The DOI matches its DataCite record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Finding Deceptive Opinion Spam by Any Stretch of the Imagination
Open accessAbstract
Consumers increasingly rate, review and research products online. Consequently, websites containing consumer reviews are becoming targets of opinion spam. While recent work has focused primarily on manually identifiable instances of opinion spam, in this work we study deceptive opinion spam---fictitious opinions that have been deliberately written to sound authentic. Integrating work from psychology and computational linguistics, we develop and compare three approaches to detecting deceptive opinion spam, and ultimately develop a classifier that is nearly 90% accurate on our gold-standard opinion spam dataset. Based on feature analysis of our learned models, we additionally make several theoretical contributions, including revealing a relationship between deceptive opinions and imaginative writing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“The dataset of deceptive reviews from Ott et al. [46, 47] has 800 truthful reviews and 800 deceptive reviews for hotels in Chicago.”
From Improving Human-AI Collaboration With Descriptions of AI Behavior (2023) · cites this paper as [47]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Text categorization with Support Vector Machines: Learning with many relevant features
Joachims, T. (1998) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/bfb0026683 · Cited by 8,271
Machine learning in automated text categorization
Sebastiani, F. (2002) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/505282.505283 · Cited by 7,927
SRILM - an extensible language modeling toolkit
Stolcke, A. (2002) · International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP) · doi:10.21437/icslp.2002-303 · Cited by 4,385
Electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management
Litvin, S. W., Goldsmith, R. E., & Pan, B. (2008) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.011 · Cited by 3,267
Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape.
Rigby, R. A., & Stasinopoulos, D. M. (2005) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.00510.x · Cited by 3,228
Accurate unlexicalized parsing
Klein, D., & Manning, C. D. (2003) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.3115/1075096.1075150 · Cited by 3,055
Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English
Biber, D., & Quirk, R. (1999) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587792 · Cited by 2,766
Accuracy of Deception Judgments
Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2 · Cited by 1,953
The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015
Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K. (2015) · University of Texas at Austin · doi:10.15781/t25p41 · Cited by 1,674
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [6]6. the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics , pages 669-672. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- [17]17. M.K. Johnson and C.L. Raye. 1981. Reality monitoring. Psychological Review , 88(1):67-85.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,002
An analysis of fake social media engagement services
Catalán, D. N., Pastrana, S., Vallina-Rodríguez, N., & Tapiador, J. (2022) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2022.103013 · Cited by 28
Markowitz, D. M., & Hancock, J. T. (2023) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x231220404 · Cited by 30
Self-citationAdaptive binary flower pollination algorithm for feature selection in review spam detection
Rajamohana, S. P., Umamaheswari, K., & Abirami, B. (2017) · International Conference on Innovations in Green Energy and Healthcare Technologies (IGEHT) · doi:10.1109/igeht.2017.8094094 · Cited by 22
Sentiment and Emotion Based Text Representation for Fake Reviews Detection
Melleng, A., Loughrey, A.-J., & Deepak, P. (2019) · International conference Recent advances in natural language processing · doi:10.26615/978-954-452-056-4_087 · Cited by 22
SPAR: A system to detect spam in Arabic opinions
Wahsheh, H. A., Al-Kabi, M. N., & Alsmadi, I. M. (2013) · IEEE Jordan Conference on Applied Electrical Engineering and Computing Technologies · doi:10.1109/aeect.2013.6716442 · Cited by 23
Deception and Language: The Contextual Organization of Language and Deception (COLD) Framework
Markowitz, D. M., & Hancock, J. T. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96334-1_10 · Cited by 23
Self-citationAn Online Fake Review Detection Approach Using Famous Machine Learning Algorithms
Alshehri, A. H. (2024) · Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print) · doi:10.32604/cmc.2023.046838 · Cited by 21
Fake Review Detection Model Based on Comment Content and Review Behavior
Sun, P., Bi, W., Zhang, Y., Wang, Q., Kou, F., Lu, T., & Chen, J. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13214322 · Cited by 21
Optimizing Sentiment Classification for Arabic Opinion Texts
Saeed, R. M. K., Rady, S., & Gharib, T. F. (2021) · Cognitive Computation · doi:10.1007/s12559-020-09771-z · Cited by 21
Brzić, B., Botički, I., & Babac, M. B. (2023) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a16050221 · Cited by 21
Detecting Collusive Spamming Activities in Community Question Answering
Liu, Y., Liu, Y., Zhou, K., Zhang, M., & Ma, S. (2017) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3038912.3052594 · Cited by 21
Deception Detection With Behavioral Methods
Sartori, G., Zangrossi, A., & Monaro, M. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-812729-2.00010-0 · Cited by 21
A Hybrid Recognition System for Check-worthy Claims Using Heuristics and Supervised Learning.
Zuo, C., Karakaş, A., & Banerjee, R. (2018) · CLEF (Working Notes) · Cited by 21
Shrestha, A., & Spezzano, F. (2019) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1145/3341161.3343536 · Cited by 21
Gârbacea, C., Carton, S., Yan, S., & Mei, Q. (2019) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1409 · Cited by 22
Opinion Spam Detection Based on Heterogeneous Information Network
Sun, Y., & Loparo, K. A. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI) · doi:10.1109/ictai.2019.00277 · Cited by 21
BERTective: Language Models and Contextual Information for Deception Detection
Fornaciari, T., Bianchi, F., Poesio, M., & Hovy, D. (2021) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.232 · Cited by 23
Marwat, M. I., Khan, J. A., Alshehri, M. D., Ali, M. A., Hizbullah, Ali, H., & Assam, M. (2022) · KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems · doi:10.3837/tiis.2022.03.005 · Cited by 20
A Knowledge-Based Deep Learning Approach for Automatic Fake News Detection using BERT on Twitter
Nair, V., Pareek, J., & Bhatt, S. (2024) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2024.04.178 · Cited by 22
Synthetic review spamming and defense
Morales, A., Sun, H., & Yan, X. (2013) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2487788.2487864 · Cited by 20
Understanding the process of writing fake online reviews
Banerjee, S., & Chua, A. Y. K. (2014) · International Conference on Digital Information Management · doi:10.1109/icdim.2014.6991395 · Cited by 20
A New Dataset and Evaluation for Belief/Factuality
Prabhakaran, V., By, T., Hirschberg, J., Rambow, O., Shaikh, S., Strzalkowski, T., Tracey, J., Arrigo, M., Basu, R., Clark, M. H., et al. (2015) · Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics · doi:10.18653/v1/s15-1009 · Cited by 20
Deception detection in text and its relation to the cultural dimension of individualism/collectivism
Papantoniou, K., Papadakos, P., Patkos, T., Flouris, G., Androutsopoulos, I., & Plexousakis, D. (2021) · Natural Language Engineering · doi:10.1017/s1351324921000152 · Cited by 23
Detecting and Analysing Fake Opinions Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms
Al-Adhaileh, M. H., & Alsaade, F. W. (2021) · Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing · doi:10.32604/iasc.2022.021225 · Cited by 20
Salminen, J. O., Mustak, M., Jung, S., Makkonen, H. S., & Jansen, B. J. J. (2025) · Journal of Marketing Analytics · doi:10.1057/s41270-025-00393-8 · Cited by 19
Identifying Dogmatism in Social Media: Signals and Models
Fast, E., & Horvitz, E. (2016) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1066 · Cited by 19
Klyueva, A. (2019) · Advances in media, entertainment and the arts (AMEA) book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-8535-0.ch002 · Cited by 19
Abd-Alhalem, S. M., Ali, H. A., Soliman, N. F., Algarni, A. D., & Salem, H. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3435916 · Cited by 19
Shrouded Prices and Firm Reputation: Evidence from the U.S. Hotel Industry
Chiles, B. S. (2017) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2019.3566 · Cited by 19
How can trustworthy influencers be identified in electronic word-of-mouth communities?
Arenas‐Márquez, F. J., Torres, M. D. R. M., & Toral, S. L. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120596 · Cited by 23
Adaptive big data analytics for deceptive review detection in online social media
Zhang, W., Lau, R. Y. K., & Li, C. (2014) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 19
A survey of multilingual human-tagged short message datasets for sentiment analysis tasks
Steiner-Correa, F., Viedma-del-Jesús, M. I., & López-Herrera, A. G. (2017) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-017-2766-5 · Cited by 19
Karduni, A. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1903.07136 · Cited by 19
Chernyaeva, O., Lee, O.-K. D., & Hong, T. (2025) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2025.114522 · Cited by 18
Implicitly Abusive Comparisons – A New Dataset and Linguistic Analysis
Wiegand, M., Geulig, M., & Ruppenhofer, J. (2021) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.27 · Cited by 18
Did you find this review helpful?
Azimi, S., & Andonova, Y. (2023) · Marketing Intelligence & Planning · doi:10.1108/mip-08-2022-0365 · Cited by 18
Predicting Credibility of Online Reviews: An Integrated Approach
Abedin, E., Mendoza, A., Akbarighatar, P., & Karunasekera, S. A. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3383846 · Cited by 18
A study on different machine learning techniques for spam review detection
Visani, C., Jadeja, N., & Modi, M. (2017) · International Conference on Energy, Communication, Data Analytics and Soft Computing (ICECDS) · doi:10.1109/icecds.2017.8389522 · Cited by 18
Decomposing TripAdvisor: Detecting Potentially Fraudulent Hotel Reviews in the Era of Big Data
Harris, C. G. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Big Knowledge (ICBK) · doi:10.1109/icbk.2018.00040 · Cited by 18
Spotting faked 5 stars ratings in E-Commerce using mouse dynamics
Monaro, M., Cannonito, E., Gamberini, L., & Sartori, G. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106348 · Cited by 18
Li, S., Zhong, G., Jin, Y., Wu, X., Zhu, P., & Wang, Z. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2022.3144013 · Cited by 18
An Evolutionary Computation Approach for Twitter Bot Detection
Rovito, L., Bonin, L., Manzoni, L., & Lorenzo, A. D. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12125915 · Cited by 18
Almela, Á., Valencia‐García, R., & Cantos-Gómez, P. (2013) · Linguistic Evidence in Security Law and Intelligence · doi:10.5195/lesli.2013.5 · Cited by 18
Finding Deceptive Opinion Spam by Correcting the Mislabeled Instances
Ren, Y., Ji, D., Yin, L., & Zhang, H. (2015) · Chinese Journal of Electronics · doi:10.1049/cje.2015.01.009 · Cited by 18
Deceptive Opinion Spam Detection Using Deep Level Linguistic Features
Chen, C., Zhao, H., & Yang, Y. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25207-0_43 · Cited by 18
Attention-based BiLSTM with positional embeddings for fake review detection
Chen, J., Zhang, T. Y., Yan, Z., Zheng, Z., Zhang, W., & Zhang, J. (2025) · Journal Of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-025-01130-9 · Cited by 17
Fine-Grained Question-Level Deception Detection via Graph-Based Learning and Cross-Modal Fusion
Zhang, H., Ding, Y., Cao, L., Wang, X. Y., & Feng, L. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2022.3186799 · Cited by 17
Bengali fake reviews: A benchmark dataset and detection system
Shahariar, G. M., Shawon, M. T. R., Shah, F. M., Alam, M. S., & Mahbub, M. S. (2024) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2024.127732 · Cited by 18
Sorour, S. E., Alojail, A., El-Shora, A. E., Amin, A. E., & Abohany, A. A. (2024) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math12233856 · Cited by 22
Arabic Fake News Dataset Development: Humans and AI-Generated Contributions
Himdi, H., Zamzami, N., Najar, F., Alrehaili, M., & Bouguila, N. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3556376 · Cited by 17
Credible Review Detection with Limited Information Using Consistency Features
Mukherjee, S., Dutta, S., & Weikum, G. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46227-1_13 · Cited by 17
Unsupervised User Behavior Representation for Fraud Review Detection with Cold-Start Problem
Li, Q., Wu, Q., Zhu, C., Zhang, J., & Zhao, W. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-16148-4_18 · Cited by 17
Lai, V., Cai, Z., & Tan, C. (2019) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1046 · Cited by 20
Decoupling in CSR reports: A Linguistic Content Analysis of the Volkswagen Dieselgate scandal
Holtbrügge, D., & Conrad, M. (2020) · International Studies of Management and Organization · doi:10.1080/00208825.2020.1811523 · Cited by 18
Deception Detection Using Machine Learning
Delgado, A. A. C., Glisson, W. B., Shashidhar, N. K., McDonald, J. T., Grispos, G., & Benton, R. (2021) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2021.857 · Cited by 17
Le, T.-K.-H., Li, Y., & Li, S.-T. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3167511 · Cited by 18
Detecting Deceptive Opinion Spam using Linguistics, Behavioral and Statistical Modeling
Mukherjee, A. (2015) · doi:10.3115/v1/p15-5007 · Cited by 17
Multi-dimension reviewer credibility quantification across diverse travel communities
Wang, Y., Chan, S. C. F., Leong, H. V., Ngai, G., & Au, N. (2016) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-016-0927-y · Cited by 17
Multi-view Ensemble Learning Using Rough Set Based Feature Ranking for Opinion Spam Detection
Saini, M., Verma, S., & Sharan, A. (2018) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-0341-8_1 · Cited by 18
Combining psycho-linguistic, content-based and chat-based features to detect predation in chatrooms
Barreiro, A., Losada, D. E., & Parapar, J. (2014) · Verlag der Technischen Universität Graz · doi:10.3217/jucs-020-02-0213 · Cited by 16
Secure and smart autonomous multi-robot systems for opinion spammer detection
Xu, G., Hu, M., & Ma, C. (2021) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2021.07.072 · Cited by 16
A Contextual Relationship Model for Deceptive Opinion Spam Detection
Fahfouh, A., Riffi, J., Mahraz, M. A., Yahyaouy, A., & Tairi, H. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2022.3183037 · Cited by 16
Techniques to Detect Fake Profiles on Social Media Using the New Age Algorithms - A Survey
Habib, A. K. M. R. R., Akpan, E. E., Ghosh, B., & Dutta, I. K. (2024) · IEEE Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC) · doi:10.1109/ccwc60891.2024.10427620 · Cited by 16
Trust-Aware Review Spam Detection
Xue, H., Li, F., Seo, H., & Pluretti, R. (2015) · doi:10.1109/trustcom-bigdatase-ispa.2015.440 · Cited by 16
Identifying Humor in Reviews using Background Text Sources
Morales, A., & Zhai, C. (2017) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1051 · Cited by 16
DCWord: A Novel Deep Learning Approach to Deceptive Review Identification by Word Vectors
Zhang, W., Wang, Q., Li, X., Yoshida, T., & Li, J. (2019) · Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11518-019-5438-4 · Cited by 16
Fake opinion detection: how similar are crowdsourced datasets to real data?
Fornaciari, T., Cagnina, L., Rosso, P., & Poesio, M. (2020) · Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.1007/s10579-020-09486-5 · Cited by 17
A fuzzy Dempster–Shafer classifier for detecting Web spams
Chatterjee, M., & Namin, A. S. (2021) · Journal of Information Security and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jisa.2021.102793 · Cited by 16
Opinion Spam Detection: A New Approach Using Machine Learning and Network-Based Algorithms
Danilchenko, K., Segal, M., & Vilenchik, D. (2022) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19278 · Cited by 17
Detection of Internet Water Army in Social Network
Wang, K., Xiao, Y., & Xiao, Z. (2014) · International Conference on Computer, Communications and Information Technology (CCIT) · doi:10.2991/ccit-14.2014.50 · Cited by 16
Multilingual Affect Polarity and Valence Prediction in Metaphor-Rich Texts
Kozareva, Z. (2013) · Cited by 16
Multi-Aspect Feature Based Neural Network Model in Detecting Fake Reviews
Luo, N., Deng, H., Zhao, L., Liu, Y., Wang, X., & Tan, Z. (2017) · International Conference on Information Science and Control Engineering · doi:10.1109/icisce.2017.106 · Cited by 16
Recital of supervised learning on review spam detection: An empirical analysis
Khurshid, F., Zhu, Y., Yohannese, C. W., & Iqbal, M. (2017) · International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering (ISKE) · doi:10.1109/iske.2017.8258755 · Cited by 16
High Dimensional Latent Space Variational AutoEncoders for Fake News Detection
Sadiq, S. B., Wagner, N., Shyu, M., & Feaster, D. J. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Information Processing and Retrieval (MIPR) · doi:10.1109/mipr.2019.00088 · Cited by 16
RST-style Discourse Parsing and Its Applications in Discourse Analysis
Feng, V. W. (2015) · TSpace (University of Toronto) · Cited by 16
A Hybridized Approach for Enhanced Fake Review Detection
Xu, S., Cuan, H., Yin, Z., & Yin, C. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2024.3411635 · Cited by 15
Review Manipulation: Literature Review, and Future Research Agenda
Ansari, S., & Gupta, S. (2021) · Pacific Asia journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1pais.13104 · Cited by 18
User-based network embedding for opinion spammer detection
Wang, Z., Wei, W., Mao, X.-L., Guo, G., Zhou, P., & Jiang, S. (2021) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2021.108512 · Cited by 15
A survey of privacy vulnerabilities and defenses in geosocial networks
Cărbunar, B., Rahman, M., & Pissinou, N. (2013) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2013.6658662 · Cited by 15
Detecting Fake Review with Rumor Model—Case Study in Hotel Review
Chang, T., Hsu, P. Y., Cheng, M. S., Chung, C.-Y., & Chung, Y.-L. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23862-3_18 · Cited by 15
Pelet, J., Barton, M., & Chapuis, C. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-75462-8_11 · Cited by 15
Using linguistically defined specific details to detect deception across domains
Vogler, N., & Pearl, L. (2019) · Natural Language Engineering · doi:10.1017/s1351324919000408 · Cited by 16
DETECTION OF FAKE REVIEWS ON SOCIAL MEDIA USING MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS
(2020) · Issues in Information Systems · doi:10.48009/1_iis_2020_185-194 · Cited by 15
COVID-19 Rumor Detection Using Psycho-Linguistic Features
Mahbub, S., Pardede, E., & Kayes, A. S. M. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3220369 · Cited by 15
The Ethics of Computational Social Science
Leslie, D. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-16624-2_4 · Cited by 18
Detecting spam reviewers by combing reviewer feature and relationship
Liang, D., Liu, X., & Shen, H. (2014) · International Conference on Informative and Cybernetics for Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/iccss.2014.6961824 · Cited by 15
Detecting Deceptive Groups Using Conversations and Network Analysis
Yu, D., Tyshchuk, Y., Ji, H., & Wallace, W. A. (2015) · doi:10.3115/v1/p15-1083 · Cited by 15
An Investigation of Ensemble Techniques for Detection of Spam Reviews
Heredia, B., Khoshgoftaar, T. M., Prusa, J. D., & Crawford, M. (2016) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications · doi:10.1109/icmla.2016.0029 · Cited by 15
A BDI Modeling Approach for Decision Support in Supply Chain Quality Inspection
Yan, J., Li, X., Sun, S. X., Shi, Y., & Wang, H. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems · doi:10.1109/tsmc.2017.2756105 · Cited by 15
Detecting deceptive communication through linguistic concretenessPreprint
Kleinberg, B., van der Vegt, I. W. J., Arntz, A. R., & Verschuère, B. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/p3qjh · Cited by 15
From Opinions to Recommendations
O’Mahony, M. P., & Smyth, B. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-90092-6_13 · Cited by 14
Collusive shill bidding detection in online auctions using Markov Random Field
Majadi, N., Trevathan, J., & Bergmann, N. W. (2019) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100831 · Cited by 14
Sangkil Moon, A., Jalali, N. Y., & Song, R. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.004 · Cited by 14
Leveraging Readability and Sentiment in Spam Review Filtering Using Transformer Models
Kanmani, R. S., & Surendiran, B. (2022) · Computer Systems Science and Engineering · doi:10.32604/csse.2023.029953 · Cited by 15
Sentiment Analysis in Social Streams
Saif, H., Ortega, F. J., Fernández, M., & Cantador, I. (2016) · Human-computer interaction series · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31413-6_7 · Cited by 14
Character N-Grams for Detecting Deceptive Controversial Opinions
Sánchez-Junquera, J., Villaseñor-Pineda, L., Montes-y-Gómez, M., & Rosso, P. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-98932-7_13 · Cited by 14
Zhang, L., Wang, S., Lin, Z., & Wu, Y. (2019) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2019.01.009 · Cited by 14
GANs for Semi-Supervised Opinion Spam Detection
Stanton, G., & Irissappane, A. A. (2019) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2019/723 · Cited by 14
DecOp: A Multilingual and Multi-domain Corpus For Detecting Deception In Typed Text.
Capuozzo, P., Lauriola, I., Strapparava, C., Aiolli, F., & Sartori, G. (2020) · Language Resources and Evaluation · Cited by 13
Pentland, S. J., Fuller, C. M., Spitzley, L. A., & Twitchell, D. P. (2022) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645579.2022.2087849 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Ott, M., Choi, Y., Cardie, C., & Hancock, J. T.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2011
- Pages
- 309-319
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1107.4557
- OpenAlex
- W2161283199
- Cited by
- 1,008
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 103 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 43
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0624267, 0904822, 0968450)
- Jack Kent Cooke Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Keywords
- opinion spam, opinion spam detection, consumer reviews, fake reviews, creative writing, feature analysis, classifier comparison, psychology of deception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
