The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Social Justice in a Diverse Society
Abstract
Issues of social justice have been an important part of social psychology since the explosion of psychological research that occurred during and after World War II. At that time, psychologists began to move away from earlier theories that paid little attention to people's subjective understanding of the world. As increasing attention was paid to people's thoughts about their social experiences, it was discovered that people are strongly affected by their assessments of what is just or fair in their dealings with others. This recognition has led to a broad range of studies exploring what people mean by justice and how it influences their thoughts, feelings, and behaviors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing
Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003) · Law & Society Review · doi:10.1111/1540-5893.3703002 · Cited by 2,973
Self-citationvan Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504 · Cited by 2,714
(2002) · Cited by 1,687
Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and the Effective Rule of Law
Tyler, T. R. (2003) · Crime and Justice · doi:10.1086/652233 · Cited by 1,432
Self-citationTyler, T. R. (2004) · The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/0002716203262627 · Cited by 1,282
Self-citationvan Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A. H., & Leach, C. W. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649 · Cited by 1,116
Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments
van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2002) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(02)80003-x · Cited by 913
Tyler, T. R. (2001) · Behavioral Sciences & the Law · doi:10.1002/bsl.438 · Cited by 616
Self-citationMaking Sense of Life: The Existential Self Trying to Deal with Personal Uncertainty
van den Bos, K. (2009) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/10478400903333411 · Cited by 395
Jost, J. T., Rudman, L. A., Blair, I. V., Carney, D. R., Dasgupta, N., Glaser, J., & Hardin, C. D. (2009) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2009.10.001 · Cited by 353
VOICE, CONTROL, AND BELONGING: The Double-Edged Sword of Procedural Fairness
MacCoun, R. J. (2005) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.1.041604.115958 · Cited by 343
Restorative Justice and Procedural Justice: Dealing with Rule Breaking
Tyler, T. R. (2006) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00452.x · Cited by 335
Self-citationOvercoming apartheid: can truth reconcile a divided nation?
Gibson *, J. L. (2004) · Politikon · doi:10.1080/0258934042000280698 · Cited by 244
Murphy, K., & Cherney, A. (2011) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1177/0004865811405260 · Cited by 237
Reconsidering the role of procedures for decision acceptance
Esaiasson, P., Persson, M., Gilljam, M., & Lindholm, T. (2019) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123416000508 · Cited by 223
A Model of Third Parties' Morally Motivated Responses to Mistreatment in Organizations
O'reilly, J., & Aquino, K. (2011) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2009.0311 · Cited by 223
Assessing public perceptions of police use-of-force: legal reasonableness and community standards
Mourtgos, S. M., & Adams, I. T. (2020) · Justice Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418825.2019.1679864 · Cited by 80
Procedural justice in contacts with the police: the perspective of victims of crime
Elliott, I., Thomas, S. D. M., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (2012) · Police Practice and Research · doi:10.1080/15614263.2011.607659 · Cited by 74
(2009) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 46
Hoogervorst, N., De Cremer, D., & van Dijke, M. (2013) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726713482150 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2019-07-11
- OpenAlex
- W2327531698
- Cited by
- 667
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.41
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
