Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,051

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills

Open access
·2018·The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation
DOI 10.4135/9781506326139.n214
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study evaluated the validity and reliability of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) using a sample of 30 special education students, fourth through sixth grade. Results support the reliability and validity of DIBELS when compared to the Woodcock Johnson III (WJ III). The DIBELS consisted of four subtests: Letter Naming Fluency (LNF), Phoneme Segmentation Fluency (PSF), Initial Sound Fluency (ISF), and Nonsense Word Fluency (NWF). These subtests were compared to two subtests of the Woodcock Johnson III: Letter Word Identification and Word Attack. DIBELS produced significant correlations for LNF, PSF, NWF, and WJ III Word Attack and between DIBELS LNF, PSF, and WJ III Word Identification. ISF exhibited no significant correlation when compared to either subtest of the WJ III.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781506326139.n214

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 1,051

Metadata

Venue
The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation
Publisher
SAGE Publications, Inc.
Published
2018
DOI
10.4135/9781506326139.n214
OpenAlex
W2460937302
Cited by
1,051
References
70
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.