Cited by 61Digital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Why uptake of blended internet-based interventions for depression is challenging: a qualitative study on therapists’ perspectives

Open access
Mol, Mayke, van Genugten, Claire, Dozeman, Els, van Schaik, Digna J. F., Draisma, Stasja, Riper, Heleen, Smit, Jan H.·2019·Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract

(1) Background: Blended cognitive behavioral therapy (bCBT; online and face-to-face sessions) seems a promising alternative alongside regular face-to-face CBT depression treatment in specialized mental health care organizations. Therapists are key in the uptake of bCBT. This study focuses on therapists’ perspectives on usability, satisfaction, and factors that promote or hinder the use of bCBT in routine practice; (2) Methods: Three focus groups (n = 8, n = 7, n = 6) and semi-structured in-depth interviews (n = 15) were held throughout the Netherlands. Beforehand, the participating therapists (n = 36) completed online questionnaires on usability and satisfaction. Interviews were analyzed by thematic analysis; (3) Results: Therapists found the usability sufficient and were generally satisfied with providing bCBT. The thematic analysis showed three main themes on promoting and hindering factors: (1) therapists’ needs regarding bCBT uptake, (2) therapists’ role in motivating patients for bCBT, and (3) therapists’ experiences with bCBT; (4) Conclusions: Overall, therapists were positive; bCBT can be offered by all CBT-trained therapists and future higher uptake is expected. Especially the pre-set structure of bCBT was found beneficial for both therapists and patients. Nevertheless, therapists did not experience promised time-savings—rather, the opposite. Besides, there are still teething problems and therapeutic shortcomings that need improvement in order to motivate therapists to use bCBT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jcm9010091

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adequate training and minimizing the time burden of DMHI use with clients is important to European mental health professionals.

    “Adequate training and minimizing the time burden of DMHI use with clients is also important to European mental health professionals [283138-40undefinedundefined].”

    From Needs and Expectations for the myNewWay Blended Digital and Face-to-Face Psychotherapy Model of Care for Depression and Anxiety (Part 2): Participatory Design Study including Mental Health Professionals (2025) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Results (§3.3, page unavailable) say therapists needed more ongoing support after fragmented training and that time constraints were the most frequently cited barrier to blended CBT uptake. The Discussion (§4.2, page unavailable) also reports that online feedback was time-consuming. The evidence comes from therapists at seven Dutch mental health organizations using blended CBT for depression, so it does not establish the same priorities for European mental health professionals generally or for all DMHIs. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The European research suggests that blended care is scalable and could enhance mental health professionals' acceptance of DMHI use in routine care, as well as improve client engagement by increasing DMHI uptake and adherence.

    “The European research suggests that blended care is scalable and could enhance mental health professionals’ acceptance of DMHI use in routine care, as well as improve client engagement by increasing DMHI uptake and adherence.”

    From Needs and Expectations for the myNewWay Blended Digital and Face-to-Face Psychotherapy Model of Care for Depression and Anxiety (Part 2): Participatory Design Study including Mental Health Professionals (2025) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Background (page unavailable) describes the potential for blended CBT to save therapist time and allow more patients to be treated, but also says uptake in routine care remains limited. The Discussion §4.3 reports therapists’ perceptions of better protocol adherence and possible future acceptance; the Results §3.3 say many therapists doubted it would save time or shorten waiting lists. The paper therefore supports potential benefits, not an established claim that blended care is scalable or increases DMHI uptake and client engagement. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findings from Germany, the Netherlands, and Denmark indicate that blended care was acceptable to CBT-based therapists and psychologists before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    “Findings from Germany, the Netherlands, and Denmark indicate that blended care was acceptable to CBT-based therapists and psychologists before and during the COVID-19 pandemic [28-31].”

    From Needs and Expectations for the myNewWay Blended Digital and Face-to-Face Psychotherapy Model of Care for Depression and Anxiety (Part 2): Participatory Design Study including Mental Health Professionals (2025) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Results (§3.2) report that 94% of participating therapists were mostly or very satisfied with blended CBT, supporting acceptability among therapists in the Netherlands before the pandemic. The Methods (§2.1) identify participants as CBT-trained psychologists, mental health nurses, or psychiatrists. This paper does not provide findings from Germany or Denmark, or from during COVID-19. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • European research shows that local mental health professionals value blended DMHIs that are flexible to use, can be customized to suit client needs, and help clients with symptom tracking and homework completion between therapy sessions.

    “European research also shows that local mental health professionals value blended DMHIs that are flexible to use [3839], can be customized to suit client needs [283140], and help clients with symptom tracking and homework completion between therapy sessions [2838].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [22]Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the Protection of Natural Persons with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data, and Repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) Official Journal of the European Union L 119/1 Available online: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj (accessed on 10 December 2019)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mol, M., van Genugten, C., Dozeman, E., van Schaik, D. J. F., Draisma, S., Riper, H., & Smit, J. H.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • Department of Research and Innovation, GGZ inGeest, Specialized Mental Health Care, 1081 Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
Mol, Mayke
Venue
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-12-30
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
91
ISSN
2077-0383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2996846236
Cited by
61
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
7.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
European Commission (621000)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
depression treatment, online intervention, therapist perspectives, implementation barriers and facilitators, usability, therapist satisfaction, patient motivation, time savings, mental health care organization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review