Cited by 297Climate Change Policy and EconomicsEnergy, Environment, Economic GrowthEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability

The PRIMAP-hist national historical emissions time series

Open access
Gütschow, Johannes, Jeffery, M. Louise, Gieseke, Robert, Gebel, Ronja, Stevens, David, Krapp, Mario, Rocha, Marcia·2016·Earth System Science Data

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract. To assess the history of greenhouse gas emissions and individual countries' contributions to emissions and climate change, detailed historical data are needed. We combine several published datasets to create a comprehensive set of emissions pathways for each country and Kyoto gas, covering the years 1850 to 2014 with yearly values, for all UNFCCC member states and most non-UNFCCC territories. The sectoral resolution is that of the main IPCC 1996 categories. Additional time series of CO2 are available for energy and industry subsectors. Country-resolved data are combined from different sources and supplemented using year-to-year growth rates from regionally resolved sources and numerical extrapolations to complete the dataset. Regional deforestation emissions are downscaled to country level using estimates of the deforested area obtained from potential vegetation and simulations of agricultural land. In this paper, we discuss the data sources and methods used and present the resulting dataset, including its limitations and uncertainties. The dataset is available from doi:10.5880/PIK.2016.003 and can be viewed on the website accompanying this paper (http://www.pik-potsdam.de/primap-live/primap-hist/).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5194/essd-8-571-2016

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The seven large emitting economies for which national models were available (Brazil, China, the European Union, India, Japan, the Russian Federation and the United States) together represent around 65% of global 2010 greenhouse gas emissions.

    “The results are presented at the global level and for the seven large emitting economies for which national models were available, i.e., Brazil, China, the European Union, India, Japan, the Russian Federation and the United States, together representing around 65% of global 2010 greenhouse gas emissions18.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. IPCC: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change: Work- ing Group III Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on, Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 2014.
  2. JRC and PBL: Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Re- search (EDGAR), release version 4.2, doi:10.2904/EDGARv4.2, available at: http://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/overview.php?v=42 (last access: 3 November 2016), 2011. JRC and PBL: Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Re- search (EDGAR), release version 4.2 FT2010, available at: http: //edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/overview.php?v=42FT2012 (last access: 3 November 2016), 2013. JRC and PBL: Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Re- search (EDGAR), release version 4.2 FT2012, available at: http: //edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/overview.php?v=42FT2012 (last access: 3 November 2016), 2014. · DOI
  3. Smith, P., Bustamante, M., Ahammad, H., Clark, H., Dong, H., El- siddig, E., Haberl, H., Harper, R., House, J., Jafari, M., Masera, O., Mbow, C., Ravindranath, N., Rice, C., Abad, C. R., Ro- manovskaya, A., Sperling, F., and Tubiello, F.: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU), in: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmen- tal Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Edenhofer, O., Pichs- Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Farahani, E., Kadner, S., Seyboth, K., Adler, A., Baum, I., Brunner, S., Eickemeier, P., Kriemann, B., Savolainen, J., Schlömer, S., von Stechow, C., Zwickel, T., and Minx, J., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 2014.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gütschow, J., Jeffery, M. L., Gieseke, R., Gebel, R., Stevens, D., Krapp, M., & Rocha, M.
Affiliations
  • Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE)
  • Climate Analytics (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Gütschow, Johannes
  • Jeffery, M. Louise
  • Gieseke, Robert
  • Gebel, Ronja
  • Stevens, David
  • Krapp, Mario
  • Rocha, Marcia
Venue
Earth System Science Data
Published
2016-11-09
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
571-603
ISSN
  • 1866-3508 (ISSN-L)
  • 1866-3516
OpenAlex
W2411841442
Cited by
297
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
20.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Earth system science data (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit (11_II_093_Global_A_SIDS_and_LDCs)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Keywords
sectoral emissions, CO2 emissions, deforestation emissions, potential natural vegetation, climate change attribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review