The DOI matches its DataCite record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Finding Deceptive Opinion Spam by Any Stretch of the Imagination
Open accessAbstract
Consumers increasingly rate, review and research products online. Consequently, websites containing consumer reviews are becoming targets of opinion spam. While recent work has focused primarily on manually identifiable instances of opinion spam, in this work we study deceptive opinion spam---fictitious opinions that have been deliberately written to sound authentic. Integrating work from psychology and computational linguistics, we develop and compare three approaches to detecting deceptive opinion spam, and ultimately develop a classifier that is nearly 90% accurate on our gold-standard opinion spam dataset. Based on feature analysis of our learned models, we additionally make several theoretical contributions, including revealing a relationship between deceptive opinions and imaginative writing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“The dataset of deceptive reviews from Ott et al. [46, 47] has 800 truthful reviews and 800 deceptive reviews for hotels in Chicago.”
From Improving Human-AI Collaboration With Descriptions of AI Behavior (2023) · cites this paper as [47]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Text categorization with Support Vector Machines: Learning with many relevant features
Joachims, T. (1998) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/bfb0026683 · Cited by 8,271
Machine learning in automated text categorization
Sebastiani, F. (2002) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/505282.505283 · Cited by 7,927
SRILM - an extensible language modeling toolkit
Stolcke, A. (2002) · International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP) · doi:10.21437/icslp.2002-303 · Cited by 4,385
Electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management
Litvin, S. W., Goldsmith, R. E., & Pan, B. (2008) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.011 · Cited by 3,267
Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape.
Rigby, R. A., & Stasinopoulos, D. M. (2005) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.00510.x · Cited by 3,228
Accurate unlexicalized parsing
Klein, D., & Manning, C. D. (2003) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.3115/1075096.1075150 · Cited by 3,055
Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English
Biber, D., & Quirk, R. (1999) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587792 · Cited by 2,766
Accuracy of Deception Judgments
Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2 · Cited by 1,953
The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015
Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K. (2015) · University of Texas at Austin · doi:10.15781/t25p41 · Cited by 1,674
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [6]6. the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics , pages 669-672. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- [17]17. M.K. Johnson and C.L. Raye. 1981. Reality monitoring. Psychological Review , 88(1):67-85.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,002
Efficient Detection of Irrelevant User Reviews Using Machine Learning
Kim, C., & Kim, H. G. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app14166900 · Cited by 2
Fake Reviews Detection Using Deep Learning: A Survey.
Abdelmohsen, Y., Wassif, K. T., & Ramadan, N. (2024) · Intelligent Methods, Systems, and Applications (IMSA) · doi:10.1109/imsa61967.2024.10652819 · Cited by 2
Spam Review Detection through Semantic Knowledge Based Algorithm for Negative Reviews
Dewang, R. K., & Singh, A. K. (2016) · International Journal of Engineering and Technology · doi:10.21817/ijet/2016/v8i6/160806257 · Cited by 3
Detecting Promotion Attacks in the App Market Using Neural Networks
He, D., Hong, K., Cheng, Y., Tang, Z., & Guizani, M. (2019) · IEEE Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/mwc.2019.1800322 · Cited by 2
Dong, M., Mihalcea, R. F., & Radev, D. (2019) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2019.06.007 · Cited by 2
Kauttonen, J., Hannukainen, J., Tikka, P., & Suomala, J. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0237144 · Cited by 2
Sentence Subjectivity and Sentiment Classification
Liu, B. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108639286.005 · Cited by 2
Fake Review Detection via Heterogeneous Graph Attention Network
Ren, Z., Zhang, X., Zhang, S., & Yang, C. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-44216-2_30 · Cited by 2
FNDaaS: Content-agnostic Detection of Websites Distributing Fake News
Papadopoulos, P., Spythouris, D., Markatos, E. P., & Kourtellis, N. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata59044.2023.10386830 · Cited by 2
Reframing and Broadening Adversarial Stylometry for Academic Integrity
Carmichael, J. J. (2024) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_148 · Cited by 2
Chatterjee, R., Pandey, M., Thakur, H. K., & Gupta, A. K. (2024) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2024.03.246 · Cited by 2
Explainable AI for Unraveling the Significance of Visual Cues in High Stakes Deception Detection
Salah, S., Elbatanouny, H., Sobuh, A. A. A., Almajali, E. R., Khan, W., Alaskar, H., Binbusayyis, A., Hassan, T., Yousaf, J., & Hussain, A. J. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3558875 · Cited by 2
Oh, Y. W., & Park, C. H. (2025) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.9623 · Cited by 2
Detecting Spam Community Using Retweeting Relationships – A Study on Sina Microblog
Zhao, B., Ji, G., Qu, W., & Zhang, Z. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04048-6_16 · Cited by 2
Yelp Events: Making Bricks Without Clay?
Ballesteros, J., Cărbunar, B., Rahman, M., & Rishe, N. D. (2013) · IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCSW) · doi:10.1109/icdcsw.2013.5 · Cited by 2
Prospects for Detecting Deception on Twitter
Franke, U., & Rosell, M. (2014) · International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud (FiCloud) · doi:10.1109/ficloud.2014.92 · Cited by 2
El mito de las opiniones manipuladas en Tripadvisor
Mellinas, J. P., García, J. J. B., & María-Dolores, S. M. M. (2015) · Papers de Turisme · Cited by 2
The Scent of Deception: Recognizing Fake Perfume Reviews in Polish
Rubikowski, M., & Wawer, A. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-38634-3_6 · Cited by 2
Deep Context Identification of Deceptive Reviews Using Word Vectors
Zhang, W., Jiang, Y., & Yoshida, T. (2016) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-2857-1_19 · Cited by 2
Pawlick, J., & Zhu, Q. (2017) · IEEE Conference on Communications and Network Security · doi:10.1109/cns.2017.8228694 · Cited by 2
Sánchez-Junquera, J., Villaseñor-Pineda, L., Escalante, H. J., & Montes-y-Gómez, M. (2017) · Research in Computing Science · doi:10.13053/rcs-134-1-11 · Cited by 2
Detection of unreliable and reliable pages on Facebook
Songram, P. (2018) · Artificial Life and Robotics · doi:10.1007/s10015-018-0509-z · Cited by 2
Credibility Analysis for Online Product Reviews
Chen, M., & Prabakaran, A. (2018) · International Journal of Multimedia Data Engineering and Management · doi:10.4018/ijmdem.2018070103 · Cited by 2
Opinion Spam Detection based on Annotation Extension and Neural Networks
Liu, Y., & Pang, B. (2019) · Computer and Information Science · doi:10.5539/cis.v12n2p87 · Cited by 3
A Machine Learning Based Approach for Mobile App Rating Manipulation Detection
Song, Y., Chen, W., Zhu, S., & Wang, H. (2019) · ICST Transactions on Security and Safety · doi:10.4108/eai.8-4-2019.157415 · Cited by 2
Kleinberg, B., van der Toolen, Y., Vrij, A., Arntz, A. R., & Verschuère, B. (2018) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3461 · Cited by 2
Rainer, A., Williams, A. H., Garousi, V., & Felderer, M. (2020) · IET Software · doi:10.1049/iet-sen.2020.0109 · Cited by 2
Effect of Various Factors in Context of Feature Selection on Opinion Spam Detection
Rastogi, A., Mehrotra, M., & Ali, S. S. (2021) · International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering (Confluence) · doi:10.1109/confluence51648.2021.9377056 · Cited by 2
Soldner, F., Kleinberg, B., & Johnson, S. D. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0277869 · Cited by 2
Revealing the Demographic Attributes of the Authors from the Abstracts of Scientific Articles
Sazzed, S. (2022) · ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (HT) · doi:10.1145/3511095.3536358 · Cited by 3
Requirements for a Comprehensive and Automated Web Reputation Monitoring System: First Iteration
Mich, L. (2012) · Software - Science, Technology and Engineering · doi:10.1109/swste.2012.15 · Cited by 2
Credible or Incredible? Dissecting Urban Legends
Guerini, M., & Strapparava, C. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-54903-8_37 · Cited by 2
Okumura, M. (2013) · IEICE ESS FUNDAMENTALS REVIEW · doi:10.1587/essfr.6.285 · Cited by 2
Graphic model analysis of frauds in online consumer reviews
Song, C., Goswami, K., Park, Y., Chang, S., & Choo, E. (2017) · International Conference on Internet of Things, Data and Cloud Computing (ICC) · doi:10.1145/3018896.3018942 · Cited by 2
Fake reviews tell no tales? Dissecting click farming in content-generated social networks
Zheng, H., Li, N., Xue, M., Du, S., & Zhu, H. (2017) · IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC) · doi:10.1109/iccchina.2017.8330469 · Cited by 2
Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Parole Hearings using Language Models
Todd, G., Voss, C., & Hong, J. (2020) · Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science (NLP+CSS) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.nlpcss-1.8 · Cited by 2
FSCR: A Deep Social Recommendation Model for Misleading Information
Zhang, D., Wu, H., & Yang, F. P. (2021) · Information · doi:10.3390/info12010037 · Cited by 2
Crowdturfing Detection in Online Review System: A Graph-Based Modeling
Feng, Q., Zhang, Y., & Kuang, L. (2021) · Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-92638-0_21 · Cited by 2
Marshall, P. H., Ireland, M. E., & Dalton, A. A. (2015) · Human-animal interaction bulletin · doi:10.1079/hai.2015.0004 · Cited by 2
Reframing and Broadening Adversarial Stylometry for Academic Integrity
Carmichael, J. J. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_148-1 · Cited by 2
A Computational Approach To Linguistic Coordination
Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C. (2012) · eCommons (Cornell University) · Cited by 2
Opinion spam detection through semantic similarity
Sandulescu, V. (2014) · Cited by 2
Misleading Metadata Detection on YouTubePreprint
Palod, P., Patwari, A., Bahety, S., Bagchi, S., & Goyal, P. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.08759 · Cited by 2
Mitigating Colluding Attacks in Online Social Networks and Crowdsourcing Platforms
Kamhoua, G. A. (2019) · doi:10.25148/etd.fidc007703 · Cited by 2
Glenski, M., Ayton, E., Cosbey, R., Arendt, D., & Volkova, S. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.11761 · Cited by 3
Rebitschek, F. G., Gigerenzer, G., & Wagner, G. G. (2021) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/kq8ra · Cited by 2
Study of authentic and fictitious online reviews
Banerjee, S. (2017) · DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) · doi:10.32657/10356/72679 · Cited by 2
Detecção automática de notícias falsas em português
Santos, R. L. D. S. (2022) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/t.55.2022.tde-14072022-165613 · Cited by 2
Text Generation for Dataset Augmentation in Security Classification TasksPreprint
Welsh, A. P., & Edwards, M. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4616394 · Cited by 4
A Method for User Credibility Evaluation on Online Business Review Services
Zhang, W., Wang, L., Han, X., Liu, H., & Xun, H. (2020) · International Conference on Cloud Computing and Big Data Analytics (ICCCBDA) · doi:10.1109/icccbda49378.2020.9095598 · Cited by 1
Detection of Fake Online Reviews using ML
Mallikarjuna, S. B. (2020) · International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · doi:10.22214/ijraset.2020.30950 · Cited by 1
Deceptive Hotel Review Detection: An Ensemble Learning Framework
Bhangale, S., & Roy, P. K. (2024) · OITS International Conference on Information Technology (OCIT) · doi:10.1109/ocit65031.2024.00022 · Cited by 1
Samineni, L., Peddi, A., Kasukurthi, A., Rao, M. V. P. C. S., Niharika, G., & Chereddy, S. V. (2023) · International Conference on Electronics and Renewable Systems (ICEARS) · doi:10.1109/icears56392.2023.10085689 · Cited by 1
Multi-task Ensemble Learning for Fake Reviews Detection and Helpfulness Prediction: A Novel Approach
Melleng, A., Loughrey, A.-J., & Deepak, P. (2023) · International conference Recent advances in natural language processing · doi:10.26615/978-954-452-092-2_078 · Cited by 1
How to detect fake online physician reviews: A deep learning approach
Zhao, Y., Li, T., Yuan, Q., & Deng, S. (2024) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076241277171 · Cited by 1
LOOM: a Privacy-Preserving Linguistic Observatory of Online Misinformation
Clos, J., McClaughlin, E., Barnard, P., Tom, T., & Yajaman, S. (2024) · International Symposium on Trustworthy Autonomous Systems (TAS) · doi:10.1145/3686038.3686062 · Cited by 1
Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithms in Fake Reviews Detection in Brazilian Portuguese
Borges, E. C. R., Garcia, C. M., Feitosa, S. D. S., & Radavelli, C. H. (2025) · Revista Brasileira de Computação Aplicada · doi:10.5335/rbca.v17i1.16183 · Cited by 1
Detecting Deceptive Reviews Using Text Features Only
Meghebbar, A., Smahi, M. I., & Benamar, A. (2024) · International Conference of the African Federation of Operational Research Societies (AFROS) · doi:10.1109/afros62115.2024.11036897 · Cited by 1
Detecting LLM-Generated Fake Reviews: A Leakage-Free Multi-Model Framework
Ranjan, H., & Dwivedi, S. (2025) · International Journal of Engineering and Information Management · doi:10.52756/ijeim.2025.v01.i04.003 · Cited by 1
The Affective Iceberg Model for Review Manipulation Detection: A GPT-Based Design Artifact
Liu, S., Wei, Y., & Wang, S. (2025) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/00472875251383550 · Cited by 1
Facets of Fakes in Cyberspace: Machine and Ensemble Learning-Based Decisions and Detections
Chatterjee, R., Pandey, M., Thakur, H. K., & Gupta, A. K. (2025) · Informatica · doi:10.31449/inf.v49i13.7050 · Cited by 1
Analyzing instance representation in cognitive models of phishing decision-making
Xu, T., & Rajivan, P. (2026) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-026-09441-z · Cited by 1
Automatic Compilation of Travel Information from Texts: A Survey
Nanba, H., Ishino, A., & Takezaw, T. (2012) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/51290 · Cited by 1
Identifying deceptive reviews using networking parameters
Gera, T., Thakur, D. S., & Singh, J. (2015) · International Conference on Computing and Communications Technologies (ICCCT) · doi:10.1109/iccct2.2015.7292769 · Cited by 1
StarTrack: The Next Generation (of Product Review Management Tools)
Baccianella, S., Esuli, A., & Sebastiani, F. (2013) · New Generation Computing · doi:10.1007/s00354-012-0122-y · Cited by 1
AN AUTOMATIC FRAMEWORK FOR DOCUMENT SPAM DETECTION USING ENHANCED CONTEXT FEATURE MATCHING
Padma, Y. (2018) · International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science · doi:10.26483/ijarcs.v9i1.5473 · Cited by 1
Online Review Analysis by Visual Feature Selection
Koka, K., & Fang, S. (2017) · IEEE Intl Conf on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, Intl Conf on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, Intl Conf on Cloud and Big Data Computing, Intl Conf on Cyber Science and Technology Congress (DASC/PiCom/CBDCom/CyberSciTech) · doi:10.1109/dasc-picom-datacom-cyberscitec.2017.176 · Cited by 1
Online Deceptive Product Review Detection Leveraging Word Embedding
Li, X., Xie, L., Zhang, F., & Wang, H. (2017) · IEEE Intl Conf on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, Intl Conf on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, Intl Conf on Cloud and Big Data Computing, Intl Conf on Cyber Science and Technology Congress (DASC/PiCom/CBDCom/CyberSciTech) · doi:10.1109/dasc-picom-datacom-cyberscitec.2017.145 · Cited by 1
Analyzing Opinion Spammers’ Network Behavior in Online Review Systems
Choo, E. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data Computing Service and Applications (BigDataService) · doi:10.1109/bigdataservice.2018.00048 · Cited by 1
Vyas, V., & Uma, V. (2018) · Advances in data mining and database management book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-6117-0.ch013 · Cited by 1
Cloud based Framework for Fake Review Detection
Robin, M. T. I. (2019) · Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology · doi:10.34257/gjcstdvol19is4pg9 · Cited by 1
Review Trade: Everything Is Free in Incentivized Review Groups
Zhang, Y., Hao, S., & Wang, H. (2020) · Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-63086-7_19 · Cited by 1
Research on fake online review recognition method based on feature engineering
Hou, J., & Zhu, A. (2022) · Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering · doi:10.3233/jcm-225932 · Cited by 1
Comparative study of deep learning based sentimental analysis with other existence techniques
(2017) · International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and Technology · doi:10.21172/1.841.04 · Cited by 1
Detecting Deceptive Reviews Utilizing Review Group Model
Li, Y., Wang, F., Zhang, S., & Niu, X. (2019) · EAI International Conference on Mobile Multimedia Communications (MobiMedia) · doi:10.4108/eai.29-6-2019.2282593 · Cited by 1
Detecting Fake Reviews via Verbal and Nonverbal Features
Wang, G., Zhang, J., & Zhang, X. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering (ICEBE) · doi:10.1109/icebe52470.2021.00013 · Cited by 1
Vyas, V., & Uma, V. (2022) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-6303-1.ch081 · Cited by 1
Spreader-Centric Fake News Mitigation Framework Based on Epidemiology
Rath, B., & Srivastava, J. (2022) · Lecture notes in social networks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-07869-9_2 · Cited by 1
Machine Learning for Solving Unstructured Problems
Zhang, W. (2023) · Translational systems sciences · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-1075-5_4 · Cited by 1
A Privacy-Preserving Observatory of Misinformation using Linguistic Markers - A Work in Progress
Clos, J., McClaughlin, E., Barnard, P., Tom, T., & Yajaman, S. (2023) · International Symposium on Trustworthy Autonomous Systems (TAS) · doi:10.1145/3597512.3597530 · Cited by 1
A Comprehensive Study of Various Modalities Used for Deception Detection
Harishbhai, M., & Vaghela, D. B. (2023) · International Journal of Computing and Digital Systems · doi:10.12785/ijcds/1401119 · Cited by 1
Combining Stylometric and Sentiment Mining Approaches for Deceptive Opinion Spam Detection
Jakupov, A., Zeddini, B., Longhi, J., & Mercadal, J. (2023) · IEEE/ACS International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA) · doi:10.1109/aiccsa59173.2023.10479298 · Cited by 2
Panda, P., Vatsa, R., Chime, D., & Awe, O. D. (2024) · STEAM-H: Science, Technology, Engineering, Agriculture, Mathematics & Health · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-72215-8_15 · Cited by 1
Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (RCNN) Model for Detecting Healthcare Fraud Spam
Das, L., Ahuja, L., & Pandey, A. K. (2024) · International Conference on Computing, Sciences and Communications (ICCSC) · doi:10.1109/iccsc62048.2024.10830350 · Cited by 1
Trust Online: From E-Commerce to Recipe Sharing
Aspray, W. F., Royer, G. L., & Ocepek, M. G. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-01598-9_4 · Cited by 1
Novel representations and methods in text classification
Montes, M., & Escalante, H. J. (2013) · Cited by 1
An agent for deception detection in discussion basedenvironments
Azaria, A., Richardson, A., & Kraus, S. (2014) · Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems · doi:10.5555/2615731.2617486 · Cited by 1
APPLICATION OF LINGUISTIC CUES IN THE ANALYSIS OF LANGUAGE OF HATE GROUPS
Balcerzak, B., & Wojciech, J. (2015) · Computer Science · doi:10.7494/csci.2015.16.2.145 · Cited by 1
Distinguishing between True and False Stories using various Linguistic Features
HaCohen‐Kerner, Y., Dilmon, R., Friedlich, S., & Cohen, D. N. (2015) · Cited by 1
Estimating the amenibility of new domains for deception detection
Fitzpatrick, E., & Bachenko, J. (2016) · doi:10.18653/v1/w16-0804 · Cited by 1
Event-Based Recognition of Lived Experiences in User Reviews
Hassan, E., Buscaldi, D., & Aldo Gangemi, A. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49004-5_21 · Cited by 1
A framework to detect unqualified restaurant reviews
Angsumalee, B., Sotthisopha, N., & Vateekul, P. (2016) · International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/kse.2016.7758039 · Cited by 1
Opinion Spam – Meinungsäußerungen als Fake
Siegel, M. (2016) · Information - Wissenschaft & Praxis · doi:10.1515/iwp-2016-0058 · Cited by 1
A Cross-Modal CCA-Based Astroturfing Detection Approach
Bai, X., Xiang, Y., Niu, W., Liu, J., Chen, T., Liu, J., & Wu, T. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-89500-0_50 · Cited by 1
Temporal Spam Identification: A Multifaceted Approach to Identifying Review Spam
Muhammad, I., Qamar, U., & Khan, F. H. (2018) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01057-7_58 · Cited by 1
Analysis of Crowdturfing Spam Characteristics on Online Social Media Systems
Pak, S., & Lee, E. (2018) · Journal of Digital Contents Society · doi:10.9728/dcs.2018.19.11.2077 · Cited by 1
Detect Cooperative Hyping Among VIP Users and Spammers in Sina Weibo
Guo, Z., Liu, S., Wang, Y., Wang, L., Pan, L., & Wu, L. (2018) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-3044-5_18 · Cited by 1
Uncover Product Review Patterns via Weighted Motifs
Li, J., Lv, P., & Ji, C. (2018) · International Conference on Systems and Informatics (ICSAI) · doi:10.1109/icsai.2018.8599334 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Ott, M., Choi, Y., Cardie, C., & Hancock, J. T.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2011
- Pages
- 309-319
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1107.4557
- OpenAlex
- W2161283199
- Cited by
- 1,008
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 103 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 43
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0624267, 0904822, 0968450)
- Jack Kent Cooke Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Keywords
- opinion spam, opinion spam detection, consumer reviews, fake reviews, creative writing, feature analysis, classifier comparison, psychology of deception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
