The DOI matches its DataCite record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 4 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter
Open accessAbstract
As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative on-device study.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
DistilBERT is a distilled version of BERT pre-trained with knowledge distillation, reducing parameters by 40% while retaining 97% of BERT’s GLUE performance and running 60% faster at inference. It is presented as a general-purpose, lighter model suitable for constrained and on-device NLP applications.
Key findings
- DistilBERT has 66M parameters vs. BERT-base’s 110M and takes 410s vs. 668s for a CPU inference pass on STS-B, i.e. 40% smaller and 60% faster.
- On GLUE dev sets, DistilBERT scores 77.0 macro-score vs. BERT-base’s 79.5, retaining 97% of performance; it is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline.
- On IMDb test accuracy, DistilBERT reaches 92.82 vs. BERT-base’s 93.46; on SQuAD v1.1, DistilBERT reaches 77.7/85.8 EM/F1 vs. BERT-base’s 81.2/88.5.
- Ablations show removing the cosine loss costs -2.96 GLUE macro-score, removing distillation loss costs -1.46, removing MLM loss costs -0.31, and random initialization costs -3.69.
Methods
- Knowledge distillation during pre-training: a student with BERT’s architecture but half the layers, no token-type embeddings and no pooler, initialized from every other teacher layer.
- Training objective is a triple loss combining distillation loss \(L_{ce}\), masked language modeling loss \(L_{mlm}\), and cosine embedding loss \(L_{cos}\), using softmax-temperature.
- Trained on English Wikipedia + Toronto Book Corpus with large batches up to 4K examples, dynamic masking, no next-sentence prediction, on 8 16GB V100 GPUs for approximately 90 hours; evaluated on GLUE, IMDb, SQuAD v1.1, CPU inference, and an iPhone 7 Plus on-device proof-of-concept.
Limitations
- The paper does not state an explicit limitations section.
- Evident from the text: evaluation is limited to English benchmarks and a small set of downstream tasks, and the on-device study is described as a proof-of-concept; the model could be further reduced with quantization.
- Evident from the text: the SQuAD second-distillation result is reported inconsistently—the prose says 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, while Table 2 lists DistilBERT (D) as 79.1/86.9.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
15 Own result · 6 Own interpretation · 2 Own method · 2 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · 1 Sources not found · accuracy not yet measured
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be finetuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
“Our general-purpose pre-trained models can be fine-tuned with good performances on several downstream tasks, keeping the flexibility of larger models.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further ablation studies indicate that all the components of the triple loss are important for best performances.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Excluding the tokenization step, DistilBERT is 71% faster than BERT, and the whole model weighs 207 MB (which could be further reduced with quantization).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found it beneficial to add a cosine embedding loss ( L cos ) which will tend to align the directions of the student and teacher hidden states vectors.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On SQuAD, DistilBERT is within 3.9 points of the full BERT.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
“DistilBERT also compares surprisingly well to BERT, retaining 97% of the performance with 40% fewer parameters.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“removing the Masked Language Modeling loss has little impact while the two distillation losses account for a large portion of the performance.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 7
- It may state two separate claims as one. 2
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“environmental cost of exponentially scaling these models' computational requirements as mentioned in Schwartz et al. [2019], Strubell et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Schwartz et al., 2019 source
The Abstract (p. 1) says the computations required for deep learning research have been doubling every few months and have a large carbon footprint. Section 2, “Red AI” (p. 4), likewise warns that the environmental cost of increasingly large models will not decrease soon. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites Strubell et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) says that computationally hungry NLP models require considerable energy and have associated environmental costs. It also says model development can multiply those costs thousands of times, but it does not establish that the models’ computational requirements are scaling exponentially. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We applied best practices for training BERT model recently proposed in Liu et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Liu et al., 2019 source
The Introduction (p. 1) says Liu et al. propose an improved recipe for training BERT, and Section 4 (p. 4) evaluates which choices matter for BERT pretraining. The citing authors’ statement that they applied those practices to DistilBERT describes their own work, not a finding attributed to Liu et al. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among the 9 tasks, DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We further demonstrated that DistilBERT is a compelling option for edge applications.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“BERT and DistilBERT results are the medians of 5 runs with different seeds.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“current research 1 on pre-trained models indicates that training even larger models still leads to better performances on downstream tasks.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites MegatronLM
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We report scores on the development sets for each task by fine-tuning DistilBERT without the use of ensembling or multi-tasking scheme for fine-tuning (which are mostly orthogonal to the present work).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Operating large pre-trained models on-device in real-time is hampered by their growing computational and memory requirements.
“the growing computational and memory requirements of these models may hamper wide adoption.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Near-zero probabilities in a trained model's output distribution reflect its generalization capabilities.
“some of these”
The paper relies on this without support.
Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
“Inference time of a full pass of GLUE task STS-B (sentiment analysis) on CPU with a batch size of 1.”
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This idea has been successfully applied to LLMs, where distilled students approximate the generation patterns of larger teachers while retaining much of their performance (Sanh et al., 2019).”
From Vision-Guided Iterative Refinement for Frontend Code Generation (2026) · cites this paper as Sanh et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“even benchmarking is not a reliable estimator of parameter count [12], [15], [28], [29]”
From Hollow-LLM Attack: Computationally Trivial Weights in Zero-Knowledge Verification of LLM Inference (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It achieves similar performance to the original BERT model while using fewer resources. The approach leveraged knowledge distillation during the pretraining phase and reduced the size of general BERT by 40%, yet it retained a language understanding capability of 97%.”
From A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [53]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Unlike in many similar circumstances, we do not employ knowledge distillation [56], because we discovered that for our sizes of the models, this technique does not provide any quality improvement.”
From Full Line Code Completion: Bringing AI to Desktop (2024) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ 4.1 Downstream task benchmark · p. 3
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
§ 3 DistilBERT: a distilled version of BERT · p. 3
“| DistilBERT (D) | - | 79.1/86.9 |”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
Reported 19 · recomputed 16.5
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.02531 · Cited by 14,204
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 · Cited by 8,741
Self-citationSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding
Wang, A., Singh, A., Michael, J., Hill, F., Levy, O., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5446 · Cited by 4,222
Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis
Maas, A. L., Daly, R. E., Pham, P. T., Huang, D., Ng, A. Y., & Potts, C. (2011) · Cited by 3,710
Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cristian Bucila, Rich Caruana, and Alexandru Niculescu-Mizil. Model compression. In KDD , 2006.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,701–1,800 of 4,692
Efficient Text Classification with Echo State Networks
Cabessa, J., Hernault, H., Kim, H., Lamonato, Y., & Levy, Y. Z. (2021) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn52387.2021.9533958 · Cited by 13
Multilingual AMR Parsing with Noisy Knowledge Distillation
Cai, D., Li, X., Ho, J. C.-S., Bing, L., & Lam, W. P. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.237 · Cited by 10
Exploration of Spanish Word Embeddings for Lexical Simplification.
Alarcón, R., Moreno, L., & Martı́nez, P. (2021) · Cited by 10
Developing a Benchmark for Reducing Data Bias in Authorship Attribution
Murauer, B., & Specht, G. (2021) · Workshop on Evaluation and Comparison of NLP Systems (Eval4NLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eval4nlp-1.18 · Cited by 11
Metadata Shaping: A Simple Approach for Knowledge-Enhanced Language Models
Arora, S., Wu, S., Liu, E., & Ré, C. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-acl.137 · Cited by 10
Are Synonym Substitution Attacks Really Synonym Substitution Attacks?
Chiang, C.-H., & Lee, H.-Y. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.117 · Cited by 14
VIRT: Improving Representation-based Text Matching via Virtual Interaction
Li, D., Yang, Y., Tang, H., Liu, J., Wang, Q., Wang, J., Xu, T., Wu, W., & Chen, E. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.59 · Cited by 10
IC3: Image Captioning by Committee Consensus
Chan, D., Myers, A., Vijayanarasimhan, S., Ross, D., & Canny, J. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.556 · Cited by 18
Model-Driven Development of Web APIs to Access Integrated Tabular Open Data
González-Mora, C., Tomás, D., Garrigós, I., Zubcoff, J., & Mazón, J.-N. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3036462 · Cited by 10
How “BERTology" Changed the State-of-the-Art also for Italian NLP
Tamburini, F. (2020) · Accademia University Press eBooks · doi:10.4000/books.aaccademia.8920 · Cited by 10
Learning to Augment for Data-scarce Domain BERT Knowledge Distillation
Feng, L., Qiu, M., Li, Y., Zheng, H.-T., & Shen, Y. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i8.16910 · Cited by 10
Decaying momentum helps neural network trainingPreprint
Chen, J., & Kyrillidis, A. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 12
Batch Clustering for Multilingual News StreamingPreprint
Linger, M., & Hajaiej, M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.08123 · Cited by 10
Adversarial NLI for Factual Correctness in Text Summarisation Models
Barrantes, M., Herudek, B., & Wang, R. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.11739 · Cited by 10
Real-Time Execution of Large-scale Language Models on MobilePreprint
Niu, W., Kong, Z., Yuan, G., Jiang, W., Guan, J., Ding, C., Zhao, P., Liu, S., Ren, B., & Wang, Y. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.06823 · Cited by 14
Identifying COVID-19 Fake News in Social MediaPreprint
Raha, T., Indurthi, V., Upadhyaya, A., Kataria, J., Bommakanti, P., Keswani, & Varma, V. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.11954 · Cited by 17
Identifying Machine-Paraphrased PlagiarismPreprint
Wahle, J. P., Ruas, T., Foltýnek, T., Meuschke, N., & Gipp, B. (2023) · doi:10.22541/au.167528156.61938925/v1 · Cited by 10
Intra-Document Cascading: Learning to Select Passages for Neural Document RankingPreprint
Hofstätter, S., Mitra, B., Zamani, H., Craswell, N., & Hanbury, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.09816 · Cited by 10
Roemmele, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.04007 · Cited by 24
Like Article, Like Audience: Enforcing Multimodal Correlations for Disinformation DetectionPreprint
Allein, L., Moens, M., & Perrotta, D. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.13892 · Cited by 21
Adversarial Token Attacks on Vision TransformersPreprint
Joshi, A., Jagatap, G., & Hegde, C. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.04337 · Cited by 20
Li, X., Hu, C., Li, W., Ruan, M., Yu, X., Paul, L. K., & Wang, S. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4359726/v1 · Cited by 10
Anonymity and Identity OnlinePreprint
Ederer, F. P., Goldsmith-Pinkham, P. S., & Jensen, K. L. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5095583 · Cited by 10
Learning Interpretable Style Embeddings via Prompting LLMs
Patel, A., Rao, D., Kothary, A., McKeown, K., & Callison-Burch, C. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.12696 · Cited by 10
Cross-Lingual Transfer with Language-Specific Subnetworks for Low-Resource Dependency Parsing
Choenni, R., Garrette, D., & Shutova, E. (2023) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00482 · Cited by 17
RoBERTa-CoA: RoBERTa-Based Effective Finetuning Method Using Co-Attention
Kim, J.-H., Park, S.-W., Kim, J.-Y., Park, J., Jung, S.-H., & Sim, C.-B. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3328352 · Cited by 12
Efficient Transformer Knowledge Distillation: A Performance Review
Brown, N., Williamson, A., Anderson, T., & Lawrence, L. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-industry.6 · Cited by 12
ClimateBERT-NetZero: Detecting and Assessing Net Zero and Reduction Targets
Schimanski, T., Bingler, J., Kraus, M., Hyslop, C., & Leippold, M. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.975 · Cited by 15
SOAP classifier for free-text clinical notes with domain-specific pre-trained language models
de Oliveira, J. M., Antunes, R. S., & da Costa, C. A. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.123046 · Cited by 9
Multimodal Temporal Fusion Transformers are Good Product Demand Forecasters
Sukel, M., Rudinac, S., & Worring, M. (2024) · IEEE Multimedia · doi:10.1109/mmul.2024.3373827 · Cited by 11
Towards smarter hiring: resume parsing and ranking with YOLOv5 and DistilBERT
Kinger, S., Kinger, D., Thakkar, S., & Bhake, D. (2024) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-024-18778-9 · Cited by 13
TACIT: A Target-Agnostic Feature Disentanglement Framework for Cross-Domain Text Classification
Song, R. F., Giunchiglia, F., Li, Y., Tian, M., & Xu, H. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i17.29866 · Cited by 10
Virtual Steps: The Experience of Walking for a Lifelong Wheelchair User in Virtual Reality
Taheri, A., Caetano, A., & Sra, M. (2024) · IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces · doi:10.1109/vr58804.2024.00040 · Cited by 10
Enhancing Procedural Writing Through Personalized Example Retrieval: A Case Study on Cooking Recipes
Mejia‐Domenzain, P., Frej, J., Neshaei, S. P., Mouchel, L., Nazaretsky, T., Wambsganß, T., Bosselut, A., & Käser, T. (2024) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-024-00405-1 · Cited by 10
Resume Ranking and Shortlisting with DistilBERT and XLM
Mukherjee, A., & Salma, M. U. (2024) · doi:10.1109/icwite59797.2024.10502523 · Cited by 9
Sadick, A.-M., Gurmu, A. T., & Gunarathna, C. L. (2024) · Engineering Construction & Architectural Management · doi:10.1108/ecam-11-2023-1108 · Cited by 9
MAC: Masked Contrastive Pre-Training for Efficient Video-Text Retrieval
Shu, F., Chen, B., Liao, Y., Wang, J., & Liu, S. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2024.3402613 · Cited by 23
Assessing the evolution of research topics in a biological field using plant science as an example
Shiu, S., & Lehti‐Shiu, M. D. (2024) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002612 · Cited by 11
Scene Graph-Aware Hierarchical Fusion Network for Remote Sensing Image Retrieval With Text Feedback
Wang, F., Zhu, X., Liu, X., Zhang, Y., & Li, Y. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2024.3404605 · Cited by 10
Private Collaborative Edge Inference via Over-the-Air Computation
Yilmaz, S. F., Hasırcıoglu, B., Qiao, L., & Gündüz, D. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Machine Learning in Communications and Networking · doi:10.1109/tmlcn.2025.3526551 · Cited by 9
Channel State Information Extrapolation in Fluid Antenna Systems Based on Masked Language Model
Wu, X., Zhang, H., Wang, C., & Li, Z. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Communications workshops · doi:10.1109/iccworkshops59551.2024.10615662 · Cited by 9
Aydın, N., Erdem, O. A., & Tekerek, A. (2024) · Journal of Polytechnic · doi:10.2339/politeknik.1469530 · Cited by 10
Movie trailer genre classification using multimodal pretrained features
Sulun, S., Viana, P., & Davies, M. E. P. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125209 · Cited by 14
Framework for automation of short answer grading based on domain-specific pre-training
Bonthu, S., Sree, S. R., & Prasad, M. H. M. K. (2024) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109163 · Cited by 12
Reparameterization of Lightweight Transformer for On-Device Speech Emotion Recognition
Zhang, Z., Dong, Z., Xu, W., & Han, J. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3483232 · Cited by 10
Hutto, A., Zikry, T. M., Bohac, B., Rose, T. L., Staebler, J., Slay, J., Cheever, C. R., Kosorok, M. R., & Nash, R. P. (2024) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/14604582241296411 · Cited by 8
RTA: A reinforcement learning-based temporal knowledge graph question answering model
Zhu, Y., Ma, T., Sun, S., Rong, H., Bian, Y., & Huang, K. (2024) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128994 · Cited by 9
Integrating advanced vision-language models for context recognition in risks assessment
Rodriguez-Juan, J., Ortiz-Pérez, D., García‐Rodríguez, J., Tomás, D., & Nalepa, G. J. (2024) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2024.129131 · Cited by 11
Vuong, T. T. L., & Kwak, J. T. (2024) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2024.103421 · Cited by 13
Mapping human security strategies to sustainable development goals: a machine learning approach
Koundouri, P., Aslanidis, P. C., Dellis, K., Plataniotis, A., & Feretzakis, G. (2025) · Discover Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s43621-025-00883-w · Cited by 12
Soud, M., Nuutinen, W., & Liebel, G. (2025) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2025.112406 · Cited by 19
Shivashankar, K., Orucevic, M., Kruke, M. M., & Martini, A. (2025) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2025.112435 · Cited by 13
Kazi, S., Khoja, S., & Daud, A. (2025) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2025.100756 · Cited by 9
Analyzing aesthetics, attractiveness and color of gastronomic images for user engagement
Casales-Garcia, V., Museros, L., Sanz, I., & Gonzalez-Abril, L. (2025) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2025.101358 · Cited by 8
Machine learning and natural language processing models to predict the extent of food processing
Arora, N., Bhagat, S., Dhama, R., & Bagler, G. (2025) · Journal of Food Composition and Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jfca.2025.107938 · Cited by 14
Sentiment analysis for depression detection: A stacking ensemble-based deep learning approach
Noor, K., Rehman, M., Anjum, M., Hussain, A., & Saleem, R. (2025) · International Journal of Information Management Data Insights · doi:10.1016/j.jjimei.2025.100358 · Cited by 10
Aghayengejeh, N. P., Balafar, M. A., & Nikzad-Khasmakhi, N. (2025) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2025.100792 · Cited by 10
Machine learning applications in climate finance: An overview
Tian, Y., Wen, H., & Guo, K. (2025) · Research in International Business and Finance · doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103063 · Cited by 10
Textual and AI-based analysis of climate disclosures: Evidence from the European energy sector
Parnaudeau, M. (2025) · The British Accounting Review · doi:10.1016/j.bar.2025.101736 · Cited by 12
Distill, Adapt, Distill: Training Small, In-Domain Models for Neural Machine Translation
Gordon, M. A., & Duh, K. (2020) · Workshop on Neural Generation and Translation (WNGT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.ngt-1.12 · Cited by 10
BERT at SemEval-2020 Task 8: Using BERT to Analyse Meme Emotions
Avvaru, A., & Vobilisetty, S. (2020) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.semeval-1.144 · Cited by 11
Multidomain Pretrained Language Models for Green NLP
Maronikolakis, A., & Schütze, H. (2021) · Cited by 9
Double Perturbation: On the Robustness of Robustness and Counterfactual Bias Evaluation
Zhang, C., Zhao, J., Zhang, H., Chang, K.-W., & Hsieh, C. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.305 · Cited by 9
Thermostat: A Large Collection of NLP Model Explanations and Analysis Tools
Feldhus, N., Schwarzenberg, R., & Möller, S. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-demo.11 · Cited by 9
On the Usability of Transformers-based models for a French Question-Answering task
QWANT, 9. N.-S.-S., Cattan, O., Université Paris-Saclay, C., Servan, C., QWANT, 9. N.-S.-S., Rosset, S., & Université Paris-Saclay, C. (2021) · International conference Recent advances in natural language processing · doi:10.26615/978-954-452-072-4_029 · Cited by 13
CS-BERT: a pretrained model for customer service dialogues
Wang, P., Fang, J., & Reinspach, J. (2021) · Workshop on NLP for Conversational AI (NLP4ConvAI) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.nlp4convai-1.13 · Cited by 9
FullStop: Multilingual Deep Models for Punctuation Prediction.
Guhr, O., Schumann, A.-K., Bahrmann, F., & Böhme, H.-J. (2021) · Cited by 9
Automated Essay Scoring Using Transformer Models
Ludwig, S., Mayer, C., Hansen, C., Eilers, K., & Brandt, S. (2021) · Psych · doi:10.3390/psych3040056 · Cited by 90
Peyrard, M., Ghotra, S., Josifoski, M., Agarwal, V., Patra, B., Carignan, D., Kıcıman, E., Tiwary, S., & West, R. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.387 · Cited by 11
An Empirical Study on Adaptive Inference for Pretrained Language Model
Liu, W., Zhao, X. W., Zhao, Z., Ju, Q., Yang, X., & Lü, W. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2021.3114188 · Cited by 9
Domain-Specific Language Model Pre-Training for Korean Tax Law Classification
Gu, Y. H., Piao, X., Yin, H., Dong, J., Zheng, R., & Yoo, S. J. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3164098 · Cited by 11
A Neural Model to Jointly Predict and Explain Truthfulness of Statements
Brand, E., Roitero, K., Soprano, M., Rahimi, A., & Demartini, G. (2022) · Journal of Data and Information Quality · doi:10.1145/3546917 · Cited by 12
Efficient, Uncertainty-based Moderation of Neural Networks Text Classifiers
Andersen, J. S., & Maalej, W. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-acl.121 · Cited by 11
An End-to-End Dialogue Summarization System for Sales Calls
Asi, A., Wang, S., Eisenstadt, R., Geckt, D., Kuper, Y., Mao, Y., & Ronen, R. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-industry.6 · Cited by 14
Laippala, V., Rönnqvist, S., Oinonen, M., Kyröläinen, A.-J., Salmela, A., Biber, D., Egbert, J., & Pyysalo, S. (2022) · Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.1007/s10579-022-09624-1 · Cited by 14
Summarization and Simplification of Medical Articles using Natural Language Processing
Patel, S. J., Nargunde, R., Verma, S., & Dhage, S. (2022) · International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT) · doi:10.1109/icccnt54827.2022.9984491 · Cited by 9
Overlapping word removal is all you need: revisiting data imbalance in hope speech detection
LekshmiAmmal, H. R., Ravikiran, M., Nisha, G., Balamuralidhar, N., Madhusoodanan, A., Kumar, M. A., & Chakravarthi, B. R. (2023) · Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1080/0952813x.2023.2166130 · Cited by 9
FakedBits- Detecting Fake Information on Social Platforms using Multi-Modal Features
Sharma, D. K., Singh, B., Agarwal, S., et al. (2023) · KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems · doi:10.3837/tiis.2023.01.004 · Cited by 9
A Lecture Centric Automated Distractor Generation for Post-Graduate Software Engineering Courses
Chughtai, R., Azam, F., Anwar, M. W., Butt, W. H., & Farooq, M. U. (2022) · International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology (FIT) · doi:10.1109/fit57066.2022.00028 · Cited by 9
Improving Pre-trained Language Models
Paaß, G., & Giesselbach, S. (2023) · Artificial intelligence: foundations, theory, and algorithms/Artificial intelligence: Foundations, theory, and algorithms · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-23190-2_3 · Cited by 9
Designing an Educational Chatbot with Joint Intent Classification and Slot Filling
Wang, Y., Liu, S., & Song, L. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering · doi:10.1109/tale54877.2022.00069 · Cited by 10
Budak, C., Stroud, N. J., Muddiman, A., et al. (2023) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2023.2222382 · Cited by 9
Learning to Imagine: Distillation-Based Interactive Context Exploitation for Dialogue State Tracking
Guo, J., Shuang, K., Zhang, K., Liu, Y., Li, J., & Wang, Z. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i11.26510 · Cited by 9
LMRank: Utilizing Pre-Trained Language Models and Dependency Parsing for Keyphrase Extraction
Giarelis, N., & Karacapilidis, N. I. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3294716 · Cited by 11
Context-aware Bug Reproduction for Mobile Apps
Huang, Y., Wang, J., Liu, Z., Wang, S., Chen, C., Li, M., & Wang, Q. (2023) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1109/icse48619.2023.00196 · Cited by 10
Pre-training Two BERT-Like Models for Moroccan Dialect: MorRoBERTa and MorrBERT
Moussaoui, O., & Younoussi, Y. E. (2023) · MENDEL · doi:10.13164/mendel.2023.1.055 · Cited by 10
Bernstein, I. A., Koornwinder, A., Hwang, H. H., & Wang, S. Y. (2023) · Ophthalmology Science · doi:10.1016/j.xops.2023.100371 · Cited by 9
Don’t Retrain, Just Rewrite: Countering Adversarial Perturbations by Rewriting Text
Gupta, A., Blum, C., Choji, T., Fei, Y., Shah, S., Vempala, A., & Srikumar, V. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.781 · Cited by 10
Holistic Sentence Embeddings for Better Out-of-Distribution Detection
Chen, S., Bi, X., Gao, R., & Sun, X. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.497 · Cited by 9
Fast Vocabulary Transfer for Language Model Compression
Gee, L., Zugarini, A., Rigutini, L., & Torroni, P. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-industry.41 · Cited by 22
Zanwar, S., Wiechmann, D., Qiao, Y., & Kerz, E. (2022) · Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science (NLP+CSS) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.nlpcss-1.1 · Cited by 18
Evaluating Transfer Learning for Simplifying GitHub READMEs
Gao, H., Treude, C., & Zahedi, M. (2023) · ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE) · doi:10.1145/3611643.3616291 · Cited by 11
Task-specific Compression for Multi-task Language Models using Attribution-based Pruning
Yang, N., Jang, Y., Lee, H., Jeong, S., & Jung, K. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-eacl.43 · Cited by 16
TaghiBeyglou, B., & Rudzicz, F. (2023) · Natural Language Processing Journal · doi:10.1016/j.nlp.2023.100046 · Cited by 12
Event Causality Extraction via Implicit Cause-Effect Interactions
Liu, J., Zhang, Z., Wei, K., Guo, Z. M., Sun, X., Li, J., & Li, X. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.420 · Cited by 9
NLI4CT: Multi-Evidence Natural Language Inference for Clinical Trial Reports
Jullien, M., Valentino, M., Frost, H., O’Regan, P., Landers, D., & Freitas, A. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.1041 · Cited by 17
Kotstein, S., & Decker, C. (2024) · Cluster Computing · doi:10.1007/s10586-023-04237-x · Cited by 9
An Ensemble Approach to Question Classification: Integrating Electra Transformer, GloVe, and LSTM
Aburass, S., Dorgham, O. M., & Rumman, M. A. (2024) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2024.0150148 · Cited by 14
Cyberbullying detection based on the fusion of DistilBERT and SIMHASH Technique
Kumar, C., Kumar, K. A., Gupta, S. K., & Sardar, T. H. (2024) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Applications Theme: Healthcare and Internet of Things (AIMLA) · doi:10.1109/aimla59606.2024.10531427 · Cited by 9
A Novel Transformer Based Deep Learning Approach of Sentiment Analysis for Movie Reviews
Saad, T. B., Ahmed, M., Ahmed, B., & Sazan, S. A. (2024) · International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Information Communication Technology · doi:10.1109/iceeict62016.2024.10534588 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., & Wolf, T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1910.01108
- OpenAlex
- W2978017171
- Cited by
- 4,653
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 443 · 2024: 801 · 2023: 1136 · 2022: 736 · 2021: 968 · 2020: 486 · 2019: 15
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- DistilBERT, knowledge distillation, BERT, pre-training, model compression, on-device computation, language modeling, transfer learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-23, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-23 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
