The DOI matches its DataCite record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Finding Deceptive Opinion Spam by Any Stretch of the Imagination
Open accessAbstract
Consumers increasingly rate, review and research products online. Consequently, websites containing consumer reviews are becoming targets of opinion spam. While recent work has focused primarily on manually identifiable instances of opinion spam, in this work we study deceptive opinion spam---fictitious opinions that have been deliberately written to sound authentic. Integrating work from psychology and computational linguistics, we develop and compare three approaches to detecting deceptive opinion spam, and ultimately develop a classifier that is nearly 90% accurate on our gold-standard opinion spam dataset. Based on feature analysis of our learned models, we additionally make several theoretical contributions, including revealing a relationship between deceptive opinions and imaginative writing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“The dataset of deceptive reviews from Ott et al. [46, 47] has 800 truthful reviews and 800 deceptive reviews for hotels in Chicago.”
From Improving Human-AI Collaboration With Descriptions of AI Behavior (2023) · cites this paper as [47]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Text categorization with Support Vector Machines: Learning with many relevant features
Joachims, T. (1998) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/bfb0026683 · Cited by 8,271
Machine learning in automated text categorization
Sebastiani, F. (2002) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/505282.505283 · Cited by 7,927
SRILM - an extensible language modeling toolkit
Stolcke, A. (2002) · International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP) · doi:10.21437/icslp.2002-303 · Cited by 4,385
Electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management
Litvin, S. W., Goldsmith, R. E., & Pan, B. (2008) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.011 · Cited by 3,267
Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape.
Rigby, R. A., & Stasinopoulos, D. M. (2005) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.00510.x · Cited by 3,228
Accurate unlexicalized parsing
Klein, D., & Manning, C. D. (2003) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.3115/1075096.1075150 · Cited by 3,055
Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English
Biber, D., & Quirk, R. (1999) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587792 · Cited by 2,766
Accuracy of Deception Judgments
Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2 · Cited by 1,953
The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015
Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K. (2015) · University of Texas at Austin · doi:10.15781/t25p41 · Cited by 1,674
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [6]6. the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics , pages 669-672. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- [17]17. M.K. Johnson and C.L. Raye. 1981. Reality monitoring. Psychological Review , 88(1):67-85.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,002
Cheng, J., & Bernstein, M. S. (2015) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2675133.2675214 · Cited by 117
Torres, M. D. R. M., & Toral, S. L. (2019) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2019.06.003 · Cited by 114
The limitations of stylometry for detecting machine-generated fake news
Schuster, T., Schuster, R., Shah, D. J., & Barzilay, R. (2020) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00380 · Cited by 109
Towards automatic filtering of fake reviews
Cardoso, E. F., Silva, R. M., & Almeida, T. A. (2018) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2018.04.074 · Cited by 111
Customer perception of the deceptiveness of online product reviews: A speech act theory perspective
Ansari, S., & Gupta, S. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102286 · Cited by 108
Fake news detection: a survey of evaluation datasets
D’Ulizia, A., Caschera, M. C., Ferri, F., & Grifoni, P. (2021) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.518 · Cited by 109
Finding disseminators via electronic word of mouth message for effective marketing communications
Bao, T., & Chang, T. S. (2014) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2014.07.006 · Cited by 130
Fighting post-truth using natural language processing: A review and open challenges
Saquete, E., Tomás, D., Moreda, P., Martínez-Barco, P., & Palomar, M. (2019) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112943 · Cited by 111
The Effect of Different Writing Tasks on Linguistic Style: A Case Study of the ROC Story Cloze Task
Schwartz, R., Sap, M., Konstas, I., Zilles, L., Choi, Y., & Smith, N. A. (2017) · Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning · doi:10.18653/v1/k17-1004 · Cited by 108
Self-citationUnderstanding and Countering Misinformation About Climate Change
Cook, J. (2019) · Advances in media, entertainment and the arts (AMEA) book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-8535-0.ch016 · Cited by 108
Review on Recent Advances in Information Mining From Big Consumer Opinion Data for Product Design
Jin, J., Liu, Y., Ji, P., & Kwong, C. K. (2018) · Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.4041087 · Cited by 105
Spam Review Detection Using the Linguistic and Spammer Behavioral Methods
Hussain, N., Mirza, H. T., Hussain, I., Iqbal, F., & Memon, I. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2979226 · Cited by 102
Bandera, C., Keshtkar, F., Bartolacci, M. R., Neerudu, S., & Passerini, K. (2017) · International Journal of Innovation Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijis.2017.10.005 · Cited by 100
Detecting Deceptive Opinions with Profile Compatibility
Feng, V. W., & Hirst, G. (2013) · Cited by 98
A pipeline and comparative study of 12 machine learning models for text classification
Occhipinti, A., Rogers, L., & Angione, C. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117193 · Cited by 104
Experiments in open domain deception detection
Pérez-Rosas, V., & Mihalcea, R. (2015) · Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1133 · Cited by 97
Content analysis of fake consumer reviews by survey-based text categorization
Sangkil Moon, A., Kim, M.-Y., & Iacobucci, D. (2020) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.08.001 · Cited by 97
Stylometric Analysis of Scientific Articles
Bergsma, S., Post, M., & Yarowsky, D. (2012) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · Cited by 97
Linguistic Traces of a Scientific Fraud: The Case of Diederik Stapel
Markowitz, D. M., & Hancock, J. T. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0105937 · Cited by 103
Self-citationPositive Unlabeled Learning for Deceptive Reviews Detection
Ren, Y., Ji, D., & Zhang, H. (2014) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1055 · Cited by 97
Uncovering Crowdsourced Manipulation of Online Reviews
Fayazi, A., Lee, K., Caverlee, J., & Squicciarini, A. (2015) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/2766462.2767742 · Cited by 98
Detection of opinion spam based on anomalous rating deviation
Savage, D., Zhang, X., Yu, X., Chou, P. L., & Wang, Q. (2015) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.019 · Cited by 97
Linguistic Cues to Deception: Identifying Political Trolls on Social Media
Addawood, A., Badawy, A., Lerman, K., & Ferrara, E. (2019) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v13i01.3205 · Cited by 98
‘Language of lies’: Urgent issues and prospects in verbal lie detection research
Nahari, G., Ashkenazi, T., Fisher, R. P., Granhag, P. A., Hershkowitz, I., Masip, J., Meijer, E. H., Nisin, Z., Sarid, N., Taylor, P. J., et al. (2019) · Legal and Criminological Psychology · doi:10.1111/lcrp.12148 · Cited by 95
Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., Kumar, A., Wang, C. L., & Gupta, S. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113370 · Cited by 95
Spam Review Detection Using Deep Learning
Shahariar, G. M., Biswas, S., Omar, F., Shah, F. M., & Hassan, S. B. (2019) · IEEE Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON) · doi:10.1109/iemcon.2019.8936148 · Cited by 91
Dong, Z. X., Li, W., Niu, B., & Wu, C. (2022) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2022.113911 · Cited by 95
Detecting Singleton Review Spammers Using Semantic Similarity
Sandulescu, V., & Ester, M. (2015) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2740908.2742570 · Cited by 92
Verbal and Nonverbal Clues for Real-life Deception Detection
Pérez‐Rosas, V., Abouelenien, M., Mihalcea, R. F., Xiao, Y., Linton, C., & Burzo, M. G. (2015) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1281 · Cited by 92
Where Not to Eat? Improving Public Policy by Predicting Hygiene Inspections Using Online Reviews
Kang, J. R. W., Kuznetsova, P., Luca, M., & Choi, Y. (2013) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d13-1150 · Cited by 89
Self-citationImproving Human-AI Collaboration With Descriptions of AI Behavior
Cabrera, Á. A., Perer, A., & Hong, J. I. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3579612 · Cited by 87
Modeling and Analysis of Leaky Deception Using Signaling Games With Evidence
Pawlick, J., Colbert, E., & Zhu, Q. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2018.2886472 · Cited by 85
Opinion spam detection: Using multi-iterative graph-based model
Noekhah, S., Salim, N. B., & Zakaria, N. H. (2019) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102140 · Cited by 86
Discovering Opinion Spammer Groups by Network Footprints
Ye, J., & Akoglu, L. (2015) · Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on Conference on Online Social Networks · doi:10.1145/2817946.2820606 · Cited by 84
Mukherjee, A., & Liu, B. (2012) · Cited by 84
Rajamohana, S. P., & Umamaheswari, K. (2018) · Computers & Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2018.02.015 · Cited by 84
A Taxonomy of Fake News Classification Techniques: Survey and Implementation Aspects
Rohera, D., Shethna, H., Patel, K., Thakker, U., Tanwar, S., Gupta, R., Hong, W., & Sharma, R. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3159651 · Cited by 92
Using Deep Linguistic Features for Finding Deceptive Opinion Spam
Xu, Q., & Zhao, H. (2012) · Cited by 82
An unsupervised topic-sentiment joint probabilistic model for detecting deceptive reviews
Dong, L., Ji, S., Zhang, C.-J., Zhang, Q., Chiu, D. K. W., Qiu, L., & Li, D. (2018) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2018.07.005 · Cited by 82
Spotting Fake Reviews using Positive-Unlabeled Learning
Li, H., Liu, B., Mukherjee, A., & Shao, J. (2014) · Computación y Sistemas · doi:10.13053/cys-18-3-2035 · Cited by 84
Sedhai, S., & Sun, A. (2015) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/2766462.2767701 · Cited by 82
Integrating aspect analysis and local outlier factor for intelligent review spam detection
You, L., Peng, Q., Xiong, Z., He, D., Meikang Qiu, A., & Zhang, X. (2019) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2019.07.044 · Cited by 81
Multimodal Deception Detection Using Real-Life Trial Data
Şen, M. U., Pérez‐Rosas, V., Yanikoglu, B. A., Abouelenien, M., Burzo, M. G., & Mihalcea, R. F. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2020.3015684 · Cited by 86
Analyzing the effectiveness of semi-supervised learning approaches for opinion spam classification
Ligthart, A., Catal, C., & Teki̇nerdoğan, B. (2020) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2020.107023 · Cited by 81
Alonso, M. Á., Vilares, D., Gómez‐Rodríguez, C., & Vilares, J. (2013) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics · Cited by 82
A Tangled Web: Should Online Review Portals Display Fraudulent Reviews?
Ananthakrishnan, U. M., Li, B., & Smith, M. D. (2020) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2020.0925 · Cited by 84
Detecting Deceptive Opinion Spam Using Human Computation
Harris, C. G. (2012) · Cited by 79
Hunting for Troll Comments in News Community Forums
Mihaylov, T., & Nakov, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-2065 · Cited by 77
An ensemble approach for spam detection in Arabic opinion texts
Saeed, R. M. K., Rady, S., & Gharib, T. F. (2019) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2019.10.002 · Cited by 76
Fake Review Detection Based on Multiple Feature Fusion and Rolling Collaborative Training
Wang, J., Kan, H., Meng, F., Mu, Q., Shi, G., & Xiao, X. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3028588 · Cited by 78
Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis
Aggarwal, C. C. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73531-3_13 · Cited by 75
Handling Cold-Start Problem in Review Spam Detection by Jointly Embedding Texts and Behaviors
Wang, X., Liu, K., & Zhao, J. (2017) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-1034 · Cited by 77
Identifying fake Amazon reviews as learning from crowds
Fornaciari, T., & Poesio, M. (2014) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/v1/e14-1030 · Cited by 78
TopicSpam: a Topic-Model-Based Approach for Spam Detection
Li, J., Cardie, C., & Li, S. (2013) · Cited by 74
Self-citationAttending Sentences to detect Satirical Fake News.
Sarkar, S. D., Yang, F., & Mukherjee, A. (2018) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · Cited by 73
Unveiling the cloak of deviance: Linguistic cues for psychological processes in fake online reviews
Li, L., Lee, K. Y., Lee, M., & Yang, S. (2020) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102468 · Cited by 74
Learning to Detect Deceptive Opinion Spam: A Survey
Ren, Y., & Ji, D. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2908495 · Cited by 75
Synthetic review spamming and defense
Sun, H., Morales, A., & Yan, X. (2013) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/2487575.2487688 · Cited by 71
Liu, Y., Pang, B., & Wang, X. (2019) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2019.08.013 · Cited by 73
Hybrid ensemble framework with self-attention mechanism for social spam detection on imbalanced data
Rao, S., Verma, A. K., & Bhatia, T. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119594 · Cited by 74
Markowitz, D. M., Hancock, J. T., & Bailenson, J. N. (2023) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x231200201 · Cited by 81
Self-citationOpinion Spam Detection in Web Forum
Chen, Y., & Chen, H. (2015) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2736277.2741085 · Cited by 71
Hotel Assessment through Social Media: The case of TripAdvisor
Molinillo, S., de Sandoval, J. L. X., Morales, A., & Coca‐Stefaniak, J. A. (2016) · Tourism & Management Studies · doi:10.18089/tms.2016.12102 · Cited by 71
Deceptive Opinion Spam Detection Using Neural Network
Ren, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2016) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · Cited by 71
Ben Jabeur, S., Ballouk, H., Ben Arfi, W., & Sahut, J.-M. (2023) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113631 · Cited by 70
Identifying Multiple Userids of the Same Author
Qian, T., & Liu, B. (2013) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d13-1113 · Cited by 70
Spam filtering for short messages in adversarial environment
Chan, P. P. K., Yang, C., Yeung, D., & Ng, W. W. Y. (2014) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2014.12.034 · Cited by 70
Feature Analysis for Fake Review Detection through Supervised Classification
Fontanarava, J., Pasi, G., & Viviani, M. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA) · doi:10.1109/dsaa.2017.51 · Cited by 71
Opinion fraud detection via neural autoencoder decision forest
Dong, M., Yao, L., Wang, X., Benatallah, B., Huang, C., & Ning, X. (2018) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2018.07.013 · Cited by 72
Kumar, A., Gopal, R. D., Shankar, R., & Tan, K. H. (2022) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2021.113728 · Cited by 72
Li, P., Abouelenien, M., Mihalcea, R. F., Ding, Z., Yang, Q., & Zhou, Y. (2024) · International Conference on Information Science, Parallel and Distributed Systems (ISPDS) · doi:10.1109/ispds62779.2024.10667569 · Cited by 83
Trusting smartphone Apps? To install or not to install, that is the question
Kuehnhausen, M., & Frost, V. S. (2013) · IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support · doi:10.1109/cogsima.2013.6523820 · Cited by 72
Towards online anti-opinion spam: Spotting fake reviews from the review sequence
Lin, Y., Zhu, T., Wu, H., Zhang, J., Wang, X., & Zhou, A. (2014) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1109/asonam.2014.6921594 · Cited by 70
Keystroke Patterns as Prosody in Digital Writings: A Case Study with Deceptive Reviews and Essays
Banerjee, R., Feng, S., Kang, J. R. W., & Choi, Y. (2014) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1155 · Cited by 70
Self-citationState-of-art approaches for review spammer detection: a survey
Dewang, R. K., & Singh, A. K. (2017) · Journal of Intelligent Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10844-017-0454-7 · Cited by 68
A Survey on Fake Review Detection using Machine Learning Techniques
Patel, N. A., & Patel, R. (2018) · International Conference on Computing, Communication and Automation · doi:10.1109/ccaa.2018.8777594 · Cited by 66
An Attention-Based Unsupervised Adversarial Model for Movie Review Spam Detection
Gao, Y., Gong, M., Xie, Y., & Qin, A. K. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2020.2990085 · Cited by 66
Analysis of concept drift in fake reviews detection
Mohawesh, R., Tran, S. N., Ollington, R., & Xu, S. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114318 · Cited by 67
Detecting Spammer Groups From Product Reviews: A Partially Supervised Learning Model
Zhang, L., Wu, Z., & Cao, J. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2784370 · Cited by 66
Box of Lies: Multimodal Deception Detection in Dialogues
Soldner, F., Pérez‐Rosas, V., & Mihalcea, R. F. (2019) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1175 · Cited by 72
Linguistic-Based Detection of Fake News in Social Media
Mahyoob, M., Algaraady, J., & Alrahaili, M. (2020) · International Journal of English Linguistics · doi:10.5539/ijel.v11n1p99 · Cited by 65
Deceptive consumer review detection: a survey
Vidanagama, D. U., Silva, T., & Karunananda, A. S. (2019) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-019-09697-5 · Cited by 71
Satirical News Detection and Analysis using Attention Mechanism and Linguistic Features
Yang, F., Mukherjee, A., & Dragut, E. C. (2017) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1211 · Cited by 70
Identifying spam in the iOS app store
Chandy, R., & Gu, H. (2012) · doi:10.1145/2184305.2184317 · Cited by 64
Detection of spam reviews: a sentiment analysis approach
Saumya, S., & Singh, J. P. (2018) · CSI Transactions on ICT · doi:10.1007/s40012-018-0193-0 · Cited by 65
Detecting Fake Reviews Utilizing Semantic and Emotion Model
Li, Y., Feng, X., & Zhang, S. (2016) · International Conference on Information Science and Control Engineering · doi:10.1109/icisce.2016.77 · Cited by 63
Exaggeration in fake vs. authentic online reviews for luxury and budget hotels
Banerjee, S. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102416 · Cited by 63
A unified framework for detecting author spamicity by modeling review deviation
Liu, Y., & Pang, B. (2018) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2018.06.028 · Cited by 65
Volodko, A., Cockbain, E., & Kleinberg, B. (2019) · Trends in Organized Crime · doi:10.1007/s12117-019-09376-5 · Cited by 62
Fake review detection using transformer-based enhanced LSTM and RoBERTa
Mohawesh, R., Salameh, H. B., Jararweh, Y., Alkhalaileh, M. S., & Maqsood, S. (2024) · International Journal of Cognitive Computing in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ijcce.2024.06.001 · Cited by 65
On the Temporal Dynamics of Opinion Spamming
Santosh, K. C., & Mukherjee, A. (2016) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2872427.2883087 · Cited by 64
Social Media and Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Patient Utilization on Instagram
Ramkumar, P. N., Navarro, S. M., Haeberle, H. S., Chughtai, M., Flynn, M. E., & Mont, M. A. (2017) · The Journal of Arthroplasty · doi:10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.067 · Cited by 62
Biomedical text mining for research rigor and integrity: tasks, challenges, directions
Kilicoglu, H. (2017) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbx057 · Cited by 61
Cross-cultural Deception Detection
Pérez‐Rosas, V., & Mihalcea, R. F. (2014) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.3115/v1/p14-2072 · Cited by 64
Deception by Design: Evidence-Based Signaling Games for Network DefensePreprint
Pawlick, J., & Zhu, Q. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.05458 · Cited by 61
Alsubari, S. N., Deshmukh, S. N., Al-Adhaileh, M. H., Alsaade, F. W., & Aldhyani, T. H. H. (2021) · Applied Bionics and Biomechanics · doi:10.1155/2021/5522574 · Cited by 60
RetractedVerhoeven, B., & Daelemans, W. M. P. (2014) · Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) · doi:10.63317/5ihmqb5uqzzs · Cited by 60
Linguistic Cues to Deception and Perceived Deception in Interview Dialogues
Levitan, S. I., Maredia, A., & Hirschberg, J. (2018) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1176 · Cited by 66
Detecting Opinion Spammer Groups Through Community Discovery and Sentiment Analysis
Choo, E., Yu, T., & Chi, M. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20810-7_11 · Cited by 60
Detection of Opinion Spam with Character n-grams
Fusilier, D. H., Montes-y-Gómez, M., Rosso, P., & Guzmán-Cabrera, R. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18117-2_21 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Ott, M., Choi, Y., Cardie, C., & Hancock, J. T.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2011
- Pages
- 309-319
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1107.4557
- OpenAlex
- W2161283199
- Cited by
- 1,008
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 103 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 43
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0624267, 0904822, 0968450)
- Jack Kent Cooke Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Keywords
- opinion spam, opinion spam detection, consumer reviews, fake reviews, creative writing, feature analysis, classifier comparison, psychology of deception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
