EC Nottingham EJt Faccini L Social problem-solving deficits and hopelessness, depression, and suicidal risk in college students and psychiatric inpatients J Clin Psychol 1998 12 54 8 1091 1107 9840781
  2. [26]Szanto K Clark L Hallquist M Vanyukov P Crockett M Dombrovski A The cost of social punishment and high-lethality suicide attempts Psychol Aging 2014 3 29 1 84 94 2014 24660798 PMC4051315
  3. [27]Brockner J Rubin JZ Entrapment in escalating conflicts: A social psychological analysis 1985 New York Springer-Verlag
  4. [33]Alloy LB Abramson LY Depressive realism: Four theoretical perspectives Cognitive processes in depression 1988 1 Jan 1988 ed. New York, NY Guilford Press (New York, NY, US) 223 265
  5. [37]Stanovich KE Who is rational?: Studies of individual differences in reasoning 1999 Psychology Press
  6. [43]First MS Gibbon M Williams JBW Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders - Patient Edition (SCID-I/P) Version 2.0 1995
  7. [48]D'Zurilla TJ Nezu AM Development and preliminary evaluation of the Social Problem-Solving Inventory Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1990 2 2 156 163
  8. [53]Williams JMG Crane C Barnhofer T Duggan D Hawton K Psychology and suicidal behaviour: elaborating the entrapment model Prevention and Treatment of Suicidal Behaviour: From Science to Practice 2005 1 ed USA Oxford University Press 71 89

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Szanto, K., de Bruin, W. B., Parker, A. M., Hallquist, M. N., Vanyukov, P. M., & Dombrovski, A. Y.
Affiliations
  • RAND Corporation (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2015-12-23
Volume
76
Issue
12
Pages
e1590-e1597
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1525456132
Cited by
75
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
FWCI
14.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (K18AG042166)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH100095, K01MH097091, K23MH086620, R01MH085651)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
suicide attempters, decision bias, framing effects, sunk cost effect, overconfidence, underconfidence, risk perception, suicidal ideation, major depressive disorder, premorbid intelligence, older adults, middle-aged adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Decision Making, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Suicide, Attempted, Mental Competency, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review