The DOI matches its DataCite record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Finding Deceptive Opinion Spam by Any Stretch of the Imagination
Open accessAbstract
Consumers increasingly rate, review and research products online. Consequently, websites containing consumer reviews are becoming targets of opinion spam. While recent work has focused primarily on manually identifiable instances of opinion spam, in this work we study deceptive opinion spam---fictitious opinions that have been deliberately written to sound authentic. Integrating work from psychology and computational linguistics, we develop and compare three approaches to detecting deceptive opinion spam, and ultimately develop a classifier that is nearly 90% accurate on our gold-standard opinion spam dataset. Based on feature analysis of our learned models, we additionally make several theoretical contributions, including revealing a relationship between deceptive opinions and imaginative writing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“The dataset of deceptive reviews from Ott et al. [46, 47] has 800 truthful reviews and 800 deceptive reviews for hotels in Chicago.”
From Improving Human-AI Collaboration With Descriptions of AI Behavior (2023) · cites this paper as [47]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Text categorization with Support Vector Machines: Learning with many relevant features
Joachims, T. (1998) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/bfb0026683 · Cited by 8,271
Machine learning in automated text categorization
Sebastiani, F. (2002) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/505282.505283 · Cited by 7,927
SRILM - an extensible language modeling toolkit
Stolcke, A. (2002) · International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP) · doi:10.21437/icslp.2002-303 · Cited by 4,385
Electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management
Litvin, S. W., Goldsmith, R. E., & Pan, B. (2008) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.011 · Cited by 3,267
Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape.
Rigby, R. A., & Stasinopoulos, D. M. (2005) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.00510.x · Cited by 3,228
Accurate unlexicalized parsing
Klein, D., & Manning, C. D. (2003) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.3115/1075096.1075150 · Cited by 3,055
Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English
Biber, D., & Quirk, R. (1999) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587792 · Cited by 2,766
Accuracy of Deception Judgments
Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2 · Cited by 1,953
The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015
Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K. (2015) · University of Texas at Austin · doi:10.15781/t25p41 · Cited by 1,674
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [6]6. the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics , pages 669-672. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- [17]17. M.K. Johnson and C.L. Raye. 1981. Reality monitoring. Psychological Review , 88(1):67-85.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,002
Xylogiannopoulos, K. F., Xanthopoulos, P., Karampelas, P., & Bakamitsos, G. A. (2024) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103842 · Cited by 38
A deceptive review detection framework: Combination of coarse and fine-grained features
Cao, N., Ji, S., Chiu, D. K. W., He, M.-X., & Sun, X. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113465 · Cited by 36
Building a Better Lie Detector with BERT: The Difference Between Truth and Lies
Barsever, D., Singh, S., & Neftci, E. (2020) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn48605.2020.9206937 · Cited by 37
Literary Detective Work on the Computer
Oakes, M. (2014) · Natural language processing · doi:10.1075/nlp.12 · Cited by 35
Detecting Deceptive Review Spam via Attention-Based Neural Networks
Wang, X., Liu, K., & Zhao, J. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73618-1_76 · Cited by 34
Identification of fake reviews using semantic and behavioral features
Wang, X., Zhang, X., Jiang, C., & Liu, H. (2018) · International Conference on Information Management · doi:10.1109/infoman.2018.8392816 · Cited by 35
FraudNE: a Joint Embedding Approach for Fraud Detection
Zheng, M., Zhou, C. D., Wu, J. X., Pan, S., Shi, J., & Guo, L. (2018) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2018.8489585 · Cited by 34
A Framework for Fake Review Detection: Issues and Challenges
Rout, J. K., Dash, A. K., & Ray, N. K. (2018) · doi:10.1109/icit.2018.00014 · Cited by 34
Impact of Sentiment Analysis in Fake Online Review Detection
Hassan, R., & Islam, M. R. (2021) · International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Sustainable Development (ICICT4SD) · doi:10.1109/icict4sd50815.2021.9396899 · Cited by 34
New ICTs and the Study of Political Communication
Garrett, R., Bimber, B., de Zúñiga, H. G., Heinderyckx, F., Kelly, J., & Smith, M. A. (2012) · Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) · Cited by 34
A Review Structure Based Ensemble Model for Deceptive Review Spam
Zeng, Z.-Y., Lin, J.-J., Chen, M.-S., Chen, M.-H., Lan, Y., & Liu, J. (2019) · Information · doi:10.3390/info10070243 · Cited by 37
Walther, M., Jakobi, T., Watson, S. J., & Stevens, G. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100278 · Cited by 33
Machine Learning-Based Opinion Spam Detection: A Systematic Literature Review
Qazi, A., Hasan, N., Mao, R., Abo, M. E. M., Dey, S. K., & Hardaker, G. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3399264 · Cited by 35
Quantifier Guided Aggregation for the Veracity Assessment of Online Reviews
Viviani, M., & Pasi, G. (2016) · International Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1002/int.21844 · Cited by 33
Cross lingual transfer learning for sentiment analysis of Italian TripAdvisor reviews
Catelli, R., Bevilacqua, L., Mariniello, N., di Carlo, V. S., Magaldi, M., Fujita, H., Pietro, G. D., & Esposito, M. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118246 · Cited by 37
Temporal burstiness and collaborative camouflage aware fraud detection
Zhang, Z., Wan, J., Zhou, M., Lai, Z., Tessone, C. J., Chen, G., & Liao, H. (2022) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103170 · Cited by 33
Should I Follow AI-based Advice? Measuring Appropriate Reliance in Human-AI Decision-Making
Schemmer, M., Hemmer, P., Kühl, N., Benz, C., & Satzger, G. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.06916 · Cited by 33
“Ott et al. [20, 21] provide the research community with a data set of 400 deceptive and 400 genuine hotel reviews.”
BackgroundSentiment and emotion classification over noisy labels
Wang, Y., Rao, Y., Zhan, X., Chen, H., Luo, M., & Yin, J. P. (2016) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2016.08.012 · Cited by 33
Yu, C., Zuo, Y., Feng, B., An, L., & Chen, B. (2018) · Information Technology and Management · doi:10.1007/s10799-018-0288-1 · Cited by 33
Tsinganos, N., Sakellariou, G., Fouliras, P., & Mavridis, I. K. (2018) · International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES) · doi:10.1145/3230833.3233277 · Cited by 32
Testosterone Imposters: An Analysis of Popular Online Testosterone Boosting Supplements
Balasubramanian, A., Thirumavalavan, N., Srivatsav, A., Yu, J., Lipshultz, L. I., & Pastuszak, A. W. (2019) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.12.008 · Cited by 32
GADM: Manual fake review detection for O2O commercial platforms
Ruan, N., Deng, R., & Su, C. (2019) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2019.101657 · Cited by 32
PV-DAE: A hybrid model for deceptive opinion spam based on neural network architectures
Fahfouh, A., Riffi, J., Mahraz, M. A., Yahyaouy, A., & Tairi, H. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113517 · Cited by 32
Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis
Aggarwal, C. C. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-96623-2_15 · Cited by 32
Understanding online fake review production strategies
Banerjee, S., & Chua, A. Y. K. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113534 · Cited by 32
Learning Document Representation for Deceptive Opinion Spam Detection
Li, L., Ren, W., Qin, B., & Liu, T. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25816-4_32 · Cited by 32
Fake Review Detection via Exploitation of Spam Indicators and Reviewer Behavior Characteristics
Dematis, I., Karapistoli, E., & Vakali, A. I. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73117-9_41 · Cited by 32
SURVEY ON REVIEW SPAM DETECTION
DIXIT, S., & AGRAWAL, A. J. (2016) · International Journal of Computer and Communication Technology · doi:10.47893/ijcct.2016.1332 · Cited by 31
How humans impair automated deception detection performance
Kleinberg, B., & Verschuère, B. (2021) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103250 · Cited by 36
Misinfo Reaction Frames: Reasoning about Readers’ Reactions to News Headlines
Gabriel, S., Hallinan, S., Sap, M., Nguyen, P., Roesner, F., Choi, E., & Choi, Y. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.222 · Cited by 60
Self-citationMulti-Source Domain Adaptation with Weak Supervision for Early Fake News Detection
Li, Y., Lee, K., Kordzadeh, N., Faber, B. D., Fiddes, C., Chen, E., & Shu, K. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata52589.2021.9671592 · Cited by 31
Comparative Study of Machine Learning Algorithms for Fake Review Detection with Emphasis on SVM
Naresh, P., Pavan, S. V. N., Mohammed, A. R., Chanti, N., & Tharun, M. (2023) · International Conference on Sustainable Computing and Smart Systems (ICSCSS) · doi:10.1109/icscss57650.2023.10169190 · Cited by 37
Seeing through Deception: A Computational Approach to Deceit Detection in Written Communication
Almela, Á., Valencia‐García, R., & Cantos-Gómez, P. (2012) · Hispana · Cited by 31
Song, L., Lau, R. Y. K., Kwok, R. C.-W., Mirkovski, K., & Dou, W. (2016) · Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.1007/s10660-016-9244-5 · Cited by 33
The Effects of Features Selection Methods on Spam Review Detection Performance
Etaiwi, W., & Awajan, A. (2017) · International Conference on New Trends in Computing Sciences (ICTCS) · doi:10.1109/ictcs.2017.50 · Cited by 31
Streaming Analysis of Discourse Participants
Durme, B. V. (2013) · Cited by 30
Minnich, A., Chavoshi, N., Mueen, A., Luan, S., & Faloutsos, M. (2015) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2736277.2741655 · Cited by 30
An Attribute Enhanced Domain Adaptive Model for Cold-Start Spam Review Detection.
You, Z., Qian, T., & Liu, B. (2018) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · Cited by 30
Detection of Fake Reviews: Analysis of Sellers’ Manipulation Behavior
Chen, L., Li, W., Chen, H., & Geng, S. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11174802 · Cited by 30
It Takes Two to Lie: One to Lie, and One to Listen
Peskov, D., Cheng, B., Elgohary, A., Barrow, J., Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., & Boyd-Graber, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.353 · Cited by 30
Identifying features of health misinformation on social media sites: an exploratory analysis
Zhang, S., Ma, F., Liu, Y., & Pian, W. (2021) · Library Hi Tech · doi:10.1108/lht-09-2020-0242 · Cited by 30
A deceptive reviews detection model: Separated training of multi-feature learning and classification
Cao, N., Ji, S., Chiu, D. K. W., & Gong, M. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115977 · Cited by 30
Explain, Edit, and Understand: Rethinking User Study Design for Evaluating Model Explanations
Arora, S., Pruthi, D., Sadeh, N., Cohen, W. W., Lipton, Z. C., & Neubig, G. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i5.20464 · Cited by 41
Lu, J., Zhan, X., Liu, G., Zhan, X., & Deng, X. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12102165 · Cited by 30
PASTA: Table-Operations Aware Fact Verification via Sentence-Table Cloze Pre-training
Gu, Z., Fan, J., Tang, N., Nakov, P., Zhao, X., & Du, X. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.331 · Cited by 30
Combating Fake News on Social Media: A Framework, Review, and Future Opportunities
Nasery, M., Turel, O., & Yuan, Y. (2023) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.05335 · Cited by 33
An ensemble approach to detect review spam using hybrid machine learning technique
Ahsan, M. N. I., Nahian, T., Kafi, A. A., Hossain, M. I., & Shah, F. M. (2016) · International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT) · doi:10.1109/iccitechn.2016.7860229 · Cited by 30
Collusion-aware detection of review spammers in location based social networks
Cao, J., Xia, R., Guo, Y., & Ma, Z. (2018) · World Wide Web · doi:10.1007/s11280-018-0614-x · Cited by 30
SGG: Spinbot, Grammarly and GloVe based Fake News Detection
Gautam, A., & Jerripothula, K. R. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Big Data · doi:10.1109/bigmm50055.2020.00033 · Cited by 29
Cheng, L., Hu, H.-W., & Wu, C. (2021) · Journal of Global Information Management · doi:10.4018/jgim.2021030104 · Cited by 29
A Supervised Machine Learning Approach for the Credibility Assessment of User-Generated Content
Jain, P. K., Pamula, R., & Ansari, S. (2021) · Wireless Personal Communications · doi:10.1007/s11277-021-08136-5 · Cited by 29
Machine Learning Approaches for Fake Reviews Detection: A Systematic Literature Review
Ennaouri, M., & Zellou, A. (2023) · Journal of Web Engineering · doi:10.13052/jwe1540-9589.2254 · Cited by 29
Review spam detection using active learning
Ahsan, M. N. I., Nahian, T., Kafi, A. A., Hossain, M. I., & Shah, F. M. (2016) · IEEE Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON) · doi:10.1109/iemcon.2016.7746279 · Cited by 30
Trust-Aware Review Spam Detection
Xue, H., Li, F., Seo, H., & Pluretti, R. (2015) · IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom) · doi:10.1109/trustcom.2015.440 · Cited by 29
Li, H., Ai, W., Liu, X., Tang, J., Huang, G., Feng, F., & Mei, Q. (2016) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2872427.2874814 · Cited by 28
Fake News Detection with Integration of Embedded Text Cues and Image Features
Mangal, D., & Sharma, D. K. (2020) · International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO) · doi:10.1109/icrito48877.2020.9197817 · Cited by 28
Man vs machine – Detecting deception in online reviews
Petrescu, M., Ajjan, H., & Harrison, D. E. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113346 · Cited by 29
A Weighted Stacking Ensemble Model With Sampling for Fake Reviews Detection
Singhal, R., & Kashef, R. F. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2023.3268548 · Cited by 28
A Supervised Machine Learning Approach to Detect Fake Online Reviews
Hassan, R., & Islam, M. R. (2020) · International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT) · doi:10.1109/iccit51783.2020.9392727 · Cited by 28
A Decision Theoretic Framework for Measuring AI Reliance
Guo, Z., Wu, Y., Hartline, J. D., & Hullman, J. (2024) · The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658901 · Cited by 27
Review Spam Detection Using Opinion Mining
Narayan, R., Rout, J. K., & Jena, S. K. (2017) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-3376-6_30 · Cited by 28
Fake or Genuine? Contextualised Text Representation for Fake Review Detection
Mohawesh, R., Xu, S., Springer, M., Al-Hawawreh, M. S., & Maqsood, S. (2021) · Natural Language Processing · doi:10.5121/csit.2021.112311 · Cited by 28
Detecting collusive spammers in online review communities
Xu, C. (2013) · Ph.D. Workshop on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/2513166.2513176 · Cited by 29
Silva, R. M., Alberto, T. C., Almeida, T. A., & Yamakami, A. (2017) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.04.055 · Cited by 28
Review spam detection using machine learning
Radovanovic, D., & Krstajić, B. (2018) · International Scientific-Professional Conference on Information Technology (IT) · doi:10.1109/spit.2018.8350457 · Cited by 27
Explaining consumer suspicion: insights of a vignette study on online product reviews
Kollmer, T., Eckhardt, A., & Reibenspiess, V. (2022) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-022-00549-9 · Cited by 26
DETECTING FAKE JOB POSTINGS USING BIDIRECTIONAL LSTM
Pillai, A. S. (2023) · International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science · doi:10.56726/irjmets35202 · Cited by 26
Detecting Spam Tweets using Character N-gram Features
Ashour, M., Salama, C. R., & El-Kharashi, M. W. (2018) · International Conference on Computer Engineering & Systems (ICCES) · doi:10.1109/icces.2018.8639297 · Cited by 26
Using of n-grams from morphological tags for fake news classification
Kapusta, J., Drlík, M., & Munk, M. (2021) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.624 · Cited by 26
Designing a deep learning-based application for detecting fake online reviews
Thảo, L. Q., Kien, D. T., Thuy, D. T. T., Thuy, L. T. M., Bach, N. C., Duc, T. X., Bach, H. G., & Cuong, D. D. (2024) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108708 · Cited by 26
Research on product review analysis and spam review detection
Chauhan, S. K., Goel, A., Goel, P., Chauhan, A., & Gurve, M. K. (2017) · International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN) · doi:10.1109/spin.2017.8049980 · Cited by 26
Spotting review spammer groups: A cosine pattern and network based method
Zhang, L., He, G., Cao, J., Zhu, H., & Xu, B. (2018) · Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience · doi:10.1002/cpe.4686 · Cited by 26
Zhao, Y., Tang, S., Zhang, H., & Lyu, L. (2025) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104400 · Cited by 28
Detecting and Characterizing Extremist Reviewer Groups in Online Product Reviews
Gupta, V., Aggarwal, A., & Chakraborty, T. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2020.2988098 · Cited by 26
DeepNet: An Efficient Neural Network for Fake News Detection using News-User Engagements
Kaliyar, R. K., Kumar, P., Kumar, M., Narkhede, M., Namboodiri, S., & Mishra, S. (2020) · International Conference on Computing, Communication and Security (ICCCS) · doi:10.1109/icccs49678.2020.9277353 · Cited by 25
Catelli, R., Bevilacqua, L., Mariniello, N., di Carlo, V. S., Magaldi, M., Fujita, H., Pietro, G. D., & Esposito, M. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3277490 · Cited by 25
Cocarascu, O., & Toni, F. (2018) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00338 · Cited by 25
Transforming Fake News: Robust Generalisable News Classification Using Transformers
Blackledge, C., & Atapour–Abarghouei, A. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata52589.2021.9671970 · Cited by 31
Munzel, A. (2015) · Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition) · doi:10.1177/2051570715604155 · Cited by 24
BERT-Based Deceptive Review Detection in Social Media: Introducing DeceptiveBERT
Hyder, S. B., Tariq, N., Moqurrab, S. A., Ashraf, M. I., Yoo, J., & Srivastava, G. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2024.3403937 · Cited by 24
To catch a fake: Curbing deceptive Yelp ratings and venues
Rahman, M., Cărbunar, B., Ballesteros, J., & Chau, D. H. (2015) · Statistical Analysis and Data Mining The ASA Data Science Journal · doi:10.1002/sam.11264 · Cited by 26
Masking domain-specific information for cross-domain deception detection
Sánchez-Junquera, J., Villaseñor-Pineda, L., Montes-y-Gómez, M., Rosso, P., & Stamatatos, E. (2020) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2020.04.020 · Cited by 24
Detecting Fake Online Reviews using Fine-tuned BERT
Refaeli, D., & Hájek, P. (2021) · International Conference on E-Business and Internet (ICEBI) · doi:10.1145/3497701.3497714 · Cited by 26
Square One Bias in NLP: Towards a Multi-Dimensional Exploration of the Research Manifold
Ruder, S., Vulić, I., & Søgaard, A. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-acl.184 · Cited by 29
Turning the Tide: Curbing Deceptive Yelp Behaviors
Rahman, M., Cărbunar, B., Ballesteros, J., Burri, G. J., & Chau, D. H. (2014) · SIAM International Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1137/1.9781611973440.28 · Cited by 24
A Multi-View Learning Approach to Deception Detection
Carissimi, N., Beyan, C., & Murino, V. (2018) · International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition · doi:10.1109/fg.2018.00095 · Cited by 25
Discriminative Models for Predicting Deception Strategies
Appling, D. S., Briscoe, E., & Hutto, C. J. (2015) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2740908.2742575 · Cited by 24
Multiscale cascaded domain-based approach for Arabic fake reviews detection in e-commerce platforms
Qandos, N., Hamad, G., Alharbi, M., Alturki, S., Alharbi, W. K., & Albelaihi, A. (2024) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2024.101926 · Cited by 23
Shilling Attacks and Fake Reviews Injection: Principles, Models, and Datasets
Nawara, D., Aly, A., & Kashef, R. F. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2024.3465008 · Cited by 23
Detecting fake review intentions in the review context: A multimodal deep learning approach
Hou, J., Tan, Z., Zhang, S., Hu, Q., & Wang, P. (2025) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2025.101485 · Cited by 28
Opinion Spam Detection in Online Reviews Using Neural Networks
Archchitha, K., & Charles, E. Y. A. (2019) · International Conference on Advances in ICT for Emerging Regions · doi:10.1109/icter48817.2019.9023695 · Cited by 23
Spam Detection in Reviews Using LSTM-Based Multi-Entity Temporal Features
Xiang, L., Guo, G., Li, Q., Zhu, C., Chen, J., & Ma, H. (2020) · Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing · doi:10.32604/iasc.2020.013382 · Cited by 23
Classification of deceptive opinions using a low dimensionality representation
Cagnina, L., & Rosso, P. (2015) · Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis (WASSA) · doi:10.18653/v1/w15-2909 · Cited by 23
CoSpa: A Co-training Approach for Spam Review Identification with Support Vector Machine
Zhang, W., Bu, C., Yoshida, T., & Zhang, S. (2016) · Information · doi:10.3390/info7010012 · Cited by 23
Product review management software based on multiple classifiers
Catal, C., & Guldan, S. (2017) · IET Software · doi:10.1049/iet-sen.2016.0137 · Cited by 23
An analysis of 14 Million tweets on hashtag‐oriented spamming*
Sedhai, S., & Sun, A. (2017) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23836 · Cited by 25
Prominence and Interpretation of Online Conflict of Interest Disclosures1
Jensen, M. L., & Yetgin, E. (2017) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2017/41.2.13 · Cited by 23
Effective Opinion Spam Detection: A Study on Review Metadata Versus Content
Rastogi, A., Mehrotra, M., & Ali, S. S. (2020) · Journal of Data and Information Science · doi:10.2478/jdis-2020-0013 · Cited by 24
Opinion Spam Detection Using Feature Selection
Patel, R., & Thakkar, P. (2014) · International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (CICN) · doi:10.1109/cicn.2014.127 · Cited by 22
Online Spam Review Detection: A Survey of Literature
Li, H., Wang, X., Chen, H., & Xu, G. (2022) · Human-Centric Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s44230-022-00001-3 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Ott, M., Choi, Y., Cardie, C., & Hancock, J. T.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2011
- Pages
- 309-319
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1107.4557
- OpenAlex
- W2161283199
- Cited by
- 1,008
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 103 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 43
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0624267, 0904822, 0968450)
- Jack Kent Cooke Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Keywords
- opinion spam, opinion spam detection, consumer reviews, fake reviews, creative writing, feature analysis, classifier comparison, psychology of deception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
