The DOI matches its DataCite record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 4 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter
Open accessAbstract
As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative on-device study.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
DistilBERT is a distilled version of BERT pre-trained with knowledge distillation, reducing parameters by 40% while retaining 97% of BERT’s GLUE performance and running 60% faster at inference. It is presented as a general-purpose, lighter model suitable for constrained and on-device NLP applications.
Key findings
- DistilBERT has 66M parameters vs. BERT-base’s 110M and takes 410s vs. 668s for a CPU inference pass on STS-B, i.e. 40% smaller and 60% faster.
- On GLUE dev sets, DistilBERT scores 77.0 macro-score vs. BERT-base’s 79.5, retaining 97% of performance; it is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline.
- On IMDb test accuracy, DistilBERT reaches 92.82 vs. BERT-base’s 93.46; on SQuAD v1.1, DistilBERT reaches 77.7/85.8 EM/F1 vs. BERT-base’s 81.2/88.5.
- Ablations show removing the cosine loss costs -2.96 GLUE macro-score, removing distillation loss costs -1.46, removing MLM loss costs -0.31, and random initialization costs -3.69.
Methods
- Knowledge distillation during pre-training: a student with BERT’s architecture but half the layers, no token-type embeddings and no pooler, initialized from every other teacher layer.
- Training objective is a triple loss combining distillation loss \(L_{ce}\), masked language modeling loss \(L_{mlm}\), and cosine embedding loss \(L_{cos}\), using softmax-temperature.
- Trained on English Wikipedia + Toronto Book Corpus with large batches up to 4K examples, dynamic masking, no next-sentence prediction, on 8 16GB V100 GPUs for approximately 90 hours; evaluated on GLUE, IMDb, SQuAD v1.1, CPU inference, and an iPhone 7 Plus on-device proof-of-concept.
Limitations
- The paper does not state an explicit limitations section.
- Evident from the text: evaluation is limited to English benchmarks and a small set of downstream tasks, and the on-device study is described as a proof-of-concept; the model could be further reduced with quantization.
- Evident from the text: the SQuAD second-distillation result is reported inconsistently—the prose says 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, while Table 2 lists DistilBERT (D) as 79.1/86.9.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
15 Own result · 6 Own interpretation · 2 Own method · 2 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · 1 Sources not found · accuracy not yet measured
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be finetuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
“Our general-purpose pre-trained models can be fine-tuned with good performances on several downstream tasks, keeping the flexibility of larger models.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further ablation studies indicate that all the components of the triple loss are important for best performances.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Excluding the tokenization step, DistilBERT is 71% faster than BERT, and the whole model weighs 207 MB (which could be further reduced with quantization).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found it beneficial to add a cosine embedding loss ( L cos ) which will tend to align the directions of the student and teacher hidden states vectors.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On SQuAD, DistilBERT is within 3.9 points of the full BERT.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
“DistilBERT also compares surprisingly well to BERT, retaining 97% of the performance with 40% fewer parameters.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“removing the Masked Language Modeling loss has little impact while the two distillation losses account for a large portion of the performance.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 7
- It may state two separate claims as one. 2
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“environmental cost of exponentially scaling these models' computational requirements as mentioned in Schwartz et al. [2019], Strubell et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Schwartz et al., 2019 source
The Abstract (p. 1) says the computations required for deep learning research have been doubling every few months and have a large carbon footprint. Section 2, “Red AI” (p. 4), likewise warns that the environmental cost of increasingly large models will not decrease soon. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites Strubell et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) says that computationally hungry NLP models require considerable energy and have associated environmental costs. It also says model development can multiply those costs thousands of times, but it does not establish that the models’ computational requirements are scaling exponentially. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We applied best practices for training BERT model recently proposed in Liu et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Liu et al., 2019 source
The Introduction (p. 1) says Liu et al. propose an improved recipe for training BERT, and Section 4 (p. 4) evaluates which choices matter for BERT pretraining. The citing authors’ statement that they applied those practices to DistilBERT describes their own work, not a finding attributed to Liu et al. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among the 9 tasks, DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We further demonstrated that DistilBERT is a compelling option for edge applications.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“BERT and DistilBERT results are the medians of 5 runs with different seeds.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“current research 1 on pre-trained models indicates that training even larger models still leads to better performances on downstream tasks.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites MegatronLM
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We report scores on the development sets for each task by fine-tuning DistilBERT without the use of ensembling or multi-tasking scheme for fine-tuning (which are mostly orthogonal to the present work).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Operating large pre-trained models on-device in real-time is hampered by their growing computational and memory requirements.
“the growing computational and memory requirements of these models may hamper wide adoption.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Near-zero probabilities in a trained model's output distribution reflect its generalization capabilities.
“some of these”
The paper relies on this without support.
Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
“Inference time of a full pass of GLUE task STS-B (sentiment analysis) on CPU with a batch size of 1.”
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This idea has been successfully applied to LLMs, where distilled students approximate the generation patterns of larger teachers while retaining much of their performance (Sanh et al., 2019).”
From Vision-Guided Iterative Refinement for Frontend Code Generation (2026) · cites this paper as Sanh et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“even benchmarking is not a reliable estimator of parameter count [12], [15], [28], [29]”
From Hollow-LLM Attack: Computationally Trivial Weights in Zero-Knowledge Verification of LLM Inference (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It achieves similar performance to the original BERT model while using fewer resources. The approach leveraged knowledge distillation during the pretraining phase and reduced the size of general BERT by 40%, yet it retained a language understanding capability of 97%.”
From A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [53]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Unlike in many similar circumstances, we do not employ knowledge distillation [56], because we discovered that for our sizes of the models, this technique does not provide any quality improvement.”
From Full Line Code Completion: Bringing AI to Desktop (2024) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ 4.1 Downstream task benchmark · p. 3
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
§ 3 DistilBERT: a distilled version of BERT · p. 3
“| DistilBERT (D) | - | 79.1/86.9 |”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
Reported 19 · recomputed 16.5
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.02531 · Cited by 14,204
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 · Cited by 8,741
Self-citationSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding
Wang, A., Singh, A., Michael, J., Hill, F., Levy, O., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5446 · Cited by 4,222
Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis
Maas, A. L., Daly, R. E., Pham, P. T., Huang, D., Ng, A. Y., & Potts, C. (2011) · Cited by 3,710
Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cristian Bucila, Rich Caruana, and Alexandru Niculescu-Mizil. Model compression. In KDD , 2006.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,901–2,000 of 4,692
TextBox 2.0: A Text Generation Library with Pre-trained Language Models
Tang, T., Li, J., Chen, Z., Hu, Y., Yu, Z., Dai, W., Zhao, W. X., Nie, J., & Wen, J.-R. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-demos.42 · Cited by 8
TABS: Efficient Textual Adversarial Attack for Pre-trained NL Code Model Using Semantic Beam Search
Choi, Y., Kim, H., & Lee, J.-H. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.369 · Cited by 8
Gubelmann, R., Kalouli, A.-L., Niklaus, C., & Handschuh, S. (2023) · Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.starsem-1.4 · Cited by 9
Sentiment and Emotion Classification in Low-resource Settings
Barnes, J. (2023) · Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis (WASSA) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.wassa-1.26 · Cited by 11
SmartBERT: A Promotion of Dynamic Early Exiting Mechanism for Accelerating BERT Inference
Hu, B., Zhu, Y., Li, J., et al. (2023) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2023/563 · Cited by 8
LEAP: Efficient and Automated Test Method for NLP Software
Xiao, M., Xiao, Y., Dong, H., Ji, S., & Zhang, P. (2023) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1109/ase56229.2023.00052 · Cited by 11
Hate Speech Detection in Low-Resource Bodo and Assamese Texts with ML-DL and BERT Models
Ghosh, K., Senapati, A., Narzary, M., & Brahma, M. (2023) · Scalable Computing Practice and Experience · doi:10.12694/scpe.v24i4.2469 · Cited by 8
Khandaker, F., Senderovich, A., Zhao, J., Cohen, E., Yu, E. S. K., Carbajales, S., & Chan, A. (2023) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107450 · Cited by 9
GPU Occupancy Prediction of Deep Learning Models Using Graph Neural Network
Mei, H., Qu, H., Sun, J., Gao, Y., Lin, H., & Sun, G. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing (CLUSTER) · doi:10.1109/cluster52292.2023.00034 · Cited by 9
Global Voices, Local Biases: Socio-Cultural Prejudices across Languages
Mukherjee, A., Raj, C., Zhu, Z., & Anastasopoulos, A. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.981 · Cited by 19
The Framework Tax: Disparities Between Inference Efficiency in NLP Research and Deployment
Fernandez, J., Kahn, J., Na, C., Bisk, Y., & Strubell, E. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.98 · Cited by 11
Comparing Prompt-Based and Standard Fine-Tuning for Urdu Text Classification
Ullah, F., Azam, U., Faheem, A., Kamiran, F., & Karim, A. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.449 · Cited by 8
MultiWD: Multi-label wellness dimensions in social media posts
Garg, M., Liu, X., Sathvik, M., Raza, S., & Sohn, S. (2024) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104586 · Cited by 12
ViLTA: Enhancing Vision-Language Pre-training through Textual Augmentation
Wang, W., Yang, Z., Xu, B., Li, J., & Sun, Y. (2023) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.00293 · Cited by 10
LightRidge: An End-to-end Agile Design Framework for Diffractive Optical Neural Networks
Li, Y., Chen, R., Lou, M., Sensale‐Rodriguez, B., Gao, W., & Yu, C. (2023) · International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS) · doi:10.1145/3623278.3624757 · Cited by 8
Prediction of Author’s Profile basing on Fine-Tuning BERT model
Bsir, B., Khoufi, N., & Zrigui, M. (2024) · Informatica · doi:10.31449/inf.v48i1.4839 · Cited by 9
Progressive Distillation Based on Masked Generation Feature Method for Knowledge Graph Completion
Fan, C., Chen, Y., Xue, J., Kong, Y., Tao, J., & Lv, Z. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i8.28680 · Cited by 9
Jeong, Y., Song, J., Yang, J., & Kang, S. M. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3383020 · Cited by 10
Combining Balancing Dataset and SentenceTransformers to Improve Short Answer Grading Performance
Wijanto, M. C., & Yong, H.-S. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app14114532 · Cited by 8
Classifying Conspiratorial Narratives at Scale: False Alarms and Erroneous Connections
Diab, A., Nefriana, R., & Lin, Y. (2024) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v18i1.31318 · Cited by 9
A Comprehensive Review of Knowledge Distillation- Methods, Applications, and Future Directions
Zhu, E. Y., Zhao, C., Yang, H., Li, J., Wu, Y., & Ding, R. (2024) · International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer Science & Technology · doi:10.55524/ijircst.2024.12.3.17 · Cited by 8
SAMPLE-BASED DYNAMIC HIERARCHICAL TRANSFORMER WITH LAYER AND HEAD FLEXIBILITY VIA CONTEXTUAL BANDIT
Meng, F., Zhang, L., Chen, Y. A., & Wang, Y. (2024) · Proceedings on Engineering Sciences · doi:10.24874/pes06.02.001 · Cited by 10
SoundingActions: Learning How Actions Sound from Narrated Egocentric Videos
Chen, C., Kumar, A., Girdhar, R., Harwath, D. F., & Grauman, K. L. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.02573 · Cited by 14
Hossain, M. R., Hoque, M. M., Dewan, M. A. A., Hoque, E., & Siddique, N. H. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125643 · Cited by 8
Enabling scalable and adaptive machine learning training via serverless computing on public cloud
Ali, A. Z. E., Ma, X., Zawad, S., Aditya, P., Akkuş, İ. E., Chen, R., Yang, L., & Yan, F. (2024) · Performance Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.peva.2024.102451 · Cited by 8
Evaluating Text Summaries Generated by Large Language Models Using OpenAI's GPT
Shakil, H., Mahi, A. M., Nguyen, P., Ortiz, Z., Kalita, J. K., & Mardini, M. (2024) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications · doi:10.1109/icmla61862.2024.00140 · Cited by 14
Learning with Privileged Knowledge Distillation for Improved Peptide–Protein Docking
Zhang, Z., Verburgt, J. C., Kagaya, Y., Christoffer, C. W., & Kihara, D. (2025) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.5c00967 · Cited by 8
Kim, S. Y., Ganesan, K., Dickens, P., & Panda, S. S. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13052673 · Cited by 19
Evaluating Multilingual BERT for Estonian
Kittask, C., Milintsevich, K., & Sirts, K. (2020) · Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · doi:10.3233/faia200597 · Cited by 9
General Purpose Text Embeddings from Pre-trained Language Models for Scalable Inference
Du, J., Ott, M., Li, H., Zhou, X., & Stoyanov, V. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.271 · Cited by 10
EdgeBERT: Optimizing On-Chip Inference for Multi-Task NLP.
Tambe, T., Hooper, C. R. C., Pentecost, L., Yang, E.-Y., Donato, M., Sanh, V., Rush, A. M., Brooks, D. M., & Wei, G.-Y. (2020) · Cited by 8
Self-citationHinglishNLP at SemEval-2020 Task 9: Fine-tuned Language Models for Hinglish Sentiment Detection
Bhange, M., & Kasliwal, N. (2020) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.semeval-1.119 · Cited by 17
Improving Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training via Sequence Span Rewriting
Zhou, W., Ge, T., Xu, C., Xu, K., & Wei, F. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.45 · Cited by 13
Deep-Sync: A novel deep learning-based tool for semantic-aware subtitling synchronisation
Martín, A. G., González‐Carrasco, I., Rodríguez-Fernández, V., Souto-Rico, M., Camacho, D., & Ruíz‐Mezcua, B. (2021) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-021-05751-y · Cited by 8
On Semantic Similarity in Video Retrieval
Wray, M., Doughty, H., & Damen, D. (2021) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00365 · Cited by 9
IITK@Detox at SemEval-2021 Task 5: Semi-Supervised Learning and Dice Loss for Toxic Spans Detection
Bansal, A., Kaushik, A., & Modi, A. (2021) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.semeval-1.24 · Cited by 9
Towards Improving Open Student Answer Assessment using Pretrained Transformers
Khayi, N. A., Rus, V., & Tamang, L. J. (2021) · Proceedings of the ... International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference · doi:10.32473/flairs.v34i1.128483 · Cited by 9
Learning Neural Textual Representations for Citation Recommendation
Kieu, B. T., Unanue, I. J., Pham, S. B., Phan, X.-H., & Piccardi, M. (2020) · UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) · Cited by 8
Efficient Relational Sentence Ordering Network
Li, Y., Cui, B., & Zhang, Z. M. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3085738 · Cited by 8
Factorization-Aware Training of Transformers for Natural Language Understanding on the Edge
Saghir, H., Choudhary, S., Eghbali, S., & Chung, C. (2021) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2021-1816 · Cited by 8
Are Rotten Apples Edible? Challenging Commonsense Inference Ability with Exceptions
Do, N., & Pavlick, E. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.181 · Cited by 8
Structural Knowledge Distillation: Tractably Distilling Information for Structured Predictor
Wang, X., Jiang, Y., Yan, Z., Jia, Z., Bách, N., Wang, T., Huang, Z., Huang, F., & Tu, K. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.46 · Cited by 11
Towards a more Robust Evaluation for Conversational Question Answering
Siblini, W., Sayil, B., & Kessaci, Y. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-short.130 · Cited by 8
Applying Attention-Based Models for Detecting Cognitive Processes and Mental Health Conditions
Villatoro-Tello, E., Parida, S., Kumar, S., & Motlíček, P. (2021) · Cognitive Computation · doi:10.1007/s12559-021-09901-1 · Cited by 9
Automatic Classification for Ontology Generation by Pretrained Language Model
Oba, A., Paik, I., & Kuwana, A. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-79457-6_18 · Cited by 8
Augmenting Semantic Lexicons Using Word Embeddings and Transfer Learning
Alshaabi, T., Oort, C. M. V., Fudolig, M. I., Arnold, M., Danforth, C. M., & Dodds, P. S. (2022) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2021.783778 · Cited by 11
StoryDB: Broad Multi-language Narrative Dataset
Tikhonov, A., Samenko, I., & Yamshchikov, I. P. (2021) · Workshop on Evaluation and Comparison of NLP Systems (Eval4NLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eval4nlp-1.4 · Cited by 11
Sengupta, S., Krone, J., & Mansour, S. (2021) · Workshop on NLP for Conversational AI (NLP4ConvAI) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.nlp4convai-1.7 · Cited by 8
Argument Mining on Twitter: A Case Study on the Planned Parenthood Debate
Bhatti, M. M., Ahmad, A., & Park, J. (2021) · Workshop on Argument Mining · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.argmining-1.1 · Cited by 11
On Classifying whether Two Texts are on the Same Side of an Argument
Körner, E., Wiedemann, G., Hakimi, A. D., et al. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.795 · Cited by 8
Learning to Rank in the Age of Muppets: Effectiveness–Efficiency Tradeoffs in Multi-Stage Ranking
Zhang, Y., Hu, C., Liu, Y., Fang, H., & Lin, J. (2021) · Workshop on Simple and Efficient Natural Language Processing (SustaiNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.sustainlp-1.8 · Cited by 10
Learning to Win Lottery Tickets in BERT Transfer via Task-agnostic Mask Training
Liu, Y., Meng, F., Lin, Z., Fu, P., Cao, Y., Wang, W., & Zhou, J. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.428 · Cited by 9
Counterfactual Explanations for Natural Language Interfaces
Tolkachev, G., Mell, S., Zdancewic, S. A., & Bastani, O. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-short.14 · Cited by 9
Separating Hate Speech and Offensive Language Classes via Adversarial Debiasing
Yuan, S., Maronikolakis, A., & Schütze, H. (2022) · Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms (WOAH) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.woah-1.1 · Cited by 9
A privacy-preserving dialogue system based on argumentation
Fazzinga, B., Galassi, A., & Torroni, P. (2022) · Intelligent Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.iswa.2022.200113 · Cited by 9
Jacobs, C. L., & MacDonald, M. C. (2022) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105265 · Cited by 9
Refining Semantic Similarity of Paraphasias Using a Contextual Language Model
Salem, A. C., Gale, R. C., Casilio, M., Fleegle, M., Fergadiotis, G., & Bedrick, S. D. (2022) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2022_jslhr-22-00277 · Cited by 7
A BERT-based Deep Learning Approach for Reputation Analysis in Social Media
Rahman, M. W. U., Shao, S., Satam, P., Hariri, S., Padilla, C., Taylor, Z., & Nevarez, C. (2022) · IEEE/ACS International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA) · doi:10.1109/aiccsa56895.2022.10017489 · Cited by 11
Examining the effect of whitening on static and contextualized word embeddings
Sasaki, S., Heinzerling, B., Suzuki, J., & Inui, K. (2023) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103272 · Cited by 10
Barbaro, F., & Skumanich, A. (2023) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3543873.3587348 · Cited by 9
Gao, X., Zhu, W., Gao, J., & Yin, C. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49357.2023.10095864 · Cited by 9
Using BERT models for breast cancer diagnosis from Turkish radiology reports
Hepsağ, P. U., Özel, S. A., Dalcı, K., & Yazıcı, A. (2023) · Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.1007/s10579-023-09669-w · Cited by 9
Active Countermeasures for Email Fraud
Chen, W., Wang, F., & Edwards, M. (2023) · IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/eurosp57164.2023.00012 · Cited by 12
Kang, J., & Maarouf, I. E. (2022) · Workshop on Financial Technology and Natural Language Processing (FinNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.finnlp-1.28 · Cited by 8
When and how to paraphrase for named entity recognition?
Sharma, S., Joshi, A., Zhao, Y., Mukhija, N., Bhathena, H., Singh, P., & Santhanam, S. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.390 · Cited by 11
BMCook: A Task-agnostic Compression Toolkit for Big Models
Zhang, Z., Gong, B., Chen, Y., Han, X., Zeng, G., Zhao, W., Chen, Y., Liu, Z., & Sun, M. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-demos.40 · Cited by 8
Wang, X., Liu, B., Tang, S., & Wu, L. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.37 · Cited by 12
Compact BERT-Based Multi-Models for Efficient Fake News Detection
Rana, V., Garg, V., Mago, Y., & Bhat, A. (2023) · International Conference on Intelligent Technologies (CONIT) · doi:10.1109/conit59222.2023.10205773 · Cited by 8
Comparative Analysis of NLP Models for Detecting Depression on Twitter
Gupta, K., Jinad, R., & Liu, Q. (2023) · International Conference on Communications, Computing and Artificial Intelligence (CCCAI) · doi:10.1109/cccai59026.2023.00013 · Cited by 9
A self-supervised language model selection strategy for biomedical question answering
Arabzadeh, N., & Bagheri, E. (2023) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104486 · Cited by 10
Haq, B., Daudpota, S. M., Imran, A. S., Kastrati, Z., & Noor, W. (2023) · Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print) · doi:10.32604/cmc.2023.040638 · Cited by 10
Forward Learning of Large Language Models by Consumer Devices
Pau, D. P., & Aymone, F. M. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13020402 · Cited by 10
Do, T., Gurung, B. D. S., Aryal, S., Khanal, A., Chataut, S., Gadhamshetty, V. R., Lushbough, C., & Gnimpiéba, E. Z. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm58861.2023.10385544 · Cited by 9
Natural Language Processing (NLP) in Chatbot Design
Rajendran, R. K., Mohana Priya, T., & Chitrarasu, K. (2024) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-1830-0.ch006 · Cited by 10
Fast and Accurate Deep Bidirectional Language Representations for Unsupervised Learning
Shin, J., Lee, Y., Yoon, S., & Jung, K. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.76 · Cited by 13
Javdan, S., ataei, T. S., & Bidgoli, B. M. (2020) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.semeval-1.170 · Cited by 11
Jia, R., Cao, Y., Shi, H., Fang, F., Liu, Y., & Tan, J. (2020) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3340531.3412078 · Cited by 8
Multi-domain Dialogue State Tracking with Recursive Inference
Liao, L., Zhu, T., Long, L. H., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1145/3442381.3450134 · Cited by 8
MergeDistill: Merging Language Models using Pre-trained Distillation
Khanuja, S., Johnson, M., & Talukdar, P. P. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.254 · Cited by 10
Extract then Distill: Efficient and Effective Task-Agnostic BERT Distillation
Chen, C., Yin, Y., Shang, L., Wang, Z., Jiang, X., Chen, X., & Liu, Q. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86365-4_46 · Cited by 9
Learning Hierarchical Document Graphs From Multilevel Sentence Relations
Zhang, H., Wang, C., Wang, Z., Duan, Z., Chen, B., Zhou, M., Henao, R., & Carin, L. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2021.3113297 · Cited by 8
Knowledge Distillation as Semiparametric InferencePreprint
Dao, T., Kamath, G. M., Syrgkanis, V., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.09732 · Cited by 8
Continual Domain-Tuning for Pretrained Language ModelsPreprint
Rongali, S., Jagannatha, A., Rawat, B. P. S., & Yu, H. Q. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.02288 · Cited by 25
Understanding Transformers for Bot Detection in TwitterPreprint
García-Silva, A., Berrío, C., & Gómez-Pérez, J. M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.06182 · Cited by 16
ParaLaw Nets -- Cross-lingual Sentence-level Pretraining for Legal Text ProcessingPreprint
Nguyen, H.-T., Tran, V., Nguyen, P., Vuong, T.-H.-Y., Bui, Q. M., Nguyen, C., Dang, T. B., Nguyen, L.-M., & Satoh, K. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.13403 · Cited by 13
Emotion Embedding Spaces for Matching Music to StoriesPreprint
Won, M., Salamon, J., Bryan, N. J., Mysore, G. J., & Serra, X. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.13468 · Cited by 11
Video-Text Pre-training with Learned RegionsPreprint
Yan, R., Shou, M. Z., Ge, Y., Wang, A. J., Lin, X., Cai, G., & Tang, J. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2112.01194 · Cited by 8
Bert-Based Feature Extraction for Long-Lived Bug Prediction in Floss: A Comparative StudyPreprint
Gomes, L. A. F., Côrtes, M. L., & Torres, R. D. S. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4166555 · Cited by 8
Exploring Nature: Datasets and Models for Analyzing Nature-Related DisclosuresPreprint
Schimanski, T., Senni, C. C., Gostlow, G., Ni, J., Yu, T., & Leippold, M. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4665715 · Cited by 11
Model Optimization Techniques for Edge Devices
Nimmagadda, Y. (2024) · doi:10.1002/9781394219230.ch4 · Cited by 8
Li, Y., Kong, C., Zhao, G., & Zhao, Z. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-025-11337-0 · Cited by 7
Zeng, Z., Liu, S., Sha, L., Li, Z., Yang, K., Liu, S., Gasevic, D., & Chen, G. (2024) · Proceedings of the Thirty-ThirdInternational Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2024/835 · Cited by 8
AI vs. Human Writing: Developing a Novel Method for Text Authenticity Detection in Education
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, R. I. O. T., Kalmani, V. H., Adamuthe, A. C., Premnath Gondil, A., Prashant Patil, V., Amar Kore, R., & Mahadev Metkari, V. (2025) · International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science · doi:10.5815/ijmecs.2025.03.04 · Cited by 7
Alper, M., Fiman, M., & Averbuch‐Elor, H. (2023) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00655 · Cited by 10
Nguyen, B.-N., Le, H.-Q., & Can, D.-C. (2023) · International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/kse59128.2023.10299512 · Cited by 7
Comparative study of sequence-to-sequence models: From RNNs to transformers
Zhu, J. (2024) · Applied and Computational Engineering · doi:10.54254/2755-2721/42/20230687 · Cited by 7
Rocca, R., Lawall, K., Manos Tsakiris, A., et al. (2024) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-024-00271-w · Cited by 7
Automating Mobile App Review User Feedback with Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis
Ballas, V., Michalakis, K., Alexandridis, G., & Caridakis, G. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-60487-4_14 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., & Wolf, T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1910.01108
- OpenAlex
- W2978017171
- Cited by
- 4,653
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 443 · 2024: 801 · 2023: 1136 · 2022: 736 · 2021: 968 · 2020: 486 · 2019: 15
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- DistilBERT, knowledge distillation, BERT, pre-training, model compression, on-device computation, language modeling, transfer learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-23, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-23 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
