The DOI matches its DataCite record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 4 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter
Open accessAbstract
As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative on-device study.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
DistilBERT is a distilled version of BERT pre-trained with knowledge distillation, reducing parameters by 40% while retaining 97% of BERT’s GLUE performance and running 60% faster at inference. It is presented as a general-purpose, lighter model suitable for constrained and on-device NLP applications.
Key findings
- DistilBERT has 66M parameters vs. BERT-base’s 110M and takes 410s vs. 668s for a CPU inference pass on STS-B, i.e. 40% smaller and 60% faster.
- On GLUE dev sets, DistilBERT scores 77.0 macro-score vs. BERT-base’s 79.5, retaining 97% of performance; it is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline.
- On IMDb test accuracy, DistilBERT reaches 92.82 vs. BERT-base’s 93.46; on SQuAD v1.1, DistilBERT reaches 77.7/85.8 EM/F1 vs. BERT-base’s 81.2/88.5.
- Ablations show removing the cosine loss costs -2.96 GLUE macro-score, removing distillation loss costs -1.46, removing MLM loss costs -0.31, and random initialization costs -3.69.
Methods
- Knowledge distillation during pre-training: a student with BERT’s architecture but half the layers, no token-type embeddings and no pooler, initialized from every other teacher layer.
- Training objective is a triple loss combining distillation loss \(L_{ce}\), masked language modeling loss \(L_{mlm}\), and cosine embedding loss \(L_{cos}\), using softmax-temperature.
- Trained on English Wikipedia + Toronto Book Corpus with large batches up to 4K examples, dynamic masking, no next-sentence prediction, on 8 16GB V100 GPUs for approximately 90 hours; evaluated on GLUE, IMDb, SQuAD v1.1, CPU inference, and an iPhone 7 Plus on-device proof-of-concept.
Limitations
- The paper does not state an explicit limitations section.
- Evident from the text: evaluation is limited to English benchmarks and a small set of downstream tasks, and the on-device study is described as a proof-of-concept; the model could be further reduced with quantization.
- Evident from the text: the SQuAD second-distillation result is reported inconsistently—the prose says 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, while Table 2 lists DistilBERT (D) as 79.1/86.9.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
15 Own result · 6 Own interpretation · 2 Own method · 2 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · 1 Sources not found · accuracy not yet measured
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be finetuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
“Our general-purpose pre-trained models can be fine-tuned with good performances on several downstream tasks, keeping the flexibility of larger models.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further ablation studies indicate that all the components of the triple loss are important for best performances.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Excluding the tokenization step, DistilBERT is 71% faster than BERT, and the whole model weighs 207 MB (which could be further reduced with quantization).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found it beneficial to add a cosine embedding loss ( L cos ) which will tend to align the directions of the student and teacher hidden states vectors.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On SQuAD, DistilBERT is within 3.9 points of the full BERT.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
“DistilBERT also compares surprisingly well to BERT, retaining 97% of the performance with 40% fewer parameters.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“removing the Masked Language Modeling loss has little impact while the two distillation losses account for a large portion of the performance.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 7
- It may state two separate claims as one. 2
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“environmental cost of exponentially scaling these models' computational requirements as mentioned in Schwartz et al. [2019], Strubell et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Schwartz et al., 2019 source
The Abstract (p. 1) says the computations required for deep learning research have been doubling every few months and have a large carbon footprint. Section 2, “Red AI” (p. 4), likewise warns that the environmental cost of increasingly large models will not decrease soon. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites Strubell et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) says that computationally hungry NLP models require considerable energy and have associated environmental costs. It also says model development can multiply those costs thousands of times, but it does not establish that the models’ computational requirements are scaling exponentially. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We applied best practices for training BERT model recently proposed in Liu et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Liu et al., 2019 source
The Introduction (p. 1) says Liu et al. propose an improved recipe for training BERT, and Section 4 (p. 4) evaluates which choices matter for BERT pretraining. The citing authors’ statement that they applied those practices to DistilBERT describes their own work, not a finding attributed to Liu et al. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among the 9 tasks, DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We further demonstrated that DistilBERT is a compelling option for edge applications.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“BERT and DistilBERT results are the medians of 5 runs with different seeds.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“current research 1 on pre-trained models indicates that training even larger models still leads to better performances on downstream tasks.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites MegatronLM
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We report scores on the development sets for each task by fine-tuning DistilBERT without the use of ensembling or multi-tasking scheme for fine-tuning (which are mostly orthogonal to the present work).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Operating large pre-trained models on-device in real-time is hampered by their growing computational and memory requirements.
“the growing computational and memory requirements of these models may hamper wide adoption.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Near-zero probabilities in a trained model's output distribution reflect its generalization capabilities.
“some of these”
The paper relies on this without support.
Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
“Inference time of a full pass of GLUE task STS-B (sentiment analysis) on CPU with a batch size of 1.”
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This idea has been successfully applied to LLMs, where distilled students approximate the generation patterns of larger teachers while retaining much of their performance (Sanh et al., 2019).”
From Vision-Guided Iterative Refinement for Frontend Code Generation (2026) · cites this paper as Sanh et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“even benchmarking is not a reliable estimator of parameter count [12], [15], [28], [29]”
From Hollow-LLM Attack: Computationally Trivial Weights in Zero-Knowledge Verification of LLM Inference (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It achieves similar performance to the original BERT model while using fewer resources. The approach leveraged knowledge distillation during the pretraining phase and reduced the size of general BERT by 40%, yet it retained a language understanding capability of 97%.”
From A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [53]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Unlike in many similar circumstances, we do not employ knowledge distillation [56], because we discovered that for our sizes of the models, this technique does not provide any quality improvement.”
From Full Line Code Completion: Bringing AI to Desktop (2024) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ 4.1 Downstream task benchmark · p. 3
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
§ 3 DistilBERT: a distilled version of BERT · p. 3
“| DistilBERT (D) | - | 79.1/86.9 |”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
Reported 19 · recomputed 16.5
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.02531 · Cited by 14,204
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 · Cited by 8,741
Self-citationSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding
Wang, A., Singh, A., Michael, J., Hill, F., Levy, O., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5446 · Cited by 4,222
Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis
Maas, A. L., Daly, R. E., Pham, P. T., Huang, D., Ng, A. Y., & Potts, C. (2011) · Cited by 3,710
Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cristian Bucila, Rich Caruana, and Alexandru Niculescu-Mizil. Model compression. In KDD , 2006.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,801–1,900 of 4,692
PoseScript: Linking 3D Human Poses and Natural Language
Delmas, G., Weinzaepfel, P., Lucas, T., Moreno-Noguer, F., & Rogez, G. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2024.3407570 · Cited by 10
Social Media Text Analysis for Disaster Management Using DistilBERT Model
Varghese, S. R., Juliet, S., & Athish, N. S. (2024) · doi:10.1109/icstem61137.2024.10560620 · Cited by 9
Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Knowledge Transfer in VQA via Multimodal Distillation
Weng, Y., Dong, J., He, W., Chaomurilige, C., Liu, X., Liu, Z., & Gao, H. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2024.3402270 · Cited by 9
COSA Plus: Enhanced Co-Operative Systolic Arrays for Attention Mechanism in Transformers
Wang, Z., Wang, G., & He, G. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/tcad.2024.3434447 · Cited by 9
Kim, H. K., Park, Y., Kim, Y. J., Yi, S., Park, Y., So, S., Lee, H., & Bae, Y. S. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3538803 · Cited by 8
Neural dynamics of semantic control underlying generative storytelling
Rastelli, C., Greco, A., Finocchiaro, C., Penazzi, G., Braun, C., & Pisapia, N. D. (2025) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-025-07913-3 · Cited by 10
News Editorials: Towards Summarizing Long Argumentative Texts
Syed, S., Baff, R. E., Kiesel, J., Al‐Khatib, K., Stein, B., & Potthast, M. (2020) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.470 · Cited by 10
Of Non-Linearity and Commutativity in BERT
Zhao, S., Pascual, D., Brunner, G., & Wattenhofer, R. P. (2021) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn52387.2021.9533563 · Cited by 12
Model Compression for Domain Adaptation through Causal Effect Estimation
Rotman, G., Feder, A., & Reichart, R. (2021) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00431 · Cited by 9
Tula, D., Potluri, P., Ms, S., Doddapaneni, S., Sahu, P., Sukumaran, R., & Patwa, P. (2021) · Cited by 8
Benedetto, L., Aradelli, G., Cremonesi, P., Cappelli, A., Giussani, A., & Turrin, R. (2021) · Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) · Cited by 9
Transformer Based Models in Fake News Detection
Kula, S., Kozik, R., Choraś, M., & Woźniak, M. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77970-2_3 · Cited by 12
Benchmarking Commercial Intent Detection Services with Practice-Driven Evaluations
Qi, H., Pan, L., Sood, A., Shah, A., Kunc, L., Yu, M., & Potdar, S. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-industry.38 · Cited by 17
An Empirical Assessment of the Qualitative Aspects of Misinformation in Health News
Zuo, C., Zhang, Q., & Banerjee, R. (2021) · Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Internet Freedom: Censorship, Disinformation, and Propaganda (NLP4IF) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.nlp4if-1.11 · Cited by 9
Machine Learning Meets Natural Language Processing - The Story so Far
Galanis, N.-I., Vafiadis, P., Mirzaev, K.-G., & Papakostas, G. A. (2021) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-79150-6_53 · Cited by 13
SemEval-2021 Task 10: Source-Free Domain Adaptation for Semantic Processing
Laparra, E., Su, X., Zhao, Y., Uzuner, Ö., Miller, T. A., & Bethard, S. J. (2021) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.semeval-1.42 · Cited by 9
Pre-trained Language Models as Prior Knowledge for Playing Text-based Games
Singh, I., Singh, G., & Modi, A. (2022) · Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems · doi:10.65109/gbmr8139 · Cited by 21
Spy the Lie: Fraudulent Jobs Detection in Recruitment Domain using Knowledge Graphs
Goyal, N. P., Sachdeva, N., & Kumaraguru, P. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-82147-0_50 · Cited by 9
A More Effective Sentence-Wise Text Segmentation Approach Using BERT
Maraj, A., Martín, M. V., & Makrehchi, M. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86337-1_16 · Cited by 9
Offensive Language Detection in Turkish Tweets with Bert Models
Ozberk, A., & Cicekli, I. (2021) · International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK) · doi:10.1109/ubmk52708.2021.9559000 · Cited by 13
Towards Enriching Responses with Crowd-sourced Knowledge for Task-oriented Dialogue
He, Y., Liao, L., Zhang, Z., & Chua, T. (2021) · doi:10.1145/3475959.3485392 · Cited by 9
An Analysis of Interaction and Engagement in YouTube Live Streaming Chat
Liebeskind, C., Liebeskind, S., & Yechezkely, S. (2021) · IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced & Trusted Computing, Scalable Computing & Communications, Cloud & Big Data Computing, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation (SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCom/IOP/SCI) · doi:10.1109/swc50871.2021.00045 · Cited by 9
Pyramid-BERT: Reducing Complexity via Successive Core-set based Token Selection
Huang, X., Khetan, A., Bidart, R., & Karnin, Z. S. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.602 · Cited by 18
Improved Prioritization of Software Development Demands in Turkish With Deep Learning-Based NLP
Tunalı, V. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3167269 · Cited by 9
ASR-Aware End-to-End Neural Diarization
Khare, A., Han, E., Yang, Y., & Stolcke, A. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp43922.2022.9746964 · Cited by 9
Federated Learning with Noisy User Feedback
Sharma, R. A., Ramakrishna, A., MacLaughlin, A., Rumshisky, A., Majmudar, J., Chung, C., Avestimehr, S., & Gupta, R. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.196 · Cited by 9
Tong, J., Wang, Z., & Rui, X. (2022) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2022/7183207 · Cited by 10
Cuesta-Lazaro, C., Prasad, A., & Wood, T. (2022) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.400 · Cited by 9
PerAnSel: A Novel Deep Neural Network-Based System for Persian Question Answering
Mozafari, J., Kazemi, A., Moradi, P., & Nematbakhsh, M. A. (2022) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2022/3661286 · Cited by 10
Deep learning to extract Breast Cancer diagnosis concepts
Pabón, O. S., Torrente, M., García-Barragán, Á., Provencio, M., Menasalvas, E., & Robles, V. (2022) · Proceedings - IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems · doi:10.1109/cbms55023.2022.00010 · Cited by 10
Noviello, A., Menghani, S., Choudhri, S., Lee, I., Mohanraj, B., & Noviello, A. (2022) · Weather Climate and Society · doi:10.1175/wcas-d-22-0053.1 · Cited by 9
Semantic Color Mapping: A Pipeline for Assigning Meaningful Colors to Text
El‐Assady, M., Kehlbeck, R., Metz, Y., Schlegel, U., Sevastjanova, R., Sperrle, F., & Spinner, T. (2022) · doi:10.1109/visguides57787.2022.00008 · Cited by 15
LECO: Improving Early Exiting via Learned Exits and Comparison-based Exiting Mechanism
Zhang, J., Tan, M., Dai, P., & Zhu, W. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-srw.43 · Cited by 9
Yang, K., Jang, W., & Cho, W. I. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.525 · Cited by 13
Rating Sentiment Analysis Systems for Bias Through a Causal Lens
Lakkaraju, K., Srivastava, B., & Valtorta, M. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society · doi:10.1109/tts.2024.3375519 · Cited by 9
Balanced Joint Adversarial Training for Robust Intent Detection and Slot Filling
Cao, X., Xiong, D., Shi, C., Wang, C., Meng, Y., & Hu, C. (2020) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.432 · Cited by 8
Limitations of Knowledge Distillation for Zero-shot Transfer Learning
Soltan, S., Khan, H., & Hamza, W. (2021) · Workshop on Simple and Efficient Natural Language Processing (SustaiNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.sustainlp-1.3 · Cited by 10
On the Evaluation of the Plausibility and Faithfulness of Sentiment Analysis Explanations
Zini, J. E., Mansour, M., Mousi, B., & Awad, M. (2022) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-08337-2_28 · Cited by 9
Length-Adaptive Transformer: Train Once with Length Drop, Use Anytime with SearchPreprint
Kim, G., & Cho, K. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.07003 · Cited by 9
Load What You Need: Smaller Versions of Multilingual BERTPreprint
Abdaoui, A., Pradel, C., & Sigel, G. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.05609 · Cited by 15
TurboTransformers: An Efficient GPU Serving System For Transformer ModelsPreprint
Fang, J., Yu, Y., Zhao, C., & Zhou, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.05680 · Cited by 9
Progressively Stacking 2.0: A Multi-stage Layerwise Training Method for BERT Training SpeedupPreprint
Yang, C. H., Wang, S., Yang, C., Li, Y., He, R., & Zhang, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.13635 · Cited by 32
Yelp Review Rating Prediction: Machine Learning and Deep Learning ModelsPreprint
Liu, Z. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.06690 · Cited by 13
RomeBERT: Robust Training of Multi-Exit BERTPreprint
Geng, S., Gao, P., Fu, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.09755 · Cited by 18
Scalable Transformers for Neural Machine TranslationPreprint
Gao, P., Geng, S., Qiao, Y., Wang, X., Dai, J., & Li, H. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.02242 · Cited by 11
Efficient pre-training objectives for TransformersPreprint
Liello, L. D., Gabburo, M., & Moschitti, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.09694 · Cited by 13
TSSuBERT: Tweet Stream Summarization Using BERTPreprint
Dusart, A., Pinel-Sauvagnat, K., & Hubert, G. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.08770 · Cited by 12
BloomNet: A Robust Transformer based model for Bloom's Learning Outcome ClassificationPreprint
Waheed, A., Goyal, M., Mittal, N., Gupta, D. K., Khanna, A. K., & Sharma, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.07249 · Cited by 13
DKM: Differentiable K-Means Clustering Layer for Neural Network CompressionPreprint
Cho, M., Alizadeh-Vahid, K., Adya, S. N., & Rastegari, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.12659 · Cited by 9
One to rule them all: Towards Joint Indic Language Hate Speech DetectionPreprint
Bhatia, M., Bhotia, T. S., Agarwal, A., Ramesh, P., Gupta, S., Shridhar, K., Laumann, F., & Dash, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.13711 · Cited by 18
Evaluating Pre-trained BERT-based Language Models for Detecting MisinformationPreprint
Anggrainingsih, R., Hassan, G. M., & Datta, A. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1608574/v1 · Cited by 9
BANDARUPALLI, G. (2025) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.174440282.23013172/v1 · Cited by 19
The Ecological Fallacy in Annotation: Modeling Human Label Variation goes beyond Sociodemographics
Orlikowski, M., Röttger, P., Cimiano, P., & Hovy, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-short.88 · Cited by 9
SemEval-2022 Task 3: PreTENS-Evaluating Neural Networks on Presuppositional Semantic Knowledge
Zamparelli, R., Chowdhury, S. A., Brunato⋄, D., Chesi, C., Dell’Orletta⋄, F., Hasan, M. A., & Venturi⋄, G. (2022) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.semeval-1.29 · Cited by 8
On understanding and predicting issue links
Lüders, C. M., Pietz, T., & Maalej, W. (2023) · Requirements Engineering · doi:10.1007/s00766-023-00406-x · Cited by 8
Federated Learning for Exploiting Annotators’ Disagreements in Natural Language Processing
Rodríguez-Barroso, N., Martínez‐Cámara, E., Camacho-Collados, J., Luzón, M. V., & Herrera, F. (2024) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00664 · Cited by 8
Hyperbolic Pre-Trained Language Model
Chen, W., Han, X., Lin, Y., He, K., Xie, R., Zhou, J., Liu, Z., & Sun, M. (2024) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2024.3407575 · Cited by 8
Robustness of models addressing Information Disorder: A comprehensive review and benchmarking study
Fenza, G., Loia, V., Stanzione, C., & Gisi, M. D. (2024) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2024.127951 · Cited by 11
Challenges of Using Pre-trained Models: the Practitioners' Perspective
Tan, X. L., Li, T., Chen, R., Liu, F., & Zhang, L. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER) · doi:10.1109/saner60148.2024.00015 · Cited by 10
Holford, D. L., Lopez-Lopez, E., Fasce, A., Karlsson, L. C., & Lewandowsky, S. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03416-4 · Cited by 11
LLM Diagnostic Toolkit: Evaluating LLMs for Ethical Issues
Bahrami, M., Sonoda, R., & Srinivasan, R. (2024) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn60899.2024.10650995 · Cited by 8
Fewshing: A Few-Shot Learning Approach to Phishing Email Detection
Zhao, P., & Jin, S. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Artificial Intelligence (SEAI) · doi:10.1109/seai62072.2024.10674290 · Cited by 8
Enhancing Intent Classifier Training with Large Language Model-generated Data
Benayas, A., Sicilia, M., & Mora‐Cantallops, M. (2024) · Applied Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1080/08839514.2024.2414483 · Cited by 13
Xiao, L., Zhang, Y. Q., Wang, D., Zhong, H., Li, R., & Wang, Q. (2024) · ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) · doi:10.1145/3664647.3681201 · Cited by 16
Performance and sustainability of BERT derivatives in dyadic data
Escarda-Fernández, M., Eiras‐Franco, C., Cancela, B., Guijarro‐Berdiñas, B., & Alonso‐Betanzos, A. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125647 · Cited by 11
Veiled Pathways: Investigating Covert and Side Channels Within GPU Uncore
Miao, Y., Zhang, Y., Wu, D., Zhang, D., Tan, G., Zhang, R., & Kandemir, M. (2024) · IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO) · doi:10.1109/micro61859.2024.00088 · Cited by 10
Haque, R., Goh, H.-N., Ting, C., Quek, A., & Hasan, M. R. (2024) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100356 · Cited by 13
A Lightweight Malware Detection Model Based on Knowledge Distillation
Miao, C., Kou, L., Zhang, J., & Dong, G. (2024) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math12244009 · Cited by 10
Shetty, A. M., Manjaiah, D. H., & Aljunid, M. F. (2025) · ETRI Journal · doi:10.4218/etrij.2024-0318 · Cited by 10
Disclosure Dynamism: TCFD Aligned Climate Claims of UK Corporates
Cortés, D. G., Lodh, S., Akbar, S., & Nandy, M. (2025) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.4189 · Cited by 10
A Comparative Study on Detecting Phishing URLs Leveraging Pre-trained BERT Variants
Patra, C., Giri, D., Maitra, T., & Kundu, B. (2024) · International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Networks (CINE) · doi:10.1109/cine63708.2024.10881521 · Cited by 11
Attention-based backdoor attacks against natural language processing models
Zhang, Y., Wang, Q., Min, S., Zuo, R., Huang, F., Liu, H., & Yao, S. (2025) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2025.112907 · Cited by 9
Distillation of Diffusion Features for Semantic Correspondence
Fundel, F., Schusterbauer, J., Hu, V. T., & Ommer, B. (2025) · IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv61041.2025.00658 · Cited by 10
Analyzing the Performance of Sentiment Analysis Using BERT, DistilBERT, RoBERTa and GPT-2
Imtiaz, S., & Hashi, E. K. (2024) · International Conference on Sustainable Technologies for Industry 5.0 (STI) · doi:10.1109/sti64222.2024.10951049 · Cited by 8
AdditiveLLM: Large language models predict defects in metals additive manufacturing
Pak, P., & Farimani, A. B. (2025) · Additive Manufacturing Letters · doi:10.1016/j.addlet.2025.100292 · Cited by 17
Dong, Y., Meng, X., Yu, N., Li, Z., & Guo, S. (2025) · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P) · doi:10.1109/sp61157.2025.00119 · Cited by 48
Predicting Company ESG Ratings from News Articles Using Multivariate Timeseries Analysis
Aue, T., Jatowt, A., & Färber, M. (2025) · doi:10.1145/3701716.3717509 · Cited by 8
Prototype-guided cross-task knowledge distillation
Li, D., Li, P., Wu, A., & Han, Y. (2025) · Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering · doi:10.1631/fitee.2400383 · Cited by 12
AI-Driven Injury Reporting in Pediatric Emergency Departments
Singh, D. A., Celik, A., Zhang, E. W. J., et al. (2025) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.24154 · Cited by 8
Matin, S., Allen, A. E. A., Shinkle, E., Pachalieva, A. A., Craven, G. T., Nebgen, B. T., Smith, J. S., Messerly, R. A., Li, Y. W., Tretiak, S., et al. (2025) · Digital Discovery · doi:10.1039/d5dd00085h · Cited by 15
Bisztray, T., Cherif, B., Dubniczky, R. A., Gruschka, N., Borsos, B., Ferrag, M. A., Kovács, A., Mavroeidis, V., & Tihanyi, N. (2025) · ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security (AISec) · doi:10.1145/3733799.3762964 · Cited by 11
On the weak link between importance and prunability of attention heads
Budhraja, A., Pande, M., Nema, P., Kumar, P., & Khapra, M. M. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.260 · Cited by 8
Question Answering System with Indic multilingual-BERT
Jha, B. K., Akana, C. M. V. S., & Anand, R. (2021) · International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC) · doi:10.1109/iccmc51019.2021.9418387 · Cited by 9
IIITT at CASE 2021 Task 1: Leveraging Pretrained Language Models for Multilingual Protest Detection
Kalyan, P., Reddy, D. V. R., Hande, A., Priyadharshini, R., Sakuntharaj, R., & Chakravarthi, B. R. (2021) · Workshop on Challenges and Applications of Automated Extraction of Socio-political Events from Text (CASE) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.case-1.13 · Cited by 9
Legal Entity Extraction using a Pointer Generator Network
Skylaki, S., Oskooei, A., Bari, O., Herger, N., & Kriegman, Z. (2021) · IEEE ... International Conference on Data Mining workshops · doi:10.1109/icdmw53433.2021.00086 · Cited by 10
On Isotropy Calibration of Transformer Models
Ding, Y., Martinkus, K., Pascual, D., Clematide, S., & Wattenhofer, R. P. (2022) · Workshop on Insights from Negative Results in NLP (Insights) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.insights-1.1 · Cited by 10
Clean or Annotate: How to Spend a Limited Data Collection Budget
Chen, D., & Bowman, Z. Y. A. S. R. (2022) · Workshop on Deep Learning Approaches for Low-Resource NLP (DeepLo) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.deeplo-1.17 · Cited by 13
Detecting Narrative Elements in Informational Text
Levi, E., Mor, G., Sheafer, T., & Shenhav, S. R. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-naacl.133 · Cited by 14
COMPASS: A creative support system that alerts novelists to the unnoticed missing contents
Mori, Y., Yamane, H., Shimizu, R., Mukuta, Y., & Harada, T. (2023) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2023.101484 · Cited by 7
Unnikrishnan, R., Kamath, S. S., & Ananthanarayana, V. S. (2023) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106214 · Cited by 9
VulDistilBERT: A CPS Vulnerability Severity Prediction Method Based on Distillation Model
Kai, S., Shi, F., & Zheng, J. (2023) · Security and Communication Networks · doi:10.1155/2023/2118305 · Cited by 9
Sentiment Analysis of Restaurant Reviews from Bangladeshi Food Delivery Apps
Rhythm, E. R., Shuvo, R. A., Hossain, M. S., et al. (2023) · International Conference on Emerging Smart Computing and Informatics (ESCI) · doi:10.1109/esci56872.2023.10100214 · Cited by 8
Learning Sentiment-Enhanced Word Representations by Fusing External Hybrid Sentiment Knowledge
Li, Y., Lin, Z., Lin, Y., Yin, J., & Chang, L. (2023) · Cognitive Computation · doi:10.1007/s12559-023-10164-1 · Cited by 8
A Survey on Asking Clarification Questions Datasets in Conversational Systems
Rahmani, H. A., Wang, X., Feng, Y., Zhang, Q., Yılmaz, E., & Lipani, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.152 · Cited by 21
Cross-Lingual Knowledge Distillation for Answer Sentence Selection in Low-Resource Languages
Gupta, S., Matsubara, Y., Chadha, A., & Moschitti, A. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.885 · Cited by 9
Wang, X., Weissweiler, L., Schütze, H., & Plank, B. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-short.157 · Cited by 11
U-CREAT: Unsupervised Case Retrieval using Events extrAcTion
Joshi, A., Sharma, A., Tanikella, S. K., & Modi, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.777 · Cited by 21
GKD: A General Knowledge Distillation Framework for Large-scale Pre-trained Language Model
Tan, S., Tam, W. L., Wang, Y., Gong, W., Zhao, S., Zhang, P., & Tang, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-industry.15 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., & Wolf, T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1910.01108
- OpenAlex
- W2978017171
- Cited by
- 4,653
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 443 · 2024: 801 · 2023: 1136 · 2022: 736 · 2021: 968 · 2020: 486 · 2019: 15
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- DistilBERT, knowledge distillation, BERT, pre-training, model compression, on-device computation, language modeling, transfer learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-23, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-23 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
