The DOI matches its DataCite record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 4 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter
Open accessAbstract
As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative on-device study.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
DistilBERT is a distilled version of BERT pre-trained with knowledge distillation, reducing parameters by 40% while retaining 97% of BERT’s GLUE performance and running 60% faster at inference. It is presented as a general-purpose, lighter model suitable for constrained and on-device NLP applications.
Key findings
- DistilBERT has 66M parameters vs. BERT-base’s 110M and takes 410s vs. 668s for a CPU inference pass on STS-B, i.e. 40% smaller and 60% faster.
- On GLUE dev sets, DistilBERT scores 77.0 macro-score vs. BERT-base’s 79.5, retaining 97% of performance; it is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline.
- On IMDb test accuracy, DistilBERT reaches 92.82 vs. BERT-base’s 93.46; on SQuAD v1.1, DistilBERT reaches 77.7/85.8 EM/F1 vs. BERT-base’s 81.2/88.5.
- Ablations show removing the cosine loss costs -2.96 GLUE macro-score, removing distillation loss costs -1.46, removing MLM loss costs -0.31, and random initialization costs -3.69.
Methods
- Knowledge distillation during pre-training: a student with BERT’s architecture but half the layers, no token-type embeddings and no pooler, initialized from every other teacher layer.
- Training objective is a triple loss combining distillation loss \(L_{ce}\), masked language modeling loss \(L_{mlm}\), and cosine embedding loss \(L_{cos}\), using softmax-temperature.
- Trained on English Wikipedia + Toronto Book Corpus with large batches up to 4K examples, dynamic masking, no next-sentence prediction, on 8 16GB V100 GPUs for approximately 90 hours; evaluated on GLUE, IMDb, SQuAD v1.1, CPU inference, and an iPhone 7 Plus on-device proof-of-concept.
Limitations
- The paper does not state an explicit limitations section.
- Evident from the text: evaluation is limited to English benchmarks and a small set of downstream tasks, and the on-device study is described as a proof-of-concept; the model could be further reduced with quantization.
- Evident from the text: the SQuAD second-distillation result is reported inconsistently—the prose says 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, while Table 2 lists DistilBERT (D) as 79.1/86.9.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
15 Own result · 6 Own interpretation · 2 Own method · 2 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · 1 Sources not found · accuracy not yet measured
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be finetuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
“Our general-purpose pre-trained models can be fine-tuned with good performances on several downstream tasks, keeping the flexibility of larger models.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further ablation studies indicate that all the components of the triple loss are important for best performances.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Excluding the tokenization step, DistilBERT is 71% faster than BERT, and the whole model weighs 207 MB (which could be further reduced with quantization).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found it beneficial to add a cosine embedding loss ( L cos ) which will tend to align the directions of the student and teacher hidden states vectors.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On SQuAD, DistilBERT is within 3.9 points of the full BERT.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
“DistilBERT also compares surprisingly well to BERT, retaining 97% of the performance with 40% fewer parameters.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“removing the Masked Language Modeling loss has little impact while the two distillation losses account for a large portion of the performance.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 7
- It may state two separate claims as one. 2
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“environmental cost of exponentially scaling these models' computational requirements as mentioned in Schwartz et al. [2019], Strubell et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Schwartz et al., 2019 source
The Abstract (p. 1) says the computations required for deep learning research have been doubling every few months and have a large carbon footprint. Section 2, “Red AI” (p. 4), likewise warns that the environmental cost of increasingly large models will not decrease soon. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites Strubell et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) says that computationally hungry NLP models require considerable energy and have associated environmental costs. It also says model development can multiply those costs thousands of times, but it does not establish that the models’ computational requirements are scaling exponentially. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We applied best practices for training BERT model recently proposed in Liu et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Liu et al., 2019 source
The Introduction (p. 1) says Liu et al. propose an improved recipe for training BERT, and Section 4 (p. 4) evaluates which choices matter for BERT pretraining. The citing authors’ statement that they applied those practices to DistilBERT describes their own work, not a finding attributed to Liu et al. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among the 9 tasks, DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We further demonstrated that DistilBERT is a compelling option for edge applications.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“BERT and DistilBERT results are the medians of 5 runs with different seeds.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“current research 1 on pre-trained models indicates that training even larger models still leads to better performances on downstream tasks.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites MegatronLM
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We report scores on the development sets for each task by fine-tuning DistilBERT without the use of ensembling or multi-tasking scheme for fine-tuning (which are mostly orthogonal to the present work).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Operating large pre-trained models on-device in real-time is hampered by their growing computational and memory requirements.
“the growing computational and memory requirements of these models may hamper wide adoption.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Near-zero probabilities in a trained model's output distribution reflect its generalization capabilities.
“some of these”
The paper relies on this without support.
Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
“Inference time of a full pass of GLUE task STS-B (sentiment analysis) on CPU with a batch size of 1.”
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This idea has been successfully applied to LLMs, where distilled students approximate the generation patterns of larger teachers while retaining much of their performance (Sanh et al., 2019).”
From Vision-Guided Iterative Refinement for Frontend Code Generation (2026) · cites this paper as Sanh et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“even benchmarking is not a reliable estimator of parameter count [12], [15], [28], [29]”
From Hollow-LLM Attack: Computationally Trivial Weights in Zero-Knowledge Verification of LLM Inference (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It achieves similar performance to the original BERT model while using fewer resources. The approach leveraged knowledge distillation during the pretraining phase and reduced the size of general BERT by 40%, yet it retained a language understanding capability of 97%.”
From A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [53]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Unlike in many similar circumstances, we do not employ knowledge distillation [56], because we discovered that for our sizes of the models, this technique does not provide any quality improvement.”
From Full Line Code Completion: Bringing AI to Desktop (2024) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ 4.1 Downstream task benchmark · p. 3
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
§ 3 DistilBERT: a distilled version of BERT · p. 3
“| DistilBERT (D) | - | 79.1/86.9 |”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
Reported 19 · recomputed 16.5
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.02531 · Cited by 14,204
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 · Cited by 8,741
Self-citationSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding
Wang, A., Singh, A., Michael, J., Hill, F., Levy, O., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5446 · Cited by 4,222
Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis
Maas, A. L., Daly, R. E., Pham, P. T., Huang, D., Ng, A. Y., & Potts, C. (2011) · Cited by 3,710
Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cristian Bucila, Rich Caruana, and Alexandru Niculescu-Mizil. Model compression. In KDD , 2006.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,401–1,500 of 4,692
Lacruz-Pleguezuelos, B., Piette, O., Garranzo, M., Pérez-Serrano, D., Milešević, J. P., Espinosa‐Salinas, I., de Molina, A. R., Laguna, T., & Pau, E. C. D. S. (2023) · Database · doi:10.1093/database/baad075 · Cited by 13
Wilson, M., Petty, J., & Frank, R. (2023) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00608 · Cited by 14
Exploring the sentiment in Borsa Istanbul with deep learning
Atak, A. (2023) · Borsa Istanbul Review · doi:10.1016/j.bir.2023.12.010 · Cited by 15
Noorian, Z., Ghenai, A., Moradisani, H., Zarrinkalam, F., & Alavijeh, S. Z. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2024.3359010 · Cited by 13
Zou, L., He, Z., Zhou, C., & Zhu, W. (2024) · International Journal of Digital Earth · doi:10.1080/17538947.2024.2348668 · Cited by 18
Discrete Prompt Compression With Reinforcement Learning
Jung, H., & Kim, K.-J. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3403426 · Cited by 29
Ortakcı, Y. (2024) · Engineering Science and Technology an International Journal · doi:10.1016/j.jestch.2024.101730 · Cited by 22
Prytula, M. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.15407/jai2024.02.085 · Cited by 26
Optimizing Supply Chain Risk Management: An Integrated Framework Leveraging Large Language Models
Zhao, M., Hussain, O. K., Zhang, Y., & Saberi, M. (2024) · IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence (CAI) · doi:10.1109/cai59869.2024.00192 · Cited by 15
SinKD: Sinkhorn Distance Minimization for Knowledge Distillation
Cui, X., Qin, Y., Gao, Y., Zhang, E., Xu, Z., Wu, T., Li, K., Sun, X., Zhou, W., & Li, H. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2024.3501335 · Cited by 15
He, L. (2024) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2024.1477714 · Cited by 16
A comparative analysis on using GPT and BERT for automated vulnerability scoring
Mirtaheri, S. L., Pugliese, A., Movahedkor, N., & Shahbazian, R. (2025) · Intelligent Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.iswa.2025.200515 · Cited by 20
Revolutionizing Mental Health Sentiment Analysis With BERT-Fuse: A Hybrid Deep Learning Model
Hossain, M. M., Sanjara, Hossain, M. S., Chaki, S., Rahman, M. S., & Ali, A. B. M. S. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3568340 · Cited by 19
SimiT: A Text Similarity Method Using Lexicon and Dependency Representations
İnan, E. (2020) · New Generation Computing · doi:10.1007/s00354-020-00099-8 · Cited by 13
Probing for Multilingual Numerical Understanding in Transformer-Based Language Models
Johnson, D., Mak, D., Barker, A., & Loessberg-Zahl, L. (2020) · BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP (BlackboxNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.blackboxnlp-1.18 · Cited by 13
Controlling Patent Text Generation by Structural Metadata
Lee, J.-S. (2020) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3340531.3418503 · Cited by 14
BERTino: an Italian DistilBERT model
Muffo, M., & Bertino, E. (2020) · Accademia University Press eBooks · doi:10.4000/books.aaccademia.8748 · Cited by 18
BERT2DNN: BERT Distillation with Massive Unlabeled Data for Online E-Commerce Search
Jiang, Y., Shang, Y., Liu, Z., Shen, H., Xiao, Y., Xu, S., Xiong, W., Yan, W., & Jin, D. (2020) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm50108.2020.00030 · Cited by 14
Yes We can: Watermarking Machine Learning Models beyond Classification
Lounici, S., Njeh, M., Ermiş, O., Önen, M., & Trabelsi, S. (2021) · IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop (CSFW) · doi:10.1109/csf51468.2021.00044 · Cited by 13
Language Representation Models for Music Genre Classification Using Lyrics
Akalp, H., Çiğdem, E. F., Yilmaz, S., Bölücü, N., & Can, B. (2021) · International Symposium on Electrical, Electronics and Information Engineering (ISEEIE) · doi:10.1145/3459104.3459171 · Cited by 14
ThreshNet: An Efficient DenseNet Using Threshold Mechanism to Reduce Connections
Ju, R., Lin, T.-Y., Jian, J.-H., Chiang, J., & Yang, W.-B. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3196492 · Cited by 13
Adversarial Data Augmentation for Task-Specific Knowledge Distillation of Pre-trained Transformers
Zhang, M., Naresh, N. U., & He, Y. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i10.21423 · Cited by 14
E8-IJS@LT-EDI-ACL2022 - BERT, AutoML and Knowledge-graph backed Detection of Depression
Tavchioski, I., Koloski, B., Škrlj, B., & Pollak, S. (2022) · Workshop on Language Technology for Equality, Diversity, Inclusion (LT-EDI) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.ltedi-1.36 · Cited by 14
scubeMSEC@LT-EDI-ACL2022: Detection of Depression using Transformer Models
Sivamanikandan, S., Santhosh, V. C. S., Sanjaykumar, N., et al. (2022) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.ltedi-1.29 · Cited by 13
Cross-Lingual Cross-Modal Consolidation for Effective Multilingual Video Corpus Moment Retrieval
Liu, J., Yu, T., Peng, H., Sun, M., & Li, P. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-naacl.142 · Cited by 14
The Transformers’ Ability to Implement for Solving Intricacies of Language Processing
Singh, P. N., & Behera, S. (2022) · Asian Conference on Innovation in Technology (ASIANCON) · doi:10.1109/asiancon55314.2022.9909423 · Cited by 15
Neural Text Classification for Digital Transformation in the Financial Regulatory Domain
Correa, N., & Correa, A. (2022) · IEEE ANDESCON · doi:10.1109/andescon56260.2022.9989638 · Cited by 13
Bhave, A., & Sinha, R. (2022) · IEEE International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation (SCAM) · doi:10.1109/scam55253.2022.00018 · Cited by 13
Explainable Cross-Topic Stance Detection for Search Results
Draws, T., Ramamurthy, K. N., Baldini, I., Dhurandhar, A., Padhi, I., Timmermans, B., & Tintarev, N. (2023) · Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3576840.3578296 · Cited by 13
Soft Target-Enhanced Matching Framework for Deep Entity Matching
Dou, W., Shen, D., Zhou, X., Nie, T., Kou, Y., Cui, H., & Yu, G. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i4.25544 · Cited by 13
A Feasible and Explainable Network Traffic Classifier Utilizing DistilBERT
Shin, C.-Y., Park, J.-T., Baek, U.-J., & Kim, M. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3293105 · Cited by 15
iSyn: Semi-automated Smart Contract Synthesis from Legal Financial Agreements
Fang, P., Zou, Z., Xiao, X., & Liu, Z. (2023) · ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA) · doi:10.1145/3597926.3598091 · Cited by 13
Using Contextual Sentence Analysis Models to Recognize ESG Concepts
Pontes, E. L., Jannet, M. A. B., Moreno, J. G., & Doucet, A. (2022) · Workshop on Financial Technology and Natural Language Processing (FinNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.finnlp-1.29 · Cited by 16
Empowering the Fact-checkers! Automatic Identification of Claim Spans on Twitter
Sundriyal, M., Kulkarni, A., Pulastya, V., Akhtar, M. S., & Chakraborty, T. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.525 · Cited by 17
Revisiting Grammatical Error Correction Evaluation and Beyond
Gong, P., Liu, X., Huang, H., & Zhang, M. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.463 · Cited by 15
ComFact: A Benchmark for Linking Contextual Commonsense Knowledge
Gao, S., Hwang, J. D., Kanno, S., Wakaki, H., Mitsufuji, Y., & Bosselut, A. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.120 · Cited by 16
Wang, R., Zhou, W., & Sachan, M. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.791 · Cited by 17
Multi-Objective Blended Ensemble For Highly Imbalanced Sequence Aware Tweet Engagement Prediction
Felicioni, N., Donati, A., Conterio, L., Bartoccioni, L., Hu, D. Y. X., Bernardis, C., & Dacrema, M. F. (2020) · ACM Recommender Systems Challenge (RecSys Challenge) · doi:10.1145/3415959.3415998 · Cited by 13
Fadel, A., Al‐Ayyoub, M., & Cambria, E. (2020) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.semeval-1.66 · Cited by 13
On the Interplay Between Fine-tuning and Composition in Transformers
Yu, L., & Ettinger, A. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.201 · Cited by 13
Chen, S., Huang, S., Pandey, S., Li, B., Gao, G. R., Zheng, L., Ding, C., & Liu, H. (2021) · International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (SC) · doi:10.1145/3458817.3476138 · Cited by 13
On the Effects of Transformer Size on In- and Out-of-Domain Calibration
Dan, S., & Roth, D. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.180 · Cited by 14
The Microsoft Toolkit of Multi-Task Deep Neural Networks for Natural Language UnderstandingPreprint
Liu, X., Wang, Y., Ji, J., Cheng, H., Zhu, X., Awa, E., He, P., Chen, W., Poon, H., Cao, G., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.07972 · Cited by 13
Tiny Transformers for Environmental Sound Classification at the EdgePreprint
Elliott, D., Otero, C. E., Wyatt, S., & Martino, E. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.12157 · Cited by 21
Intersectional Bias in Causal Language ModelsPreprint
Magee, L., Ghahremanlou, L., Soldatić, K., & Robertson, S. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.07691 · Cited by 42
Hi, my name is Martha: Using names to measure and mitigate bias in generative dialogue modelsPreprint
Smith, E. M., & Williams, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.03300 · Cited by 33
Ranking and Tuning Pre-trained Models: A New Paradigm for Exploiting Model HubsPreprint
You, K., Liu, Y., Zhang, Z., Wang, J., Jordan, M. I., & Long, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.10545 · Cited by 22
FQ-ViT: Fully Quantized Vision Transformer without RetrainingPreprint
Lin, Y., Zhang, T., Sun, P., Li, Z., & Zhou, S. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 13
Toward robust natural language systems
Moon, H. C. (2023) · DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) · doi:10.32657/10356/169803 · Cited by 13
An Applied Statistics dataset for human vs AI-generated answer classification
Salim, M. S., & Hossain, S. I. (2024) · Data in Brief · doi:10.1016/j.dib.2024.110240 · Cited by 14
LOLA: LLM-Assisted Online Learning Algorithm for Content ExperimentsPreprint
Ye, Z., Yoganarasimhan, H., & Zheng, Y. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4851778 · Cited by 23
Using large language models to extract plant functional traits from unstructured text
Domazetoski, V., Kreft, H., Bestová, H., Wieder, P., Koynov, R., Zarei, A., & Weigelt, P. (2025) · Applications in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1002/aps3.70011 · Cited by 23
Masking as an Efficient Alternative to Finetuning for Pretrained Language Models
Zhao, M., Lin, T., Mi, F., et al. (2020) · Open access LMU (Ludwid Maxmilian's Universitat Munchen) · doi:10.5282/ubm/epub.74038 · Cited by 12
Devine, R. T., Kovatchev, V., Grumley Traynor, I., Smith, P., & Lee, M. (2023) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0001186 · Cited by 12
Transformer-based Automatic Music Mood Classification Using Multi-modal Framework
Sujeesha, A. S., & Rajan, R. (2023) · Journal of Computer Science and Technology · doi:10.24215/16666038.23.e02 · Cited by 16
AD-KD: Attribution-Driven Knowledge Distillation for Language Model Compression
Wu, S., Chen, H., Quan, X., Wang, Q., & Wang, R. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.471 · Cited by 30
ReAugKD: Retrieval-Augmented Knowledge Distillation For Pre-trained Language Models
Zhang, J., Muhamed, A., Anantharaman, A., Wang, G., Chen, C., Zhong, K., Cui, Q., Xu, Y., Zeng, B., Chilimbi, T. M., et al. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-short.97 · Cited by 17
Bridging Fairness and Environmental Sustainability in Natural Language Processing
Hessenthaler, M., Strubell, E., Hovy, D., & Lauscher, A. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.533 · Cited by 16
SEAL: Interactive Tool for Systematic Error Analysis and Labeling
Rajani, N. F., Liang, W., Chen, L., Mitchell, M., & Zou, J. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-demos.36 · Cited by 19
PromptMix: A Class Boundary Augmentation Method for Large Language Model Distillation
Sahu, G., Vechtomova, O., Bahdanau, D., & Laradji, I. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.323 · Cited by 33
Entity recognition from colloquial text
Babaian, T., & Xu, J. (2024) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2024.114172 · Cited by 14
Network constraints on worker mobility
Frank, M. R., Moro, E., South, T., Rutherford, A., Pentland, A., Taska, B., & Rahwan, I. (2024) · Nature Cities · doi:10.1038/s44284-023-00009-1 · Cited by 13
Breaking The Limits of Text-conditioned 3D Motion Synthesis with Elaborative Descriptions
Qian, Y., Urbanek, J., Hauptmann, A. G., & Won, J. (2023) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.00219 · Cited by 14
Zhang, Z., Lu, Y., Wang, T., Wei, X., & Wei, Z. (2024) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2024.106164 · Cited by 12
A multimodal deep learning architecture for smoking detection with a small data approach
Lakatos, R., Pollner, P., Hajdú, A., & Joó, T. (2024) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2024.1326050 · Cited by 14
Ferraz, T. P., Boito, M. Z., Brun, C., & Nikoulina, V. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp48485.2024.10447520 · Cited by 19
Zeng, Z., Hong, Y., Dai, H., Zhuang, H., & Chen, C. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i17.29922 · Cited by 16
Processing Natural Language on Embedded Devices: How Well Do Transformer Models Perform?
Sarkar, S., Babar, M. F., Hassan, M. M., Hasan, M., & Karmaker, S. K. (2024) · ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering (ICPE) · doi:10.1145/3629526.3645054 · Cited by 19
Efficient Cross-Modal Video Retrieval With Meta-Optimized Frames
Han, N., Yang, X., Lim, E., Chen, H., & Sun, Q. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2024.3416669 · Cited by 13
The Fill-Mask Association Test (FMAT): Measuring propositions in natural language.
Bao, H. (2024) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000396 · Cited by 14
NLP-based smart decision making for business and academics
Sawant, P., & Sonawane, K. V. (2024) · Natural Language Processing Journal · doi:10.1016/j.nlp.2024.100090 · Cited by 16
Knowledge-prompted ChatGPT: Enhancing drug trafficking detection on social media
Hu, C., Liu, B., Li, X., Ye, Y., & Yin, M. (2024) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2024.104010 · Cited by 21
Zero-shot text classification with knowledge resources under label-fully-unseen setting
Wang, Y., Wang, W., Chen, Q., Huang, K., Nguyen, A., & De, S. (2024) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128580 · Cited by 14
PELA: Learning Parameter-Efficient Models with Low-Rank Approximation
Guo, Y., Wang, G., & Kankanhalli, M. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01486 · Cited by 14
DistilRoBiLSTMFuse: an efficient hybrid deep learning approach for sentiment analysis
Papia, S. K., Khan, M. A., Habib, T., Rahman, M., & Islam, M. N. (2024) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.2349 · Cited by 16
Ensemble learning approach for distinguishing human and computer-generated Arabic reviews
Alhayan, F., & Himdi, H. (2024) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.2345 · Cited by 13
Fine-tune BERT based on Machine Learning Models For Sentiment Analysis
Smairi, N., Abadlia, H., Brahim, H., & Chaari, W. L. (2024) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2024.09.531 · Cited by 17
TMAC: Training-Targeted Mapping and Architecture Co-Exploration for Wafer-Scale Chips
Wang, H., Yang, Q., Wei, T., Yu, X., Li, C., Fang, J., Lu, G., Dai, X., Liu, L., Jiang, S., et al. (2024) · Integrated Circuits and Systems · doi:10.23919/ics.2024.3515003 · Cited by 13
FLEX: Flexible Federated Learning Framework
Herrera, F., Jiménez-López, D., Argente-Garrido, A., Rodríguez-Barroso, N., Zuheros, C., Aguilera-Martos, I., Bello, B. L. M., García-Márquez, M., & Luzón, M. V. (2024) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102792 · Cited by 14
Pendyala, V. S., Kamdar, K., & Mulchandani, K. (2025) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics14020256 · Cited by 15
A novel rumor detection method focusing on social psychology with graph attention network
Li, L., Liu, G., Liu, Y., Yu, Q., Luo, C., & Li, N. (2025) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2025.129609 · Cited by 12
Text Classification by CEFR Levels Using Machine Learning Methods and the BERT Language Model
Lagutina, N. S., Lagutina, K. V., Brederman, A. M., & Николаевна, К. Н. (2024) · Automatic Control and Computer Sciences · doi:10.3103/s0146411624700329 · Cited by 13
Tamir, A., & Yuan, J. S. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3547594 · Cited by 14
Leveraging Large Language Models and Machine Learning for Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection
Hossain, S. M. M., Altarawneh, A., & Roberts, J. (2025) · IEEE Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC) · doi:10.1109/ccwc62904.2025.10903869 · Cited by 19
A Review of Machine Learning Approaches for Non-Invasive Cognitive Impairment Detection
Alsuhaibani, M., Fard, A. P., Sun, J., Poor, F. F., Pressman, P., & Mahoor, M. H. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3555176 · Cited by 20
ET-GNN: Ensemble Transformer-Based Graph Neural Networks for Holistic Automated Essay Scoring
Aljuaid, H., Alhothali, A., Alzamzami, O., et al. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3556352 · Cited by 12
Leveraging BERT, DistilBERT, and TinyBERT for Rumor Detection
Qazi, A., Goudar, R. H., Patil, R., Hukkeri, G. S., & Kulkarni, D. S. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3563301 · Cited by 14
RecSys 2020 Challenge Workshop: Engagement Prediction on Twitter’s Home Timeline
Anelli, V. W., Delić, A., Sottocornola, G., et al. (2020) · doi:10.1145/3383313.3411532 · Cited by 12
Virtual Pre-Service Teacher Assessment and Feedback via Conversational Agents
Datta, D., Phillips, M., Bywater, J. P., Chiu, J. L., Watson, G. S., Barnes, L. E., & Brown, D. E. (2021) · Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications · Cited by 12
Alleman, M., Mamou, J., Rio, M. A. D., Tang, H., Kim, Y., & Chung, S. (2021) · Workshop on Representation Learning for NLP (RepL4NLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.repl4nlp-1.27 · Cited by 17
Context-Sensitive Visualization of Deep Learning Natural Language Processing Models
Dunn, A., Inkpen, D. Z., & Andonie, R. (2021) · International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV) · doi:10.1109/iv53921.2021.00035 · Cited by 12
Du, J., Huang, Y., & Moilanen, K. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i14.17511 · Cited by 12
Exploiting ICD Hierarchy for Classification of EHRs in Spanish Through Multi-Task Transformers
Blanco, A., Pérez, A., & Casillas, A. (2021) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2021.3112130 · Cited by 13
UniDS: A Unified Dialogue System for Chit-Chat and Task-oriented Dialogues
Zhao, X., He, B., Wang, Y., Li, Y., Mi, F., Liu, Y., Jiang, X., Liu, Q., & Chen, H. (2022) · DialDoc Workshop on Document-grounded Dialogue and Conversational Question Answering (DialDoc) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.dialdoc-1.2 · Cited by 12
LIDSNet: A Lightweight on-device Intent Detection model using Deep Siamese Network
Agarwal, V., Shivnikar, S. D., Ghosh, S. K., Arora, H., & Saini, Y. (2021) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications · doi:10.1109/icmla52953.2021.00182 · Cited by 13
Liu, P., Wang, X., Wang, L., Ye, W., Xi, X., & Zhang, S. (2021) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3459637.3481909 · Cited by 14
Spinde, T. (2021) · IEEE ... International Conference on Data Mining workshops · doi:10.1109/icdmw53433.2021.00144 · Cited by 16
Using BERT for Multi-Label Multi-Language Web Page Classification
Artene, C.-G., Tibeică, M. N., & Leon, F. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing (ICCP) · doi:10.1109/iccp53602.2021.9733492 · Cited by 12
Social media data analysis framework for disaster response
Ponce-López, V., & Spataru, C. (2022) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-022-00026-4 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., & Wolf, T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1910.01108
- OpenAlex
- W2978017171
- Cited by
- 4,653
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 443 · 2024: 801 · 2023: 1136 · 2022: 736 · 2021: 968 · 2020: 486 · 2019: 15
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- DistilBERT, knowledge distillation, BERT, pre-training, model compression, on-device computation, language modeling, transfer learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-23, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-23 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
