The DOI matches its DataCite record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 4 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter
Open accessAbstract
As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative on-device study.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
DistilBERT is a distilled version of BERT pre-trained with knowledge distillation, reducing parameters by 40% while retaining 97% of BERT’s GLUE performance and running 60% faster at inference. It is presented as a general-purpose, lighter model suitable for constrained and on-device NLP applications.
Key findings
- DistilBERT has 66M parameters vs. BERT-base’s 110M and takes 410s vs. 668s for a CPU inference pass on STS-B, i.e. 40% smaller and 60% faster.
- On GLUE dev sets, DistilBERT scores 77.0 macro-score vs. BERT-base’s 79.5, retaining 97% of performance; it is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline.
- On IMDb test accuracy, DistilBERT reaches 92.82 vs. BERT-base’s 93.46; on SQuAD v1.1, DistilBERT reaches 77.7/85.8 EM/F1 vs. BERT-base’s 81.2/88.5.
- Ablations show removing the cosine loss costs -2.96 GLUE macro-score, removing distillation loss costs -1.46, removing MLM loss costs -0.31, and random initialization costs -3.69.
Methods
- Knowledge distillation during pre-training: a student with BERT’s architecture but half the layers, no token-type embeddings and no pooler, initialized from every other teacher layer.
- Training objective is a triple loss combining distillation loss \(L_{ce}\), masked language modeling loss \(L_{mlm}\), and cosine embedding loss \(L_{cos}\), using softmax-temperature.
- Trained on English Wikipedia + Toronto Book Corpus with large batches up to 4K examples, dynamic masking, no next-sentence prediction, on 8 16GB V100 GPUs for approximately 90 hours; evaluated on GLUE, IMDb, SQuAD v1.1, CPU inference, and an iPhone 7 Plus on-device proof-of-concept.
Limitations
- The paper does not state an explicit limitations section.
- Evident from the text: evaluation is limited to English benchmarks and a small set of downstream tasks, and the on-device study is described as a proof-of-concept; the model could be further reduced with quantization.
- Evident from the text: the SQuAD second-distillation result is reported inconsistently—the prose says 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, while Table 2 lists DistilBERT (D) as 79.1/86.9.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
15 Own result · 6 Own interpretation · 2 Own method · 2 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · 1 Sources not found · accuracy not yet measured
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be finetuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
“Our general-purpose pre-trained models can be fine-tuned with good performances on several downstream tasks, keeping the flexibility of larger models.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further ablation studies indicate that all the components of the triple loss are important for best performances.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Excluding the tokenization step, DistilBERT is 71% faster than BERT, and the whole model weighs 207 MB (which could be further reduced with quantization).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found it beneficial to add a cosine embedding loss ( L cos ) which will tend to align the directions of the student and teacher hidden states vectors.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On SQuAD, DistilBERT is within 3.9 points of the full BERT.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
“DistilBERT also compares surprisingly well to BERT, retaining 97% of the performance with 40% fewer parameters.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“removing the Masked Language Modeling loss has little impact while the two distillation losses account for a large portion of the performance.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 7
- It may state two separate claims as one. 2
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“environmental cost of exponentially scaling these models' computational requirements as mentioned in Schwartz et al. [2019], Strubell et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Schwartz et al., 2019 source
The Abstract (p. 1) says the computations required for deep learning research have been doubling every few months and have a large carbon footprint. Section 2, “Red AI” (p. 4), likewise warns that the environmental cost of increasingly large models will not decrease soon. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites Strubell et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) says that computationally hungry NLP models require considerable energy and have associated environmental costs. It also says model development can multiply those costs thousands of times, but it does not establish that the models’ computational requirements are scaling exponentially. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We applied best practices for training BERT model recently proposed in Liu et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Liu et al., 2019 source
The Introduction (p. 1) says Liu et al. propose an improved recipe for training BERT, and Section 4 (p. 4) evaluates which choices matter for BERT pretraining. The citing authors’ statement that they applied those practices to DistilBERT describes their own work, not a finding attributed to Liu et al. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among the 9 tasks, DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We further demonstrated that DistilBERT is a compelling option for edge applications.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“BERT and DistilBERT results are the medians of 5 runs with different seeds.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“current research 1 on pre-trained models indicates that training even larger models still leads to better performances on downstream tasks.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites MegatronLM
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We report scores on the development sets for each task by fine-tuning DistilBERT without the use of ensembling or multi-tasking scheme for fine-tuning (which are mostly orthogonal to the present work).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Operating large pre-trained models on-device in real-time is hampered by their growing computational and memory requirements.
“the growing computational and memory requirements of these models may hamper wide adoption.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Near-zero probabilities in a trained model's output distribution reflect its generalization capabilities.
“some of these”
The paper relies on this without support.
Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
“Inference time of a full pass of GLUE task STS-B (sentiment analysis) on CPU with a batch size of 1.”
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This idea has been successfully applied to LLMs, where distilled students approximate the generation patterns of larger teachers while retaining much of their performance (Sanh et al., 2019).”
From Vision-Guided Iterative Refinement for Frontend Code Generation (2026) · cites this paper as Sanh et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“even benchmarking is not a reliable estimator of parameter count [12], [15], [28], [29]”
From Hollow-LLM Attack: Computationally Trivial Weights in Zero-Knowledge Verification of LLM Inference (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It achieves similar performance to the original BERT model while using fewer resources. The approach leveraged knowledge distillation during the pretraining phase and reduced the size of general BERT by 40%, yet it retained a language understanding capability of 97%.”
From A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [53]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Unlike in many similar circumstances, we do not employ knowledge distillation [56], because we discovered that for our sizes of the models, this technique does not provide any quality improvement.”
From Full Line Code Completion: Bringing AI to Desktop (2024) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ 4.1 Downstream task benchmark · p. 3
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
§ 3 DistilBERT: a distilled version of BERT · p. 3
“| DistilBERT (D) | - | 79.1/86.9 |”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
Reported 19 · recomputed 16.5
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.02531 · Cited by 14,204
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 · Cited by 8,741
Self-citationSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding
Wang, A., Singh, A., Michael, J., Hill, F., Levy, O., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5446 · Cited by 4,222
Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis
Maas, A. L., Daly, R. E., Pham, P. T., Huang, D., Ng, A. Y., & Potts, C. (2011) · Cited by 3,710
Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cristian Bucila, Rich Caruana, and Alexandru Niculescu-Mizil. Model compression. In KDD , 2006.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,501–1,600 of 4,692
Joniak, P., & Aizawa, A. (2022) · Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing (GeBNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.gebnlp-1.6 · Cited by 12
Data Augmentation for Biomedical Factoid Question Answering
Pappas, D., Malakasiotis, P., & Androutsopoulos, I. (2022) · Workshop on Biomedical Language Processing (BioNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.bionlp-1.6 · Cited by 19
KADO@LT-EDI-ACL2022: BERT-based Ensembles for Detecting Signs of Depression from Social Media Text
Janatdoust, M., Ehsani-Besheli, F., & Zeinali, H. (2022) · Workshop on Language Technology for Equality, Diversity, Inclusion (LT-EDI) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.ltedi-1.38 · Cited by 12
Tahaei, M. S., Charlaix, E., Nia, V. P., Ghodsi, A., & Rezagholizadeh, M. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.154 · Cited by 18
Moosavi, N. S., Delfosse, Q., Kersting, K., & Gurevych, I. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.274 · Cited by 12
Neely, M., Schouten, S. F., Bleeker, M., & Lučić, A. (2022) · Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · doi:10.3233/faia220190 · Cited by 18
Overcoming Language Disparity in Online Content Classification with Multimodal Learning
Verma, G., Mujumdar, R., Wang, Z. J., Choudhury, M. D., & Kumar, S. (2022) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19356 · Cited by 14
A Tale of Two Subreddits: Measuring the Impacts of Quarantines on Political Engagement on Reddit
Shen, Q., & Rosé, C. P. (2022) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19347 · Cited by 12
TSSuBERT: How to Sum Up Multiple Years of Reading in a Few Tweets
Dusart, A., Pinel-Sauvagnat, K., & Hubert, G. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3581786 · Cited by 14
Using Transformers for Identification of Persuasion Principles in Phishing Emails
Karki, B., Abri, F., Namin, A. S., & Jones, K. S. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata55660.2022.10020452 · Cited by 14
Dyrmishi, S., Ghamizi, S., Simonetto, T., Traon, Y. L., & Cordy, M. (2023) · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P) · doi:10.1109/sp46215.2023.10179316 · Cited by 13
Robustness Challenges in Model Distillation and Pruning for Natural Language Understanding
Du, M., Mukherjee, S., Cheng, Y., Shokouhi, M., Xia, H., & Awadallah, A. H. (2023) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-main.129 · Cited by 30
InterroLang: Exploring NLP Models and Datasets through Dialogue-based Explanations
Feldhus, N., Wang, Q., Anikina, T., Chopra, S., Oguz, C., & Möller, S. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.359 · Cited by 15
Multi-Aspect Annotation and Analysis of Nepali Tweets on Anti-Establishment Election Discourse
Rauniyar, K., Poudel, S., Shiwakoti, S., Thapa, S., Rashid, J., Kim, J., Imran, M. A., & Naseem, U. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3342154 · Cited by 14
Sarwar, R., Ha, L. A., Teh, P. S., Sabah, F., Nawaz, R., Hameed, I. A., & Hassan, M. U. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3358199 · Cited by 14
Language-Conditioned Robotic Manipulation with Fast and Slow Thinking
Zhu, M., Zhu, Y., Li, J., Wen, J., Xu, Z., Che, Z., Shen, C., Peng, Y., Liu, D., Feng, F., et al. (2024) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra57147.2024.10611525 · Cited by 21
Zhou, S., Campbell, L. N. P., & Fyffe, S. (2024) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1017/iop.2024.11 · Cited by 12
Scaling Systematic Literature Reviews with Machine Learning Pipelines
Goldfarb-Tarrant, S., Robertson, A., Lazić, J., Tsouloufi, T. K., Donnison, L. M., & Smyth, K. (2020) · Workshop on Scholarly Document Processing (SDP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.sdp-1.21 · Cited by 12
Mitigating the Position Bias of Transformer Models in Passage Re-ranking
Hofstätter, S., Lipani, A., Althammer, S., Zlabinger, M., & Hanbury, A. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72113-8_16 · Cited by 19
dos Reis, E. S., da Costa, C. A., da Silveira, D. E., Bavaresco, R. S., Righi, R. D. R., Barbosa, J. L. V., Antunes, R. S., Gomes, M. M., & Federizzi, G. (2021) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3430937 · Cited by 12
A Metamorphic Testing Approach for Assessing Question Answering Systems
Tu, K., Jiang, M., & Ding, Z. (2021) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math9070726 · Cited by 15
Towards Efficient NLP: A Standard Evaluation and A Strong Baseline
Liu, X., Sun, T., He, J., Wu, J., Wu, L., Zhang, X., Jiang, H., Cao, Z., Huang, X., & Qiu, X. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.240 · Cited by 18
Sociolectal Analysis of Pretrained Language Models
Zhang, S., Zhang, X., Zhang, W., & Søgaard, A. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.375 · Cited by 14
Investigating Text Shortening Strategy in BERT: Truncation vs Summarization
Mutasodirin, M. A., & Prasojo, R. E. (2021) · International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems · doi:10.1109/icacsis53237.2021.9631364 · Cited by 12
Nitish, S., Darsini, R., Shashank, G. S., Tejas, V. R., & Arya, A. (2022) · International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering (Confluence) · doi:10.1109/confluence52989.2022.9734142 · Cited by 12
Sarcasm Detection in Twitter - Performance Impact While Using Data Augmentation: Word Embeddings
Handoyo, A. T., rahman, H., Setiadi, C. J., & Suhartono, D. (2022) · International Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems · doi:10.5391/ijfis.2022.22.4.401 · Cited by 17
DC-BERT: Decoupling Question and Document for Efficient Contextual EncodingPreprint
Zhang, Y., Nie, P., Geng, X., Ramamurthy, A., Song, L., & Jiang, D. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.12591 · Cited by 12
Generating informative conclusions for argumentative textsPreprint
Syed, S., Al-Khatib, K., Alshomary, M., Wachsmuth, H., & Potthast, M. (2021) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · Cited by 12
Dbias: Detecting biases and ensuring Fairness in news articlesPreprint
Raza, S., Reji, D. J., & Ding, C. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1356281/v1 · Cited by 15
Fast-Fnet: Accelerating Transformer Encoder Models Via Efficient Fourier LayersPreprint
Sevim, N., Özyedek, E. O., Şahinuç, F., & Koç, A. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4566618 · Cited by 12
ClimateBERT-NetZero: Detecting and Assessing Net Zero and Reduction TargetsPreprint
Schimanski, T., Bingler, J., Hyslop, C., Kraus, M., & Leippold, M. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4599483 · Cited by 12
Generative AI and digital twin integrated intelligent process planning：A conceptual frameworkPreprint
Xu, Q., Zhou, G., Zhang, C., Chang, F., Cao, Y., & Zhao, D. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3652246/v1 · Cited by 12
Thinking Fast and Slow: Efficient Text-to-Visual Retrieval with Transformers
Miech, A., Alayrac, J.-B., Laptev, I., Sivic, J., & Zisserman, A. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00970 · Cited by 149
$π_0$: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control
Black, K., Brown, N., Driess, D., Esmail, A., Equi, M., Finn, C., Fusai, N., Groom, L., Hausman, K., Ichter, B., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.24164 · Cited by 13
“This model has about 470M parameters, and differs from our main model in the following ways: (1) We use DistilBERT [42] to encode the language tokens of the language command ℓ t , since this model does not use a language model backbone; (2) The action expert cross-attends to the outputs of the…”
A Comprehensive Survey on Evaluating Large Language Model Applications in the Medical Industry
Huang, Y., Tang, K., Chen, M., & Wang, B. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.15777 · Cited by 14
FitzGerald, J., Ananthakrishnan, S., Arkoudas, K., Bernardi, D., Bhagia, A., Delli Bovi, C., Cao, J., Chada, R., Chauhan, A., Chen, L., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3534678.3539173 · Cited by 68
D-Score: Holistic Dialogue Evaluation Without Reference
Zhang, C., Lee, G., D'Haro, L. F., & Li, H. (2021) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2021.3074012 · Cited by 21
Mind captioning: Evolving descriptive text of mental content from human brain activity
Horikawa, T. (2025) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adw1464 · Cited by 13
Alhuzali, A. (2025) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.3371 · Cited by 19
Naseem, U., Khushi, M., Kim, J., & Dunn, A. G. (2021) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn52387.2021.9533454 · Cited by 13
ePiC: Employing Proverbs in Context as a Benchmark for Abstract Language Understanding
Ghosh, S., & Srivastava, S. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.276 · Cited by 19
Machine Learning Models for Predicting, Understanding, and Influencing Health Perception
Aka, A., & Bhatia, S. (2021) · Journal of the Association for Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/718456 · Cited by 13
Text Feature Adversarial Learning for Text Generation With Knowledge Transfer From GPT2
Zhang, H., Cong, Y., Wang, Z., Zhang, L., Zhao, M., Chen, L., Si, S., Henao, R., & Carin, L. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2022.3210975 · Cited by 13
Data Augmentation for Automated Essay Scoring using Transformer Models
Gupta, K. (2023) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Smart Communication (AISC) · doi:10.1109/aisc56616.2023.10085523 · Cited by 12
Soft Prompt Decoding for Multilingual Dense Retrieval
Huang, Z., Zeng, H., Zamani, H., & Allan, J. (2023) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3539618.3591769 · Cited by 13
Transformer-based Sentiment Analysis for Anomaly Detection on Drone Forensic Timeline
Silalahi, S., Ahmad, T., & Studiawan, H. (2023) · International Symposium on Digital Forensics and Security (ISDFS) · doi:10.1109/isdfs58141.2023.10131749 · Cited by 12
Vrbanec, T., & Meštrović, A. (2023) · Expert Systems · doi:10.1111/exsy.13386 · Cited by 13
An Exploratory Study on Energy Consumption of Dataframe Processing Libraries
Shanbhag, S., & Chimalakonda, S. (2023) · International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR) · doi:10.1109/msr59073.2023.00048 · Cited by 17
CONCORD: Clone-Aware Contrastive Learning for Source Code
Ding, Y., Chakraborty, S., Buratti, L., Pujar, S., Morari, A., Kaiser, G. E., & Ray, B. (2023) · ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA) · doi:10.1145/3597926.3598035 · Cited by 13
Kim, M., Lee, S.-H., Hong, S.-J., Chang, D.-S., & Choi, J. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.450 · Cited by 13
Xu, H., Liu, C., Niu, Y., Chen, Y., Cai, X., Wen, Y., & Yuan, X. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.979 · Cited by 13
Impact of data quality for automatic issue classification using pre-trained language models
Colavito, G., Lanubile, F., Novielli, N., & Quaranta, L. (2023) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2023.111838 · Cited by 12
Personality Trait Detection via Transfer Learning
Alshouha, B., Serrano‐Guerrero, J., Chiclana, F., Romero, F. P., & Olivas, J. Á. (2024) · Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print) · doi:10.32604/cmc.2023.046711 · Cited by 12
RT-LM: Uncertainty-Aware Resource Management for Real-Time Inference of Language Models
Li, Y., Li, Z., Yang, W. P., & Liu, C. (2023) · IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS) · doi:10.1109/rtss59052.2023.00023 · Cited by 20
Li, Y., Yuan, P., Feng, S., Pan, B., Sun, B., Wang, X. X., Wang, H., & Li, K. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i17.29821 · Cited by 20
A conversational agent framework for mental health screening: design, implementation, and usability
Boian, R., Bucur, A.-M., Todea, D., Luca, A., Rebedea, T. E., & Podina, I. R. (2024) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2024.2332934 · Cited by 14
Integrating wearable sensor data and self-reported diaries for personalized affect forecasting
Yang, Z., Wang, Y., Yamashita, K. S., Khatibi, E., Azimi, I., Dutt, N. D., Borelli, J. L., & Rahmani, A. M. (2024) · Smart Health · doi:10.1016/j.smhl.2024.100464 · Cited by 11
Addressing Challenges in Hate Speech Detection Using BERT-Based Models: A Review
Aljawazeri, J. A., & Jasim, M. N. (2024) · Iraqi Journal for Computer Science and Mathematics · doi:10.52866/ijcsm.2024.05.02.001 · Cited by 13
A deep neural network model for Chinese toponym matching with geographic pre-training model
Qiu, Q., Zheng, S., Miao, T., Li, J., Ma, K., Tao, L., & Xie, Z. (2024) · International Journal of Digital Earth · doi:10.1080/17538947.2024.2353111 · Cited by 13
Research on Multifeature Fusion False Review Detection Based on DynDistilBERT-BiLSTM-CNN
Zhang, J., Huang, K., Lang, D., Xu, Y., Li, H.-A., & Li, X. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3410015 · Cited by 12
Efficiency at scale: Investigating the performance of diminutive language models in clinical tasks
Taylor, N., Ghose, U., Rohanian, O., Nouriborji, M., Kormilitzin, A., Clifton, D. A., & Nevado‐Holgado, A. J. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2024.103002 · Cited by 14
Kalogeropoulos, N.-R., Kontogiannis, G., & Makris, C. H. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125771 · Cited by 13
MemesViTa: A Novel Multimodal Fusion Technique for Troll Memes Identification
Sultan, T., Rony, M. A. T., Islam, M. S., Saad, A., & El‐Shafai, W. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3505614 · Cited by 12
Azad, M. S., Leeon, S. I., Khan, R., Mohammed, N., & Momen, S. (2024) · Array · doi:10.1016/j.array.2024.100372 · Cited by 11
Liu, J., Niu, Q., Nagai‐Tanima, M., & Aoyama, T. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/68881 · Cited by 13
Enhancing text anonymization via re-identification risk-based explainability
Manzanares-Salor, B., & Sánchez, D. (2025) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2024.112945 · Cited by 11
Zero-shot LLM-guided Counterfactual Generation: A Case Study on NLP Model Evaluation
Bhattacharjee, A., Moraffah, R., Garland, J., & Liu, H. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825537 · Cited by 25
BVQA: Connecting Language and Vision Through Multimodal Attention for Open-Ended Question Answering
Bhuyan, M. S. M., Hossain, E., Sathi, K. A., Hossain, M. A., & Dewan, M. A. A. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3540388 · Cited by 11
EmoNet: Deep Attentional Recurrent CNN for X (Formerly Twitter) Emotion Classification
Hossain, M. J., Hossain, M. M., Hossain, M. S., Mridha, M. F., Safran, M., & Alfarhood, S. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3545863 · Cited by 13
Distilling Wisdom: A Review on Optimizing Learning From Massive Language Models
Zhang, D., Listiyani, D., Singh, P., & Mohanty, M. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3554586 · Cited by 18
Nandkumar, C., & Peternel, L. (2025) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2025.1576348 · Cited by 20
Alhaizaey, A., & Al‐Mashari, M. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3570359 · Cited by 16
A joint learning framework for fake news detection
Abdullah, M., Zan, H., Javed, A., Mamyrbayev, O. J., Caraffini, F., & Eshkiki, H. (2025) · Displays · doi:10.1016/j.displa.2025.103154 · Cited by 13
TheNorth at SemEval-2020 Task 12: Hate Speech Detection Using RoBERTa
Alonso, P., Saini, R., & Kovács, G. (2020) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.semeval-1.292 · Cited by 13
Kulshreshtha, D., Belfer, R., Serban, I. V., & Reddy, S. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.566 · Cited by 14
Through the Looking Glass: Learning to Attribute Synthetic Text Generated by Language Models
Munir, S., Batool, B., Shafiq, Z., Srinivasan, P., & Zaffar, F. (2021) · Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.155 · Cited by 11
End-To-End Neural Coreference Resolution Revisited: A Simple Yet Effective Baseline
Lai, T., Bui, T., & Kim, D. S. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp43922.2022.9746254 · Cited by 14
Speech Emotion Recognition via Multi-Level Cross-Modal Distillation
Li, R., Zhao, J., & Jin, Q. (2021) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2021-785 · Cited by 11
Drozdov, I. A., Szubert, B., Reda, E., Makary, P., Forbes, D., Chang, S. L., Ezhil, A., Puttagunta, S. A., Hall, M., Carlin, C. M., et al. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-99986-3 · Cited by 12
Leveraging Latent Economic Concepts and Sentiments in the News for Market Prediction
Farimani, S. A., Jahan, M. V., Fard, A. M., & Haffari, G. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA) · doi:10.1109/dsaa53316.2021.9564122 · Cited by 13
An Empirical Study of Memorization in NLP
Zheng, X., & Jiang, J. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.434 · Cited by 12
Using Decision Tree as Local Interpretable Model in Autoencoder-based LIME
Ranjbar, N., & Safabakhsh, R. (2022) · International Computer Conference, Computer Society of Iran (CSICC) · doi:10.1109/csicc55295.2022.9780503 · Cited by 11
Learning Dialogue Representations from Consecutive Utterances
Zhou, Z., Zhang, D., Xiao, W., Dingwall, N., Ma, X., Arnold, A., & Xiang, B. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.55 · Cited by 14
UMUTeam@LT-EDI-ACL2022: Detecting homophobic and transphobic comments in Tamil
García-Díaz, J. A., Caparros-Laiz, C., & Valencia‐García, R. (2022) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.ltedi-1.16 · Cited by 11
Low precision decentralized distributed training over IID and non-IID data
Aketi, S. A., Kodge, S., & Roy, K. (2022) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2022.08.032 · Cited by 11
A machine learning based framework to identify unseen classes in open-world text classification
Parmar, J., Chouhan, S. S., & Raychoudhury, V. (2022) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103214 · Cited by 11
Figueroa, A. (2022) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2022.12.003 · Cited by 11
Conditional generative data-free knowledge distillation
Yu, X., Yan, L., Yang, Y., Libo, Z. H. O. U., & Ou, L. (2023) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2023.104627 · Cited by 11
Multimodal Fake News Detection on Fakeddit Dataset Using Transformer-Based Architectures
Kalra, S., Kumar, C. H. S., Sharma, Y., & Chauhan, G. S. (2022) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-24367-7_28 · Cited by 11
TaughtNet: Learning Multi-Task Biomedical Named Entity Recognition From Single-Task Teachers
Moscato, V., Postiglione, M., Sansone, C., & Sperlí, G. (2023) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2023.3244044 · Cited by 12
A FAISS-based Search for Story Generation
George, G. C., & Rajan, R. (2022) · IEEE India Conference · doi:10.1109/indicon56171.2022.10039758 · Cited by 11
Bias Detection for Customer Interaction Data: A Survey on Datasets, Methods, and Tools
Donald, A., Galanopoulos, A., Curry, E., Muñoz, E., Ullah, I., Waskow, M. A., Dabrowski, M., & Kalra, M. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3276757 · Cited by 12
DistilBERT and RoBERTa Models for Identification of Fake News
Kitanovski, A., Toshevska, M., & Mirceva, G. (2023) · International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics · doi:10.23919/mipro57284.2023.10159740 · Cited by 13
Zerveas, G., Rekabsaz, N., Cohen, D., & Eickhoff, C. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.727 · Cited by 16
Adaptive Contrastive Knowledge Distillation for BERT Compression
Guo, J., Liu, J., Wang, Z., Ma, Y., Gong, R., Xu, K., & Liu, X. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.569 · Cited by 11
Robustness of Fusion-based Multimodal Classifiers to Cross-Modal Content Dilutions
Verma, G., Vinay, V., Rossi, R. A., & Kumar, S. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.25 · Cited by 11
Next-Word Prediction: A Perspective of Energy-Aware Distributed Inference
Wang, S., Shao, Z., & Lui, J. C. S. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/tmc.2023.3310536 · Cited by 12
JobXMLC: EXtreme Multi-Label Classification of Job Skills with Graph Neural Networks
Goyal, N. P., Kalra, J., Sharma, C., Mutharaju, R., Sachdeva, N., & Kumaraguru, P. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-eacl.163 · Cited by 13
Representation biases in sentence transformers
Nikolaev, D., & Padó, S. (2023) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-main.268 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., & Wolf, T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1910.01108
- OpenAlex
- W2978017171
- Cited by
- 4,653
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 443 · 2024: 801 · 2023: 1136 · 2022: 736 · 2021: 968 · 2020: 486 · 2019: 15
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- DistilBERT, knowledge distillation, BERT, pre-training, model compression, on-device computation, language modeling, transfer learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-23, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-23 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
