The DOI matches its DataCite record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Finding Deceptive Opinion Spam by Any Stretch of the Imagination
Open accessAbstract
Consumers increasingly rate, review and research products online. Consequently, websites containing consumer reviews are becoming targets of opinion spam. While recent work has focused primarily on manually identifiable instances of opinion spam, in this work we study deceptive opinion spam---fictitious opinions that have been deliberately written to sound authentic. Integrating work from psychology and computational linguistics, we develop and compare three approaches to detecting deceptive opinion spam, and ultimately develop a classifier that is nearly 90% accurate on our gold-standard opinion spam dataset. Based on feature analysis of our learned models, we additionally make several theoretical contributions, including revealing a relationship between deceptive opinions and imaginative writing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“The dataset of deceptive reviews from Ott et al. [46, 47] has 800 truthful reviews and 800 deceptive reviews for hotels in Chicago.”
From Improving Human-AI Collaboration With Descriptions of AI Behavior (2023) · cites this paper as [47]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Text categorization with Support Vector Machines: Learning with many relevant features
Joachims, T. (1998) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/bfb0026683 · Cited by 8,271
Machine learning in automated text categorization
Sebastiani, F. (2002) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/505282.505283 · Cited by 7,927
SRILM - an extensible language modeling toolkit
Stolcke, A. (2002) · International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP) · doi:10.21437/icslp.2002-303 · Cited by 4,385
Electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management
Litvin, S. W., Goldsmith, R. E., & Pan, B. (2008) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.011 · Cited by 3,267
Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape.
Rigby, R. A., & Stasinopoulos, D. M. (2005) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.00510.x · Cited by 3,228
Accurate unlexicalized parsing
Klein, D., & Manning, C. D. (2003) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.3115/1075096.1075150 · Cited by 3,055
Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English
Biber, D., & Quirk, R. (1999) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587792 · Cited by 2,766
Accuracy of Deception Judgments
Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2 · Cited by 1,953
The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015
Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K. (2015) · University of Texas at Austin · doi:10.15781/t25p41 · Cited by 1,674
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [6]6. the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics , pages 669-672. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- [17]17. M.K. Johnson and C.L. Raye. 1981. Reality monitoring. Psychological Review , 88(1):67-85.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Liu, B. (2012) · Synthesis lectures on human language technologies · doi:10.2200/s00416ed1v01y201204hlt016 · Cited by 3,995
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Zhang, L., & Liu, B. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7687-1_907 · Cited by 3,307
"Liar, Liar Pants on Fire": A New Benchmark Dataset for Fake News Detection
Wang, W. Y. (2017) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-2067 · Cited by 2,010
Graph based anomaly detection and description: a survey
Akoglu, L., Tong, H., & Koutra, D. (2015) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-014-0365-y · Cited by 1,504
A survey on opinion mining and sentiment analysis: Tasks, approaches and applications
Ravi, K., & Ravi, V. (2015) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2015.06.015 · Cited by 1,376
An overview of online fake news: Characterization, detection, and discussion
Zhang, X., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2020) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2019.03.004 · Cited by 997
Truth of Varying Shades: Analyzing Language in Fake News and Political Fact-Checking
Rashkin, H., Choi, E., Jang, J. Y., Volkova, S., & Choi, Y. (2017) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1317 · Cited by 965
Self-citationPromotional Reviews: An Empirical Investigation of Online Review Manipulation
Mayzlin, D., Dover, Y., & Chevalier, J. (2014) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.104.8.2421 · Cited by 937
Spotting fake reviewer groups in consumer reviews
Mukherjee, A., Liu, B., & Glance, N. (2012) · Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/2187836.2187863 · Cited by 773
Automatic Detection of Fake NewsPreprint
Pérez‐Rosas, V., Kleinberg, B., Lefevre, A., & Mihalcea, R. F. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1708.07104 · Cited by 709
A survey on sentiment analysis challenges
Hussein, D. M. E.-D. M. (2016) · Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jksues.2016.04.002 · Cited by 694
Salehan, M., & Kim, D. J. (2015) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2015.10.006 · Cited by 588
What Yelp Fake Review Filter Might Be Doing?
Mukherjee, A., Venkataraman, V., Liu, B., & Glance, N. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v7i1.14389 · Cited by 570
Machine learning for email spam filtering: review, approaches and open research problems
Dada, E. G., Bassi, J. S., Chiroma, H., Abdulhamid, S. M., Adetunmbi, A. O., & Ajibuwa, O. (2019) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01802 · Cited by 604
Survey of review spam detection using machine learning techniques
Crawford, M., Khoshgoftaar, T. M., Prusa, J. D., Richter, A. N., & Najada, H. A. (2015) · Journal Of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-015-0029-9 · Cited by 530
Syntactic Stylometry for Deception Detection
Feng, S., Banerjee, R., & Choi, Y. (2012) · Cited by 499
Self-citationCommon Sense Reasoning for Detection, Prevention, and Mitigation of Cyberbullying
Dinakar, K., Jones, B., Havasi, C., Lieberman, H. A., & Picard, R. W. (2012) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/2362394.2362400 · Cited by 441
Spotting opinion spammers using behavioral footprints
Mukherjee, A., Kumar, A., Liu, B., Wang, J., Hsu, M., Castellanos, M., & Ghosh, R. (2013) · Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/2487575.2487580 · Cited by 426
Sentiment Analysis: An Overview from Linguistics
Taboada, M. (2015) · Annual Review of Linguistics · doi:10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011415-040518 · Cited by 468
Empath: Understanding Topic Signals in Large-Scale Text
Fast, E., Chen, B., & Bernstein, M. S. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858535 · Cited by 413
Review spam detection via temporal pattern discovery
Xie, S., Wang, G., Lin, S., & Yu, P. S. (2012) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/2339530.2339662 · Cited by 406
Opinion Fraud Detection in Online Reviews by Network Effects
Akoglu, L., Chandy, R., & Faloutsos, C. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v7i1.14380 · Cited by 402
Review Graph Based Online Store Review Spammer Detection
Wang, G., Xie, S., Liu, B., & Yu, P. S. (2011) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm.2011.124 · Cited by 390
Liu, B. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108639286 · Cited by 422
Fake online reviews: Literature review, synthesis, and directions for future research
Wu, Y., Ngai, E. W. T., Wu, P., & Wu, C. (2020) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2020.113280 · Cited by 401
Lai, V., & Tan, C. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287590 · Cited by 377
Towards a General Rule for Identifying Deceptive Opinion Spam
Li, J., Ott, M., Cardie, C., & Hovy, E. H. (2014) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.3115/v1/p14-1147 · Cited by 383
Self-citation(2013) · Cited by 353
Self-citationExploiting Burstiness in Reviews for Review Spammer Detection
Fei, G., Mukherjee, A., Liu, B., Hsu, M., Castellanos, M., & Ghosh, R. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v7i1.14400 · Cited by 356
Creating and detecting fake reviews of online products
Salminen, J. O., Kandpal, C. S., Kamel, A. M., Jung, S., & Jansen, B. J. J. (2021) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102771 · Cited by 361
The social impact of natural language processing
Hovy, D., & Spruit, S. L. (2016) · Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-2096 · Cited by 329
Estimating the prevalence of deception in online review communities
Ott, M., Cardie, C., & Hancock, J. T. (2012) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2187836.2187864 · Cited by 304
Self-citationDetection of review spam: A survey
Heydari, A., Tavakoli, M. A., Salim, N. B., & Heydari, Z. (2014) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.12.029 · Cited by 307
A framework for fake review detection in online consumer electronics retailers
Barbado, R., Araque, Ó., & Iglesias, C. Á. (2019) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2019.03.002 · Cited by 300
Reviews without a Purchase: Low Ratings, Loyal Customers, and Deception
Anderson, E. T., & Simester, D. I. (2014) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.13.0209 · Cited by 307
Credibility of Anonymous Online Product Reviews: A Language Expectancy Perspective
Jensen, M. L., Averbeck, J. M., Zhang, Z., & Wright, K. B. (2013) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222300109 · Cited by 305
Spam Review Detection with Graph Convolutional Networks
Li, A., Qin, Z., Liu, R., Yang, Y., & Li, D. (2019) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3357384.3357820 · Cited by 273
Data Analytics for the Identification of Fake Reviews Using Supervised Learning
Alsubari, S. N. (2021) · Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print) · doi:10.32604/cmc.2022.019625 · Cited by 264
Socially Responsible AI Algorithms: Issues, Purposes, and Challenges
Cheng, L., Varshney, K. R., & Liu, H. (2021) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.12814 · Cited by 261
Kauffmann, E., Peral, J., Gil, D., Ferrández, A., Rubio, R. S., & Mora, H. (2019) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.08.003 · Cited by 265
Sentiment Analysis for Fake News Detection
Alonso, M. Á., Vilares, D., Gómez‐Rodríguez, C., & Vilares, J. (2021) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics10111348 · Cited by 267
SDTE: A Secure Blockchain-Based Data Trading Ecosystem
Dai, W., Dai, C., Choo, K. R., Cui, C., Zou, D., & Jin, H. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2019.2928256 · Cited by 246
Communication Processes in Participatory Websites
Walther, J. B., & Jang, J.-W. (2012) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01592.x · Cited by 246
Automated Fact Checking: Task formulations, methods and future directionsPreprint
Thorne, J. P., & Vlachos, A. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.17863/cam.78745 · Cited by 260
Neural networks for deceptive opinion spam detection: An empirical study
Ren, Y., & Ji, D. (2017) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2017.01.015 · Cited by 248
Veracity Roadmap: Is Big Data Objective, Truthful and Credible?
Lukoianove, T., & Rubin, V. L. (2014) · Advances in Classification Research Online · doi:10.7152/acro.v24i1.14671 · Cited by 243
Fake Reviews Detection: A Survey
Mohawesh, R., Xu, S., Tran, S. N., Ollington, R., Springer, M., Jararweh, Y., & Maqsood, S. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3075573 · Cited by 238
A review on social spam detection: Challenges, open issues, and future directions
Rao, S., Verma, A. K., & Bhatia, T. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115742 · Cited by 237
Detecting and Monitoring Hate Speech in Twitter
Pereira-Kohatsu, J. C., Quijano-Sánchez, L., Liberatore, F., & Camacho‐Collados, M. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19214654 · Cited by 233
Distributional Footprints of Deceptive Product Reviews
Feng, S., Xing, L., Gogar, A., & Choi, Y. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v6i1.14275 · Cited by 217
Self-citationInterpretable Rumor Detection in Microblogs by Attending to User Interactions
Khoo, L. M. S., Chieu, H. L., Zhong, Q., & Jiang, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i05.6405 · Cited by 214
Appropriate Reliance on AI Advice: Conceptualization and the Effect of Explanations
Schemmer, M., Kuehl, N., Benz, C., Bartos, A., & Satzger, G. (2023) · Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces · doi:10.1145/3581641.3584066 · Cited by 208
Identify Online Store Review Spammers via Social Review Graph
Wang, G., Xie, S., Liu, B., & Yu, P. S. (2012) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/2337542.2337546 · Cited by 200
Serf and turf: crowdturfing for fun and profit
Wang, G., Wilson, C., Zhao, X., Zhu, Y., Mohanlal, M., Zheng, H., & Zhao, B. Y. (2012) · Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/2187836.2187928 · Cited by 197
Zhao, Y., Da, J., & Yan, J. (2020) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102390 · Cited by 207
Hotels׳ responses to online reviews: Managing consumer dissatisfaction
Zhang, Y., & Vásquez, C. (2014) · Discourse Context & Media · doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2014.08.004 · Cited by 193
When good WOM hurts and bad WOM gains: The effect of untrustworthy online reviews
Reimer, T., & Benkenstein, M. (2016) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.05.014 · Cited by 207
Exploring Demographic Language Variations to Improve Multilingual Sentiment Analysis in Social Media
Volkova, S., Wilson, T., & Yarowsky, D. (2013) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d13-1187 · Cited by 191
Computational Argumentation Quality Assessment in Natural Language
Wachsmuth, H., Naderi, N., Hou, Y., Bilu, Y., Prabhakaran, V., Thijm, T. A., Hirst, G., & Stein, B. (2017) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/e17-1017 · Cited by 190
Hajek, P., Barushka, A., & Munk, M. (2020) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-020-04757-2 · Cited by 186
Battling the internet water army
Chen, C., Wu, K., Srinivasan, V., & Zhang, X. (2013) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1145/2492517.2492637 · Cited by 188
Taking fake online consumer reviews seriously
Malbon, J. (2013) · Journal of Consumer Policy · doi:10.1007/s10603-012-9216-7 · Cited by 183
Mobile phishing attacks and defence mechanisms: State of art and open research challenges
Goel, D., & Jain, A. K. (2017) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2017.12.006 · Cited by 182
Detecting positive and negative deceptive opinions using PU-learning
Fusilier, D. H., Montes-y-Gómez, M., Rosso, P., & Guzmán-Cabrera, R. (2014) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2014.11.001 · Cited by 176
hPSD: A Hybrid PU-Learning-Based Spammer Detection Model for Product Reviews
Wu, Z., Cao, J., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, L., & Wu, J. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2018.2877161 · Cited by 166
Fake news detection: A survey of graph neural network methods
Phan, H. T., Nguyên, N. T., & Hwang, D. (2023) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110235 · Cited by 178
NetSpam: A Network-Based Spam Detection Framework for Reviews in Online Social Media
Shehnepoor, S., Salehi, M., Farahbakhsh, R., & Crespi, N. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2017.2675361 · Cited by 165
Uncovering collusive spammers in Chinese review websites
Xu, C., Zhang, J., Chang, K., & Long, C. (2013) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/2505515.2505700 · Cited by 159
Munzel, A. (2016) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.06.002 · Cited by 166
Choraś, M., Demestichas, K. P., Giełczyk, A., Herrero, Á., Ksieniewicz, P., Remoundou, K., Urda, D., & Woźniak, M. (2020) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2020.107050 · Cited by 158
Weak Supervision for Fake News Detection via Reinforcement Learning
Wang, Y., Yang, W., Ma, F., Xu, J., Zhong, B., Deng, Q., & Gao, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i01.5389 · Cited by 157
Multi-Source Multi-Class Fake News Detection
Karimi, H. R., Roy, P. C., Saba-Sadiya, S., & Tang, J. (2018) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · Cited by 156
The promise and peril of real-time corrections to political misperceptions
Garrett, R., & Weeks, B. E. (2013) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2441776.2441895 · Cited by 155
Document representation and feature combination for deceptive spam review detection
Li, L., Qin, B., Ren, W., & Liu, T. (2017) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2016.10.080 · Cited by 156
Detecting deceptive reviews using lexical and syntactic features
Shojaee, S., Murad, M. A. A., Azman, A., Sharef, N. M., & Nadali, S. (2013) · International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA) · doi:10.1109/isda.2013.6920707 · Cited by 147
Learning Hierarchical Discourse-level Structure for Fake News Detection
Karimi, H., & Tang, J. (2019) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1347 · Cited by 155
Wang, Q., Zhang, W., Li, J., Mai, F., & Ma, Z. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107272 · Cited by 156
Man vs. machine: practical adversarial detection of malicious crowdsourcing workers
Wang, G., Wang, T., Zhang, H., & Zhao, B. Y. (2014) · Cited by 142
Bimodal Distribution and Co-Bursting in Review Spam Detection
Li, H., Fei, G., Wang, S., Liu, B., Shao, W., Mukherjee, A., & Shao, J. (2017) · Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/3038912.3052582 · Cited by 141
Ginger Cannot Cure Cancer: Battling Fake Health News with a Comprehensive Data Repository
Dai, E., Sun, Y., & Wang, S. (2020) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v14i1.7350 · Cited by 140
User-Generated Content and Social Media
Luca, M. (2015) · Handbook of media economics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-63685-0.00012-7 · Cited by 130
Revisiting Semi-Supervised Learning for Online Deceptive Review Detection
Rout, J. K., Dalmia, A., Choo, K. R., Bakshi, S., & Jena, S. K. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2655032 · Cited by 130
Plotkina, D., Munzel, A., & Pallud, J. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.009 · Cited by 134
Automatic Detection of Online Recruitment Frauds: Characteristics, Methods, and a Public Dataset
Vidros, S., Kolias, C., Kambourakis, G., & Akoglu, L. (2017) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi9010006 · Cited by 127
"Why is 'Chicago' deceptive?" Towards Building Model-Driven Tutorials for Humans
Lai, V., Liu, H., & Tan, C. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376873 · Cited by 123
Fake review detection on online E-commerce platforms: a systematic literature review
Paul, H., & Nikolaev, A. G. (2021) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-021-00772-6 · Cited by 126
An Evaluation of the Brazilian Portuguese LIWC Dictionary for Sentiment Analysis
Filho, P. P. B., Pardo, T. A. S., & Aluísio, S. M. (2013) · Cited by 122
Zhang, W., Du, Y., Yoshida, T., & Wang, Q. (2018) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2018.03.007 · Cited by 122
Spam Review Detection Techniques: A Systematic Literature Review
Hussain, N., Mirza, H. T., Rasool, G., Hussain, I., & Kaleem, M. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9050987 · Cited by 122
A review of feature selection methods based on meta-heuristic algorithms
Sadeghian, Z., Akbari, E., Nematzadeh, H., & Motameni, H. (2023) · Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1080/0952813x.2023.2183267 · Cited by 119
BIRDNEST: Bayesian Inference for Ratings-Fraud Detection
Hooi, B., Shah, N., Beutel, A., Günnemann, S., Akoglu, L., Kumar, M., Makhija, D., & Faloutsos, C. (2016) · SIAM International Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1137/1.9781611974348.56 · Cited by 118
A Review on Mobile SMS Spam Filtering Techniques
Abdulhamid, S. M., Latiff, M. S. A., Chiroma, H., Osho, O., Abdul-Salaam, G., Abubakar, A., & Herawan, T. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2666785 · Cited by 118
Detection of fake opinions using time series
Heydari, A., Tavakoli, M. A., & Salim, N. B. (2016) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.03.020 · Cited by 118
Analyzing and Detecting Opinion Spam on a Large-scale Dataset via Temporal and Spatial Patterns
Li, H., Chen, Z., Mukherjee, A., Liu, B., & Shao, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v9i1.14652 · Cited by 117
Detecting Deceptive Reviews Using Generative Adversarial Networks
Aghakhani, H., Machiry, A., Nilizadeh, S., Kruegel, C., & Vigna, G. (2018) · IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW) · doi:10.1109/spw.2018.00022 · Cited by 118
Misinformation and How to Correct It
Cook, J., Ecker, U. K. H., & Lewandowsky, S. (2015) · Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0222 · Cited by 95
Linguistic Obfuscation in Fraudulent Science
Markowitz, D. M., & Hancock, J. T. (2015) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x15614605 · Cited by 116
Self-citationFrom conflicts and confusion to doubts: Examining review inconsistency for fake review detection
Shan, G., Zhou, L., & Zhang, D. (2021) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2021.113513 · Cited by 117
Extracting relevant knowledge for the detection of sarcasm and nastiness in the social web
Justo, R., Corcoran, T., Lukin, S. M., Walker, M., & Torres, M. I. (2014) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2014.05.021 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Ott, M., Choi, Y., Cardie, C., & Hancock, J. T.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2011
- Pages
- 309-319
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1107.4557
- OpenAlex
- W2161283199
- Cited by
- 1,008
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 103 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 43
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0624267, 0904822, 0968450)
- Jack Kent Cooke Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Keywords
- opinion spam, opinion spam detection, consumer reviews, fake reviews, creative writing, feature analysis, classifier comparison, psychology of deception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
