The DOI matches its DataCite record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Finding Deceptive Opinion Spam by Any Stretch of the Imagination
Open accessAbstract
Consumers increasingly rate, review and research products online. Consequently, websites containing consumer reviews are becoming targets of opinion spam. While recent work has focused primarily on manually identifiable instances of opinion spam, in this work we study deceptive opinion spam---fictitious opinions that have been deliberately written to sound authentic. Integrating work from psychology and computational linguistics, we develop and compare three approaches to detecting deceptive opinion spam, and ultimately develop a classifier that is nearly 90% accurate on our gold-standard opinion spam dataset. Based on feature analysis of our learned models, we additionally make several theoretical contributions, including revealing a relationship between deceptive opinions and imaginative writing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“The dataset of deceptive reviews from Ott et al. [46, 47] has 800 truthful reviews and 800 deceptive reviews for hotels in Chicago.”
From Improving Human-AI Collaboration With Descriptions of AI Behavior (2023) · cites this paper as [47]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Text categorization with Support Vector Machines: Learning with many relevant features
Joachims, T. (1998) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/bfb0026683 · Cited by 8,271
Machine learning in automated text categorization
Sebastiani, F. (2002) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/505282.505283 · Cited by 7,927
SRILM - an extensible language modeling toolkit
Stolcke, A. (2002) · International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP) · doi:10.21437/icslp.2002-303 · Cited by 4,385
Electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management
Litvin, S. W., Goldsmith, R. E., & Pan, B. (2008) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.011 · Cited by 3,267
Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape.
Rigby, R. A., & Stasinopoulos, D. M. (2005) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.00510.x · Cited by 3,228
Accurate unlexicalized parsing
Klein, D., & Manning, C. D. (2003) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.3115/1075096.1075150 · Cited by 3,055
Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English
Biber, D., & Quirk, R. (1999) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587792 · Cited by 2,766
Accuracy of Deception Judgments
Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2 · Cited by 1,953
The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015
Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K. (2015) · University of Texas at Austin · doi:10.15781/t25p41 · Cited by 1,674
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [6]6. the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics , pages 669-672. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- [17]17. M.K. Johnson and C.L. Raye. 1981. Reality monitoring. Psychological Review , 88(1):67-85.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,002
A Review of Methodologies for Fake News Analysis
Tajrian, M., Rahman, A., Kabir, M. A., & Islam, R. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3294989 · Cited by 62
Leveraging online reviews for hotel demand forecasting: A deep learning approach
Zhang, D., & Niu, B. (2023) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103527 · Cited by 61
Simultaneously detecting fake reviews and review spammers using factor graph model
Lu, Y., Zhang, L., Xiao, Y., & Li, Y. (2013) · ACM Web Science Conference (WebSci) · doi:10.1145/2464464.2464470 · Cited by 60
Deceptive Review Spam Detection via Exploiting Task Relatedness and Unlabeled Data
Hai, Z., Zhao, P., Cheng, P., Yang, P., Li, X., & Li, G. (2016) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1187 · Cited by 59
Perceived risks and restaurant visit intentions in China: Do online customer reviews matter?
Huifeng, P., Ha, H., & Lee, J.-W. (2020) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.04.005 · Cited by 59
Fake news detection using dual BERT deep neural networks
Farokhian, M., Rafe, V., & Veisi, H. (2023) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-023-17115-w · Cited by 58
Yao, J., Zheng, Y. F., & Jiang, H. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3051174 · Cited by 56
Robustness of Trust and Reputation Systems: Does It Matter?
Jøsang, A. (2012) · IFIP International Federation for Information Processing/IFIP · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29852-3_21 · Cited by 56
Ramkumar, P. N., La, T., Fisch, E., Fabricant, P. D., White, A. E., Jones, K. J., & Taylor, S. A. (2016) · Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2016.08.021 · Cited by 57
Detection of fake online reviews using semi-supervised and supervised learning
Hassan, R., & Islam, M. R. (2019) · International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Engineering · doi:10.1109/ecace.2019.8679186 · Cited by 56
Dynamic knowledge graph based fake-review detection
Fang, Y., Wang, H., Zhao, L., Yu, F., & Wang, C. (2020) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-020-01761-w · Cited by 56
A Novel Stream Clustering Framework for Spam Detection in Twitter
Tajalizadeh, H., & Boostani, R. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2019.2910818 · Cited by 57
A Method for the Detection of Fake Reviews Based on Temporal Features of Reviews and Comments
Liu, W., He, J., Han, S., Cai, F., Yang, Z., & Zhu, N. (2019) · IEEE Engineering Management Review · doi:10.1109/emr.2019.2928964 · Cited by 55
Using Named Entities for Computer‐Automated Verbal Deception Detection
Kleinberg, B., Mozes, M., Arntz, A. R., & Verschuère, B. (2017) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/1556-4029.13645 · Cited by 60
Generating behavior features for cold-start spam review detection with adversarial learning
Tang, X., Qian, T., & You, Z. (2020) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2020.03.063 · Cited by 55
Classification of Fake News by Fine-tuning Deep Bidirectional Transformers based Language Model
Aggarwal, A., Chauhan, A., Kumar, D., Mittal, M., & Verma, S. (2018) · ICST Transactions on Scalable Information Systems · doi:10.4108/eai.13-7-2018.163973 · Cited by 54
AI-Assisted Decision-making: a Cognitive Modeling Approach to Infer Latent Reliance Strategies
Tejeda, H., Kumar, A., Smyth, P., & Steyvers, M. (2022) · Computational Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1007/s42113-022-00157-y · Cited by 53
Review quality aware collaborative filtering
Raghavan, S., Gunasekar, S., & Ghosh, J. (2012) · ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys) · doi:10.1145/2365952.2365978 · Cited by 53
Determinants and Impact of Online Reviews on Product Satisfaction
Changchit, C., & Klaus, T. (2019) · Journal of Internet Commerce · doi:10.1080/15332861.2019.1672135 · Cited by 52
Towards online review spam detection
Lin, Y., Zhu, T., Wang, X., Zhang, J., & Zhou, A. (2014) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2567948.2577293 · Cited by 52
Applauses in hotel reviews: Genuine or deceptive?
Banerjee, S., & Chua, A. Y. K. (2014) · Science and Information Conference · doi:10.1109/sai.2014.6918299 · Cited by 52
Gaming the system: Fake online reviews v. consumer law
Hunt, K. M. (2015) · Computer law & security review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2014.11.003 · Cited by 55
Semi-supervised clue fusion for spammer detection in Sina Weibo
Chen, H., Liu, J., Lv, Y., Li, M. H., Liu, M., & Zheng, Q. (2017) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2017.11.002 · Cited by 52
A non-convex semi-supervised approach to opinion spam detection by ramp-one class SVM
Tian, Y., Mirzabagheri, M., Tirandazi, P., & Bamakan, S. M. H. (2020) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102381 · Cited by 52
Budhi, G. S., Chiong, R., Wang, Z., & Dhakal, S. (2021) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2021.101048 · Cited by 52
Combating Product Review Spam Campaigns via Multiple Heterogeneous Pairwise Features
Xu, C., & Zhang, J. (2015) · Proceedings of the 2015 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1137/1.9781611974010.20 · Cited by 51
Temporal Opinion Spam Detection by Multivariate Indicative Signals
Ye, J., Kumar, S., & Akoglu, L. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v10i1.14801 · Cited by 51
Interaction Through Technological Lenses
Walther, J. B. (2012) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x12446610 · Cited by 51
Learning to Represent Review with Tensor Decomposition for Spam Detection
Wang, X., Liu, K., He, S., & Zhao, J. (2016) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1083 · Cited by 53
A survey on author profiling, deception, and irony detection for the Arabic language
Rosso, P., Rangel, F., Hernández-Farías, I., Cagnina, L., Zaghouani, W., & Charfi, A. (2018) · Language and Linguistics Compass · doi:10.1111/lnc3.12275 · Cited by 55
Ontology based sentiment analysis for fake review detection
Vidanagama, D. U., Silva, T., & Karunananda, A. S. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117869 · Cited by 51
A Machine Learning Based Web Spam Filtering Approach
Kumar, S., Gao, X., Welch, I. S., & Mansoori, M. (2016) · International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA) · doi:10.1109/aina.2016.177 · Cited by 50
Spam review detection using LSTM autoencoder: an unsupervised approach
Saumya, S., & Singh, J. P. (2020) · Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.1007/s10660-020-09413-4 · Cited by 50
Explainable Tsetlin Machine framework for fake news detection with credibility score assessmentPreprint
Bhattarai, B., Granmo, O., & Jiao, L. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.09114 · Cited by 50
Linguistic Harbingers of Betrayal: A Case Study on an Online Strategy Game
Niculae, V., Kumar, S., Boyd-Graber, J. L., & Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C. (2015) · doi:10.3115/v1/p15-1159 · Cited by 49
Learning Review Representations from user and Product Level Information for Spam Detection
Yuan, C., Zhou, W. J., Ma, Q., Lv, S., Han, J., & Hu, S. (2019) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm.2019.00188 · Cited by 48
Ensemble Machine Learning Model for Classification of Spam Product Reviews
Fayaz, M., Khan, A., Rahman, J. U., Alharbi, A., Uddin, M. I., & Alouffi, B. (2020) · Complexity · doi:10.1155/2020/8857570 · Cited by 48
A theoretical framework to identify authentic online reviews
Banerjee, S., & Chua, A. Y. K. (2014) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-02-2014-0047 · Cited by 48
Fake reviews classification using deep learning ensemble of shallow convolutions
Javed, M. S., Majeed, H., Mujtaba, H., & Beg, M. O. (2021) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-021-00114-y · Cited by 48
‘Usually not one to complain but…’: constructing identities in user-generated online reviews
Vásquez, C. (2014) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137029317_4 · Cited by 47
Hovy, D. (2016) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-2057 · Cited by 47
Fake reviews detection based on LDA
Jia, S., Zhang, X., Wang, X., & Yang, L. (2018) · International Conference on Information Management · doi:10.1109/infoman.2018.8392850 · Cited by 47
Linguistic Features for Detecting Fake Reviews
Abri, F., Gutiérrez, L. F. G., Namin, A. S., Jones, K. S., & Sears, D. R. W. (2020) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications · doi:10.1109/icmla51294.2020.00063 · Cited by 47
Peng, L., Liao, Q., Wang, X., & He, X. (2016) · Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.1007/s10660-016-9213-z · Cited by 54
Moon, S., Kim, M.-Y., & Bergey, P. K. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.05.016 · Cited by 50
Calling out fake online reviews through robust epistemic belief
Banerjee, S., & Chua, A. Y. K. (2021) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2021.103445 · Cited by 48
Fake Online Reviews: A Unified Detection Model Using Deception Theories
Abdulqader, M., Namoun, A., & Alsaawy, Y. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3227631 · Cited by 49
Identifying Manipulated Offerings on Review Portals
Li, J., Ott, M., & Cardie, C. (2013) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d13-1199 · Cited by 47
Self-citationAutomatic Detection of Verbal Deception
Fitzpatrick, E., Bachenko, J., & Fornaciari, T. (2015) · Synthesis lectures on human language technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-02158-9 · Cited by 46
Spotting Collective Behaviour of Online Frauds in Customer Reviews
Dhawan, S., Gangireddy, S. C. R., Kumar, S., & Chakraborty, T. (2019) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2019/35 · Cited by 46
Spam review detection using self-organizing maps and convolutional neural networks
Neisari, A., Rueda, L. G., & Saad, S. (2021) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2021.102274 · Cited by 45
Identifying Groups of Fake Reviewers Using a Semisupervised Approach
Rathore, P., Soni, J., Prabakar, N., Palaniswami, M. S., & Santi, P. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2021.3085406 · Cited by 45
Exposing Paid Opinion Manipulation TrollsPreprint
Mihaylov, T., Koychev, I. K., Georgiev, G., & Nakov, P. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.13726 · Cited by 45
Description Based Text Classification with Reinforcement LearningPreprint
Chai, D., Wu, W., Han, Q., Wu, F. Q., & Li, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.03067 · Cited by 46
Text Analysis in Adversarial Settings
Gröndahl, T., & Asokan, N. (2019) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3310331 · Cited by 46
Deceptive reviews and sentiment polarity: Effective link by exploiting BERT
Catelli, R., Fujita, H., Pietro, G. D., & Esposito, M. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118290 · Cited by 43
iSRD: Spam review detection with imbalanced data distributions
Najada, H. A., & Xingquan Zhu, A. (2014) · IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IRI) · doi:10.1109/iri.2014.7051938 · Cited by 43
ORFDetector: Ensemble Learning Based Online Recruitment Fraud Detection
Lal, S., Jiaswal, R., Sardana, N., Verma, A., Kaur, A., & Mourya, R. (2019) · International Conference on Contemporary Computing · doi:10.1109/ic3.2019.8844879 · Cited by 43
Cassar, M. L., Caruana, A., & Konietzny, J. (2020) · Journal of Wine Research · doi:10.1080/09571264.2020.1764919 · Cited by 43
Exploring groups of opinion spam using sentiment analysis guided by nominated topics
Li, J., Lv, P., Xiao, W., Yang, L., & Zhang, P. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114585 · Cited by 44
Research on false review detection Methods: A state-of-the-art review
Mewada, A., & Dewang, R. K. (2021) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.07.021 · Cited by 43
Kakhki, A. M., Kliman-Silver, C., & Mislove, A. E. (2013) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2488388.2488468 · Cited by 42
Online Social Influence: Past, Present, and Future
Kim, Y. J., & Hollingshead, A. B. (2015) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.2015.11679175 · Cited by 42
Impact of reviewer social interaction on online consumer review fraud detection
Goswami, K., Park, Y., & Song, C. (2017) · Journal Of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-017-0075-6 · Cited by 42
Fact or Factitious? Contextualized Opinion Spam Detection
Kennedy, S., Walsh, N., Sloka, K., McCarren, A. L., & Foster, J. (2019) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Student Research Workshop (ACL SRW) · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-2048 · Cited by 48
The Grievance Dictionary: Understanding threatening language use
van der Vegt, I., Mozes, M., Kleinberg, B., & Gill, P. (2021) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-021-01536-2 · Cited by 42
Social-benefit certification as a game
Buckley, R. (2013) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2013.01.004 · Cited by 42
Akinyelu, A. A. (2021) · Journal of Computer Security · doi:10.3233/jcs-210022 · Cited by 42
Deep Semantic Frame-Based Deceptive Opinion Spam Analysis
Kim, S., Chang, H., Lee, S., Yu, M., & Kang, J. (2015) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/2806416.2806551 · Cited by 43
Review spam detector with rating consistency check
Sharma, K., & Lin, K.-I. (2013) · ACM Southeast Regional Conference (ACMSE) · doi:10.1145/2498328.2500083 · Cited by 41
Theorizing the textual differences between authentic and fictitious reviews
Banerjee, S., & Chua, A. Y. K. (2017) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-11-2015-0309 · Cited by 41
An Interpretable Joint Graphical Model for Fact-Checking From Crowds
Nguyen, A., Kharosekar, A., Lease, M., & Wallace, B. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11487 · Cited by 43
ColluEagle: collusive review spammer detection using Markov random fields
Wang, Z., Hu, R., Chen, Q., Gao, P., & Xu, X. (2020) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-020-00693-w · Cited by 41
Pollution, bad-mouthing, and local marketing: The underground of location-based social networks
Costa, H., Merschmann, L. H. D. C., Barth, F. J., & Benevenuto, F. (2014) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2014.03.108 · Cited by 41
Can Large Language Models Identify Authorship?
Huang, B., Chen, C., & Shu, K. (2024) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.26 · Cited by 55
In Search of a Gold Standard in Studies of Deception
Gokhman, S., Hancock, J. T., Prabhu, P., Ott, M., & Cardie, C. (2012) · Cited by 40
Self-citationSPR2EP: A Semi-Supervised Spam Review Detection Framework
Yilmaz, C. M., & Durahim, A. O. (2018) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1109/asonam.2018.8508314 · Cited by 42
Social Turing Tests: Crowdsourcing Sybil Detection
Wang, G., Mohanlal, M., Wilson, C., Wang, X., Metzger, M. J., Zheng, H.-T., & Zhao, B. Y. (2012) · Cited by 40
Mind the fake reviews! Protecting consumers from deception through persuasion knowledge acquisition
Filho, M. C. M. D. C., Rafael, D., Barros, L. S. G., & Mesquita, E. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113538 · Cited by 39
Tabany, M. R., & Gueffal, M. (2024) · Journal of Advances in Information Technology · doi:10.12720/jait.15.1.49-58 · Cited by 39
Understanding and Countering Misinformation About Climate Change
Cook, J. (2021) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-3686-8.ch081 · Cited by 40
Don't be deceived: Using linguistic analysis to learn how to discern online review authenticity
Banerjee, S., Chua, A. Y. K., & Kim, J. (2017) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23784 · Cited by 40
Promotional Reviews: An Empirical Investigation of Online Review Manipulation
Mayzlin, D., Dover, Y., & Chevalier, J. A. (2012) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w18340 · Cited by 39
AppWatcher: unveiling the underground market of trading mobile app reviews
Xie, Z., & Zhu, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Security & Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks · doi:10.1145/2766498.2766510 · Cited by 38
Authorship Attribution in the Era of LLMs: Problems, Methodologies, and Challenges
Huang, B., Chen, C., & Shu, K. (2025) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/3715073.3715076 · Cited by 42
“• Deceptive Opinion Spam (Ott et al., 2011): Includes 400 genuine and 400 deceptive hotel reviews, with deceptive reviews generated using Amazon Mechanical Turk, useful for studying the nuances of fake versus real reviews.”
Choi, M., Pei, J., Kumar, S., Shu, C., & Jurgens, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.699 · Cited by 38
Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap: A Darker Side to Crowdsourcing
Harris, C. G. (2011) · International Conference on Social Computing · doi:10.1109/passat/socialcom.2011.89 · Cited by 38
Recollection versus Imagination: Exploring Human Memory and Cognition via Neural Language Models
Sap, M., Horvitz, E., Choi, Y., Smith, N. A., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.178 · Cited by 38
Self-citationImproving Static SMS Spam Detection by Using New Content-based Features
Karami, A., & Zhou, L. (2014) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 38
Quijano-Sánchez, L., Liberatore, F., Camacho-Collados, J., & Camacho‐Collados, M. (2018) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2018.03.010 · Cited by 44
Incorporating feature representation into BiLSTM for deceptive review detection
Liu, W., Jing, W., & Li, Y. (2019) · Computing · doi:10.1007/s00607-019-00763-y · Cited by 39
Recent State-of-the-art of Fake News Detection: A Review
Vishwakarma, D. K., & Jain, C. (2020) · International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET) · doi:10.1109/incet49848.2020.9153985 · Cited by 37
Detecting opinion spams through supervised boosting approach
Hazim, M., Anuar, N. B., Razak, M. F. A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0198884 · Cited by 37
Review Spam Detection Using Semi-supervised Technique
Narayan, R., Rout, J. K., & Jena, S. K. (2017) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-3376-6_31 · Cited by 36
Reinforcement Mechanism Design for Fraudulent Behaviour in e-Commerce
Cai, Q., Filos-Ratsikas, A., Tang, P., & Zhang, Y. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11452 · Cited by 36
A Contrast Metric for Fraud Detection in Rich Graphs
Liu, S., Hooi, B., & Faloutsos, C. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2018.2876531 · Cited by 36
Acoustic-Prosodic and Lexical Cues to Deception and Trust: Deciphering How People Detect Lies
Chen, X., Levitan, S. I., Levine, M., Mandic, M., & Hirschberg, J. (2020) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00311 · Cited by 38
ScoreGAN: A Fraud Review Detector Based on Regulated GAN With Data Augmentation
Shehnepoor, S., Togneri, R. B., Liu, W., & Bennamoun, M. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2021.3139771 · Cited by 38
Kleinberg, B., van der Toolen, Y., Vrij, A., Arntz, A. R., & Verschuère, B. (2018) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3407 · Cited by 36
Ng, K. C., Ke, P. F., So, M. K. P., & Tam, K. Y. (2023) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.13959 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Ott, M., Choi, Y., Cardie, C., & Hancock, J. T.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2011
- Pages
- 309-319
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1107.4557
- OpenAlex
- W2161283199
- Cited by
- 1,008
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 103 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 43
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0624267, 0904822, 0968450)
- Jack Kent Cooke Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Keywords
- opinion spam, opinion spam detection, consumer reviews, fake reviews, creative writing, feature analysis, classifier comparison, psychology of deception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
