The DOI matches its DataCite record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Finding Deceptive Opinion Spam by Any Stretch of the Imagination
Open accessAbstract
Consumers increasingly rate, review and research products online. Consequently, websites containing consumer reviews are becoming targets of opinion spam. While recent work has focused primarily on manually identifiable instances of opinion spam, in this work we study deceptive opinion spam---fictitious opinions that have been deliberately written to sound authentic. Integrating work from psychology and computational linguistics, we develop and compare three approaches to detecting deceptive opinion spam, and ultimately develop a classifier that is nearly 90% accurate on our gold-standard opinion spam dataset. Based on feature analysis of our learned models, we additionally make several theoretical contributions, including revealing a relationship between deceptive opinions and imaginative writing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“The dataset of deceptive reviews from Ott et al. [46, 47] has 800 truthful reviews and 800 deceptive reviews for hotels in Chicago.”
From Improving Human-AI Collaboration With Descriptions of AI Behavior (2023) · cites this paper as [47]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Text categorization with Support Vector Machines: Learning with many relevant features
Joachims, T. (1998) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/bfb0026683 · Cited by 8,271
Machine learning in automated text categorization
Sebastiani, F. (2002) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/505282.505283 · Cited by 7,927
SRILM - an extensible language modeling toolkit
Stolcke, A. (2002) · International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP) · doi:10.21437/icslp.2002-303 · Cited by 4,385
Electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management
Litvin, S. W., Goldsmith, R. E., & Pan, B. (2008) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.011 · Cited by 3,267
Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape.
Rigby, R. A., & Stasinopoulos, D. M. (2005) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.00510.x · Cited by 3,228
Accurate unlexicalized parsing
Klein, D., & Manning, C. D. (2003) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.3115/1075096.1075150 · Cited by 3,055
Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English
Biber, D., & Quirk, R. (1999) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587792 · Cited by 2,766
Accuracy of Deception Judgments
Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2 · Cited by 1,953
The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015
Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K. (2015) · University of Texas at Austin · doi:10.15781/t25p41 · Cited by 1,674
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [6]6. the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics , pages 669-672. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- [17]17. M.K. Johnson and C.L. Raye. 1981. Reality monitoring. Psychological Review , 88(1):67-85.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,002
Shukla, A. D., Goh, J. M., & Agarwal, L. (2025) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-01-2024-0042 · Cited by 4
A comprehensive analysis of deception detection techniques leveraging machine learning
Elbatanouny, H., Roken, N. A., Hussain, A. J., Khan, W., Khan, B., & Almajali, E. R. (2025) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127601 · Cited by 5
A grounded theory of how consumers determine the veracity of online user reviews
Walther, M., Watson, S. J., Boden, A., & Stel, M. (2025) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2025.2528764 · Cited by 4
Mughal, N., Mujtaba, G., Mughal, M. H., Manaf, A., & Kamangar, Z. U. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing · doi:10.1145/3748493 · Cited by 4
Pervasive Online Spam Review Detection based on Ontology using Naive Bayesian
Katiyar, A., Kumar, R., Kant, S., & Arya, Y. D. S. (2018) · International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication Control and Networking (ICAC3N) · doi:10.1109/icacccn.2018.8748781 · Cited by 4
Perbandingan Pretrained Model Transformer pada Deteksi Ulasan Palsu
Awalina, A., Bachtiar, F. A., & Utaminingrum, F. (2022) · Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer · doi:10.25126/jtiik.2022935696 · Cited by 4
Identifying spammer groups in consumer reviews using meta-data via bipartite graph approach
Balakrishna, V., Bag, S., & Sarkar, S. (2022) · International Conference on Data Analytics for Business and Industry (ICDABI) · doi:10.1109/icdabi56818.2022.10041687 · Cited by 4
Kumar, K., George, K. S., Bhatt, D., & Paul, O. P. (2023) · International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · doi:10.22214/ijraset.2023.52743 · Cited by 4
Task-Oriented Speech and Information Processing
Bhagwat, V., Shirley, S. E., & Stark, J. R. (2024) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107095 · Cited by 2
Distinguishing Sellers Reported as Scammers on Online Illicit Markets Using Their Language Traces
Degeneve, C., Longhi, J., & Rossy, Q. (2024) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages9070235 · Cited by 4
End-to-End Explainable Fake News Detection Via Evidence-Claim Variational Causal Inference
Wang, J., Qian, S., Hu, J., Dong, W., Huang, X., & Hong, R. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3728462 · Cited by 4
MAiDE-up: Multilingual Deception Detection of AI-generated Hotel Reviews
Ignat, O., Xu, X., & Mihalcea, R. F. (2025) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-naacl.88 · Cited by 4
A Comprehensive Analysis of Detection of Online Paid Posters
Chen, C., Wu, K., Srinivasan, V., & Zhang, X. (2015) · Lecture notes in social networks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14379-8_6 · Cited by 4
Anomalous Reviews Owing to Referral Incentive
Abu-el-rub, N., Minnich, A., & Mueen, A. (2017) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1145/3110025.3110100 · Cited by 4
Dery, L., Hermel, D., & Jelnov, A. (2020) · Review of Industrial Organization · doi:10.1007/s11151-020-09754-2 · Cited by 4
Hasan, M. K., Sen, T., Yang, Y., Baten, R. A., Haut, K. G., & Hoque, M. E. (2019) · International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and workshops · doi:10.1109/acii.2019.8925467 · Cited by 4
Enriching Conventional Ensemble Learner with Deep Contextual Semantics to Detect Fake News in Urdu
Saeed, R., Afzal, H., Abbas, H., & Fatima, M. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing · doi:10.1145/3461614 · Cited by 4
Classification of Authentic and Fake Online Reviews with Supervised Machine Learning Techniques
Kurtcan, B. D., & Kaya, T. (2022) · Lecture notes on data engineering and communications technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-10388-9_22 · Cited by 4
Walther, M., Petrov, P., Smith, R. S., Young, D., de Vries, P. W., & Stel, M. (2022) · The Open Psychology Journal · doi:10.2174/18743501-v15-e2207050 · Cited by 6
Ensemble learning with soft-prompted pretrained language models for fact checking
Huang, S., Wang, Y., Wong, E. Y. C., & Yu, L. (2024) · Natural Language Processing Journal · doi:10.1016/j.nlp.2024.100067 · Cited by 5
Reviewing the Reviews: Discussions of Race by Film Reviewers
Anderson, A., & Grether, S. T. (2017) · Sociological Spectrum · doi:10.1080/02732173.2017.1319306 · Cited by 4
Review spam detection based on psychological and linguistic features
Onan, A. (2018) · Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU) · doi:10.1109/siu.2018.8404388 · Cited by 4
Detection of Spam Reviews and Spammers in E-Commerce Sites
Kotian, H., & Meshram, B. B. (2017) · International Conference on Current Trends in Computer, Electrical, Electronics and Communication (CTCEEC) · doi:10.1109/ctceec.2017.8455013 · Cited by 4
Steve Martin at SemEval-2019 Task 4: Ensemble Learning Model for Detecting Hyperpartisan News
Joo, Y., & Hwang, I. (2019) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/s19-2171 · Cited by 4
Neural Networks Merging Semantic and Non-semantic Features for Opinion Spam Detection
Jiang, C., & Zhang, X. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32233-5_45 · Cited by 4
Random Forest Model for Intrusion Detection in Crowd-Sourced Reviews
Pillala, P., Bhansali, P. K., Reddy, M. A. E., & Rojamani, G. (2020) · International Conference on Smart Electronics and Communication (ICOSEC) · doi:10.1109/icosec49089.2020.9215423 · Cited by 4
Study and Detection of Fake News: P2C2-Based Machine Learning Approach
Verma, P. K., & Agrawal, P. (2020) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-5619-7_18 · Cited by 4
A Review on Various Techniques for Spam Detection
Kawale, N. J., & Sait, S. Y. (2021) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Smart Energy (ICAIS) · doi:10.1109/icais50930.2021.9395979 · Cited by 5
Kim, J.-H., Kang, J., Shin, S., & Myaeng, S.-H. (2021) · Cited by 4
Toplu, A., & Liu, H. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM) · doi:10.1109/ieem50564.2021.9672994 · Cited by 4
Lahire, M. (2022) · International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · doi:10.22214/ijraset.2022.40743 · Cited by 4
Improving Cross-domain, Cross-lingual and Multi-modal Deception Detection
Panda, S., & Levitan, S. I. (2022) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Student Research Workshop (ACL SRW) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-srw.30 · Cited by 4
Classifications of E-MAIL SPAM Using Deep Learning Approaches
Anshumaanmishra, & VigneshwaranPandi (2022) · Advances in parallel computing · doi:10.3233/apc220058 · Cited by 4
Alsubari, S. N., Aldhyani, T. H. H., Deshmukh, S. N., Maashi, M. S., Alharbi, S., & Al-Baity, H. H. (2022) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2022/4656846 · Cited by 5
RetractedPopoola, O. (2022) · Ethics and integrity in educational contexts · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-16976-2_10 · Cited by 4
Analyzing Deceptive Opinion Spam Patterns: the Topic Modeling Approach
Jakupov, A., Mercadal, J., Zeddini, B., & Longhi, J. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI) · doi:10.1109/ictai56018.2022.00190 · Cited by 5
Domain-independent deception: a new taxonomy and linguistic analysis
Verma, R. M., Dershowitz, N., Zeng, V., Boumber, D., & Liu, X. (2025) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2025.1581734 · Cited by 7
A Lot of Slots – Outliers Confinement in Review-Based Systems
Pietro, R. D., Petrocchi, M., & Spognardi, A. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11749-2_2 · Cited by 4
Duan, H., & Zirn, C. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34210-3_15 · Cited by 4
Building robust Reputation Systems for travel-related services
Duan, H., & Yang, P. (2012) · Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust · doi:10.1109/pst.2012.6297937 · Cited by 4
Mittal, M., Wu, W., Rubin, S., Madden, S. R., & Hartmann, B. (2012) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2141512.2141570 · Cited by 4
What Makes a Good Review: Analyzing Reviews on JD.com
Liu, J., Fu, X., Liu, L., & Yue, K. (2015) · International Conference on Service Science (ICSS) · doi:10.1109/icss.2015.21 · Cited by 4
Review Spam Detection by Highlighting Potential Spammers and Diminishing Their Effect
Keshavarz, F., Waheed, A. P. A., Rachdi, B., & Alhajj, R. (2017) · International Journal of E-Business Research · doi:10.4018/ijebr.2018010104 · Cited by 4
A Corpus-Based Study of Linguistic Deception in Spanish
Almela, Á. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11198817 · Cited by 4
Deception Detection Within and Across Cultures
Pérez‐Rosas, V., Bologa, C., Burzo, M. G., & Mihalcea, R. F. (2014) · Theory and applications of natural language processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12655-5_8 · Cited by 4
Toward a Theoretical Model of Authentic and Fake User-Generated Online Reviews
Banerjee, S., & Chua, A. Y. K. (2019) · Advances in media, entertainment and the arts (AMEA) book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-8535-0.ch007 · Cited by 4
Sharing Experiences via Social Media as Integral Part of the Service ExperiencePreprint
Munzel, A., & Kunz, W. H. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2307120 · Cited by 4
Social Fraud Detection Review: Methods, Challenges and AnalysisPreprint
Shehnepoor, S., Togneri, R. B., Liu, W., & Bennamoun, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.05645 · Cited by 6
Don’t 'Research Fast and Break Things': On the Ethics of Computational Social SciencePreprint
Leslie, D. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4134621 · Cited by 4
Comparative Study of Artificial Intelligence Approaches in Deceptive Opinion Detection
Mewada, A., Maurya, S. K., & Ansari, M. A. (2025) · International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Communication Technology and Networking (CICTN) · doi:10.1109/cictn64563.2025.10932501 · Cited by 3
Effective faking of verbal deception detection with target‐aligned adversarial attacks
Kleinberg, B., Loconte, R., & Verschuère, B. (2025) · Legal and Criminological Psychology · doi:10.1111/lcrp.70001 · Cited by 6
Large Language Model Based Machine Learning Approach for Fake News Detection: Invited Paper
Chen, P.-C., Ajayi, O. T., & Cheng, Y. (2024) · International Conference on Meta Computing (ICMC) · doi:10.1109/icmc60390.2024.00033 · Cited by 3
Kakde, S. T., Roychowdhury, S., Tanaji, B. A., & Maiti, J. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2024.3375883 · Cited by 3
Balaji, T., Bablani, A., Sreeja, S. R., & Misra, H. (2024) · Expert Systems · doi:10.1111/exsy.13765 · Cited by 3
Viewers' Side Analysis of Social Interests
Mitamura, T., & Yoshida, K. (2012) · IEEE ... International Conference on Data Mining workshops · doi:10.1109/icdmw.2012.28 · Cited by 3
Impact of Referral Incentives on Mobile App Reviews
Abu-el-rub, N., Minnich, A., & Mueen, A. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60131-1_20 · Cited by 3
A Content-Aware Trust Index for Online Review Spam Detection
Xue, H., & Li, F. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-61176-1_27 · Cited by 3
Fake Review Prevention Using Classification and Authentication Techniques
Prakash, P., Shashank, N., Arjun, M., Yadav, P., Shreyamsa, S. M., & Prazwal, N. R. (2020) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-0936-0_42 · Cited by 3
Du, X., Zhao, F., Zhu, Z., & Han, P. (2021) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn52387.2021.9534008 · Cited by 3
Looking Beyond Content: Modeling and Detection of Fake News from a Social Context Perspective
Xiao, K., Wang, L., Gupta, A., & Qin, X. (2022) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2022.163 · Cited by 3
Machine Learning Based Deception Detection System in Online Social Networks
Bingöl, H., & Alataş, B. (2022) · International Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences · doi:10.29132/ijpas.994840 · Cited by 3
Adversarial Spam Detector With Character Similarity Network
Chen, Y., Huang, L., Wang, C., Fu, M., Huang, S., Huang, J., Tan, Y., & Yan, C. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2022.3177726 · Cited by 3
Research on Fake Reviews Detection Based on Feature Construction and EasyEnsemble-RF
Ren, X., Yuan, Z., & Huang, J. (2021) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Engineering (ICAICE) · doi:10.1109/icaice54393.2021.00098 · Cited by 3
Modeling the Impact of Fake Data Dissemination During Covid-19
Amrita, S., & Sankaran, S. (2023) · Smart innovation, systems and technologies · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-8094-7_36 · Cited by 3
UNIDECOR: A Unified Deception Corpus for Cross-Corpus Deception Detection
Velutharambath, A., & Klinger, R. (2023) · Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis (WASSA) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.wassa-1.5 · Cited by 5
Efficient Detection of Noise Reviews Over a Large Number of Places
Kim, H. G., & Park, Y. H. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3324654 · Cited by 3
Framing is Mightier than the Sword: Detection of Episodic and Thematic Framing in News Media
Mavridis, P., Inel, O., Wilcke, X., Makhortykh, M., de Jong, M., Mazepus, H., Dimitrova, A. L., de Vos, J., Bozzon, A., & Kuhn, T. (2024) · Human Computation · doi:10.15346/hc.v11i1.132 · Cited by 4
Ennaouri, M., Raoui, M., Zellou, A., & Yazidi, M. H. E. (2024) · International Conference on Electrical, Communication, and Computer Engineering (ICECCE) · doi:10.1109/icecce63537.2024.10823434 · Cited by 3
Eye Movements as Indicators of Deception: A Machine Learning Approach
Foucher, V., de León-Martínez, S., & Móro, R. (2025) · ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (ETRA) · doi:10.1145/3715669.3723129 · Cited by 3
Fake online reviews: A study on eWOM influence when suspicions arise
Cavazza, N., & Guidetti, M. (2014) · IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) · doi:10.1482/76369 · Cited by 3
Detecting Concealed Information on a Large Scale
Kleinberg, B., van der Toolen, Y., Arntz, A. R., & Verschuère, B. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-812729-2.00016-1 · Cited by 3
Fact Checking or Psycholinguistics: How to Distinguish Fake and True Claims?
Wawer, A., Wojdyga, G., & Sarzyńska‐Wawer, J. (2019) · Fact Extraction and VERification Workshop (FEVER) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-6602 · Cited by 3
do Vale, T. F., de Carvalho, K. G., & Moreira, J. C. (2019) · Revista Acadêmica Observatório de Inovação do Turismo · doi:10.17648/raoit.v13n3.5509 · Cited by 3
A Review of Research on Identification of False Reviews in E-Commerce
Luo, H. (2020) · Journal of Management and Humanity Research · doi:10.22457/jmhr.v03a02102 · Cited by 3
The Problem of Sentiment Analysis
Liu, B. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108639286.003 · Cited by 3
Klyueva, A. (2020) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-7291-7.ch018 · Cited by 3
Banerjee, S., Chua, A. Y. K., & Kim, J. (2015) · Science and Information Conference · doi:10.1109/sai.2015.7237129 · Cited by 3
Detecting Thai Messages Leading to Deception on Facebook
Songram, P., Choompol, A., Thipsanthia, P., & Boonjing, V. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49046-5_25 · Cited by 3
al., S. E. (2019) · International Journal of ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES · doi:10.21833/ijaas.2019.08.004 · Cited by 3
İstenmeyen Epostaların Tespiti için Kullanılan Yöntemlerin İncelenmesi
Eryılmaz, E. E., & Kılıç, E. (2020) · DÜMF Mühendislik Dergisi · doi:10.24012/dumf.715638 · Cited by 3
Injurious Comment Detection and Removal utilizing Neural Network
Wadhwani, A., Jain, P., & Sahu, S. (2021) · International Conference on Innovative Practices in Technology and Management (ICIPTM) · doi:10.1109/iciptm52218.2021.9388331 · Cited by 3
Detecting Fake Yelp Reviews Using a Positional LSTM / K-L Divergence Ensemble Approach
Harris, C. G. (2022) · International Conference on Information System & Information Technology (ICISIT) · doi:10.1109/icisit54091.2022.9872788 · Cited by 3
A Tangled Web: The Faint Signals of Deception in Text - Boulder Lies and Truth Corpus (BLT-C)
Salvetti, F., Lowe, J. B., & Martin, J. (2016) · Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) · doi:10.63317/299qy7u4dwux · Cited by 3
Adaptive Slide Window-Based Feature Cognition for Deceptive Information Identification
Yang, H., Xu, Z., Liu, L., Tian, J., & Zhang, Y. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3011072 · Cited by 3
Studying Dishonest Intentions in Brazilian Portuguese Texts
Vargas, F., & Pardo, T. A. S. (2021) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-91779-1_12 · Cited by 3
Text mining to detect indications of fraud in annual reports worldwide
Fissette, M. (2017) · doi:10.3990/1.9789036544207 · Cited by 3
Detecting Vietnamese Opinion SpamPreprint
Duong, T. H., Vu, T.-T., & Ngo, V. M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.06112 · Cited by 3
Predicting Threats to Academic Integrity: A Text-Mining and Scenario Modeling Framework
Carmichael, J. J. (2024) · Carleton University's Institutional Repository (MacOdrum Library, Carleton University) · doi:10.22215/etd/2024-15985 · Cited by 3
Sockpuppets Detection Using Markov-Driven Graph Convolutional Networks with Ensemble Learning
Fan, C., Tsai, M.-F., Hu, C.-P., & Wang, M.-H. (2024) · IEEE Conference on Dependable and Secure Computing (DSC) · doi:10.1109/dsc63325.2024.00018 · Cited by 2
Fake Review Detection System: A Machine Learning Approach with Linguistic and Semantic Analysis
Janokar, S., More, K., Raikwar, R., Joshi, K. V., Pawar, P., & Singh, T. (2024) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Quantum Computation-Based Sensor Application (ICAIQSA) · doi:10.1109/icaiqsa64000.2024.10882276 · Cited by 2
Sharma, S., & Desai, N. (2024) · IEEE Global Conference for Advancement in Technology (GCAT) · doi:10.1109/gcat62922.2024.10923940 · Cited by 2
A Hotel Ranking Method Through Online Reviews Considering the Cultural Background of Reviewers
Shi, J., Du, X., Wu, J., & Liu, Y. (2025) · International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications · doi:10.4018/ijfsa.371752 · Cited by 2
Access to Digital Extension Services and Crop Yield: Evidence From Paddy Cultivation in India
Pramanik, C. (2026) · Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/agec.70099 · Cited by 2
Dirchaoui, M., Abarda, A., & Ouardighi, A. E. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing · doi:10.1145/3799228 · Cited by 2
Inter- and Intra-Graph Attention Aggregation Learning for Multi-relational GNN Spam Detection
Tang, J., Wang, Y., Cao, J., Tao, H., & Zhu, G. (2022) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2022.11.339 · Cited by 2
Satauri, I., Satouri, B., & Beqqali, O. E. (2023) · European Journal of Information Technologies and Computer Science · doi:10.24018/compute.2023.3.2.94 · Cited by 2
A Machine Learning-based Automated Approach for Mining Customer Opinion
Kumar, A. (2023) · International Conference on Electronics and Sustainable Communication Systems (ICESC) · doi:10.1109/icesc57686.2023.10193256 · Cited by 2
Kazemi, A., Younus, A., Jeon, M., Qureshi, M. A., & Caton, S. J. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3303105 · Cited by 2
Research on Spam Review Detection: A Survey
Li, Y., Liu, Y., & Chong, L. (2023) · International Conference on Natural Computation, Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (ICNC-FSKD) · doi:10.1109/icnc-fskd59587.2023.10281054 · Cited by 2
Kandoussi, M. E. (2023) · European Scientific Journal ESJ · doi:10.19044/esj.2023.v19n31p148 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Ott, M., Choi, Y., Cardie, C., & Hancock, J. T.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2011
- Pages
- 309-319
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1107.4557
- OpenAlex
- W2161283199
- Cited by
- 1,008
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 103 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 43
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0624267, 0904822, 0968450)
- Jack Kent Cooke Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Keywords
- opinion spam, opinion spam detection, consumer reviews, fake reviews, creative writing, feature analysis, classifier comparison, psychology of deception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
