Cited by 281Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthNatural Products and Biological ResearchFatty Acid Research and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 294 of the 294 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 352 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Lipid lowering nutraceuticals in clinical practice: position paper from an International Lipid Expert Panel

Open access

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of mortality worldwide, reaching 31% of deaths in 2012 [1]. In particular, atherosclerosis and ischemic heart disease (IHD) are the main causes of premature death in Europe and are responsible for 42% of deaths in women and 38% in men under 75 years old [2]. The global economic impact of CVD is estimated to have been US $906 billion in 2015 and is expected to rise by 22% by 2030 [3]. Cardiovascular diseases also represent the major cause of disability in developed countries. It has been estimated that their growing burden could lead to a global increase in loss of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), from a loss of 85 million DALYs in 1990 to a loss of ~150 million DALYs in 2020, becoming a major non-psychological cause of lost productivity [4]. Several risk factors contribute to the etiology and development of CVD; they are divided into those modifiable through lifestyle changes or by taking a pharmacologic treatment (e.g. for hypertension, smoking, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia) and those that are not modifiable (age, male gender, and family history) [5]. Elevated total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) blood concentrations are the major modifiable risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD), whereas high concentrations of plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in certain conditions are considered protective [6]. Moreover, LDL-C remains a fundamental CV risk factor (and a main target of therapy) even when statins are largely used in the general population [7]. An examination of the data of 18 053 participants aged ≥ 20 years who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) from 1999 to 2006 showed that the unadjusted prevalence of hypercholesterolemia ranged from 53.2% to 56.1% in United States adults [8]. Differences related to gender and race or ethnicity were observed; in particular, a lower rate of control was found among women than men and lower rates of having a cholesterol check and being told about hypercholesterolemia were reported by African Americans and Mexican Americans than whites [8]. A recent report from the American Heart Association confirmed that in the US only 75.7% of children and 46.6% of adults present targeted TC levels (TC < 170 mg/dl for children and < 200 mg/dl for adults, in untreated individuals) [9]. The pattern is similar in other Western countries [10, 11].

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This International Lipid Expert Panel position paper reviews lipid-lowering nutraceuticals and their combinations, grading evidence and recommending selected agents as adjuncts for mild dyslipidemia or statin intolerance. It emphasizes that nutraceuticals cannot replace indicated lipid-lowering therapy and that outcome data proving CVD event reduction are still lacking.

Key findings

  • Red yeast rice (RYR) reduced LDL-C by 1.02 mmol/l (39.4 mg/dl) versus placebo in a meta-analysis of 20 trials, comparable to moderate-intensity statins; it was graded Class I, Level A, with expected LDL-C reduction of –15% to –25%.
  • Berberine, in a meta-analysis of 27 clinical studies with 2569 participants, reduced LDL-C by –0.65 mmol/l (25.14 mg/dl), TG by –0.39 mmol/l (34.5 mg/dl), and increased HDL-C by 0.07 mmol/l (2.71 mg/dl); it was graded Class I, Level A.
  • The RYR–policosanol–berberine combination, in a meta-analysis of 14 RCTs with 3159 subjects, improved LDL-C by –0.61 mmol/l (23.6 mg/dl), HDL-C by 0.07 mmol/l (2.71 mg/dl), TG by –0.16 mmol/l (14.2 mg/dl), and glucose by –0.14 mmol/l (2.52 mg/dl); it was graded Class I, Level A.
  • Omega-3 EPA/DHA, in a meta-analysis of 47 RCTs with 16,511 hypercholesterolemic participants using a mean 3.25 g/day for 24 weeks, reduced TG by 14% (–0.34 mmol/l/30.12 mg/dl), with no significant HDL-C difference; it was graded Class I, Level A for TG lowering.

Methods

  • Position paper/consensus from an International Lipid Expert Panel, endorsed by multiple national societies, providing a narrative review of clinical evidence on individual lipid-lowering nutraceuticals and nutraceutical combinations.
  • Evidence was drawn from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses; treatment options were graded by Class of recommendation (I–III) and Level of evidence (A–C) as defined in Tables I and II.
  • For each nutraceutical, the paper describes mechanism of action, active principles, effective dosages, effects on lipid profile, extra-lipid-lowering properties, and safety profile where available.

Limitations

  • The paper states that there are still no outcome studies proving that nutraceuticals can prevent CVD morbidity or mortality; many combinations have been tested only in a single study and results have not been confirmed, and some tested combinations contained underdosed components.
  • The paper notes long-term safety data are lacking for some agents, such as plant sterols beyond 2 years, beta-glucan long-term efficacy/safety, and silymarin safety data.
  • Evident from the text: the evidence base is heterogeneous, with small or short trials, inconsistent RCT results for some agents (e.g., curcumin, policosanols), and bergamot efficacy data largely from a single research unit and not confirmed elsewhere.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5114/aoms.2017.69326

Cites

294 of 294 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 352 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 182 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 181
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 17
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 20
188 of 188
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The cited meta-analyses and RCTs are of sufficient methodological quality and their results are valid for the populations studied.

    “Based on available data it seems that the best results were obtained with Lactobacillus strains.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The effects of nutraceuticals observed in trials generalize to clinical practice in the broader patient populations for whom they are recommended.

    “In summary, the administration of RYR can be recommended because of its effects on LDL-C in patients with moderately elevated cholesterol, especially in primary prevention.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The safety data from clinical trials adequately reflect real-world safety of these nutraceuticals.

    “Clinical studies conducted to date with dosages between 500 and 1500 mg/day showed a good safety profile, with no side effects detected.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The chronic use of a high quantity of soy products containing isoflavones could interfere with thyroid function and fertility.

    “Safety: The chronic use of a high quantity of soy products containing isoflavones could interfere with thyroid function and fertility.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Soybean and its derivatives contain high amounts of phytic acid that reduces the absorption of minerals such as calcium, magnesium, copper, iron and zinc.

    “Furthermore, soybean and its derivatives contain high amounts of phytic acid that reduces the absorption of minerals such as calcium, magnesium, copper, iron and zinc.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Lupine has a good safety profile, causing no severe side effects, and those which occurred were mostly gastrointestinal.

    “Lupine has shown a good safety profile, causing no severe side effects, and those which occurred were mostly gastrointestinal.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In alloxan-injured mice, phycocyanin decreases TC and TG levels in serum, increases hepatic glycogen level and maintains glucokinase expression in the liver.

    “According to experimental studies in alloxan-injured mice, phycocyanin decreases TC and TG levels in serum, increases the hepatic glycogen level and maintains glucokinase (GK) expression in the liver.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The lipid-lowering effects of nutraceuticals observed in short-term trials translate into reduced cardiovascular risk.

    “In conclusion, the intake of soy and lupine represents a potential, relatively weak adjuvant therapy in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia, especially in individuals with moderate cholesterol levels.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The safety data from short-term studies are sufficient to establish long-term safety.

    “Long-term safety studies are not available yet.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The cited studies' results are reliable and applicable to the populations described in the paper.

    “Based on the available data, no serious safety concerns have been raised.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The absence of reported serious safety concerns in the available studies indicates that the nutraceutical combinations have no serious safety concerns.

    “Based on the available data, no serious safety concerns have been raised.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Improvements in surrogate endpoints such as LDL-C, hs-CRP, and endothelial function translate into clinical cardiovascular benefit.

    “Many available data, including the most recent studies with PCSK9 inhibitors, support the LDL-C concept that “lower is better” [276].”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Low vitamin D status is associated with hyperlipidemia.

    “Low vitamin D status has been associated with hyperlipidemia.”
13 of 13

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Conclusion denies outcome evidence described earlier

    Major

    The conclusion says no outcome studies show prevention of CVD morbidity or mortality, but the paper describes a red yeast rice trial with significant reductions in CHD, all-cause mortality, and stroke.

  • LDL-C target attainment percentage uses the wrong denominator

    Major

    The reported 58 patients are 67.4% of the stated combined-therapy group of 86, not 72.5%. This changes the reported rate of achieving the therapeutic goal.

    Reported 72.5 · recomputed 67.44186

  • Two different EFSA citrinin limits are stated

    Major

    The paper gives the EFSA limit as both 0.2 and 20 μg/kg body weight per day-a hundredfold difference that affects its safety assessment.

  • β-glucan estimate falls outside its stated confidence interval

    Minor

    The LDL-C estimate is -0.21 mmol/l, whereas the printed confidence-interval endpoints are 0.27 and -0.14 mmol/l. The estimate is outside the interval formed by those endpoints.

  • Psyllium combination heading names an ingredient absent from the described trial

    Minor

    The subsection is headed as a psyllium-omega-3 combination, but its trial description identifies the combination as plant sterols and omega-3 fatty acids, without psyllium.

  • Pantethine table omits an LDL-C effect reported in the text

    Minor

    The pantethine table calls its expected LDL-C effect "Not applicable," while the accompanying text reports LDL-C reductions of 4% and 11% in trials.

  • Red yeast rice HDL-C estimate falls outside its stated interval

    Minor

    The stated HDL-C estimate of 0.007 mmol/l is below both printed interval endpoints, 0.03 and 0.11 mmol/l.

  • Triglyceride unit conversions disagree

    Minor

    The paper pairs a 0.60 mmol/l triglyceride change with 23.2 mg/dl, but elsewhere pairs a smaller 0.34 mmol/l change with a larger 30.12 mg/dl change. Both pairs cannot use the same conversion between triglyceride units.

8 of 8

Citations

Cites

Items 201–294 of 294

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [11]NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC) Trends in total cholesterol and lipid fractions in 22 Western and Asian countries Lancet 2017 in press
  2. [207]Mazidi M Rezaie P Banach M Impact of L-carnitine on C-reactive proteIn: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 10 randomized control trials with 925 patients 2017 7 Presentation at 2nd CPPEI Congress in Vienna (data unpublished)
  3. [285]Dietary supplementation with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and vitamin E after myocardial infarction: results of the GISSI-Prevenzione trial. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell’Infarto miocardico Lancet 1999 354 447 55 10465168

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 281

Metadata

Authors
Cicero, A. F. G., Colletti, A., Bajraktari, G., Descamps, O., Djuric, D. M., Ezhov, M., Fras, Z., Katsiki, N., Langlois, M., Latkovskis, G., Panagiotakos, D. B., Paragh, G., Mikhailidis, D. P., Mitchenko, O., Paulweber, B., Pella, D., Pitsavos, C., Reiner, Ž., Ray, K. K., Rizzo, M., Sahebkar, A., Serban, M.-C., Sperling, L. S., Toth, P. P., Vinereanu, D., Vrablík, M., Wong, N. D., & Banach, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • University Clinical Center of Kosovo (XK)
  • University of Belgrade (RS)
  • University of Ljubljana (SI)
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
  • University of Pavol Jozef Šafárik (SK)
  • Harokopio University of Athens (GR)
  • The Royal Free Hospital (GB)
  • Paracelsus Medical University (AT)
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • University Hospital Centre Zagreb (HR)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Istituto Euro Mediterraneo di Scienza e Tecnologia (IT)
  • Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Emory University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • Medical University of Lodz (PL)
Corresponding author
  • Cicero, Arrigo F.G.
  • Banach, Maciej
Venue
Archives of Medical Science
Published
2017
Volume
5
Issue
5
Pages
965-1005
ISSN
1734-1922 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2743820880
Cited by
281
References
294
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 12
FWCI
42.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Archives of Medical Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository of the Medical Faculty of the University of Zagreb (University of Zagreb) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Debrecen Electronic Archive (University of Debrecen) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Debrecen Electronic Archive (University of Debrecen) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Natural Products and Biological Research
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
Keywords
nutraceuticals, lipid-lowering drugs, cardiovascular disease, hypercholesterolemia, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, atherosclerosis, ischemic heart disease, coronary artery disease, cardiovascular risk factors, statins, dietary cholesterol, dietary fiber, phytosterols, omega-3 fatty acids, clinical guidelines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review