CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 5,105EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesEmotion and Mood RecognitionGaze Tracking and Assistive Technology

EEGNet: A Compact Convolutional Network for EEG-based Brain-Computer Interfaces

Open access
Lawhern, Vernon J., Solon, Amelia J., Waytowich, Nicholas R., Gordon, Stephen M., Hung, Chou P., Lance, Brent J.·2016·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1611.08024arXiv 1611.08024
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Brain computer interfaces (BCI) enable direct communication with a computer, using neural activity as the control signal. This neural signal is generally chosen from a variety of well-studied electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. For a given BCI paradigm, feature extractors and classifiers are tailored to the distinct characteristics of its expected EEG control signal, limiting its application to that specific signal. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), which have been used in computer vision and speech recognition, have successfully been applied to EEG-based BCIs; however, they have mainly been applied to single BCI paradigms and thus it remains unclear how these architectures generalize to other paradigms. Here, we ask if we can design a single CNN architecture to accurately classify EEG signals from different BCI paradigms, while simultaneously being as compact as possible. In this work we introduce EEGNet, a compact convolutional network for EEG-based BCIs. We introduce the use of depthwise and separable convolutions to construct an EEG-specific model which encapsulates well-known EEG feature extraction concepts for BCI. We compare EEGNet to current state-of-the-art approaches across four BCI paradigms: P300 visual-evoked potentials, error-related negativity responses (ERN), movement-related cortical potentials (MRCP), and sensory motor rhythms (SMR). We show that EEGNet generalizes across paradigms better than the reference algorithms when only limited training data is available. We demonstrate three different approaches to visualize the contents of a trained EEGNet model to enable interpretation of the learned features. Our results suggest that EEGNet is robust enough to learn a wide variety of interpretable features over a range of BCI tasks, suggesting that the observed performances were not due to artifact or noise sources in the data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1611.08024

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deep ConvNets can be applied to other types of tasks such as workload estimation, error- or event-related potential decoding, or even other types of recordings such as MEG or ECoG.

    “Deep ConvNets can be applied to other types of tasks such as as workload estimation, error‐ or event‐related potential decoding (as others have started [Lawhern et al., 2016]) or even other types of recordings such as MEG or ECoG.”

    From Deep learning with convolutional neural networks for EEG decoding and visualization (2017) · cites this paper as Lawhern et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 100

  1. Wolpaw J R, Birbaumer N, McFarland D J, Pfurtscheller G and Vaughan T M 2002 Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control Clin. Neurophysiol. 113 767-91 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Schwartz A B, Cui X T, Weber D and Moran D W 2006 Brain- controlled interfaces: movement restoration with neural prosthetics Neuron 52 205-20 · DOI · Paper page
  3. van Erp J, Lotte F and Tangermann M 2012 Brain-computer interfaces: beyond medical applications Computer 45 26-34 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Saproo S, Faller J, Shih V, Sajda P, Waytowich N R, Bohannon A, Lawhern V J, Lance B J and Jangraw D 2016 Cortically coupled computing: a new paradigm for synergistic human-machine interaction Computer 49 60-8 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Lance B J, Kerick S E, Ries A J, Oie K S and McDowell K 2012 Brain-computer interface technologies in the coming decades Proc. IEEE 100 1585-99 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Nicolas-Alonso L F and Gomez-Gil J 2012 Brain-computer interfaces, a review Sensors 12 1211 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Bashashati A, Fatourechi M, Ward R K and Birch G E 2007 A survey of signal processing algorithms in brain-computer interfaces based on electrical brain signals J. Neural Eng. 4 R32 · DOI · Paper page
  8. McFarland D J, Anderson C W, Muller K R, Schlogl A and Krusienski D J 2006 Bci meeting 2005-workshop on BCI signal processing: feature extraction and translation IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 14 135-8 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Lotte F, Congedo M, Lécuyer A, Lamarche F and Arnaldi B 2007 A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces J. Neural Eng. 4 R1 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Zander T O and Kothe C 2011 Towards passive brain- computer interfaces: applying brain-computer interface technology to human-machine systems in general J. Neural Eng. 8 025005 · DOI
  11. Blankertz B et al 2010 The Berlin brain-computer interface: non-medical uses of BCI technology Frontiers Neurosci. 4 198 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gordon S M, Jaswa M, Solon A J and Lawhern V J 2017 Real world BCI: cross-domain learning and practical applications Proc. 2017 ACM Workshop on an Application- Oriented Approach to BCI out of the Laboratory (New York, NY, USA: ACM) pp 25-8 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Hinton G et al 2012 Deep neural networks for acoustic modeling in speech recognition: The shared views of four research groups IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 29 82-97 · DOI · Paper page
  14. LeCun Y, Bengio Y and Hinton G 2015 Deep learning Nature 521 436-44 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Krizhevsky A and Sutskever I 2012 Hinton imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems ed F Pereira et al pp 1097-105
  16. Simonyan K and Zisserman A 2014 Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition CoRR (arXiv:1409.1556) · arXiv
  17. Szegedy C, Liu W, Jia Y, Sermanet P, Reed S E, Anguelov D, Erhan D, Vanhoucke V and Rabinovich A 2014 Going deeper with convolutions CoRR (arXiv:1409.4842) · arXiv
  18. He K, Zhang X, Ren S and Sun J 2015 Deep residual learning for image recognition CoRR (arXiv:1512.03385) · arXiv
  19. Huang G, Liu Z, Weinberger K Q and van der Maaten L 2016 Densely connected convolutional networks CoRR (arXiv:1608.06993) · arXiv
  20. Schmidhuber J 2014 Deep learning in neural networks: an overview (arXiv:1404.7828) · arXiv
  21. Antoniades A, Spyrou L, Took C C and Sanei S 2016 Deep learning for epileptic intracranial EEG data IEEE 26th Int. Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing pp 1-6 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Liang J, Lu R, Zhang C and Wang F 2016 Predicting seizures from electroencephalography recordings: a knowledge transfer strategy IEEE Int. Conf. on Healthcare Informatics pp 184-91 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Page A, Shea C and Mohsenin T 2016 Wearable seizure detection using convolutional neural networks with transfer learning IEEE Int. Symp. on Circuits and Systems pp 1086-9 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Mirowski P, Madhavan D, LeCun Y and Kuzniecky R 2009 Classification of patterns of EEG synchronization for seizure prediction Clin. Neurophysiol. 120 1927-40 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Thodoroff P, Pineau J and Lim A 2016 Learning robust features using deep learning for automatic seizure detection CoRR (arXiv:1608.00220) · arXiv
  26. Stober S, Cameron D J and Grahn J A 2014 Using convolutional neural networks to recognize rhythm stimuli from electroencephalography recordings Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27 ed Z Ghahramani pp 1449-57
  27. Stober S, Sternin A, Owen A M and Grahn J A 2015 Deep feature learning for EEG recordings CoRR (arXiv:1511.04306) · arXiv
  28. Cecotti H and Graser A 2011 Convolutional neural networks for p300 detection with application to brain-computer interfaces IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 33 433-45 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Manor R and Geva A 2015 Convolutional neural network for multi-category rapid serial visual presentation BCI Frontiers Comput. Neurosci. 9 146 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Shamwell J, Lee H, Kwon H, Marathe A R, Lawhern V and Nothwang W 2016 Single-trial EEG rsvp classification using convolutional neural networks Proc. SPIE 9836 983622 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Cecotti H, Eckstein M P and Giesbrecht B 2014 Single- trial classification of event-related potentials in rapid serial visual presentation tasks using supervised spatial filtering IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 25 2030-42 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Schirrmeister R T, Springenberg J T, Fiederer L D J, Glasstetter M, Eggensperger K, Tangermann M, Hutter F, Burgard W and Ball T 2017 Deep learning with convolutional neural networks for EEG decoding and visualization Hum. Brain Mapp. 38 5391-420 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Sturm I, Lapuschkin S, Samek W and Müller K-R 2016 Interpretable deep neural networks for single-trial EEG classification J. Neurosci. Methods 274 141-5 · DOI
  34. Längkvist M, Karlsson L and Loutfi A 2012 Sleep stage classification using unsupervised feature learning Adv. Artif. Neu. Sys. 2012 5 · DOI
  35. Wulsin D F, Gupta J R, Mani R, Blanco J A and Litt B 2011 Modeling electroencephalography waveforms with semi- supervised deep belief nets: fast classification and anomaly measurement J. Neural Eng. 8 036015 · DOI
  36. Ma T, Li H, Yang H, Lv X, Li P, Liu T, Yao D and Xu P 2017 The extraction of motion-onset vep BCI features based on deep learning and compressed sensing J. Neurosci. Methods 275 80-92 · DOI
  37. Bashivan P, Rish I, Yeasin M and Codella N 2015 Learning representations from EEG with deep recurrent- convolutional neural networks CoRR (arXiv:1511.06448) · arXiv
  38. Tabar Y R and Halici U 2017 A novel deep learning approach for classification of EEG motor imagery signals J. Neural Eng. 14 016003 · DOI · Paper page
  39. An X, Kuang D, Guo X, Zhao Y and He L 2014 A deep learning method for classification of EEG data based on motor imagery Intelligent Computing in Bioinformatics (ICIC 2014) (Lect. Not. Comput. Sci. vol 8590) ed D S Huang et al (Cham: Springer) pp 203-10 · DOI
  40. Sakhavi S, Guan C and Yan S 2015 Parallel convolutional- linear neural network for motor imagery classification 23rd European Signal Processing Conf. pp 2736-40 · DOI
  41. Lu N, Li T, Ren X and Miao H 2017 A deep learning scheme for motor imagery classification based on restricted Boltzmann machines IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 25 566-76 · DOI
  42. Yin Z and Zhang J 2017 Cross-session classification of mental workload levels using eeg and an adaptive deep learning model Biomed. Signal Process. Control 33 30-47 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Chollet F 2016 Xception: deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions CoRR (arXiv:1610.02357) · arXiv
  44. Yang Z, Moczulski M, Denil M, Freitas N D, Smola A, Song L and Wang Z 2015 Deep fried convnets IEEE Int. Conf. on Computer Vision pp 1476-83 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Lotte F 2015 Signal processing approaches to minimize or suppress calibration time in oscillatory activity-based brain-computer interfaces Proc. IEEE 103 871-90 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Fazel-Rezai R, Allison B Z, Guger C, Sellers E W, Kleih S C and Kübler A 2012 P300 brain-computer interface: current challenges and emerging trends Frontiers Neuroeng. 5 14 · DOI
  47. Pfurtscheller G and Neuper C 2001 Motor imagery and direct brain-computer communication Proc. IEEE 89 1123-34 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Makeig S 1993 Auditory event-related dynamics of the {EEG} spectrum and effects of exposure to tones Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 86 283-93 · DOI
  49. Polich J 2007 Updating p300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b Clin. Neurophysiol. 118 2128-48 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Sajda P, Pohlmeyer E, Wang Parra L C, Christoforou C, Dmochowski J, Hanna B, Bahlmann C, Singh M K and Chang S F 2010 In a blink of an eye and a switch of a transistor: cortically coupled computer vision Proc. IEEE 98 462-78 · DOI
  51. Marathe A R, Lawhern V J, Wu D, Slayback D and Lance B J 2016 Improved neural signal classification in a rapid serial visual presentation task using active learning IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 24 333-43 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Waytowich N, Lawhern V, Bohannon A, Ball K and Lance B 2016 Spectral transfer learning using information geometry for a user-independent brain-computer interface Frontiers Neurosci. 10 430 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Delorme A and Makeig S 2004 Eeglab: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis J. Neurosci. Methods 134 9-21 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Miltner W H R, Braun C H and Coles M G H 1997 Event- related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: evidence for a generic neural system for error detection J. Cogn. Neurosci. 9 788-98 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Gehring W J, Goss B, Coles M G H, Meyer D E and Donchin E 1993 A neural system for error detection and compensation Psychol. Sci. 4 385-90 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Falkenstein M, Hohnsbein J, Hoormann J and Blanke L 1991 Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 78 447-55 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Margaux P, Emmanuel M, Sébastien D, Olivier B and Jérémie M 2012 Objective and subjective evaluation of online error correction during p300-based spelling Adv. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2012 4 · DOI
  58. Zander T O, Kothe C, Welke S and Roetting M 2009 Utilizing secondary input from passive brain-computer interfaces for enhancing human-machine interaction Foundations of Augmented Cognition. Neuroergonomics and Operational Neuroscience (FAC 2009) (Lect. Not. Comput. Sci. vol 5638) ed D D Schmorrow et al (Berlin: Springer) pp 759-71 · DOI
  59. Millán J D R et al 2010 Combining brain-computer interfaces and assistive technologies: state-of-the-art and challenges Frontiers Neurosci. 4 161 · DOI
  60. Spüler M, Bensch M, Kleih S, Rosenstiel W, Bogdan M and Kübler A 2012 Online use of error-related potentials in healthy users and people with severe motor impairment increases performance of a p300-BCI Clin. Neurophysiol. 123 1328-37 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Krusienski D J, Sellers E W, McFarland D J, Vaughan T M and Wolpaw J R 2008 Toward enhanced p300 speller performance J. Neurosci. Methods 167 15-21 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Toro C, Deuschl G, Thatcher R, Sato S, Kufta C and Hallett M 1994 Event-related desynchronization and movement-related cortical potentials on the ECoG and EEG Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. Evoked Potentials Sect. 93 380-9 · DOI
  63. Pfurtscheller G and Aranibar A 1977 Event-related cortical desynchronization detected by power measurements of scalp EEG Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 42 817-26 · DOI
  64. Pfurtscheller G and da Silva F L 1999 Event-related eeg/meg synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles Clin. Neurophysiol. 110 1842-57 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Liao K, Xiao R, Gonzalez J and Ding L 2014 Decoding individual finger movements from one hand using human EEG signals PLoS ONE 9 1-12 · DOI
  66. Barrett G, Shibasaki H and Neshige R 1986 Cortical potentials preceding voluntary movement: evidence for three periods of preparation in man Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 63 327-39 · DOI
  67. Yilmaz O, Birbaumer N and Ramos-Murguialday A 2015 Movement related slow cortical potentials in severely paralyzed chronic stroke patients Frontiers Hum. Neurosci. 8 1033 · DOI
  68. Deecke L, Scheid P and Kornhuber H H 1969 Distribution of readiness potential, pre-motion positivity, and motor potential of the human cerebral cortex preceding voluntary finger movements Exp. Brain Res. 7 158-68 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Leuthardt E C, Schalk G, Moran D and Ojemann J G 2006 The emerging world of motor neuroprosthetics: a neurosurgical perspective Neurosurgery 59 1-14 · DOI
  70. Yom-Tov E and Inbar G F 2003 Detection of movement- related potentials from the electro-encephalogram for possible use in a brain-computer interface Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 41 85-93 · DOI
  71. Karimi F, Kofman J, Mrachacz-Kersting N, Farina D and Jiang N 2017 Detection of movement related cortical potentials from EEG using constrained ICA for brain- computer interface applications Frontiers Neurosci. 11 356 · DOI
  72. Gordon S, Lawhern V, Passaro A and McDowell K 2015 Informed decomposition of electroencephalographic data J. Neurosci. Methods 256 41-55 · DOI
  73. Bigdely-Shamlo N, Mullen T, Kothe C, Su K M and Robbins K A 2015 The prep pipeline: standardized preprocessing for large-scale EEG analysis Frontiers Neuroinformatics 9 16 · DOI
  74. Tangermann M et al 2012 Review of the BCI competition iv Frontiers Neurosci. 6 55 · DOI · Paper page
  75. Kingma D P and Ba J 2014 Adam: a method for stochastic optimization (arXiv:1412.6980) · arXiv
  76. Abadi M et al 2016 Tensorflow: a system for large-scale machine learning Proc. 12th USENIX Conf. on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (Berkeley, CA, USA: USENIX Association) pp 265-83
  77. Ang K K, Chin Z Y, Wang C, Guan C and Zhang H 2012 Filter bank common spatial pattern algorithm on BCI competition iv datasets 2a and 2b Frontiers Neurosci. 6 39 · DOI · Paper page
  78. Ioffe S and Szegedy C 2015 Batch normalization: accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift (arXiv:1502.03167) · arXiv
  79. Clevert D, Unterthiner T and Hochreiter S 2015 Fast and accurate deep network learning by exponential linear units (elus) CoRR (arXiv:1511.07289) · arXiv
  80. Springenberg J T, Dosovitskiy A, Brox T and Riedmiller M A 2014 Striving for simplicity: the all convolutional net (arXiv:1412.6806) · arXiv
  81. Rivet B, Souloumiac A, Attina V and Gibert G 2009 xDAWN algorithm to enhance evoked potentials: application to brain- computer interface IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 56 2035-43 · DOI · Paper page
  82. Barachant A, Bonnet S, Congedo M and Jutten C 2012 Multiclass brain-computer interface classification by Riemannian geometry IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 59 920-8 · DOI · Paper page
  83. Barachant A and Congedo M 2014 A plug & play P300 BCI using information geometry (arXiv:1409.0107 [cs, stat]) · arXiv
  84. Congedo M, Barachant A and Andreev A 2013 A new generation of brain-computer interface based on riemannian geometry CoRR (arXiv:1310.8115) · arXiv
  85. Barachant A and Bonnet S 2011 Channel selection procedure using riemannian distance for bci applications 5th Int. IEEE/EMBS Conf. on Neural Engineering pp 348-51 · DOI
  86. Barachant A, Bonnet S, Congedo M and Jutten C 2013 Classification of covariance matrices using a Riemannian- based kernel for BCI applications Neurocomputing 112 172-8 · DOI · Paper page
  87. Ng A Y 2004 Feature selection, l1 versus l2 regularization, and rotational invariance Proc. 21st Int. Conf. on Machine Learning (New York, NY: ACM) p 78 · DOI · Paper page
  88. Ledoit O and Wolf M 2004 A well-conditioned estimator for large-dimensional covariance matrices J. Multivariate Anal. 88 365-411 · DOI · Paper page
  89. Zou H and Hastie T 2005 Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net J. R. Stat. Soc. B 67 301-20 · DOI · Paper page
  90. Kothe C A and Makeig S 2013 Bcilab: a platform for brain- computer interface development J. Neural Eng. 10 056014 · DOI · Paper page
  91. Zeiler M D and Fergus R 2014 Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks Computer Vision-ECCV ed D Fleet et al (Cham: Springer) pp 818-33 · DOI · Paper page
  92. Nguyen A M, Yosinski J and Clune J 2014 Deep neural networks are easily fooled: high confidence predictions for unrecognizable images CoRR (arXiv:1412.1897) · arXiv
  93. Ribeiro M T, Singh S and Guestrin C 2016 'Why should I trust you?': explaining the predictions of any classifier In Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (New York, NY: ACM) pp 1135-44 · DOI · Paper page
  94. Shrikumar A, Greenside P and Kundaje A 2017 Learning important features through propagating activation differences CoRR (arXiv:1704.02685) · arXiv
  95. Ancona M, Ceolini E, Öztireli C and Gross M 2018 Towards better understanding of gradient-based attribution methods for deep neural networks Int. Conf. on Learning Representations
  96. Montavon G, Samek W and Müller K-R 2018 Methods for interpreting and understanding deep neural networks Digit. Signal Process. 73 1-15 · DOI · Paper page
  97. Torrence C and Compo G P 1998 A practical guide to wavelet analysis Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 79 61-78 · DOI
  98. Mazaheri A and Picton T W 2005 EEG spectral dynamics during discrimination of auditory and visual targets Cogn. Brain Res. 24 81-96 · DOI
  99. Johnson G, Waytowich N and Krusienski D J 2011 The challenges of using scalp-EEG input signals for continuous device control Foundations of Augmented Cognition. Directing the Future of Adaptive Systems. Int. Conf. on Foundations of Augmented Cognition ed D D Schmorrow and C M Fidopiastis (Berlin: Springer) pp 525-7 · DOI
  100. Lawhern V, Hairston W D, McDowell K, Westerfield M and Robbins K 2012 Detection and classification of subject- generated artifacts in EEG signals using autoregressive models J. Neurosci. Methods 208 181-9 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lawhern, V. J., Solon, A. J., Waytowich, N. R., Gordon, S. M., Hung, C. P., & Lance, B. J.
Affiliations
DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Lawhern, Vernon J.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2016
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
056013-056013
ISSN
1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1611.08024
arXiv
1611.08024
OpenAlex
W2559463885
Cited by
5,105
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1121 · 2025: 1233 · 2024: 935 · 2023: 649 · 2022: 468 · 2021: 334 · 2020: 213 · 2019: 105 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 10
FWCI
102.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Army Research Laboratory (W911-NF-10-2-0022, CAST 076910227001, ARL-74A-HRCYB, W911NF, ARL-H70-HR52, W911NF-10)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Keywords
EEGNet, EEG-based brain-computer interface, compact convolutional neural networks, depthwise separable convolution, error-related negativity, movement-related cortical potentials, sensory motor rhythm, EEG classification, model interpretability, feature visualization, limited training data
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Algorithms, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Movement, Neural Networks, Computer, Event-Related Potentials, P300, Young Adult, Brain-Computer Interfaces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review