The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Skills of Document Use
Abstract
The Skills of Document Use: From Text Comprehension to Web-Based Learning examines functional literacy from a psychological standpoint. It offers a comprehensive discussion of the cognitive skills involved in reading, comprehending, and making use of complex documents. Understanding such skills is important at times when printed and online informat
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Similarly, poorly designed multimedia interfaces overwhelm working memory [21], while complex electronic texts, such as hypertexts, increase cognitive overload by demanding navigational skills [22].”
From Cognitive benefits and risks of digital technology engagement (2025) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“For example, metacognitive apps reduce cognitive overload while enhancing self-regulation [11], demonstrating synergy between cognitive load reduction and multimedia design, while strategic navigation of digital texts supports memory and decision-making [22].”
From Cognitive benefits and risks of digital technology engagement (2025) · cites this paper as [22]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Interactive Multimodal Learning Environments
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2007) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2 · Cited by 2,043
Source Evaluation, Comprehension, and Learning in Internet Science Inquiry Tasks
Wiley, J., Goldman, S. R., Graesser, A. C., Sanchez, C. A., Ash, I. K., & Hemmerich, J. A. (2009) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831209333183 · Cited by 419
“Previous research has explored some of the dimensions used in the SEEK unit (Brem et al., 2001; Britt & Aglinskas, 2002; Rouet, 2006; Slotta & Linn, 2000), but the SEEK condition consolidated them and tested for the effects of such instruction on learning outcomes from a new unit.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialNew Literacies: A Dual-Level Theory of the Changing Nature of Literacy, Instruction, and Assessment
Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. A. (2017) · Journal of Education · doi:10.1177/002205741719700202 · Cited by 410
The New Literacies of Online Research and Comprehension: Rethinking the Reading Achievement Gap
Leu, D. J., Forzani, E. E., Rhoads, C., Maykel, C., Kennedy, C., & Timbrell, N. (2014) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1002/rrq.85 · Cited by 368
“…2000 ; Eagleton, Guinee, & Langlais, 2003 ; Kuiper & Volman, 2008 ), to read and infer which link may be most useful within a set of search engine results (Henry, 2006 ), and to scan efficiently for relevant information on websites (Rouet, 2006 ; Rouet, Ros, Goumi, MacedoRouet, & Dinet, 2011 ).”
BackgroundGoldman, S. R., Britt, M. A., Brown, W. R., Cribb, G., George, M., Greenleaf, C. L., Lee, C. D., Shanahan, C. R., & Project READI (2016) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1168741 · Cited by 396
Bråten, I., Britt, M. A., Strømsø, H. I., & Rouet, J.-F. (2011) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.538647 · Cited by 346
“This, however, seems to be a great challenge to most individuals regardless of age (Rouet, 2006).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationComprehending and Learning From Internet Sources: Processing Patterns of Better and Poorer Learners
Goldman, S. R., Braasch, J. L. G., Wiley, J., Graesser, A. C., & Brodowinska, K. (2012) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1002/rrq.027 · Cited by 365
“…357 produce a coherent solution to a problem or an answer to an inquiry question (Bråten, Strømsø, & Britt, 2009; Britt & Aglinskas, 2002; Goldman, 2004, 2010; Lawless, Goldman, Gomez, Manning, & Braasch, in press; Leu et al., 2008; Rouet, 2006; Wallace, Kupperman, Krajcik, & Soloway, 2000).”
BackgroundReading on Paper and Digitally: What the Past Decades of Empirical Research Reveal
Singer, L. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2017) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654317722961 · Cited by 325
“…from the emerging models of multiple source use, such as the Multiple Documents-Task-Based Relevance Assessment and content extraction model (Rouet, 2006; Rouet & Britt, 2011), there is a growing awareness that several factors, such as individuals’ epistemic beliefs, task directives, or the…”
BackgroundAutoTutor and Family: A Review of 17 Years of Natural Language Tutoring
Nye, B. D., Graesser, A. C., & Hu, X. (2014) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-014-0029-5 · Cited by 326
RESOLV: Readers' Representation of Reading Contexts and Tasks
Rouet, J., Britt, M. A., & Durik, A. M. (2017) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2017.1329015 · Cited by 306
“However, effectively selecting and making use of multiple sources of information requires a set of advanced literacy skills that extend beyond word decoding and passage comprehension (Britt & Gabrys, 2000; Goldman, 2004; Leu, Kinzer, Coiro, & Cammack, 2004; Rouet, 2006).”
BackgroundSelf-citationBråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Britt, M. A. (2009) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1598/rrq.44.1.1 · Cited by 255
Relevance Processes in Multiple Document Comprehension
Rouet, J., & Britt, M. A. (2011) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-61735-531-820251003 · Cited by 296
Self-citationEpistemic Thinking in Action: Evaluating and Integrating Online Sources
Barzilai, S., & Zohar, A. (2012) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370008.2011.636495 · Cited by 267
“However, studies reveal that students find it difficult to use multiple sources to construct an integrated account; instead, they frequently consider their task to be the accumulation of information (e.g., Rouet, 2006; Wineburg, 1991; Wolfe & Goldman, 2005).”
BackgroundInfluentialComprehension of Multiple Documents With Conflicting Information: A Two-Step Model of Validation
Richter, T., & Abendroth, J. (2017) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2017.1322968 · Cited by 204
E-readers, computer screens, or paper: Does reading comprehension change across media platforms?
Margolin, S. J., Driscoll, C., Toland, M. J., & Kegler, J. L. (2013) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.2930 · Cited by 203
“Research in this area is still in its infancy, and new models will need to be developed to help researchers and educators to address the advantages and disadvantages to using new technologies for reading texts (e.g., Rouet, 2006; Hartman et al., 2010).”
BackgroundCoh-Metrix Measures Text Characteristics at Multiple Levels of Language and Discourse
Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., Cai, Z., Conley, M. W., Li, H., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2014) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/678293 · Cited by 199
“Just as a speaker in a conversation has a purpose in conveying a message to the listener (Clark, 1996 ), the writer tries to convey a message to the reader (Rouet, 2006 ).”
BackgroundReaders’ use of source information in text comprehension
Braasch, J. L. G., Rouet, J., Vibert, N., & Britt, M. A. (2011) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-011-0160-6 · Cited by 194
Self-citationLearning with Multiple Documents
Britt, M. A., & Rouet, J. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139048224.017 · Cited by 197
Self-citationThe New Literacies of Online Reading Comprehension: Expanding the Literacy and Learning Curriculum
Leu, D. J., Gregory McVerry, J., Ian O'Byrne, W., Kiili, C., Zawilinski, L., Everett‐Cacopardo, H., Kennedy, C., & Forzani, E. (2011) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1598/jaal.55.1.1 · Cited by 176
“sources ( Jenkins, 2006; Rouet, 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialBritt, M. A., Richter, T., & Rouet, J. (2014) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.916217 · Cited by 179
Self-citationPromoting Integration of Multiple Texts: a Review of Instructional Approaches and Practices
Barzilai, S., Zohar, A. R., & Mor-Hagani, S. (2018) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-018-9436-8 · Cited by 176
Barzilai, S., & Zohar, A. (2014) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.863265 · Cited by 169
Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2009) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/01638530902959646 · Cited by 156
“This seems to be a great challenge to most readers, regardless of age (Rouet, 2006); and the ability to meet this challenge might be influenced by characteristics of the task, as well as by characteristics of the reader.”
BackgroundBraasch, J. L. G., & Bråten, I. (2017) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2017.1323219 · Cited by 157
“Models of multiple text comprehension—such as the documents model (DM) and the multiple-document task-based relevance assessment and content extraction (MD-TRACE) model of Britt, Rouet, and colleagues—are then presented due to their focus on readers’ source representations when reading multiple texts (Britt, Perfetti,…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGoldman, S. R., & Scardamalia, M. (2013) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/10824669.2013.773217 · Cited by 158
Toward an Integrated Framework of Multiple Text Use
List, A., & Alexander, P. A. (2019) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2018.1505514 · Cited by 147
Spontaneous Sourcing Among Students Reading Multiple Documents
Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., Britt, M. A., & Ferguson, L. E. (2013) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370008.2013.769994 · Cited by 144
“By tagging information units of sources, the reader may differentiate between documents and evaluate the contribution of each document to a comprehensive understanding of the topic or situation (Rouet, 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialvan den Broek, P., & Helder, A. (2017) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/0163853x.2017.1306677 · Cited by 143
Epistemic metacognition in context: evaluating and learning online information
Mason, L., Boldrin, A., & Ariasi, N. (2010) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-009-9048-2 · Cited by 139
Cognitive Affective Engagement Model of Multiple Source Use
List, A., & Alexander, P. A. (2017) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2017.1329014 · Cited by 140
“Like cognitivist models of multiple text use (Rouet, 2006; Rouet & Britt, 2011), the CAEM examines processing initiated by a task assigned to or self-developed by students.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBigot, L. L., & Rouet, J. (2007) · Journal of Literacy Research · doi:10.1080/10862960701675317 · Cited by 143
“Navigating hypertext (i.e., networks of text pages connected through electronic links) involves a complex set of cognitive processes that are partly similar to those involved in the comprehension of printed texts (Dillon, 1994; Foltz, 1996; Rouet, 2006).”
BackgroundSelf-citationStadtler, M., Scharrer, L., Brummernhenrich, B., & Bromme, R. (2013) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370008.2013.769996 · Cited by 126
“Recently, several scholars have emphasized that the immediate access to scientific information on the Internet comes with new challenges in the acquisition of knowledge, including the need to handle conflicting information presented by sources of varying topic expertise (Goldman et al., 2011; Leu et al., 2007; Rouet,…”
BackgroundMeasuring strategic processing when students read multiple texts
Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2011) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-011-9075-7 · Cited by 126
“afford unique learning opportunities, they also represent unique challenges for most readers regardless of age (Rouet 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialAzevedo, R. (2007) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-007-9018-5 · Cited by 137
The role of personal epistemology in the self-regulation of internet-based learning
Strømsø, H. I., & Bråten, I. (2010) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-009-9043-7 · Cited by 119
Source evaluation of domain experts and novices during Web search
Brand‐Gruwel, S., Kammerer, Y., van Meeuwen, L. W., & van Gog, T. (2017) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12162 · Cited by 127
“Therefore, when searching the Web, the critical evaluation of sources and information is a very important sub-skill in information problem solving (Brand-Gruwel & Stadtler, 2011; Kammerer & Gerjets, 2012; Rouet, 2006).”
Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2009) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9091-4 · Cited by 126
“However, in present-day knowledge societies, readers both in and out of school typically learn about different topics from multiple documents that often present conflicting information (Goldman 2004; Rouet 2006).”
BackgroundBarzilai, S., Tzadok, E., & Eshet‐Alkalai, Y. (2015) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-015-9359-4 · Cited by 125
Teaching Fourth and Fifth Graders to Evaluate Information Sources During Text Comprehension
Macedo‐Rouet, M., Braasch, J. L. G., Britt, M. A., & Rouet, J. (2013) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370008.2013.769995 · Cited by 109
Self-citationBråten, I., Ferguson, L. E., Anmarkrud, Ø., & Strømsø, H. I. (2012) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-012-9371-x · Cited by 109
Distribution of cognitive load in Web search
Jacek Gwizdka, A. (2010) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21385 · Cited by 130
“In these stages, additional working memory “slots” were needed for recalling the terms from long-term memory and possibly for holding in working memory information from previously seen documents (Rouet, 2006).”
BackgroundGil, L., Bråten, I., Vidal‐Abarca, E., & Strømsø, H. I. (2010) · Reading Psychology · doi:10.1080/02702710902733600 · Cited by 106
“Thus, students need new literacy skills involved in the processes of reading, comprehending, writing, and using multiple documents (Rouet, 2006), not only for academic success but also in the world outside school.”
BackgroundKammerer, Y., & Gerjets, P. H. (2011) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2011.599040 · Cited by 103
“As a starting point for identifying factors that potentially facilitate source evaluations on SERPs we chose a conceptual framework proposed by Lazonder and Rouet (2008; see also Rouet 2006).”
BackgroundSEEK Web tutor: fostering a critical stance while exploring the causes of volcanic eruption
Graesser, A. C., Wiley, J., Goldman, S. R., O’Reilly, T., Jeon, M., & McDaniel, B. (2007) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-007-9013-x · Cited by 102
“…(Otero and Kintsch 1992), strategically searching through hypermedia (Azevedo and Cromley 2004; Hadwin and Winne 2001), generating causal inferences in science (Graesser and Bertus 1998), integrating related information sources (Rouet 2006), and formulating accurate coherent mental models.”
BackgroundBorgonovi, F. (2016) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.01.004 · Cited by 125
“…of continuous texts e including literary texts, but also to deploy information-processing strategies such as analyzing, synthesizing, integrating and interpreting relevant information from multiple texts and information sources (Rouet, 2006; Spiro, Deschryver, Hagerman, Morsink, & Thompson, 2015).”
MethodSabatini, J., O’Reilly, T., Halderman, L. K., et al. (2014) · Learning Disabilities Research and Practice · doi:10.1111/ldrp.12028 · Cited by 100
“Principle 4 Reading is a purposeful activity, aimed at attaining a coherent understanding of a text that is sufficient for the reader’s goals (McCrudden, Magliano, & Schraw, 2011; McCrudden & Schraw, 2007; Rouet, 2006).”
BackgroundBarzilai, S., & Ka’adan, I. (2016) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-016-9165-7 · Cited by 111
“(c) Making connections visible – Finally, because some students might not spontaneously construct links between sources and claims and among sources (Rouet 2006), participants were asked to draw an arrow from each source to the claim it supports and to draw links of agreement and disagreement…”
BackgroundComprehension processes in digital reading
Salmerón, L., Strømsø, H. I., Kammerer, Y., Stadtler, M., & van den Broek, P. (2018) · Studies in written language and literacy · doi:10.1075/swll.17.04sal · Cited by 94
Abendroth, J., & Richter, T. (2014) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-013-9111-x · Cited by 93
Bråten, I., Brante, E. W., & Strømsø, H. I. (2019) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1002/rrq.253 · Cited by 91
Justification beliefs and multiple-documents comprehension
Bråten, I., Ferguson, L. E., Strømsø, H. I., & Anmarkrud, Ø. (2012) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-012-0145-2 · Cited by 89
Task-oriented reading of multiple documents: online comprehension processes and offline products
Anmarkrud, Ø., McCrudden, M. T., Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2013) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9263-8 · Cited by 85
Hagen, Å. M. M., Braasch, J. L. G., & Bråten, I. (2012) · Journal of Research in Reading · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01536.x · Cited by 82
Competent Adolescent Readers’ Use of Internet Reading Strategies: A Think-Aloud Study
Cho, B. (2014) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370008.2014.918133 · Cited by 94
The Role of Individual Differences in Sourcing: a Systematic Review
Anmarkrud, Ø., Bråten, I., Florit, E., & Masón, L. (2021) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-021-09640-7 · Cited by 79
“Although sourcing is but one component of multiple document literacy, with content integration considered another important aspect (Braasch et al., 2018), it has long been regarded as crucial by researchers in this area (Rouet, 2006).”
BackgroundBråten, I., McCrudden, M. T., Lund, E. S., Brante, E. W., & Strømsø, H. I. (2017) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1002/rrq.197 · Cited by 78
Challenges of Assessing Collaborative Problem Solving
Graesser, A. C., Foltz, P. W., Rosen, Y., Shaffer, D. W., Forsyth, C. M., & Germany, M.-L. (2017) · Educational assessment in an information age · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-65368-6_5 · Cited by 83
Undergraduate Students’ Justifications for Source Selection in a Digital Academic Context
List, A., Grossnickle, E. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2015) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633115606659 · Cited by 74
“Empirical work has demonstrated that attention to such sourcing information may be of particular import for students’ multiple text evaluation and comprehension and performance on MSU tasks (Bra˚ten, Strømsø, & Britt, 2009; Perfetti, Rouet, & Britt, 1999; Rouet, 2006).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLiteracy skills and online research and comprehension: struggling readers face difficulties online
Kanniainen, L., Kiili, C., Tolvanen, A. J., Aro, M. T., & Leppänen, P. H. T. (2019) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-019-09944-9 · Cited by 75
“A high quality synthesis also requires readers to compare and contrast information and different perspectives presented in multiple online resources (Cho & Afflerbach, 2015; Rouet, 2006).”
BackgroundReading to Learn From Online Information: Modeling the Factor Structure
Kiili, C., Leu, D. J., Utriainen, J., Coiro, J., Kanniainen, L., Tolvanen, A. J., Lohvansuu, K., & Leppänen, P. H. T. (2018) · Journal of Literacy Research · doi:10.1177/1086296x18784640 · Cited by 71
“Readers select important ideas from multiple resources, and they organize, connect, compare, and contrast these ideas to build a coherent understanding of the issue (Cho & Afflerbach, 2015; Rouet, 2006; Strømsø, Bråten, & Britt, 2010).”
BackgroundDo students’ beliefs about knowledge and knowing predict their judgement of texts’ trustworthiness?
Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., & Britt, M. A. (2011) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2010.538039 · Cited by 69
“These source categories were based on the Rouet et al. (1996) study and Britt and Aglinskas (2002) reanalysis of data from that study.”
MethodAnalyzing and Integrating Models of Multiple Text Comprehension
List, A., & Alexander, P. A. (2017) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2017.1328309 · Cited by 68
Comprehension of relations among controversial texts: effects of external strategy use
Kobayashi, K. (2008) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-007-9041-6 · Cited by 64
Instruction of Digital Reading Strategies Based on Eye-Movements Modeling Examples
Salmerón, L., & Llorens, A. (2018) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633117751605 · Cited by 63
“, and to integrate information from multiple pages (Afflerbach & Cho, 2009; Brand-Gruwel, Wopereis & Walraven, 2009; Rouet, 2006; Salmerón, Strømsø, Kammerer, Stadtler, & van den Broek, 2017).”
The effects of textual environment on reading comprehension: Implications for searching as learning
Freund, L., Kopak, R., & O'Brien, H. L. (2016) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/0165551515614472 · Cited by 63
“Text comprehension, a precursor to learning, is ‘a complex, memory-based process that allows the integration of information into a meaningful mental representation’ [9].”
BackgroundInfluentialKnowledge and processes that predict proficiency in digital literacy
Bulger, M., Mayer, R. E., & Metzger, M. J. (2014) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-014-9507-2 · Cited by 78
Measuring Multiple Text Integration: A Review
Primor, L., & Katzir, T. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02294 · Cited by 60
“Generating a coherent representation based on multiple texts is a demanding task that builds on numerous top-down and bottom-up processes (Rouet, 2006; Britt and Rouet, 2012); in order to construct a coherent and complete representation of multiple texts, readers first need to efficiently process each text separately…”
BackgroundInfluentialREADING FOR UNDERSTANDING: HOW PERFORMANCE MODERATORS AND SCENARIOS IMPACT ASSESSMENT DESIGN
O’Reilly, T., & Sabatini, J. (2013) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2013.tb02338.x · Cited by 60
“In 21st century learning environments, these core abilities are more important as the sheer amount and quality of information available alters the nature of the construct (Coiro, 2009; Lawless, Goldman, Gomez, Manning, & Braasch, 2012; Metzger, 2007; Rouet, 2006; Rouet & Britt, 2011).”
BackgroundWhat really matters: The role of behavioural engagement in multiple document literacy tasks
Bråten, I., Brante, E. W., & Strømsø, H. I. (2018) · Journal of Research in Reading · doi:10.1111/1467-9817.12247 · Cited by 59
How does interactivity in videos affect task performance?
Merkt, M., & Schwan, S. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.018 · Cited by 64
The acquisition of document search strategies in grade school students
Rouet, J., & Coutelet, B. (2008) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1415 · Cited by 63
Self-citationSabatini, J., O’Reilly, T., Weeks, J. P., et al. (2019) · International Journal of Testing · doi:10.1080/15305058.2018.1551224 · Cited by 56
“Third, the sophistication of the tasks that students are expected to perform also changes (Ozuru, Rowe, O’Reilly, & McNamara, 2008; Rouet, 2006).”
BackgroundBeliefs about knowledge and knowing and multiple‐text comprehension among upper secondary students
Strømsø, H. I., & Bråten, I. (2009) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410903046864 · Cited by 55
Bråten, I., & Braasch, J. L. G. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-4331-4_4 · Cited by 56
Castek, J., Zawilinski, L., McVerry, J. G., O’Byrne, W. I., & Leu, D. J. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8864-3_4 · Cited by 55
Kobayashi, K. (2013) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9276-3 · Cited by 52
Rouet, J., Bigot, L. L., de Pereyra, G., & Britt, M. A. (2016) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-016-9625-0 · Cited by 50
Self-citationExamining Adolescents’ Strategic Processing During Online Reading With a Question-Generating Task
Cho, B., Woodward, L., Li, D., & Barlow, W. (2017) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831217701694 · Cited by 48
New Literacies of Online Reading Comprehension
Leu, D. J., Everett‐Cacopardo, H., Zawilinski, L., McVerry, G., & O’Byrne, W. I. (2012) · The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0865 · Cited by 47
Effects of epistemological sensitization on source choices
Porsch, T., & Bromme, R. (2010) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-010-9155-0 · Cited by 46
Multiple Document Comprehension: An Approach to Public Understanding of Science
Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2013) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370008.2013.771106 · Cited by 46
Sourcing in professional education: Do text factors make any difference?
Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Andreassen, R. (2016) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-015-9611-y · Cited by 50
Lund, E. S., Bråten, I., Brandmo, C., Brante, E. W., & Strømsø, H. I. (2018) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-018-9868-z · Cited by 46
Texts and pictures serve different functions in conjoint mental model construction and adaptation
Zhao, F., Schnotz, W., Wagner, I., & Gaschler, R. (2019) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-019-00962-0 · Cited by 47
“…as to read for a specific purpose or to adopt a specific perspective during reading (Pichert & Anderson, 1977), or by questions that require inferences or elaborative interrogation of the material (Rickards & Denner, 1978; Rouet, 2006), or by priming (van der Laan, Papies, Hooge, & Smeets, 2017).”
BackgroundDynamics of mental model construction from text and graphics
Hochpöchler, U., Schnotz, W., Rasch, T., Ullrich, M., Horz, H., McElvany, N., & Baumert, J. (2012) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-012-0156-z · Cited by 48
“Our findings could perhaps contribute to a more differentiated view of both text processing and graphic processing from a general, developmental and instructional perspective, as they suggest that text and graphics play fundamentally different roles in mental model construction (Goldman and Rakestraw 2000; Graesser et…”
BackgroundPotocki, A., de Pereyra, G., Ros, C., Macedo‐Rouet, M., Stadtler, M., Salmerón, L., & Rouet, J. (2019) · Journal for the Study of Education and Development Infancia y Aprendizaje · doi:10.1080/02103702.2019.1690848 · Cited by 54
Self-citationPersonal Epistemology, Understanding of Multiple Texts, and Learning Within Internet Technologies
Bråten, I. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6596-5_17 · Cited by 46
“Again, given the great challenge involved in searching for and using information located on the Internet (Rouet, 2006), this relationship may suggest that the more naive beliefs students hold about Internet-based knowledge and knowing, the more naive they may be about the ease with which relevant Internet-based source…”
BackgroundBråten, I., Braasch, J. L. G., Strømsø, H. I., & Ferguson, L. E. (2014) · Reading Psychology · doi:10.1080/02702711.2013.864362 · Cited by 44
“Such comprehension conditions require a cognizance that documents are socially constructed artifacts in which authors and publication venues might support particular agendas (Britt et al., 2013; Rouet, 2006).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHämäläinen, E. K., Kiili, C., Räikkönen, E., & Marttunen, M. J. (2021) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12580 · Cited by 48
“The theory of multiple documents comprehension (Britt et al., 2018; Perfetti et al., 1999; Rouet, 2006) describes how, to achieve their reading goals, readers select, evaluate and use information from more than one document.”
BackgroundCognitive Flexibility and Epistemic Validation in Learning from Multiple Texts
Richter, T. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1793-0_7 · Cited by 44
“Cognitive flexibility is a relevant objective also for learning with multiple texts, a field that has started to attract research in educational psychology only a decade or so ago (Perfetti, Britt, & Rouet, 1999; Rouet, 2006; Rouet, Britt, Mason, & Perfetti, 1996).”
BackgroundReader's memory for information sources in simple news stories: Effects of text and task features
de Pereyra, G., Britt, M. A., Braasch, J. L. G., & Rouet, J. (2014) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2013.879152 · Cited by 41
“Since source recall was quite low, we deemed it of interest to assess whether a task designed to enhance source-processing relevance could increase the recall of information sources (McCrudden & Schraw, 2007; Rouet, 2006).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationStudents’ Sourcing While Reading and Writing From Multiple Web Documents
Strømsø, H. I., & Bråten, I. (2014) · Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy · doi:10.18261/issn1891-943x-2014-02-02 · Cited by 42
Deeper Learning With Advances in Discourse Science and Technology
Graesser, A. C. (2015) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/2372732215600888 · Cited by 42
“Deep reading is particularly important in the 21st century because progressively more documents are not edited for factuality and writing quality (Rouet, 2006).”
BackgroundSabatini, J., O’Reilly, T., & Deane, P. (2013) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2013.tb02337.x · Cited by 46
Content integration across multiple documents reduces memory for sources
Braasch, J. L. G., McCabe, R. M., & Daniel, F. K. (2016) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-015-9609-5 · Cited by 39
Sabatini, J., O’Reilly, T., Halderman, L. K., & Bruce, K. (2014) · L’Année psychologique · doi:10.4074/s0003503314004059 · Cited by 48
The gender gap in educational outcomes in Norway
Borgonovi, F., Ferrara, A., & Maghnouj, S. (2018) · OECD education working papers · doi:10.1787/f8ef1489-en · Cited by 53
“…and interpret extended pieces of continuous texts e including literary texts, but also to deploy information-processing strategies such as analysing, synthesising, integrating and interpreting relevant information from multiple texts and information sources (Rouet, 2013[16]; Spiro, 2015[17]).”
Multimedia Learning from Multiple Documents
Rouet, J., & Britt, A. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139547369.039 · Cited by 38
Self-citationSaux, G., Britt, M. A., Vibert, N., & Rouet, J. (2021) · Language and Linguistics Compass · doi:10.1111/lnc3.12409 · Cited by 44
Self-citationExamining interest throughout multiple text use
List, A., Stephens, L. A., & Alexander, P. A. (2018) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-018-9863-4 · Cited by 35
“For instance, given that multiple text use has been identified as a complex, cognitively demanding process (Rouet, 2006), interest has been proposed as a factor easing cognitive load during multiple text task completion, by increasing students’ cognitive absorption (Dias, Gomes, & Correia, 1999; Kang & Kim, 2006; Nied…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Rouet, J.-F.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2006-03-14
- OpenAlex
- W4252507649
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 9.71
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Literacy, Media, and Education
- Keywords
- document use, functional literacy, text comprehension, reading comprehension, cognitive skills, web-based learning, online information
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review