Cited by 16Digital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Blended e-Health in Cognitive Behavioural Therapy: Usage Intensity, Attitude and Therapeutic Alliance in Clinical Practice

Open access
Aerts, Janneke E. M., Dam, Arno van·2018·Psychology

Abstract

Background: Though internet based cognitive behaviour therapy is proven to be effective, e-health is applied only in a minority of treatments in specialised mental health care. The low application rates are associated with therapists’ attitudes towards e-health. One of the major concerns is limitations in the therapeutic relation and communication between patient and therapist. Since therapist involvement is important in an effective e-health treatment, negative attitudes towards e-health can be a risk for effective e-health application. Aims: This study aimed to examine the relationship between patients’ e-health usage as well as patients’ attitudes towards e-health and the therapeutic alliance. The possible influence of therapists’ attitudes on patients’ e-health usage is also examined. Method: In an outpatient mental health setting, patients attended a blended treatment program for major depressive disorder and completed questionnaires on attitudes towards e-health and the therapeutic alliance. Therapists completed an alliance and attitude questionnaire as well. Results: Patients with more positive attitudes used the e-health application more intensively. Higher work alliance rates were related to sharing digital homework assignments and seeking contact with their therapist. Also, when treated by therapists with more positive attitudes towards e-health, patients shared more assignments with their therapist. Patients with high symptom rates at start, had more negative attitude rates and tended to use the e-health application less frequently. Conclusions: In a treatment cohesion in which therapists are positive about blended e-health, patients’ attitudes are positively related to e-health usage and therefore a factor of interest in improvement of effective e-health application. Patients with severe symptoms may need extra attention like active support and iteration to promote adherence to the e-health program.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4236/psych.2018.910139

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The blended care delivery model used in this study could have provided a sense of connectedness with the research team for the participants.

    “The blended care delivery model used in this study, although simple, promoting knowledge that the research team is only one phone call or text message away, could also have provided a sense of connectedness with the research team for the participants [62,63].”

    From Short-Term Findings From Testing EPIO, a Digital Self-Management Program for People Living With Chronic Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial (2023) · cites this paper as [62]

    The Intervention section describes blended face-to-face and online care in which patients could message their therapist. The Discussion reports that a stronger therapeutic alliance was associated with more therapist contact. These passages support a possible connection through blended care, but they do not address participants feeling connected to a research team or being able to reach it by phone or text. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Beutler, L. E., Malik, M., Alimohamed, S., Harwood, T. M., Talebi, H., Noble, S., & Wong, E. (2004).Therapist Variables. In M. J. Lambert (Eds.), Bergin and Garfield's Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behaviour Change (5th ed., pp. 227-306). New York: Wiley.
  2. van der Does, A. J. W. (2002). BDI-II-NL. Handleiding. De Nederlandse Versie van de Beck Depression Inventory (2nd ed.). Lisse: Harcourt Test Publishers.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aerts, J. E. M., & Dam, A. V.
Affiliations
Tilburg University (NL)
Venue
Psychology
Published
2018
Volume
09
Issue
10
Pages
2422-2435
ISSN
  • 2152-7180 (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-7199
OpenAlex
W2889916527
Cited by
16
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, therapeutic relationship, major depressive disorder, therapist attitudes, outpatient psychiatric care, medication adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review