The DOI matches its DataCite record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Finding Deceptive Opinion Spam by Any Stretch of the Imagination
Open accessAbstract
Consumers increasingly rate, review and research products online. Consequently, websites containing consumer reviews are becoming targets of opinion spam. While recent work has focused primarily on manually identifiable instances of opinion spam, in this work we study deceptive opinion spam---fictitious opinions that have been deliberately written to sound authentic. Integrating work from psychology and computational linguistics, we develop and compare three approaches to detecting deceptive opinion spam, and ultimately develop a classifier that is nearly 90% accurate on our gold-standard opinion spam dataset. Based on feature analysis of our learned models, we additionally make several theoretical contributions, including revealing a relationship between deceptive opinions and imaginative writing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“The dataset of deceptive reviews from Ott et al. [46, 47] has 800 truthful reviews and 800 deceptive reviews for hotels in Chicago.”
From Improving Human-AI Collaboration With Descriptions of AI Behavior (2023) · cites this paper as [47]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Text categorization with Support Vector Machines: Learning with many relevant features
Joachims, T. (1998) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/bfb0026683 · Cited by 8,271
Machine learning in automated text categorization
Sebastiani, F. (2002) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/505282.505283 · Cited by 7,927
SRILM - an extensible language modeling toolkit
Stolcke, A. (2002) · International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP) · doi:10.21437/icslp.2002-303 · Cited by 4,385
Electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management
Litvin, S. W., Goldsmith, R. E., & Pan, B. (2008) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.011 · Cited by 3,267
Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape.
Rigby, R. A., & Stasinopoulos, D. M. (2005) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.00510.x · Cited by 3,228
Accurate unlexicalized parsing
Klein, D., & Manning, C. D. (2003) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.3115/1075096.1075150 · Cited by 3,055
Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English
Biber, D., & Quirk, R. (1999) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587792 · Cited by 2,766
Accuracy of Deception Judgments
Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2 · Cited by 1,953
The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015
Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K. (2015) · University of Texas at Austin · doi:10.15781/t25p41 · Cited by 1,674
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [6]6. the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics , pages 669-672. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- [17]17. M.K. Johnson and C.L. Raye. 1981. Reality monitoring. Psychological Review , 88(1):67-85.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,002
Determining psycholinguistic features of deception in phishing messages
Xu, T., & Rajivan, P. (2023) · Information and Computer Security · doi:10.1108/ics-11-2021-0185 · Cited by 13
Ensemble learning approach for distinguishing human and computer-generated Arabic reviews
Alhayan, F., & Himdi, H. (2024) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.2345 · Cited by 13
An “Eye” for an “I”: The Challenges and Opportunities for Spotting Credibility in a Digital World
Hancock, J. T., & Woodworth, M. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5547-9_13 · Cited by 13
Self-citationDiscovering Rhetoric Agreement between a Request and Response
Galitsky, B. A. (2017) · Dialogue & Discourse · doi:10.5087/dad.2017.208 · Cited by 13
"Someone told me": Preemptive reputation protection in communication
Giardini, F., Fitneva, S. A., & Tamm, A. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200883 · Cited by 13
Taneja, H., & Kaur, S. (2021) · Computers & Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107217 · Cited by 13
Detecting Product Review Spammers Using Principles of Big Data
Rout, J. K., Dalmia, A., Rath, S. K., Mohanta, B. K., Ramasubbareddy, S., & Gandomi, A. H. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2021.3097805 · Cited by 13
Table-based Fact Verification With Salience-aware Learning
Wang, F., Sun, K., Pujara, J., Szekely, P. A., & Chen, M. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.338 · Cited by 13
Detecting Fake Reviews using Machine learning techniques: a survey
Agarwal, R., & Sharma, D. K. (2022) · International Conference on Advance Computing and Innovative Technologies in Engineering (ICACITE) · doi:10.1109/icacite53722.2022.9823633 · Cited by 14
Chaos enhanced intelligent optimization-based novel deception detection system
Bingöl, H., & Alataş, B. (2022) · Chaos Solitons & Fractals · doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112896 · Cited by 13
Automatic detection of deceit in verbal communication
Mihalcea, R. F., Pérez‐Rosas, V., & Burzo, M. G. (2013) · INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION · doi:10.1145/2522848.2522888 · Cited by 13
Towards multimodal deception detection -- step 1
Mihalcea, R. F., & Burzo, M. G. (2012) · INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION · doi:10.1145/2388676.2388714 · Cited by 13
Psycholinguistic Features for Deceptive Role Detection in Werewolf
Girlea, C., Gîrju, R., & Eyal Amir, A. (2016) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n16-1047 · Cited by 13
Lawlor, A., & Kirakowski, J. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.070 · Cited by 13
Lexicons on Demand: Neural Word Embeddings for Large-Scale Text Analysis
Fast, E., Chen, B., & Bernstein, M. S. (2017) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2017/677 · Cited by 13
Securing Behavior-based Opinion Spam Detection
Ge, S., Ma, G., Xie, S., & Yu, P. S. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata.2018.8622582 · Cited by 14
The Impact of Fake Reviews on Demand and Welfare
Akesson, J., Hahn, R. W., Metcalfe, R., & Monti-Nussbaum, M. (2023) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w31836 · Cited by 13
Fake reviews detection in e-commerce using machine learning techniques: A comparative survey
Jalal, M., & Hussein, M. H. (2024) · BIO Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/bioconf/20249700099 · Cited by 12
AI-generated fake review detection
Luo, J., Nan, G., Li, D., & Tan, Y. (2026) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2026.114628 · Cited by 12
Gender Differences in Deceivers Writing Style
Pérez‐Rosas, V., & Mihalcea, R. F. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13647-9_17 · Cited by 12
Detecting Professional Spam Reviewers
Huang, J., Qian, T., He, G., Zhong, M., & Peng, Q. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-53917-6_26 · Cited by 12
Online Review Spam Detection using Language Model and Feature Selection
S.Patil, M., & Bagade, A. M. (2012) · International Journal of Computer Applications · doi:10.5120/9562-4031 · Cited by 12
Overview of Web Spammer Detection
Mo, Q., & Yang, K. (2014) · Cited by 12
An ensemble predictive analytics of COVID-19 infodemic tweets using bag of words
Olaleye, T. O., Arogundade, O. '., Abayomi-Alli, A. A., & Adesemowo, A. K. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-824536-1.00004-6 · Cited by 12
Fake News Detection Using Machine Learning
Octaviano, M. (2021) · International Conference on E-Society, E-Education and E-Technology (ICSET) · doi:10.1145/3485768.3485774 · Cited by 12
An Empirical Analysis of Different Techniques for Spam Detection
Rangari, K., & Khan, A. (2022) · International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS) · doi:10.1109/icaccs54159.2022.9785177 · Cited by 12
Fake Reviews Classification using Deep Learning
Ashraf, S., Rehman, F. U., Sharif, H., Kirn, H., Arshad, H., & Manzoor, H. (2023) · International Multi-disciplinary Conference in Emerging Research Trends (IMCERT) · doi:10.1109/imcert57083.2023.10075156 · Cited by 12
Robust Fake Review Detection Using Uncertainty-Aware LSTM and BERT
Zabeen, S., Hasan, A., Islam, M. F., Hossain, M. S., & Rasel, A. A. (2023) · International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (CICN) · doi:10.1109/cicn59264.2023.10402342 · Cited by 12
Monaro, M., Spolaor, R., Li, Q., Conti, M., Gamberini, L., & Sartori, G. (2017) · International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES) · doi:10.1145/3098954.3104047 · Cited by 12
A fuzzy approach to detect spammer groups
Do, Q. N. T., Hussain, F. K., & Nguyen, B. T. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE) · doi:10.1109/fuzz-ieee.2017.8015478 · Cited by 12
An overview of soft computing techniques on Review Spam Detection
Amin, I., & Dubey, M. K. (2021) · International Conference on Intelligent Engineering and Management (ICIEM) · doi:10.1109/iciem51511.2021.9445280 · Cited by 12
Opinion spam detection using Deep Learning
Bathla, G., & Kumar, A. (2021) · International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN) · doi:10.1109/spin52536.2021.9566048 · Cited by 12
The market design and policy of online review platforms
Edelman, B. G. (2017) · Oxford Review of Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/oxrep/grx043 · Cited by 12
Hunting for Troll Comments in News Community ForumsPreprint
Mihaylov, T., & Nakov, P. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.08113 · Cited by 12
Haque, A., & Abulaish, M. (2023) · International Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Social Media (SocialNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.socialnlp-1.4 · Cited by 11
Dissenting Explanations: Leveraging Disagreement to Reduce Model Overreliance
Reingold, O., Shen, J. H., & Talati, A. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i19.30151 · Cited by 11
Leveraging Stacking Framework for Fake Review Detection in the Hospitality Sector
Ashraf, S. A., Javed, A. F., Bellary, S., Bala, P. K., & Panigrahi, P. K. (2024) · Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research · doi:10.3390/jtaer19020075 · Cited by 12
Detecting Fake Reviews Using Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis and Graph Convolutional Networks
Phukon, P., Ποτίκας, Π., & Potika, K. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15073771 · Cited by 11
Gender Differences in Multimodal Contact-Free Deception Detection
Abouelenien, M., Burzo, M. G., Pérez‐Rosas, V., Mihalcea, R. F., Sun, H., & Zhao, B. (2018) · IEEE Multimedia · doi:10.1109/mmul.2018.2883128 · Cited by 11
A Study on Identification of Important Features for Efficient Detection of Fake Reviews
Lin, T.-Y., Chakraborty, B., & Peng, C. (2021) · International Conference on Data Analytics for Business and Industry (ICDABI) · doi:10.1109/icdabi53623.2021.9655845 · Cited by 11
Store Review Spammer Detection Based on Review Relationship
Peng, Q. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14139-8_30 · Cited by 11
Deceptive Opinion Detection Using Machine Learning Techniques
Sultana, N., & Palaniappan, S. (2020) · International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business · doi:10.5815/ijieeb.2020.01.01 · Cited by 11
Deceptive Opinion Spam based On Deep Learning
Fahfouh, A., Riffi, J., Mahraz, M. A., Yahyaouy, A., & Tairi, H. (2020) · International Conference on Intelligent Computing in Data Sciences (ICDS) · doi:10.1109/icds50568.2020.9268772 · Cited by 11
How fakes make it through: the role of review features versus consumer characteristics
Azimi, S., Chan, K., & Krasnikov, A. V. (2022) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/jcm-04-2021-4597 · Cited by 12
Analysis of Linguistic Style Accommodation in Online Debates
Mukherjee, A., & Liu, B. (2012) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · Cited by 11
The Best Answers? Think Twice: Identifying Commercial Campagins in the CQA Forums
Chen, C., Wu, K., Srinivasan, V., & Bharadwaj, R. K. (2015) · Journal of Computer Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s11390-015-1562-x · Cited by 11
Leveraging GPT-2 for Classifying Spam Reviews with Limited Labeled Data via Adversarial TrainingPreprint
Irissappane, A. A., Yu, H., Shen, Y., Agrawal, A., & Stanton, G. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.13400 · Cited by 15
Mining Weak Relations Between Reviews for Opinion Spam Detection
Xu, Y., Liu, H., Ge, J., Zhang, X., Hu, J., Wu, Y., Lv, H., Shi, H., & Zhou, W. J. (2022) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2022.3221008 · Cited by 10
Deep Learning Based Model for Fake Review Detection
Singh, D., Memoria, M., & Kumar, R. (2023) · International Conference on Advancement in Computation & Computer Technologies (InCACCT) · doi:10.1109/incacct57535.2023.10141826 · Cited by 10
A hierarchical neural network model with user and product attention for deceptive reviews detection
Ren, Y., Yan, M., & Ji, D. (2022) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2022.05.011 · Cited by 10
Impacts of Influencers on Customer’s Purchase Intentions in Instagram
Wibisono, M. M. B., Prasetyanto, H., Sitanggang, B., Dewangga, A., & Maryati, M. (2023) · Indonesian Business Review · doi:10.21632/ibr.6.1.35-48 · Cited by 11
Mewada, A., Dewang, R. K., Goldar, P., & Maurya, S. K. (2023) · International Conference on Contemporary Computing · doi:10.1145/3607947.3607991 · Cited by 10
Opinion mining and opinion spam: A literature review focusing on product reviews
Sheibani, A. A. (2012) · International Symposium on Telecommunications · doi:10.1109/istel.2012.6483152 · Cited by 10
Highlighting the Fake Reviews in Review Sequence with the Suspicious Contents and Behaviours
Li, Y. (2015) · Journal of Information and Computational Science · doi:10.12733/jics20105452 · Cited by 10
Kleinberg, B., Nahari, G., & Verschuère, B. (2016) · doi:10.18653/v1/w16-0803 · Cited by 10
Opinion Spam Detection in Social Networks
Fei, G., Li, H., & Liu, B. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-804412-4.00009-7 · Cited by 11
Deceptive text detection using continuous semantic space models
Hernández-Castañeda, Á., & Calvo, H. (2017) · Intelligent Data Analysis · doi:10.3233/ida-170882 · Cited by 10
Can You Identify Fake or Authentic Reviews? An fsQCA Approach
Lee, K., Ham, J., Yang, S., & Koo, C. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-72923-7_17 · Cited by 10
Detection of fake online hotel reviews
Sandifer, A. V., Wilson, C., & Olmsted, A. (2017) · International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions · doi:10.23919/icitst.2017.8356460 · Cited by 10
Identifying Singleton Spammers via Spammer Group Detection
Kumar, D., Shaalan, Y., Zhang, X., & Chan, J. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93034-3_52 · Cited by 10
Comparing Human Computation, Machine, and Hybrid Methods for Detecting Hotel Review Spam
Harris, C. G. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-29374-1_7 · Cited by 10
Effects of Pre-trained Word Embeddings on Text-based Deception Detection
Nam, D., Yasmin, J., & Zulkernine, F. H. (2020) · IEEE Intl Conf on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, Intl Conf on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, Intl Conf on Cloud and Big Data Computing, Intl Conf on Cyber Science and Technology Congress (DASC/PiCom/CBDCom/CyberSciTech) · doi:10.1109/dasc-picom-cbdcom-cyberscitech49142.2020.00083 · Cited by 11
Did they answer? Subjective acts and intents in conversational discourse
Ferracane, E., Durrett, G., Li, J. J., & Erk, K. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.129 · Cited by 10
Using Inductive Transfer Learning to Improve Hotel Review Spam Detection
Crawford, M., & Khoshgoftaar, T. M. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IRI) · doi:10.1109/iri51335.2021.00040 · Cited by 10
Detecting Review Spam: Challenges and Opportunities
Ma, Y., & Li, F. (2012) · International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom) · doi:10.4108/icst.collaboratecom.2012.250640 · Cited by 10
Rating consistency and review content based multiple stores review spam detection
Algur, S. P., & Biradar, J. G. (2015) · doi:10.1109/infop.2015.7489470 · Cited by 10
Combining Word and Character N-Grams for Detecting Deceptive Opinions
Siagian, A. H. A. M., & Aritsugi, M. (2017) · IEEE Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) · doi:10.1109/compsac.2017.90 · Cited by 10
Detecting Deceptive Intentions: Possibilities for Large-Scale Applications
Kleinberg, B., Arntz, A. R., & Verschuère, B. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96334-1_21 · Cited by 10
Fake Review Detection using Principal Component Analysis and Active Learning
Muhammad, F., & Ahmed, S. (2019) · International Journal of Computer Applications · doi:10.5120/ijca2019919418 · Cited by 12
Proceedings of the Workshop on Stylistic Variation
(2017) · doi:10.18653/v1/w17-49 · Cited by 10
Catch Me If You Can — Detecting Fraudulent Online Reviews of Doctors Using Deep LearningPreprint
Shukla, A. D., Wang, W., Gao, G. G., & Agarwal, R. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3320258 · Cited by 11
Impact of Behavioral and Textual Features on Opinion Spam Detection
Rastogi, A., & Mehrotra, M. (2018) · International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICICCS) · doi:10.1109/iccons.2018.8662912 · Cited by 9
Alallaq, N., Al-Khiza’ay, M., & Han, X. (2019) · Cybersecurity · doi:10.1186/s42400-019-0029-8 · Cited by 9
Modelling users' trust in online health rumours: an experiment-based study in China
Deng, S., Fu, S., Yong, L., & Li, H. (2021) · Information Research · doi:10.47989/irpaper890 · Cited by 9
Deceptive Opinions Detection Using New Proposed Arabic Semantic Features
Ziani, A., Azizi, N., Schwab, D., Zenakhra, D., Aldwairi, M., Chekkai, N., Zemmal, N., & Salah, M. H. (2021) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2021.05.067 · Cited by 9
Shang, Y., Liu, M., Zhao, T., & Zhou, J. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86383-8_33 · Cited by 9
Fake Review Detection Using Deep Neural Networks with Multimodal Feature Fusion Method
Li, X., & Chen, L. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS) · doi:10.1109/icpads60453.2023.00411 · Cited by 10
Guarasci, R., Catelli, R., & Esposito, M. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124131 · Cited by 9
SGAN-SAM-ERNIE: A Novel and Effective Detection Scheme for Chinese Fake Reviews
Zhang, M., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, X. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3445354 · Cited by 9
Interpretable and effective opinion spam detection via temporal patterns mining across websites
Yuan, Y., Xie, S., Lu, C.-T., Tang, J., & Yu, P. S. (2016) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata.2016.7840593 · Cited by 10
Detecting Sockpuppets in Deceptive Opinion Spam
Hosseinia, M., & Mukherjee, A. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-77116-8_19 · Cited by 9
Finding the Keywords Affecting the Success of Crowdfunding Projects
Chen, L., & Shen, E.-L. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (ICIEA) · doi:10.1109/iea.2019.8714815 · Cited by 9
Fake Review Detection Using Machine Learning Techniques
Abhinandan, V., Aishwarya, C., & Sultana, A. (2020) · International Journal of Fog Computing · doi:10.4018/ijfc.2020070104 · Cited by 9
A cross-site comparison of online review manipulation using Benford’s law
Zhao, C., & Wang, C. A. (2021) · Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.1007/s10660-020-09455-8 · Cited by 9
Alawadh, H. M., Alabrah, A. A., Meraj, T., & Rauf, H. T. (2022) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2022.101450 · Cited by 9
Wang, B., & Kuan, K. K. Y. (2022) · AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.17705/1thci.00167 · Cited by 9
Understanding Large-Scale Network Effects in Detecting Review Spammers
Rout, J. K., Sahoo, K. S., Dalmia, A., Bakshi, S., Bilal, M., & Song, H. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2023.3243139 · Cited by 9
Rubin, V. L., & Vashchilko, T. (2012) · Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/meet.14504901350 · Cited by 9
Online Deception Detection Refueled by RealWorld Data Collection
Yao, W., Dai, Z., Huang, R., & Caverlee, J. (2017) · International conference Recent advances in natural language processing · doi:10.26615/978-954-452-049-6_102 · Cited by 9
Social network sites and requirements engineering: A systematic literature review
Ali, N., Hong, J., & Chung, L. (2020) · Journal of Software Evolution and Process · doi:10.1002/smr.2332 · Cited by 9
Neural Semi-supervised Learning for Text Classification Under Large-Scale PretrainingPreprint
Sun, Z., Fan, C. C., Sun, X., Meng, Y., Wu, F. Q., & Li, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.08626 · Cited by 9
Detecting deception in interrogation settings
Lamb, C., & Skillicorn, D. B. (2013) · IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI) · doi:10.1109/isi.2013.6578809 · Cited by 8
Opinioned Post Detection in Sina Weibo
Lv, Y., Liu, J., Chen, H., Mi, J., Liu, M., & Zheng, Q. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2679227 · Cited by 8
Devising a Cross-Domain Model to Detect Fake Review Comments
Wei, C.-S., Hsu, P., Huang, C.-W., Cheng, M.-S., & Prassida, G. F. (2020) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-63119-2_58 · Cited by 8
Detecting Deception Through Linguistic Cues: From Reality Monitoring to Natural Language Processing
Loconte, R., Battaglini, C., Maldera, S., Pietrini, P., Sartori, G., Navarin, N., & Monaro, M. (2025) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x251316883 · Cited by 10
Detecting the spam review using tri-training
Chengzhang, J., & Kang, D.-K. (2015) · International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology · doi:10.1109/icact.2015.7224822 · Cited by 8
A faceted characterization of the opinion mining landscape
Arora, R., & Srinivasa, S. (2014) · International Conference on Communication Systems & Networks (COMSNETS) · doi:10.1109/comsnets.2014.6734936 · Cited by 8
Temporal and Sentimental Analysis of A Real Case of Fake Reviews in Taiwan
Wang, C., Day, M.-Y., Chen, C.-C., & Liou, J.-W. (2017) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1145/3110025.3116206 · Cited by 8
Deception Detection for the Russian Language: Lexical and Syntactic Parameters
Борисовна, П. Д., Litvinova, T., & Litvinova, O. (2017) · doi:10.26615/978-954-452-038-0_001 · Cited by 8
Survey of Challenges in Sentiment Analysis
Singhal, S., Maheshwari, S., & Meena, M. (2018) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-8633-5_24 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Ott, M., Choi, Y., Cardie, C., & Hancock, J. T.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2011
- Pages
- 309-319
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1107.4557
- OpenAlex
- W2161283199
- Cited by
- 1,008
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 103 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 43
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0624267, 0904822, 0968450)
- Jack Kent Cooke Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Keywords
- opinion spam, opinion spam detection, consumer reviews, fake reviews, creative writing, feature analysis, classifier comparison, psychology of deception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review