The DOI matches its DataCite record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Finding Deceptive Opinion Spam by Any Stretch of the Imagination
Open accessAbstract
Consumers increasingly rate, review and research products online. Consequently, websites containing consumer reviews are becoming targets of opinion spam. While recent work has focused primarily on manually identifiable instances of opinion spam, in this work we study deceptive opinion spam---fictitious opinions that have been deliberately written to sound authentic. Integrating work from psychology and computational linguistics, we develop and compare three approaches to detecting deceptive opinion spam, and ultimately develop a classifier that is nearly 90% accurate on our gold-standard opinion spam dataset. Based on feature analysis of our learned models, we additionally make several theoretical contributions, including revealing a relationship between deceptive opinions and imaginative writing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“The dataset of deceptive reviews from Ott et al. [46, 47] has 800 truthful reviews and 800 deceptive reviews for hotels in Chicago.”
From Improving Human-AI Collaboration With Descriptions of AI Behavior (2023) · cites this paper as [47]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Text categorization with Support Vector Machines: Learning with many relevant features
Joachims, T. (1998) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/bfb0026683 · Cited by 8,271
Machine learning in automated text categorization
Sebastiani, F. (2002) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/505282.505283 · Cited by 7,927
SRILM - an extensible language modeling toolkit
Stolcke, A. (2002) · International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP) · doi:10.21437/icslp.2002-303 · Cited by 4,385
Electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management
Litvin, S. W., Goldsmith, R. E., & Pan, B. (2008) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.011 · Cited by 3,267
Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape.
Rigby, R. A., & Stasinopoulos, D. M. (2005) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.00510.x · Cited by 3,228
Accurate unlexicalized parsing
Klein, D., & Manning, C. D. (2003) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.3115/1075096.1075150 · Cited by 3,055
Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English
Biber, D., & Quirk, R. (1999) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587792 · Cited by 2,766
Accuracy of Deception Judgments
Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2 · Cited by 1,953
The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015
Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K. (2015) · University of Texas at Austin · doi:10.15781/t25p41 · Cited by 1,674
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [6]6. the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics , pages 669-672. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- [17]17. M.K. Johnson and C.L. Raye. 1981. Reality monitoring. Psychological Review , 88(1):67-85.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,002
Detecting Concealed Information in Text and Speech
Hu, S. (2019) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1039 · Cited by 8
Deceptive Journalism: Characteristics of Untrustworthy News Items
Govaert, C., Lagerwerf, L., & Klemm, C. (2019) · Journalism Practice · doi:10.1080/17512786.2019.1637768 · Cited by 8
An Inferable Representation Learning for Fraud Review Detection with Cold-start Problem
Li, Q., Wu, Q., Zhu, C., Zhang, J., & Zhao, W. (2019) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2019.8852437 · Cited by 9
Identifying Automatically Generated Headlines using Transformers
Maronikolakis, A., Schütze, H., & Stevenson, M. (2021) · Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Internet Freedom: Censorship, Disinformation, and Propaganda (NLP4IF) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.nlp4if-1.1 · Cited by 12
Trust Hardware Based Secured Privacy Preserving Computation System for Three-Dimensional Data
Yuan, M., Li, X., Li, X., Tan, H., & Xu, J. (2021) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics10131546 · Cited by 8
Song, L., Zhang, W., Liao, S. S., & Kwok, R. C.-W. (2012) · Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems · Cited by 8
Review authenticity verification using supervised learning and reviewer personality traits
Christopher, S. L., & Rahulnath, H. A. (2016) · International Conference on Emerging Technological Trends · doi:10.1109/icett.2016.7873647 · Cited by 8
Trust4App: Automating Trustworthiness Assessment of Mobile Applications
Habib, S. M., Alexopoulos, N., Islam, M. M., Heider, J., Marsh, S., & Muehlhaeuser, M. (2018) · 2018 17th IEEE International Conference On Trust, Security And Privacy In Computing And Communications/ 12th IEEE International Conference On Big Data Science And Engineering (TrustCom/BigDataSE) · doi:10.1109/trustcom/bigdatase.2018.00029 · Cited by 8
The Impact of Spam Reviews on Feature-based Sentiment Analysis
Saeed, N. M. K., Helal, N. A., Badr, N. L., & Gharib, T. F. (2018) · International Conference on Computer Engineering & Systems (ICCES) · doi:10.1109/icces.2018.8639343 · Cited by 8
Dynamic Slide Window-Based Feature Scoring and Extraction for On-Line Rumor Detection with CNN
Yang, H., Xu, Z., Liu, L., Guo, M., & Zhang, Y. (2019) · International Conference on Communications · doi:10.1109/icc.2019.8761288 · Cited by 9
Task-specific word identification from short texts using a convolutional neural network1
Yuan, S., Wu, X., & Xiang, Y. (2018) · Intelligent Data Analysis · doi:10.3233/ida-173413 · Cited by 8
Fusion Convolutional Attention Network for Opinion Spam Detection
Li, J., Ma, Q., Yuan, C., Zhou, W. J., Han, J., & Hu, S. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-36708-4_19 · Cited by 8
Al-Ramahi, M. A., & Alsmadi, I. M. (2020) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2020.304 · Cited by 8
An unsupervised approach to detect review spam using duplicates of images, videos and Chinese texts
Li, J., Zhang, P., & Yang, L. (2020) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2020.101186 · Cited by 8
Malicious accounts detection from online social networks: a systematic review of literature
Sassi, I. B., & Yahia, S. B. (2021) · International Journal of General Systems · doi:10.1080/03081079.2021.1976773 · Cited by 8
Fake Review Identification Methods Based on Multidimensional Feature Engineering
Wang, G., Shang, G., Pu, P., Li, X., & Peng, H. (2022) · Mobile Information Systems · doi:10.1155/2022/5229277 · Cited by 8
Detecting fraudulent online Yelp reviews using K-L divergence and linguistic features
Harris, C. G. (2022) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2022.08.075 · Cited by 8
Review Spammer Detection by using Behaviors Based Scoring Methods
(2014) · International Conference on Advances in Engineering and Technology (ICAET'2014) March 29-30, 2014 Singapore · doi:10.15242/iie.e0314158 · Cited by 9
Finding Valuable Yelp Comments by Personality, Content, Geo, and Anomaly Analysis
Koven, J., Siadati, H., & Lin, C. (2014) · IEEE ... International Conference on Data Mining workshops · doi:10.1109/icdmw.2014.49 · Cited by 8
CoFea: A Novel Approach to Spam Review Identification Based on Entropy and Co-Training
Zhang, W., Bu, C., Yoshida, T., & Zhang, S. (2016) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e18120429 · Cited by 8
Schutte, M., Bogaard, G., Giolla, E. M., Warmelink, L., Kleinberg, B., & Verschuère, B. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/cth58 · Cited by 8
(2015) · International Conference on Information Systems · Cited by 8
Is It genuine or fake? Analyzing e-commerce reviews using large language models
Bhangale, S., & Roy, P. K. (2025) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2025.114556 · Cited by 7
Online Reputation Management in Tourism: Emerging Themes, Theories, Problems, and Solutions
Rialti, R., Kvítková, Z., & Makovník, T. (2023) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-80382-375-120231001 · Cited by 7
ExFake: Towards an Explainable Fake News Detection Based on Content and Social Context Information
Amri, S., Boleilanga, H. M., & Aı̈meur, E. (2023) · Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering, and Applied Computing (CSCE) · doi:10.1109/csce60160.2023.00373 · Cited by 7
A parameterized approach to deal with sock puppets
Gera, T., & Singh, J. (2015) · International Conference on Computer, Communication, Control and Information Technology · doi:10.1109/c3it.2015.7060150 · Cited by 7
Research on Opinion Spam Detection by Time Series Anomaly Detection
Wang, Y., Zuo, W., & Wang, Y. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-24274-9_16 · Cited by 7
Detecting Online Fake Reviews via Hierarchical Neural Networks and Multivariate Features
Jiang, C., Zhang, X., & Jin, A. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-63830-6_61 · Cited by 7
A Review-and-Reviewer based approach for Fake Review Detection
Bhopale, J., Bhise, R., Mane, A., & Talele, K. (2021) · International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Technologies (ICECCT) · doi:10.1109/icecct52121.2021.9616697 · Cited by 7
Ko, E., & Bowman, D. (2023) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2023.06.006 · Cited by 7
Harris, C. G., & Srinivasan, P. (2012) · International Conference on Social Computing · doi:10.1109/socialcom-passat.2012.140 · Cited by 8
Compression-Based Algorithms for Deception Detection
Ting, C. L., Fisher, A. N., & Bauer, T. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67217-5_16 · Cited by 7
Try to Find Fake Reviews with Semantic and Relational Discovery
Runa, D., Zhang, X., & Zhai, Y. (2017) · International Conference on Semantics, Knowledge and Grid (SKG) · doi:10.1109/skg.2017.00048 · Cited by 8
Approach to detect non-adversarial overlapping collusion in crowdsourcing
Kamhoua, G. A., Pissinou, N., Iyengar, S. S., Beltran, J., Miller, J., Kamhoua, C., & Njilla, L. (2017) · IEEE International Performance, Computing, and Communications Conference · doi:10.1109/pccc.2017.8280462 · Cited by 7
WEC: Weighted Ensemble of Text Classifiers
Upadhyay, A., Nguyen, T. T., Massie, S., & McCall, J. (2020) · IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) · doi:10.1109/cec48606.2020.9185641 · Cited by 7
Detecting incentivized review groups with co-review graph
Zhang, Y., Hao, S., & Wang, H. (2021) · High-Confidence Computing · doi:10.1016/j.hcc.2021.100006 · Cited by 7
Detecting Spam Game Reviews on Steam with a Semi-Supervised Approach
Bian, P., Liu, L., & Sweetser, P. (2021) · International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (FDG) · doi:10.1145/3472538.3472547 · Cited by 7
Fake Review Detection Using Hybrid Ensemble Learning
Hegde, S. B., Rai, R. R., Hiremath, P. G. S., & Gangisetty, S. (2021) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-33-6987-0_22 · Cited by 7
Challenges of Sentiment Analysis - A Survey
Parvin, S. A., Sumathi, M., & Mohan, C. (2021) · International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI) · doi:10.1109/icoei51242.2021.9453026 · Cited by 7
The Process Of Multi-Class Fake News Dataset Generation
Rezaei, S., Kahani, M., & Behkamal, B. (2021) · International Conference on Computer and Knowledge Engineering · doi:10.1109/iccke54056.2021.9721509 · Cited by 7
Fake News Detection Using Deep Learning
Konagala, V. L., & Bano, S. (2020) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-7291-7.ch025 · Cited by 7
Detecting Rumor Veracity with Only Textual Information by Double-Channel Structure
Kim, A. G., & Yoon, S. W. (2022) · International Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Social Media (SocialNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.socialnlp-1.3 · Cited by 9
Chiranjeevi, P., Teja, S. D., & Vishnu Vardhan, B. (2018) · International Journal of Engineering and Technology · doi:10.21817/ijet/2018/v10i1/181001131 · Cited by 7
A Methodological Template to Construct Ground Truth of Authentic and Fake Online Reviews
Banerjee, S. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA) · doi:10.1109/dsaa.2018.00083 · Cited by 7
Vrij, A., Taylor, P., & Picornell, I. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118769133.ch12 · Cited by 9
Serving in a Social Media World - How to React Online to Negative Word of MouthPreprint
Munzel, A., Kunz, W. H., & Jahn, B. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2898312 · Cited by 7
The (in)efficacy of AI personas in deception detection experiments
Markowitz, D. M., & Levine, T. R. (2025) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqaf034 · Cited by 8
KEN: Knowledge Augmentation and Emotion Guidance Network for Multimodal Fake News Detection
Zhu, P., Jing, Y., Cheng, L., Tang, K., & Guo, Y. (2025) · ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) · doi:10.1145/3746027.3755435 · Cited by 7
Alhayan, F., Himdi, H., & Alharbi, B. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3424531 · Cited by 7
BILD Testing for Spotting Out Suspicious Reviews, Suspicious Reviewers and Group Spammers
Gera, T., Thakur, D. S., & Singh, J. (2015) · International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies · doi:10.1109/csnt.2015.138 · Cited by 7
Case Study of Fake Web Reviews
Cheng, L., Tseng, J. C. R., & Chung, T.-Y. (2017) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1145/3110025.3110119 · Cited by 6
Composite Sequential Modeling for Identifying Fake Reviews
Bhargava, R., Baoni, A., & Sharma, Y. (2018) · Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1515/jisys-2017-0501 · Cited by 6
Борисовна, П. Д., Galitsky, B. A., Taylor, J., & Ozerov, A. (2019) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3308560.3316604 · Cited by 6
Towards De-Anonymization of Google Play Search Rank Fraud
Rahman, M. M., Hernandez, N., Cărbunar, B., & Chau, D. H. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2020.2975170 · Cited by 6
Spam Consumer’s Reviews Detection for E-Commerce Website using Linguistic Approach in Deep Learning
Ashraf, M. S., Rehman, F. U., Sharif, H., Aqeel, M., Arslan, M., & Rida, A. (2022) · International Conference on Innovations in Computer Science & Software Engineering (ICONICS) · doi:10.1109/iconics56716.2022.10100351 · Cited by 6
Manipulation: Online Platforms' Inescapable Fate
Lee, S. Y., Qiu, L., & Whinston, A. B. (2014) · International Conference on Information Systems · Cited by 6
FAdR: A System for Recognizing False Online Advertisements
Tang, Y.-J., & Chen, H. (2014) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations (ACL Demo) · doi:10.3115/v1/p14-5018 · Cited by 6
Can criminals create opportunities for crime?Malvertisingand illegal online medicine trade
Zabyelina, Y. G. (2016) · Global Crime · doi:10.1080/17440572.2016.1197124 · Cited by 6
Exploiting Function Words Feature in Classifying Deceptive and Truthful Reviews
Siagian, A. H. A. M., & Aritsugi, M. (2018) · International Conference on Digital Information Management · doi:10.1109/icdim.2018.8846971 · Cited by 6
Fake Reviews Detection Based on Text Feature and Behavior Feature
Shuqin, Y., & Jing, F. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications; IEEE International Conference on Smart City; IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Systems (HPCC/SmartCity/DSS) · doi:10.1109/hpcc/smartcity/dss.2019.00277 · Cited by 6
Fake News Detection Using Deep Learning
Konagala, V. L., & Bano, S. (2019) · Advances in systems analysis, software engineering, and high performance computing book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-1192-3.ch011 · Cited by 6
Superlatives and Scope of Improvement in Online Recommendations: Breath of Life or a Kiss of Death?
Aggarwal, R., Midha, V., & Sullivan, N. P. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/15205 · Cited by 8
Toward Discourse-Aware Models for Multilingual Fake News Detection
Vargas, F., Benevenuto, F., & Pardo, T. A. S. (2021) · Student Research Workshop .../Proceedings of the Student Research Workshop ... · doi:10.26615/issn.2603-2821.2021_029 · Cited by 6
Liu, B. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108639286.002 · Cited by 7
Distributed Document Representation for Document Classification
Li, R., & Shindo, H. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18038-0_17 · Cited by 6
Detecting Internet Hidden Paid Posters Based on Group and Individual Characteristics
Wang, X., Zhou, B., Jia, Y., & Li, S. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26187-4_8 · Cited by 6
Trojan Horses in Amazon's Castle: Understanding the Incentivized Online Reviews
Jamshidi, S., Rejaie, R., & Li, J. (2018) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1109/asonam.2018.8508267 · Cited by 6
Spam Review Classification Using Ensemble of Global and Local Feature Selectors
Ansari, G., Ahmad, T., & Doja, M. N. (2018) · Cybernetics and Information Technologies · doi:10.2478/cait-2018-0046 · Cited by 6
Towards Linking Camouflaged Descriptions to Implicit Products in E-commerce
Huang, L., Bo, Y., Zhang, R., & Lu, Q. (2020) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3397271.3401067 · Cited by 6
Statistical Analysis & Survey of Research Work in Opinion MiningPreprint
Ratmele, A., & Thakur, R. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3366294 · Cited by 6
Internet Identity Analysis and Similarities Detection
Wilaszek, K., Wójcik, T., Opaliński, A., & Turek, W. (2012) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30721-8_36 · Cited by 5
Is AI-assisted paraphrase the new tool for fake review creation? Challenges and remedies
Xylogiannopoulos, K. F., Xanthopoulos, P., Karampelas, P., & Bakamitsos, G. A. (2025) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2025.114151 · Cited by 6
Effect of Feature Reduction using Bigram Technique for detection of Forged Reviews
Nandakishor Prabhu, R., & Ashok, A. (2018) · International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI) · doi:10.1109/icacci.2018.8554706 · Cited by 5
Lying Through One’s Teeth: A Study on Verbal Leakage Cues
Yeh, M.-H., & Ku, L. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.370 · Cited by 5
Research on fake reviews detection based on graph neural network
Ren, X., Yuan, Z., & Huang, J. (2022) · International Symposium on Computer Applications and Information Systems (ISCAIS) · doi:10.1117/12.2639534 · Cited by 5
Deception detection in conversations using the proximity of linguistic markers
Bajaj, N., Rajwadi, M., Constance, T. G., Wall, J. A., Moniri, M., Laird, T., Woodruff, C., Laird, J., Glackin, C., & Cannings, N. (2023) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110422 · Cited by 6
Differentiating mental models of self and others: A hierarchical framework for knowledge assessment.
Kumar, A., Smyth, P., & Mark Steyvers, B. (2023) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000443 · Cited by 5
An interpretable wide and deep model for online disinformation detection
Chai, Y., Liu, Y., Li, W., Zhu, B., Liu, H., & Jiang, Y. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121588 · Cited by 7
Pengqi, W. A. N. G., Yue, L. I. N., & Chai, J. (2023) · Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/smc53992.2023.10394573 · Cited by 5
Fraud Detection on Crowdfunding Platforms Using Multiple Feature Selection Methods
Lee, S., Park, H., & Kim, H.-C. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3547396 · Cited by 5
Dissecting Genuine and Deceptive Kudos: The Case of Online Hotel Reviews
Banerjee, S., & Chua, A. Y. K. (2014) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/specialissue.2014.040304 · Cited by 5
Detecting Spammers in Community Question Answering
Ding, Z., Gong, Y., Zhou, Y., Zhang, Q., & Huang, J. X. (2013) · Cited by 5
Rafi, M., Rafay, M., Noman, U., Rehman, A., & Ali, U. (2015) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2015.061034 · Cited by 5
A Mapping Study to Investigate Spam Detection on Social Networks
Kamoru, B. A., Jaafar, A., & Murad, M. A. A. (2017) · International Journal of Applied Information Systems · doi:10.5120/ijais2017451652 · Cited by 5
A Proposal for Account Recovery in Decentralized Applications
Zhu, Y., Xia, L., & Seneviratne, O. W. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain) · doi:10.1109/blockchain.2019.00028 · Cited by 5
Jayathunga, D. P., Ranasinghe, R. M. I. S., & Ramashini, M. (2021) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-68133-3_10 · Cited by 5
Detection of Fake Online Reviews using Semi-supervised and Supervised learning
Yashaswini, D. M. (2022) · International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · doi:10.22214/ijraset.2022.44368 · Cited by 5
Data Augmentation for Fake Reviews Detection
Liu, M., & Poesio, M. (2023) · International conference Recent advances in natural language processing · doi:10.26615/978-954-452-092-2_073 · Cited by 5
Identifying Deceptive Review Comments with Rumor and Lie Theories
Lin, C. H., Hsu, P. Y., Cheng, M. S., Lei, H. T., & Hsu, M. C. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-61833-3_44 · Cited by 5
Identifying Deceptive Opinion Spam using Aspect-based Emotions and Human Behavior Modeling
Saini, M., & Sharan, A. (2017) · International Journal of Hybrid Information Technology · doi:10.14257/ijhit.2017.10.1.36 · Cited by 6
Empirical Study on Influencing Factors of Knowledge Product Remixing in OIC
Tan, J. J., Miao, D., & Tan, Q. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2974693 · Cited by 5
A Community Discovery and TrustRank based Approach for Spammer Ranking
Li, Y., & Zhang, S. (2020) · International Conference on Culture-oriented Science & Technology (ICCST) · doi:10.1109/iccst50977.2020.00060 · Cited by 5
An Efficient Fake News Identification System Using A-SQUARE CNN Algorithm
Malhotra, P., & Malik, S. K. (2022) · Wireless Personal Communications · doi:10.1007/s11277-022-09646-6 · Cited by 5
Distinguishing between authentic and fictitious user-generated hotel reviews
Banerjee, S., Chua, A. Y. K., & Kim, J. (2015) · International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT) · doi:10.1109/icccnt.2015.7395179 · Cited by 5
Give the people what they want: studying end-user needs for enhancing the web
Lee, T. Y., & Bederson, B. B. (2016) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.91 · Cited by 5
Identification of Deceptive Reviews by Sentimental Analysis and Characteristics of Reviewers
Gao, X., Li, S., Zhu, Y., Nan, Y., Jian, Z., & Tang, H. (2019) · Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review · doi:10.25103/jestr.121.23 · Cited by 5
Why do urban legends go viral?
Guerini, M., & Strapparava, C. (2015) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2015.05.003 · Cited by 5
Study of authentic and fictitious online reviews
Banerjee, S. (2017) · doi:10.32657/10220/46219 · Cited by 5
Lai, V., Cai, J. Z., & Tan, C. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.08534 · Cited by 5
Automatic, adaptive, and applicative sentiment analysis
Pak, A. (2012) · doi:10.70675/49d233b8z3d3fz49c6zafd4z7480d335333b · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Ott, M., Choi, Y., Cardie, C., & Hancock, J. T.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2011
- Pages
- 309-319
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1107.4557
- OpenAlex
- W2161283199
- Cited by
- 1,008
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 103 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 43
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0624267, 0904822, 0968450)
- Jack Kent Cooke Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Keywords
- opinion spam, opinion spam detection, consumer reviews, fake reviews, creative writing, feature analysis, classifier comparison, psychology of deception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
