CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 234Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesQuantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 281 of the 287 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 3 are not checked yet.

Lessons from the Information Paradox

Open access
Raju, Suvrat·2020·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2012.05770arXiv 2012.05770
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We review recent progress on the information paradox. We explain why exponentially small correlations in the radiation emitted by a black hole are sufficient to resolve the original paradox put forward by Hawking. We then describe a refinement of the paradox that makes essential reference to the black-hole interior. This analysis leads to a broadly-applicable physical principle: in a theory of quantum gravity, a copy of all the information on a Cauchy slice is also available near the boundary of the slice. This principle can be made precise and established -- under weak assumptions, and using only low-energy techniques -- in asymptotically global AdS and in four dimensional asymptotically flat spacetime. When applied to black holes, this principle tells us that the exterior of the black hole always retains a complete copy of the information in the interior. We show that accounting for this redundancy provides a resolution of the information paradox for evaporating black holes and, conversely, that ignoring this redundancy leads to paradoxes even in the absence of black holes. We relate this perspective to recent computations of the Page curve for holographic CFTs coupled to nongravitational baths. But we argue that such models may provide an inaccurate picture of the rate at which information can be extracted from evaporating black holes in asymptotically flat space. We discuss large black holes dual to typical states in AdS/CFT and the new paradoxes that arise in this setting. These paradoxes also extend to the eternal black hole. They can be resolved by assuming that the map between the boundary CFT and the black-hole interior is state dependent. We discuss the consistency of state-dependent bulk reconstructions. We conclude by examining the viability of arguments for firewalls, fuzzballs and other kinds of structure at the horizon.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2012.05770

Cites

281 of 284 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 287 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. S. Lloyd, Black Holes, Demons and the Loss of Coherence: How complex systems get information, and what they do with it. PhD thesis, Rockefeller University, 1988.
  2. K. Kuchar, The problem of time in canonical quantization, in Conceptual Problems of Quantum Gravity (A. Ashtekar and J. Stachel, eds.). Birkhauser, 1991.
  3. T. Banks, M. R. Douglas, G. T. Horowitz and E. J. Martinec, AdS dynamics from conformal field theory, hep-th/9808016. · arXiv
  4. J. A. Wheeler, Geometrodynamics and the issue of the final state, in Relativity, groups and topology, vol. 317. Gordon and Breach, 1964.
  5. V. Kumar, "Examining nonviolent nonlocality." M.Sc. Thesis, ICTS-TIFR, 2020.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 234

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Raju, S.
Affiliations
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (IN)
Corresponding author
Raju, Suvrat
ORCID
Raju, Suvrat
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
Volume
943
Pages
1-80
ISSN
0370-1573 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2012.05770
arXiv
2012.05770
OpenAlex
W3113113316
Cited by
234
References
287
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 28
FWCI
11.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Physics Reports (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India (DST/SJF/PSA-02/2016-17)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
Keywords
black hole information paradox, Hawking radiation, black hole interior, quantum gravity, AdS/CFT correspondence, Page curve, holographic CFT, black hole evaporation, eternal black holes, firewall, fuzzballs, information redundancy, asymptotically flat spacetimes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review